Diagnostic value of the Biofire® Filmarray Pneumonia panel compared to conventional sputum culture in patients with an exacerbation of bronchiectasis

Author(s):  
Patricia Elena Oscanoa Huaman ◽  
Victoria Alcaraz Serrano ◽  
Rosanel Amaro Rodriguez ◽  
Leticia Bueno Freire ◽  
Nil Vàzquez ◽  
...  
JAMA ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 233 (8) ◽  
pp. 894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurdur B. Thorsteinsson

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1926-1930
Author(s):  
Gorica Popova ◽  
Katerina Boskovska ◽  
Ivana Arnaudova-Danevska ◽  
Olga Smilevska-Spasova ◽  
Tatjana Jakovska

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of specimens from the lower airways is often debatable. However, they are most commonly examined for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs).AIM: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of sputum quality assessment about sputum culture for diagnosing LRTIs in children.METHODS: In six months, a total of 1485 sputum samples were quality assessed by using Bartlett’s grading system. All samples, regardless of their quality, were cultured, identified, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion method.RESULTS: Among the acceptable category, defined by Bartlett’s grading system, 132 (63.2%) samples showed culture positivity of which Streptococcus pneumoniae 48 (36.4%) was most commonly isolated, followed by Moraxella catarrhalis 22 (16.7%) and Haemophilus influenza 21 (15.9%). Among the non-acceptable category, 185 (14.5%) samples were culture positive of which most commonly isolated were Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 64 (34.6%), 54 (29.2%) and 28 (15.1%), respectively.CONCLUSION: Sputum quality assessment is a useful tool for distinguishing the true respiratory pathogens from possible colonising flora for which antibiotic treatment should not be highly considered.  


JAMA ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 233 (8) ◽  
pp. 894-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Thorsteinsson

Author(s):  
Gerald Fine ◽  
Azorides R. Morales

For years the separation of carcinoma and sarcoma and the subclassification of sarcomas has been based on the appearance of the tumor cells and their microscopic growth pattern and information derived from certain histochemical and special stains. Although this method of study has produced good agreement among pathologists in the separation of carcinoma from sarcoma, it has given less uniform results in the subclassification of sarcomas. There remain examples of neoplasms of different histogenesis, the classification of which is questionable because of similar cytologic and growth patterns at the light microscopic level; i.e. amelanotic melanoma versus carcinoma and occasionally sarcoma, sarcomas with an epithelial pattern of growth simulating carcinoma, histologically similar mesenchymal tumors of different histogenesis (histiocytoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma, lytic osteogenic sarcoma versus rhabdomyosarcoma), and myxomatous mesenchymal tumors of diverse histogenesis (myxoid rhabdo and liposarcomas, cardiac myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, etc.)


1957 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry J. Culver ◽  
William V. McDermott ◽  
Chester M. Jones

1965 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard E. Ticktin ◽  
Nelson P. Trujillo ◽  
Phyllis F. Evans ◽  
Joseph H. Roe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document