scholarly journals Study Protocol: establishing good relationships between patients and health care providers while providing cardiac care. Exploring how patient-clinician engagement contributes to health disparities between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians in South Australia

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvette L Roe ◽  
Christopher J Zeitz ◽  
Bronwyn Fredericks
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Anikeeva ◽  
Paul Arbon ◽  
Kathryn Zeitz ◽  
Murk Bottema ◽  
Adam Lund ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionMass gatherings are complex events that present a unique set of challenges to attendees’ health and well-being. There are numerous factors that influence the number and type of injuries and illnesses that occur at these events, including weather, event and venue type, and crowd demographics and behavior.ProblemWhile the impact of some factors, such as weather conditions and the availability of alcohol, on patient presentations at mass gatherings have been described previously, the influence of many other variables, including crowd demographics, crowd behavior, and event type, is poorly understood. Furthermore, a large number of studies reporting on the influence of these variables on patient presentations are based on anecdotal evidence at a single mass-gathering event.MethodsData were collected by trained fieldworkers at 15 mass gatherings in South Australia and included event characteristics, crowd demographics, and weather. De-identified patient records were obtained from on-site health care providers. Data analysis included the calculation of patient proportions in each variable category, as well as the total number of patient presentations per event and the patient presentation rate (PPR).ResultsThe total number of expected attendees at the 15 mass gatherings was 303,500, of which 146 presented to on-site health care services. The majority of patient presentations occurred at events with a mean temperature between 20°C and 25°C. The PPR was more than double at events with a predominantly male crowd compared to events with a more equal sex distribution. Almost 90.0% of patient presentations occurred at events where alcohol was available.Conclusion:The results of the study suggest that several weather, crowd, and event variables influence the type and number of patient presentations observed at mass-gathering events. Given that the study sample size did not allow for these interactions to be quantified, further research is warranted to investigate the relationships between alcohol availability, crowd demographics, crowd mobility, venue design, and injuries and illnesses.Anikeeva O, Arbon P, Zeitz K, Bottema M, Lund A, Turris S, Steenkamp M. Patient presentation trends at 15 mass-gathering events in South Australia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):368–374.


Author(s):  
Anneke M.F. Schreurs ◽  
Charlotte I. van Schaijik ◽  
Bianca De Bie ◽  
Jacques W.M. Maas ◽  
Cornelis Lambalk ◽  
...  

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecologic disease, causing pain and infertility. As there is no definitive cure, patients are subjected to long-term care. This study aimed to improve patient-centred endometriosis care. Patient-centredness of endometriosis care can be evaluated using the validated ENDOCARE questionnaire (ECQ), resulting in centre-specific targets for improvement. To understand how to tackle the targets for improvement as found by the ECQ, focus groups can be organized. <b><i>Design:</i></b> This protocol presents a prospective study with a mixed-methods approach to improve patient-centredness of endometriosis care. The study consists of 5 steps: (1) evaluating current patient-centredness of endometriosis care by using the ECQ, (2) understanding targets for improvement, (3) drafting an improvement plan, (4) implementing improvements, and (5) evaluating the improved patient-centredness of endometriosis care. The final evaluation will be performed 1.5 years after implementing the improvement plan. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patient-centredness will be evaluated using the ECQ by inviting women with endometriosis to participate (steps 1 and 5). To investigate step 2, focus groups will be organized. For these focus groups, women with endometriosis are asked to participate until data saturation is achieved. During focus groups, participants are motivated to discuss the found targets for improvement and stimulated to find ways to improve them. The drafting and implementing of the improvement plan (steps 3 and 4) will be organized with the help of health-care providers in close collaboration with the patient organization. To assess whether the implementation of the improvement plan was successful in improving endometriosis care, the results from the ECQ in step 5 will be compared to the results from the ECQ in step 1. Ethical approval was granted by the local Institutional Review Board (Ref 2018.438). <b><i>Setting:</i></b> The study was conducted in the university hospital in the Netherlands. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> Both patients and health-care providers will be involved in drafting the improvement plan. By making the health-care providers responsible for improving care, the chance of succeeding is optimized. Whether this improvement strategy is successful will be investigated after the implementation of the improvement plan. The improvement plan is clinic specific and can possibly not be extrapolated to other endometriosis clinics. In order to aim to improve patient-centred endometriosis care elsewhere, the complete study protocol should be performed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study protocol aimed to investigate focus groups as a strategy to identify possible interventions to improve patient-centred endometriosis care by investigating the underlying causes for poor performance on patient-centred care. This study protocol could be used in more endometriosis care centres in the future and might also be useful for improving patient-centredness in other chronic diseases.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsiaryna Laryionava ◽  
Jan Schildmann ◽  
Michael Wensing ◽  
Ullrich Wedding ◽  
Bastian Surmann ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND To support advanced cancer patients, for whom standard therapy is no longer avail-able, and their oncologists in therapy decisions, we aim to develop a decision-making aid (DA) in a multi-phased bicentric study. The DA aims to help patients to better un-derstand risks and benefits of available treatment options including the options of standard palliative care, off-label drug use within an individual treatment plan and involvement in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE This study protocol outlines the development and testing of a DA in a pre-post design study targeting at a heterogeneous population of advanced cancer patients. METHODS In phase I, The DA will be developed after of decisional needs of patients and views of health care providers based on face-to face interviews and focus groups discus-sions. Subsequently, the DA will be alpha-tested and redrafted, as necessary, in phase II. In phase III, the DA will be (1) beta-tested with patients and oncologists and (2) assessed by experts. In the last project phase, we will run a pre-post design study with n= 70 doctor-patient-encounters to access improvements on primary study outcome, i.e. patients’ level of decisional conflict. In addition, the user ac-ceptance will be tested. RESULTS Interviews with cancer patients, oncologists and health care providers have been completed. CONCLUSIONS A unique feature of this study is the development of a DA for patients with different types of advanced cancer, which covers a wide range of topics relevant for patients near the end of life such as forgoing cancer-specific therapy and patients’ inclusion in clinical trials. CLINICALTRIAL NCT04606238 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04606238


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Koch ◽  
Anna-Jasmin Wetzel ◽  
Christine Preiser ◽  
Regina Müller ◽  
Malte Klemmt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Symptom checker applications (SCA) are accessible tools that provide early symptom assessment for users. Ethical, legal, and social implications of SCA, their impact on the patient-physician relationship, the health care providers and the health care system have sparsely been examined. This study protocol describes an approach to investigate possible impacts and implications of SCA on different levels of health care provision. It considers the perspectives of users, non-users, general practitioners and (international) health care experts. We aim to assess a comprehensive overview of the use of SCA and reveal problematic issues.Methods: The primary outcomes of this study are empirically informed, multi-perspective recommendations for different stakeholders on ethical, legal, and social implications of SCA. Quantitative and qualitative methods will be used in several consecutive and interconnected parts: Study part 1 comprises a survey that will be analyzed with a logistic regression. It aims to assess the user degree of SCA in Germany as well as predictors for SCA usage. Study part 2 will comprise self-observational diary and user-interviews, which will be analyzed as integrated cases to assess the user perspectives, usage pattern and arising problems. Study part 3 will comprise GP interviews to assess their experiences, perspectives, self-image, and concepts and will be analyzed with the basic procedure by Kruse. Moreover, interviews with health care experts will be conducted in study part 3 and will be analyzed by using the reflexive thematical analysis by Braun and Clark. Discussion: Possible ethical, social and legal implications of a widespread use of SCA affect stakeholders and stakeholder groups on different levels of health care. The proposed methodological approach provides a multi-faceted and diverse empirical basis for a broad discussion on these implications.Trial registration: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) with the ID: DRKS00022465 since the 7th of August 2020.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani K. Atrash

Racial disparities in health outcomes, access to health care, insurance coverage, and quality of care in the United States have existed for many years. The Development and implementation of effective strategies to reduce or eliminate health disparities are hindered by our inability to accurately assess the extent and types of health disparities due to the limited availability of race/ethnicity-specific information, the limited reliability of existing data and information, and the increasing diversity of the American population. Variations in racial and ethnic classification used to collect data hinders the ability to obtain reliable and accurate health-indicator rates and in some instances cause bias in estimating the race/ethnicity-specific health measures. In 1978, The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued "Directive 15" titled "Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting" and provided a set of clear guidelines for classifying people by race and ethnicity. Access to health care, behavioral and psychosocial factors as well as cultural differences contribute to the racial and ethnic variations that exist in a person’s health. To help eliminate health disparities, we must ensure equal access to health care services as well as quality of care. Health care providers must become culturally competent and understand the differences that exist among the people they serve in order to eliminate disparities. Enhancement of data collection systems is essential for developing and implementing interventions targeted to deal with population-specific problems. Developing comprehensive and multi-level programs to eliminate healthcare disparities requires coordination and collaboration between the public (Local, state and federal health departments), private (Health Insurance companies, private health care providers), and professional (Physicians, nurses, pharmacists, laboratories, etc) sectors.  


1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 66 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Paul

Discussion about the on-going poor health status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island peoples in Australia needs to be better informed about both history, and the nature of health determining factors. Access is only one of many factors of importance in health seeking behaviour. This paper explores how the cultural appropriateness of health care services is a determinant of whether they are accessed or not. Contemporary attitudes, and their historical roots, are key issues which need to be addressed by health care providers and services. The onus is on health care providers to be informed and to act appropriately in all their interactions with health care consumers. The Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody provides some useful suggestions for improving the quality of health care services for Indigenous Australians.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document