scholarly journals Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Associated Factors in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solomon Weldegebreal Asgedom ◽  
Mebrahtu Teweldemedhin ◽  
Hailay Gebreyesus
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Previous Exposure ◽  
Tb Control ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Antituberculosis Treatment ◽  
Mdr Tb

Background. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has continued to be a challenge for tuberculosis (TB) control globally. Ethiopia is one of the countries with high MDR-TB burden. Objective. The main purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of MDR-TB and associated factors in Ethiopia. Methods. A systematic review of the literatures on prevalence of MDR-TB and associated factors was conducted in the country. Results. In our electronic search, 546 citations were depicted. Among the total 546 citations described, a total of 22 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the review article. According to our review, the prevalence of MDR-TB ranged from 0 to 46.3%. The average mean rate of MDR-TB in Ethiopia was found to be 12.6±15.9%. The overall prevalence of MDR-TB in all TB cases was estimated to be 1.4%. From a total of 3849 patients studied, 527 had MDR-TB. Previous exposure to antituberculosis treatment was the most commonly identified risk factor of MDR-TB in Ethiopia. Conclusion. Despite relative decline in incidence of MDR-TB, the distribution and prevalence of MDR-TB continued to be a serious challenge for TB control in Ethiopia. Previous exposure to antituberculosis treatment was also the most common risk factor for MDR-TB. Therefore, strong TB and MDR-TB treatment along with tight introduction of follow-up strategies should be applied for better TB control.

scholarly journals An updated systematic review and meta-analysis for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 1600803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayara Lisboa Bastos ◽  
Zhiyi Lan ◽  
Dick Menzies
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Aminosalicylic Acid ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Culture Conversion

This systematic review aimed to update the current evidence for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment.We searched for studies that reported treatment information and clinical characteristics for at least 25 patients with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary MDR-TB and either end of treatment outcomes, 6-month culture conversion or severe adverse events (SAEs). We assessed the association of these outcomes with patients' characteristics or treatment parameters. We identified 74 studies, including 17 494 participants.The pooled treatment success was 26% in extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) patients and 60% in MDR-TB patients. Treatment parameters such as number or duration and individual drugs were not associated with improved 6-month sputum culture conversion or end of treatment outcomes. However, MDR-TB patients that received individualised regimens had higher success than patients who received standardised regimens (64% versus 52%; p<0.0.01). When reports from 20 cohorts were pooled, proportions of SAE ranged from 0.5% attributed to ethambutol to 12.2% attributed to para-aminosalicylic acid. The lack of significant associations of treatment outcomes with specific drugs or regimens may reflect the limitations of pooling the data rather than a true lack of differences in efficacy of regimens or individual drugs.This analysis highlights the need for stronger evidence for treatment of MDR-TB from better-designed and reported studies.

scholarly journals WHO Group 5 Drugs and Difficult Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review with Cohort Analysis and Meta-Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 4097-4104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwok-Chiu Chang ◽  
Wing-Wai Yew ◽  
Cheuk-Ming Tam ◽  
Chi-Chiu Leung
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Geographical Regions ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Group 5

ABSTRACTIt is often necessary to include WHO group 5 drugs in the treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) and fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). As clinical evidence about the use of group 5 drugs is scarce, we conducted a systematic review using published individual patient data. We searched PubMed and OvidSP through 7 April 2013 for publications in English to assemble a cohort with fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB treated with group 5 drugs. Favorable outcome was defined as sputum culture conversion, cure, or treatment completion in the absence of death, default, treatment failure, or relapse. A cohort of 194 patients was assembled from 20 articles involving 12 geographical regions. In descending order of frequency, linezolid was used in treatment of 162 (84%) patients, macrolides in 84 (43%), clofazimine in 65 (34%), amoxicillin with clavulanate in 56 (29%), thioridazine in 18 (9%), carbapenem in 16 (8%), and high-dose isoniazid in 16 (8%). Cohort analysis with robust Poisson regression models and random-effects meta-analysis similarly suggested that linezolid use significantly increased the probability (95% confidence interval) of favorable outcome by 57% (10% to 124%) and 55% (10% to 121%), respectively. Defining significant associations by risk ratios ≥ 1.2 or ≤ 0.9, neither cohort analysis nor meta-analysis demonstrated any significant add-on benefit from the use of other group 5 drugs with respect to outcome for patients treated with linezolid, although selection bias might have led to underestimation of their effects. Our findings substantiated the use of linezolid in the treatment of XDR-TB or fluoroquinolone-resistant MDR-TB and call for further studies to evaluate the roles of other group 5 drugs.

Health System and Policy Perspectives of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) Control in India

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Janmejaya Samal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Surveillance System ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Control Programme ◽  
Tb Control ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
The Right

Despite the lack of reliable information on multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) epidemiology, research shows an increasing trend of MDR-TB incidence in India. Of several determinants attributable to the rising trend of MDR-TB, health systems and policy (HSP) determinants play a pivotal role. With this article, an attempt has been made to unravel the HSP challenges for the control of MDR-TB and recommend strategies to overcome that. Ten different strategies have been recommended in this article that includes operations research (OR), molecular epidemiological studies, drug susceptibility test (DST), surveillance system, advocacy communication and social mobilisation (ACSM), nutrition and livelihood support, contribution of private practitioners (PPs), human resources for health (HRH), social determinants of health and information systems. Methods of OR with the right technical expertise can help in decision-making and evaluation of the TB control programme. Molecular epidemiological studies further help identify the right strain and can help in institutionalising the right therapeutic regimen. Similarly, the DST allows extended treatment strategies, including second-line drugs. A proper surveillance system can enable the availability of the right information for public health decision-making. Communication enables and empowers the community in accessing health services and helps policymakers take informed decisions. Nutrition and livelihood support are essential in TB control as it mostly affects the poor and people in the productive age group. Further, tapping PPs is equally important as more than 50 per cent of TB patients visit them. Proper orientation of the PPs about the TB control programme is non-negotiable given these facts. The HRH issues are pertinent—staff members lack the required motivation owing to delay in payment of salaries and the lack of job promotion. The HRH form the backbone of any health system, as the mere presence of drugs, technologies and infrastructure do not suffice for the provision of healthcare. Attention on the neglected social determinants of health is required as well. Finally, all these suggestions need to be implemented in coordination with each other to bring down the scourge of MDR-TB in India.

scholarly journals Impact of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and its medications on adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e034821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kefyalew Addis Alene ◽  
Akilew Awoke Adane ◽  
Alemken Jegnie
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionMultidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a common public health problem affecting pregnant women. However, the impact of MDR-TB and its medication on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes has been poorly understood and inconsistently reported. Therefore, using the available literature, we aim to determine whether MDR-TB and its medications during pregnancy impact maternal and perinatal outcomes.Methods and analysisThis systematic review and meta-analysis will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Systematic searches will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on 10 February 2020 for studies that reported adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes due to MDR-TB and/or its medication. The search will be performed without language and time restrictions. Adverse birth outcomes include miscarriage or abortion, stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, small and large for gestational age, and neonatal death. Two independent reviewers will screen search records, extract data and assess the quality of the studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale will be used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. In addition to a narrative synthesis, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted when sufficient data are available. I2 statistics will be used to assess the heterogeneity between studies.Ethics and disseminationAs it will be a systematic review and meta-analysis based on previously published evidence, there will be no requirement for ethical approval. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at various conferences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document