scholarly journals Physician counseling of young adults with rapid weight gain: a retrospective cohort study

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce W Tang ◽  
Robert F Kushner ◽  
Jason Thompson ◽  
David W Baker
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1907-1914 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Chu ◽  
Lauren C. Balmert ◽  
Cameron M. Arkin ◽  
Theresa Meyer ◽  
Ilina Rosoklija ◽  
...  

Hernia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 675-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. van Kerckhoven ◽  
L. Toonen ◽  
W. A. Draaisma ◽  
L. S. de Vries ◽  
P. M. Verheijen

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. e2020003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mekonen Adimasu ◽  
Girum Sebsibie ◽  
Fikrtemariam Abebe ◽  
Getaneh Baye ◽  
Kerebih Abere

OBJECTIVES: Recovery time from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is often a neglected topic despite its clinical impact. Although a few studies have examined nutritional recovery time, the length of hospitalization in those studies varied greatly. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the recovery time from SAM and to identify predictors of length of hospitalization among under-5 children.METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 423 under-5 children with SAM who had been admitted to Yekatit 12 Hospital. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to nutritional recovery, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors.RESULTS: The nutritional recovery rate was 81.3%, and the median recovery time was 15.00 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.61 to 16.39). Age, daily weight gain per kilogram of body weight, vaccination status, and the existence of at least 1 comorbidity (e.g., pneumonia, stunting, shock, and deworming) were found to be significant independent predictors of nutritional recovery time. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for nutritional recovery decreased by 1.9% for every 1-month increase in child age (aHR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97 to 0.99).CONCLUSIONS: The overall nutritional recovery time in this study was within the Sphere standards. However, approximately 13.0% of children stayed in the hospital for more than 28.00 days, which is an unacceptably large proportion. Daily weight gain of ≥8 g/kg, full vaccination, and deworming with albendazole or mebendazole reduced nutritional recovery time. Conversely, older age, pneumonia, stunting, and shock increased nutritional recovery time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chao Hsiao ◽  
Jen-Hung Wang ◽  
Chia-Hsiang Chu ◽  
Yu-Hsun Chang ◽  
Jui-Shia Chen ◽  
...  

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the contribution of high body mass index (BMI) to growth velocity among school-aged children who remained in the same BMI categories for a 6-year period.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included children who enrolled in the school year 2009 and remained in the same BMI categories during their 1st, 4th, and 7th grades (6–7, 9–10, 12–13 years of age). Annual linear growth velocity and weight gain were calculated and compared between sexes, BMI groups, and different times. Risk analysis and repeated measures analysis of variance were performed to identify the impact of BMI on growth velocity.Results: Of the 1,637 subjects, 53.0% were male, and 2.5% and 10.9% belonged to BMI groups of overweight and obese, respectively. In students between 6 and 13 years of age, obesity was associated with higher annual weight gain and height gain. Risk analysis showed that obese subjects had higher linear growth velocity than normal BMI groups of both sexes between 6 and 9 years of age. Unexpectedly, overweight and obese girls between 9 and 13 years of age had less linear growth velocity than underweight girls at the same interval. Repeated measures analysis of variance in both sexes showed a significant statistical association between BMI and different times of growth. However, the effect was less in girls between 9 and 13 years of age.Conclusion: Puberty may dominate over BMI as the main contributor to high growth velocity in girls with underweight BMI emerging into pubertal age.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e023987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Pankova ◽  
Eva Kralikova ◽  
Kamila Zvolska ◽  
Lenka Stepankova ◽  
Milan Blaha ◽  
...  

ObjectivesMost people gain weight on stopping smoking but the extent of weight gain varies greatly. Interventions aimed at all quitters to prevent weight gain on cessation have proven unpopular but targeting people who have gained excess weight immediately after quitting may improve uptake and cost-effectiveness. We examined whether early large postcessation weight gain predicts overall large weight gain.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingPrimary care setting—smoking cessation centre in Prague, Czech Republic.ParticipantsOut of 3537 patients treated between 2005 and 2013, 1050 were continuous abstainers (verified by carbon monoxide measurement) at 1-year follow-up and formed the cohort of the current report. 48.7% were women (n=511) with the mean age of 46 (±14.4) years.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, all patients underwent usual tobacco dependence treatment using evidence-based methods. Weight was measured prior to smoking cessation and at each visit after quitting.ResultsThe mean weight gain in the first month (n=763) was 0.79% (±2.03%), in the second month (n=646) was 1.49% (±2.58%), for the third month (n=566) 2.33% (±3.44%) and 4.1% (±5.31%) after 1-year follow-up (n=1050). The regression coefficient per 1% rise in the first 3 months was +0.13% (95% CI −0.04% to 0.30%). A receiver operating curve analysis showed that patients gaining more than 0.98% of their baseline weight during first 3 months had a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 44% for gaining 7% or more weight by 12 months. In addition, lower body mass index and an increase in appetite at 3 months after quitting were associated with greater weight gain, while using nicotine replacement therapy was associated with less weight gain at 1-year follow-up.ConclusionsPeople who stop smoking and gain a larger amount of weight early after quitting are not more likely to gain excessively at 1 year.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document