A prospective randomized phase II trial of GM-CSF priming to prevent topotecan-induced neutropenia in chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant melanoma or renal cell carcinoma

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 1942-1946 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Janik ◽  
Langdon L. Miller ◽  
Edward L. Korn ◽  
Diane Stevens ◽  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
...  

Abstract We conducted a phase II randomized trial of recombinant granculocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administered before topotecan chemotherapy to determine whether it could prevent myelosuppression and to determine the antitumor activity of this topoisomerase I inhibitor in 53 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and renal cell cancer. All patients received GM-CSF after topotecan at a dose of 250 μg/m2 daily for at least 8 days. Patients randomly assigned to receive GM-CSF priming were treated with GM-CSF at 250 μg/m2 twice daily for 5 days before treatment. Twenty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive GM-CSF priming and 28 to receive topotecan without priming. The primary analysis was restricted to the protective effects seen during the first cycle of therapy. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 8 of 23 patients (35%) and grade 3 neutropenia in 5 of 23 patients (22%) randomized to GM-CSF priming, whereas 18 of 26 (69%) and 5 of 26 (19%) patients experienced grade 4 or 3 neutropenia, respectively, without GM-CSF priming (P = .0074). The mean duration of neutropenia was reduced by GM-CSF priming: grade 3 neutropenia from 5.2 ± 0.7 to 2.8 ± 0.7 days (P = .0232) and grade 4 neutropenia from 2.7 ± 0.6 to 1.1 ± 0.4 days (P = 0.0332). The protective effects of GM-CSF extended to the second cycle of treatment. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was also reduced. Chemotherapy-induced anemia and thrombocytopenia were similar in both groups. One partial response was seen in a patient with melanoma, and one patient with renal cell cancer had complete regression of pulmonary metastases and was rendered disease-free by nephrectomy.

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 402
Author(s):  
J. P. Dutcher ◽  
G. Caliendo ◽  
L. Oleksowicz ◽  
J. Sparano ◽  
J. Suh ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (27) ◽  
pp. 4469-4474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo ◽  
Giacomo Cartenì ◽  
Riccardo Autorino ◽  
Gianni Bruni ◽  
Marianna Tudini ◽  
...  

Purpose No previous prospective trials have been reported with sorafenib in patients with sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC). We conducted a multicenter study to determine the activity and tolerability of sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib progression in MRCC. Patients and Methods Between January 2006 and September 2008, 52 patients were enrolled onto this single-arm phase II study. All patients received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (complete or partial response) evaluated every 8 weeks by use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; secondary end points were toxicity, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results All patients were included in response and safety analyses. Partial responses were observed in 9.6% of patients (five of 52 patients; 95% CI, 5% to 17%) after two cycles. Grade 1 to 2 fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, rash, and neutropenia were the most common side effects, noted in 16 (30.8%), 19 (36.5%), 20 (38.5%), 19 (36.5%), and 20 patients (38.5%), respectively. The most common grade 3 toxicity was diarrhea, noted in six patients (11.5%). Median TTP was 16 weeks (range, 8 to 40 weeks), and median OS was 32 weeks (range, 16 to 64 weeks). Conclusion Although well tolerated, sorafenib shows limited efficacy in sunitinib-refractory MRCC. Further randomized trials comparing sorafenib with other drugs that target different biologic pathways are needed to define the best second-line treatment option in these patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy B. Davis ◽  
David A. Taber ◽  
Rafat H. Ansari ◽  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Christopher George ◽  
...  

PurposeDetermine response rate, time to disease progression, and toxicity of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in patients with stage IV renal cell cancer.Patients and MethodsPS-341 1.5 mg/m2was administered intravenously twice weekly for 2 weeks every 21 days. Dose escalation to 1.7 mg/m2ensued in the absence of grade 3 to 4 toxicities. Re-evaluation took place after three cycles. To assess proteasome inhibition, patients were randomly assigned to tumor core biopsy either before the first dose or after the third cycle of PS-341. Additionally, whole blood was collected at the same time intervals.ResultsTwenty-three patients were enrolled; 21 were assessable for response. Two patients were never treated (one patient refused treatment and one had insufficient tumor for biopsy). Eighteen patients completed at least three cycles of therapy; three patients experienced disease progression after two cycles. Grade 4 toxicities were arthralgia, diarrhea, and vomiting. Grade 3 toxicities included thrombocytopenia with one hemorrhage, anemia, febrile neutropenia, gastrointestinal toxicity, pain, fatigue, neuropathy (one sensory, one mixed sensorimotor), and electrolyte disturbances. Grade 1 to 2 neuropathy occurred in seven patients. One case of thrombosis and one case of pleural effusion occurred. Only one objective response was seen. Proteasome activity was measured by specific chymotryptic activity (SpA) and chymotryptic/tryptic activity (ChT:T). After PS-341, there was a decrease in mean whole blood SpA and ChT:T (P = .07 and .11, respectively).ConclusionEvidence is lacking for clinically significant activity of PS-341 in metastatic renal cell cancer. Insufficient biopsy and whole blood sample numbers preclude conclusions regarding proteasome inhibition within tumor. Further evaluation in this disease setting is not recommended.


1989 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 111-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Stoter ◽  
S.D. Fosså ◽  
C. Rugarli ◽  
M. Symann ◽  
C. Jasmin ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 754-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Schuler ◽  
U Bruntsch ◽  
E Späth-Schwalbe ◽  
H Schrezenmeier ◽  
C Peschel ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv292 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Bjarnason ◽  
B. Naveen ◽  
E. Winquist ◽  
C.K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
C. Canil ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v319
Author(s):  
G.A. Bjarnason ◽  
J. Knox ◽  
C.K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
D. Soulieres ◽  
D.S. Ernst ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document