scholarly journals An updated systematic review and meta-analysis for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 1600803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayara Lisboa Bastos ◽  
Zhiyi Lan ◽  
Dick Menzies
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Aminosalicylic Acid ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Culture Conversion

This systematic review aimed to update the current evidence for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment.We searched for studies that reported treatment information and clinical characteristics for at least 25 patients with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary MDR-TB and either end of treatment outcomes, 6-month culture conversion or severe adverse events (SAEs). We assessed the association of these outcomes with patients' characteristics or treatment parameters. We identified 74 studies, including 17 494 participants.The pooled treatment success was 26% in extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) patients and 60% in MDR-TB patients. Treatment parameters such as number or duration and individual drugs were not associated with improved 6-month sputum culture conversion or end of treatment outcomes. However, MDR-TB patients that received individualised regimens had higher success than patients who received standardised regimens (64% versus 52%; p<0.0.01). When reports from 20 cohorts were pooled, proportions of SAE ranged from 0.5% attributed to ethambutol to 12.2% attributed to para-aminosalicylic acid. The lack of significant associations of treatment outcomes with specific drugs or regimens may reflect the limitations of pooling the data rather than a true lack of differences in efficacy of regimens or individual drugs.This analysis highlights the need for stronger evidence for treatment of MDR-TB from better-designed and reported studies.

Treatment outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis according to pyrazinamide susceptibility

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-239
Author(s):  
S. Park ◽  
K-W. Jo ◽  
T. S. Shim
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Treatment Success Rate ◽  
Aminosalicylic Acid ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Effective Drugs

BACKGROUND: Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important anti-tuberculosis drug for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, PZA has recently been demoted within the hierarchy of TB drugs used for MDR-TB.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate treatment outcomes for simple MDR-TB (susceptible to both second-line injectable drugs and fluoroquinolones) according to PZA susceptibility.RESULTS: Among 216 pulmonary MDR-TB patients included in the study, 68 (31.5%) were PZA-resistant (PZA-R). The mean age was 41.8 years, and 63.4% were male. Baseline characteristics such as comorbidity, previous TB history, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity and cavitation were similar in PZA-susceptible (PZA-S) and PZA-R patients. The number of potentially effective drugs was slightly higher among PZA-S patients than among the PZA-R (5.1 vs. 4.8, respectively; P = 0.003). PZA was more frequently used in PZA-S patients (73.0%) than in the PZA-R (14.7%), while para-aminosalicylic acid was more frequently used in PZA-R than in PZA-S patients (76.5% vs. 50.7%). The treatment success rate was similar in PZA-S (77.7%) and PZA-R (75.0%) patients. PZA resistance was not associated with treatment success in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSIONS: PZA-resistant simple MDR-TB patients had the same treatment success rate as the PZA-susceptible group even without using novel anti-TB drugs.

scholarly journals Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Drug Effects of Ethambutol, Cycloserine, and Terizidone for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. e00744-20
Author(s):  
Martha L. van der Walt ◽  
Karen Shean ◽  
Piet Becker ◽  
Karen H. Keddy ◽  
Joey Lancaster
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Default Rates ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Culture Conversion

ABSTRACTTreatment outcomes among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients receiving ethambutol, cycloserine, or terizidone as part of a standardized regimen were compared, determining occurrence of serious adverse drug events (SADEs). Newly diagnosed adult MDR-TB patients were enrolled between 2000 and 2004, receiving a standardized multidrug regimen for 18 to 24 months, including ethambutol, cycloserine, or terizidone. Cycloserine and terizidone were recorded individually. SADEs and factors associated with culture conversion and unfavorable treatment outcomes (default, death, treatment failure) were determined. Of 858 patients, 435 (51%) received ethambutol, 278 (32%) received cycloserine, and 145 (17%) received terizidone. Demographic and baseline clinical data were comparable. Successful treatment occurred in 56%, significantly more in patients receiving cycloserine (60%) and terizidone (62%) than in those receiving ethambutol (52% [P = 0.03]). Defaults rates were 30% in ethambutol patients versus 15% and 11% for cycloserine and terizidone patients, respectively. Terizidone was associated with fewer unfavorable outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.4; P = 0.008; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 0.8). Patients receiving cycloserine were more likely to achieve culture conversion than those receiving ethambutol or terizidone (AOR, 2.2; P = 0.02; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.38). Failure to convert increased the odds of unfavorable outcomes (AOR, 23.7; P < 0.001; 95% CI, 13 to 44). SADEs were reported in two patients receiving ethambutol, seven patients receiving cycloserine, and three receiving terizidone (P = 0.05). Ethambutol was associated with high culture conversion and default rates. Cycloserine achieved higher culture conversion rates than terizidone. Fewer patients on terizidone experienced SADEs, with lower default rates. The differences that we observed between cycloserine and terizidone require further elucidation.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of Bedaquiline-containing Regimens for Treatment on Patients With Refractory Rifampicin/multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study in East China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Jun Zhang ◽  
Yan Yang ◽  
Wen-Wen Sun ◽  
Zhong-Shun Zhang ◽  
He-ping Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
East China ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Culture Conversion ◽  
Closing Rate

Abstract Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing and bedaquiline-free regimens for treatment of patients with refractory rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB).Methods: Patients with refractory RR/MDR-TB receiving bedaquiline-containing regimens (bedaquiline group, n=102) and bedaquiline-free regimens (non-bedaquiline group, n=100) were included in this retrospective historical control study across East China. The culture conversion, end-of-treatment outcomes, cavity closing rate, and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of treatment success and culture reversion.Results: The baseline characteristics of the patients were well balanced between the two groups. The culture conversion rates in the bedaquiline group at month 3 (89.2% vs. 66.0%), month 6 (90.2% vs. 72.0%), month 9 (91.2% vs. 66.0%), and month 12 (94.1% vs. 65.0%) were all significantly higher than those in the non-bedaquiline group (all p<0.001). Similar results were observed in the cavity closing rate at month 9 (19.6% vs. 8.0%, p=0.017) and month 12 (39.2% vs. 15.0%, p<0.001). Patients receiving bedaquiline-containing regimens had more treatment success than those receiving bedaquiline-free regimens (p<0.001; cure rate, 69.6% vs. 45.0%; complete the treatment, 22.5% vs. 18.0%; treatment success, 92.2% vs. 63.0%). The use of bedaquiline was identified as an independent predictor of both treatment success (OR=7.356, 95% CI: 2.920–18.530, p<0.001) and culture reversion (OR=0.124, 95% CI: 0.035–0.452, p<0.001). AEs were similarly reported in 26.5% of patients in the bedaquiline group and 19.0% in the non-bedaquiline group (p=0.206).Conclusions: Bedaquiline-containing regimens resulted in better treatment outcomes and similar safety relative to bedaquiline-free regimens for patients with refractory pulmonary RR/MDR-TB.

scholarly journals Time to sputum culture conversion and its predictors among patients with multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Hangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingchun Li ◽  
Min Lu ◽  
Evelyn Hsieh ◽  
Limin Wu ◽  
Yifei Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Sputum Culture Conversion ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Culture Conversion

Abstract Background To investigate the time to initial sputum culture conversion (SCC) and its predictors among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients in Hangzhou, China.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients initiating treatment for MDR-TB from 2011-2015 in Hangzhou, China. Time to initial SCC was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of SCC.Results Among 384 patients enrolled with MDR-TB, 359 (93.5%) successfully achieved initial SCC after a median of 85 days (inter-quartile range, 40-112 days). A higher rate of SCC was observed in participants with successful treatment outcomes than those with poor treatment outcomes (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that age 25-64 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9; P<0.01), age ≥65 years (AOR, 0.5; 95%CI, 0.3-0.8; P<0.01) and household registration in Hangzhou (AOR, 1.3; 95%CI, 1.0-1.5; P<0.05) were found to be associated with SCC.Conclusions Although high SCC and treatment success rates were observed among MDR-TB patients in Hangzhou, the prolonged duration to initial SCC underscores the importance of emphasizing measures for infection control. A new policy of shifting outpatient treatment to inpatient treatment in China may reduce the risk of transmission from patients in the time window prior to SCC.

scholarly journals Limited Effect of Later-Generation Fluoroquinolones in the Treatment of Ofloxacin-Resistant and Moxifloxacin-Susceptible Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Lee ◽  
Soohyun Ahn ◽  
Na Young Hwang ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
O Jung Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Aminosalicylic Acid ◽  
Logistic Analysis ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Resistant Group ◽  
Susceptible Group

ABSTRACT Recent data conflict on the clinical efficacy of later-generation fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin or levofloxacin, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) that is resistant to ofloxacin but susceptible to moxifloxacin. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether later-generation fluoroquinolones can improve treatment outcomes in patients with ofloxacin-resistant, moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB. A retrospective cohort study was performed on 208 patients with moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB who were treated between 2006 and 2011. Later-generation fluoroquinolones were used for all patients. Overall, 171 patients (82%) had ofloxacin-susceptible, moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB (ofloxacin-susceptible group), and 37 (18%) had ofloxacin-resistant, moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB (ofloxacin-resistant group). Compared to the ofloxacin-susceptible group, the ofloxacin-resistant group was more likely to have a history of MDR-TB treatment (P < 0.001) and cavitary lesions on chest radiography (P < 0.001). In addition, the ofloxacin-resistant group was more likely than the ofloxacin-susceptible group to have resistance to the drugs pyrazinamide (P = 0.003), streptomycin (P = 0.015), prothionamide (P < 0.001), and para-aminosalicylic acid (P < 0.001). Favorable outcomes were more frequently achieved for the ofloxacin-susceptible group than for the ofloxacin-resistant group (91% [156/171] versus 57% [21/37], respectively [P < 0.001]). In multivariable regression logistic analysis, the ofloxacin-susceptible group was about 5.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 18.53) times more likely than the ofloxacin-resistant group (P < 0.001) to have favorable outcomes. Despite in vitro moxifloxacin susceptibility, the frequency of favorable treatment outcomes for ofloxacin-resistant MDR-TB was significantly lower than that for ofloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB, even when later-generation fluoroquinolones were used, indicating that more-aggressive therapies may be needed for ofloxacin-resistant MDR-TB.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Associated Factors in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solomon Weldegebreal Asgedom ◽  
Mebrahtu Teweldemedhin ◽  
Hailay Gebreyesus
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Previous Exposure ◽  
Tb Control ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Antituberculosis Treatment ◽  
Mdr Tb

Background. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has continued to be a challenge for tuberculosis (TB) control globally. Ethiopia is one of the countries with high MDR-TB burden. Objective. The main purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of MDR-TB and associated factors in Ethiopia. Methods. A systematic review of the literatures on prevalence of MDR-TB and associated factors was conducted in the country. Results. In our electronic search, 546 citations were depicted. Among the total 546 citations described, a total of 22 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the review article. According to our review, the prevalence of MDR-TB ranged from 0 to 46.3%. The average mean rate of MDR-TB in Ethiopia was found to be 12.6±15.9%. The overall prevalence of MDR-TB in all TB cases was estimated to be 1.4%. From a total of 3849 patients studied, 527 had MDR-TB. Previous exposure to antituberculosis treatment was the most commonly identified risk factor of MDR-TB in Ethiopia. Conclusion. Despite relative decline in incidence of MDR-TB, the distribution and prevalence of MDR-TB continued to be a serious challenge for TB control in Ethiopia. Previous exposure to antituberculosis treatment was also the most common risk factor for MDR-TB. Therefore, strong TB and MDR-TB treatment along with tight introduction of follow-up strategies should be applied for better TB control.

Genotypic Resistance of Pyrazinamide but Not Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Is Associated With Longer Time to Sputum Culture Conversion in Patients With Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Kuhlin ◽  
Lina Davies Forsman ◽  
Mikael Mansjö ◽  
Michaela Jonsson Nordvall ◽  
Maria Wijkander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Inhibitory Concentration ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Sputum Culture ◽  
Sputum Culture Conversion ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Culture Conversion

Abstract Background Pyrazinamide (PZA) resistance in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is common; yet, it is not clear how it affects interim and treatment outcomes. Although rarely performed, phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) is used to define PZA resistance, but genotypic DST (gDST) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) could be beneficial. We aimed to assess the impact of PZA gDST and MIC on time to sputum culture conversion (SCC) and treatment outcome in patients with MDR-TB. Methods Clinical, microbiological, and treatment data were collected in this cohort study for all patients diagnosed with MDR-TB in Sweden from 1992–2014. MIC, pDST, and whole-genome sequencing of the pncA, rpsA, and panD genes were used to define PZA resistance. A Cox regression model was used for statistical analyses. Results Of 157 patients with MDR-TB, 56.1% (n = 88) had PZA-resistant strains and 49.7% (n = 78) were treated with PZA. In crude and adjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% conficence interval [CI], .29-.82; P = .007), PZA gDST resistance was associated with a 29-day longer time to SCC. A 2-fold decrease in dilutions of PZA MIC for PZA-susceptible strains showed no association with SCC in crude or adjusted analyses (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, .73–1.31; P = .89). MIC and gDST for PZA were not associated with treatment outcome. Conclusions In patients with MDR-TB, gDST PZA resistance was associated with a longer time to SCC. Rapid PZA gDST is important to identify patients who may benefit from PZA treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document