scholarly journals Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangjun Guo ◽  
Hui Miao ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Shasha Zhang ◽  
Dongyan Zhou ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1266-1269
Author(s):  
Sumit Dash ◽  
Jyotirmay Singh ◽  
Prabu MS Ismail ◽  
Muhammad AS Agwan ◽  
Kaarunya Ravikumar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1738-1744
Author(s):  
Nayra Bittencourt Orlowski ◽  
Tamer Ferreira Schimdt ◽  
Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira ◽  
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ◽  
Julia Menezes Savaris ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Branislav Karadzic ◽  
Nina Dimitrijevic ◽  
Dragica Manojlovic ◽  
Tomislav Trisovic

Introduction. Canal irrigation is an important segment of endodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of 0.5% NaOCl solutions of different pH values on smear layer removal. Material and Methods. Thirty-two freshly extracted single rooted teeth with gangrenous pulp were used in the study. The samples were divided into four groups of eight teeth in each. Four solutions of 0.5% NaOCl having pH values 5, 7, 9 and 12 respectively, were used during chemomechanical instrumentation with hand instruments and using step back technique. SEM analysis was done to assess the quality of smear layer removal in apical, middle and coronal part of root canal. Presence and quantity of smear layer and detritus was quantified using the scale from 1 to 5. Results. SEM analysis results showed similar results for 0.5% NaOCl solutions of different pH values in root canal cleaning with no statistically significant differences. Conclusion. The most effective cleaning root canal was achieved with 0.5% NaOCl solution of pH 5.


2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Z. Guerisoli ◽  
M. A. Marchesan ◽  
A. D. Walmsley ◽  
P. J. Lumley ◽  
J. D. Pecora

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polliana Vilaça Silva ◽  
Débora Fernandes Costa Guedes ◽  
Jesus Djalma Pécora ◽  
Antonio Miranda da Cruz-Filho

Complete debridement with smear layer removal are essential measures for achieving a successful outcome of root canal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chitosan at different concentrations on the removal of the smear layer and on dentin structure after 3 and 5 min of application. Twelve recently extracted maxillary canine teeth were instrumented using the crown-down technique and irrigated with 1% sodium hypochlorite. The specimens were distributed according to the time and concentration of the final irrigating solution: G1: 0.1% chitosan for 3 min; G2: 0.2% chitosan for 3 min; G3: 0.37% chitosan for 3 min; G4: 0.1% chitosan for 5 min; G5: 0.2% chitosan for 5 min; G6: 0.37% chitosan for 5 min. All samples were prepared for SEM analysis. G1 exhibited removal of the smear layer, but not the smear plugs. G2 showed visible and open tubules with slight erosion of the peritubular dentin. Cleaning in G3 was similar to that in G2, however, the erosive effect was greater. There was expansion of the diameter of the tubules in G4; and in G5 and G6, there was severe erosion with deterioration of dentin surface. In conclusion, 0.2% chitosan for 3 min appeared to be efficient for removing the smear layer, causing little erosion of dentin.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Táccio de Miranda Candeiro ◽  
Isabela Barbosa de Matos ◽  
Clarice Fernandes Eloy da Costa ◽  
Cristiane Sá Roriz Fonteles ◽  
Mônica Sampaio do Vale

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Martins Gomes ◽  
Lais Dos Santos Lissi ◽  
Marcella Batista Pavanello Coelho ◽  
Eduardo Galera Da Silva ◽  
Frederico Canato Martinho ◽  
...  

<p class="western" lang="en-US"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><strong>Objective: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 0.5% peracetic acid solution and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution on smear layer removal of root canal walls after rotary instrumentation. </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><strong>Material and methods:</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"> Sixty single-rooted human teeth with standardized length had their canals instrumented by three rotary systems (Biorace, MTwo and Endowave), varying the irrigation solution, as follows (n=10): G1- Biorace System + 0.5% peracetic acid solution; G2- Biorace System + 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution; G3- MTwo System + 0.5% peracetic acid solution; G4- MTwo System + 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution; G5- Endowave System + 0.5% peracetic acid solution; G6- Endowave System + 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution. After instrumentation, the roots were cleaved and the dentin walls were evaluated by SEM at x500 and x2000 magnification for assessing the cleaning of the root canals at the cervical, middle and apical thirds. The analyzed area was quantified according to the total number of tubules present and the percentage of open tubules at each region. Data were submitted to statistical analysis by ANOVA and Tukey tests, at the significance level of 5%. </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><strong>Results:</strong></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"> There were no statistical significant differences among the experimental groups. In all groups the smear layer removal at cervical and medium thirds was higher than that of apical third. </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><strong>Conclusion: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">It was concluded that the cleaning obtained at the apical third was lower in all groups studied</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">and neither the instrumentation technique nor the irrigating solution was able to promote total smear layer removal from root canal walls.</span></span></span></p><p class="western" lang="en-US"> </p><p class="western" align="JUSTIFY"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><strong>KEYWORDS: </strong></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"> Peracetic acid; Root canal irrigants; Scanning electron microscopy; Sodium hypochlorite.</span></span></span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document