scholarly journals Why are pyramidal cell firing rates increased with aging, and what can we do about it?

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Yadav ◽  
Christina M Weaver ◽  
Yuan Z Gao ◽  
Jennifer I Luebke ◽  
Susan L Wearne
2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 2849-2858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ildiko Aradi ◽  
Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar ◽  
Ivan Soltesz

Previous computational modeling studies suggested a set of rules underlying the modulation of principal cell firing rates by heterogeneity in the synaptic parameters (peak amplitude and decay kinetics) of populations of GABAergic inputs. Here we performed dynamic clamp experiments in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells to test these ideas in biological neurons. In agreement with the simulation studies, the effects of increasing the event-to-event variance in a population of perisomatically injected inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) peak conductances caused either an increase, decrease, or no change in the firing rates of CA1 pyramidal cells depending on the mean around which the scatter was introduced, the degree of the scatter, the depolarization that the pyramidal cell received, and the IPSC reversal potential. In contrast to CA1 pyramidal cells, both model and biological CA3 pyramidal cells responded with bursts of action potentials to sudden, step-wise alterations in input heterogeneity. In addition, injections of 40-Hz IPSC conductances together with θ-modulated depolarizing current inputs to CA1 pyramidal cells demonstrated that the principles underlying the modulation of pyramidal cell excitability by heterogeneous IPSC populations also apply during membrane potential oscillations. Taken together, these experimental results and the computational modeling data show the existence of simple rules governing the interactions of heterogeneous interneuronal inputs and principal cells.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1487-1497 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Llado-Pelfort ◽  
N. Santana ◽  
V. Ghisi ◽  
F. Artigas ◽  
P. Celada

Author(s):  
Alexandre Guet-McCreight ◽  
Frances K Skinner

The wide diversity of inhibitory cells across the brain makes them suitable to contribute to network dynamics in specialized fashions. However, the contributions of a particular inhibitory cell type in a behaving animal are challenging to untangle as one needs to both record cellular activities and identify the cell type being recorded. Thus, using computational modeling and theory to predict and hypothesize cell-specific contributions is desirable. Here, we examine potential contributions of interneuron-specific 3 (I-S3) cells - an inhibitory interneuron found in CA1 hippocampus that only targets other inhibitory interneurons - during simulated theta rhythms. We use previously developed multi-compartment models of oriens lacunosum-moleculare (OLM) cells, the main target of I-S3 cells, and explore how I-S3 cell inputs during in vitro and in vivo scenarios contribute to theta. We find that I-S3 cells suppress OLM cell spiking, rather than engender its spiking via post-inhibitory rebound mechanisms, and contribute to theta frequency spike resonance during simulated in vivo scenarios. To elicit recruitment similar to in vitro experiments, inclusion of disinhibited pyramidal cell inputs is necessary, implying that I-S3 cell firing broadens the window for pyramidal cell disinhibition. Using in vivo virtual networks, we show that I-S3 cells contribute to a sharpening of OLM cell recruitment at theta frequencies. Further, shifting the timing of I-S3 cell spiking due to external modulation shifts the timing of the OLM cell firing and thus disinhibitory windows. We propose a specialized contribution of I-S3 cells to create temporally precise coordination of modulation pathways.


1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 1658-1671 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Krnjević ◽  
M. E. Morris ◽  
R. J. Reiffenstein ◽  
N. Ropert

In the CA1 area of the hippocampus of urethane-anaesthetized rats, the greatest Δ[K+]o and Δ[Ca2+]o evoked by repetitive fimbrial – commissural stimulation were always found in the pyramidal cell layer; but there were large increases in [K+]o over a wide range of depth, whereas a major fall in [Ca2+]o was localized almost exclusively to the level of the pyramidal layer. A sustained focal negative potential was also evoked by fimbrial stimulation; it resembled Δ[K+]o in time course and depth distribution and therefore probably reflected cellular depolarization caused by increased [K+]o. The close correlation between Δ[Ca2+]o and Δ[K+]o and the appearance of population spikes (especially in bursts of three to four spikes) indicate that pyramidal cell firing and corresponding K-outward and Ca-inward currents are mainly responsible for the accumulation of [Formula: see text] and the depletion of [Formula: see text]. In CA3 pyramidal areas, Δ[K+]o and Δ[Ca2+]o were comparable in magnitude and distribution to changes seen in CA1, but they occurred after a longer latency, and the major Δ[Ca2+]o had a longer duration, consistent with a more prolonged Ca2+ current.


Author(s):  
Maria Psarrou ◽  
Stefanos S. Stefanou ◽  
Athanasia Papoutsi ◽  
Alexandra Tzilivaki ◽  
Vassilis Cutsuridis ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément E. Lemercier ◽  
Steffen B. Schulz ◽  
Karin E. Heidmann ◽  
Richard Kovács ◽  
Zoltan Gerevich

1982 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 765-768
Author(s):  
R. M. Bilof ◽  
R. D. Boehmer ◽  
A. Sances ◽  
S. J. Larson ◽  
E. A. Millar

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 2538-2553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bálint Lasztóczi ◽  
Gabriella Nyitrai ◽  
László Héja ◽  
Julianna Kardos

Here we address how dynamics of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic input to CA3 pyramidal cells contribute to spontaneous emergence and evolution of recurrent seizure-like events (SLEs) in juvenile (P10-13) rat hippocampal slices bathed in low-[Mg2+] artificial cerebrospinal fluid. In field potential recordings from the CA3 pyramidal layer, a short epoch of high-frequency oscillation (HFO; 400–800 Hz) was observed during the first 10 ms of SLE onset. GABAergic synaptic input currents to CA3 pyramidal cells were synchronized and coincided with HFO, whereas the glutamatergic input lagged by ∼10 ms. If the intracellular [Cl−] remained unperturbed (cell-attached recordings) or was set high with whole cell electrode solution, CA3 pyramidal cell firing peaked with HFO and GABAergic input. By contrast, with low intracellular [Cl−], spikes of CA3 pyramidal cells lagged behind HFO and GABAergic input. This temporal arrangement of HFO, synaptic input sequence, synchrony of GABAergic currents, and pyramidal cell firing emerged gradually with preictal discharges until the SLE onset. Blockade of GABAA receptor-mediated currents by picrotoxin reduced the inter-SLE interval and the number of preictal discharges and did not block recurrent SLEs. Our data suggest that dynamic changes of the functional properties of GABAergic input contribute to ictogenesis and GABAergic and glutamatergic inputs are both excitatory at the instant of SLE onset. At the SLE onset GABAergic input contributes to synchronization and recruitment of pyramidal cells. We conjecture that this network state is reached by an activity-dependent shift in GABA reversal potential during the preictal phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document