scholarly journals Creating a nationwide cancer registration system to support AIDS-cancer match studies in Nigeria

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement Adebamowo ◽  
Elima Jedy-Agba ◽  
Emmanuel Oga ◽  
Peju Osinubi ◽  
Festus Igbinoba ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Contiero ◽  
Andrea Tittarelli ◽  
Anna Maghini ◽  
Sabrina Fabiano ◽  
Emanuela Frassoldi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariya A. Qurieshi ◽  
S. M. Salim Khan ◽  
Muneer A. Masoodi ◽  
Uruj Qurieshi ◽  
Quratul Ain ◽  
...  

Cancer is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the world. The aim of the present study was to measure the pattern of different cancers in Kashmir, India, a cancer belt with peculiar cancer profile. A hospital based cancer registry was started by the Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Srinagar, in January 2006, wherein information was collected from cancer patients who were diagnosed and treated in the hospital. Data has been analysed for a period extending from January 2006 to December 2012. Descriptive analysis has been done by using statistical software. A total of 1598 cancer patients were admitted during this period. Overall male to female ratio was 1.33 : 1. Stomach cancer was the most commonly reported cancer (25.2%), followed by colorectal cancer (16.4%) and lung cancer (13.2%) among males. For females, colorectal cancer (16.8%), breast cancer (16.1%), and stomach cancer (10.4%) were the most frequently reported cancers in order of frequency. Tobacco related cancers contributed to more than three-fourths of cancers among men and more than half of cancers for women. There is an urgent need to set up a population based cancer registration system to understand the profile of cancers specific to this geographic region.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
G. V. Petrova ◽  
O. P. Gretsova ◽  
V. V. Starinsky

The purpose of the study was to compare data on the cancer incidence rates for 2016 between the official reports on cancer statistics and federal cancer registry, collected in December 2018.Material and Methods. The study estimated the total data on 18 parameters from 35 regions of Russia, covering 66.3 million people (2016). The database of the Russian cancer registry and the database containing reports on the state cancer statistics were used. The cancer statistics/cancer registry ratio was assessed.Results. No differences in cancer incidence between the official reports on cancer statistics and cancer registry data were found. In the official reports on cancer statistics, the mortality rate, the proportion of posthumously recorded patients per 100 newly diagnosed, the proportion of deaths from diseases not related to cancer per 100 deceased patients, the cancer prevalence and the prevalence rate of unspecified malignant tumors were slightly reduced (to 10 %, 9 %, 5 %, and 4 %, respectively), and the rate of cancer detection, the proportion of histologically verified diagnoses and the proportion of cancers detected in stage III were increased (to 19 %, 10 % and 14 %, respectively) compared to those in cancer registry data.Conclusion. Improvement in the quality and completeness of information about cancer patients is associated rather with increasing the annual report length than with the need to improve the cancer registration system itself.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv21-iv21
Author(s):  
Hamish Sinclair ◽  
Kerlann Le Calvez ◽  
Jiarong Chen ◽  
Lillie Pakzad-Shahabi ◽  
Luke Dixon ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumour and affect approximately 20% of adult cancer patients, most commonly from lung, breast, melanoma, and kidney cancer. However, the true incidence of brain metastasis is unknown. England’s cancer registration system only reliably captures brain metastases present at diagnosis (rather than those that develop later), and the same is true for US-based data. Although it is relatively easy to identify patients receiving some treatments for brain metastases (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT)), identifying those receiving chemotherapy or no treatment is much harder. As a result, the existing literature is heavily biased towards reporting treated populations. This study attempts to find an unbiased estimate of the true number of patients developing brain metastases, based on data from a single centre. Method Cases of brain metastasis were retrospectively identified from the radiology information system database (SolitonTM). We performed a Boolean search for specific keywords in the radiology reports of all CT and MRI head scans performed at the trust between 1st January 2018 and 31st December 2019. The following keywords were searched for “metastases”, “metastatic“, “metastasis”, “mets”, “deposit”, “deposits”, “secondaries”, “secondary” and “disseminated”. Duplicate cases were then removed and the subsequent list was manually reviewed We identified all patients who received any treatment for brain metastases who were diagnosed at our centre. We only included patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases (included: leptomeningeal; excluded: skull-based metastases). We excluded patients who were diagnosed in other centres and treated here or diagnosed outside the study period. We then extracted data on primary diagnosis, admissions, and survival. Results 1192 patients had a CT or MRI of the head with a mention of “brain metastases” in the report; of these 305 were newly diagnosed with brain metastases during the study period (432 had metastases; 127 diagnosed earlier). Of these 305 patients, 217 (71.1%) were treated locally (SRS = 88; WBRT = 74; surgery = 88; systemic therapy = 16; multiple treatments = 45) and 10 (3.3%) were referred elsewhere. 78 (25.6%) patients received no treatment. Of the 217 treated patients, 124 were female, and the median age was 61. Of the 78 untreated patients, 38 were females, and the median age was 70 years old. The commonest primary diagnoses in both groups were lung (39%) and breast (21%) cancer. 16 (21%) of the untreated patients had an unbiopsied primary tumour. Median survival for patients having (any) treatment was 52 weeks compared to 5 weeks for those not having treatment. Conclusion We have presented an unbiased single-centre estimate of brain metastases occurrence. Unlike previous work, we manually reviewed all imaging reports that suggested metastasis, and included all patients diagnosed with brain metastases at any timepoint. We reduced the bias associated with being a tertiary centre by only including patients who were diagnosed here, rather than referred from other centres. 25% of our cohort received no treatment, and survival in this group is poor. This is broadly in line with the only other study on this topic (Bentley, 2019) that reported a large minority (39%) of untreated patients. Our key conclusions are: When assessing the incidence of brain metastases, studies that do not account for untreated patients are likely to significantly underestimate incidence, and over-estimate survival. Improving outcomes in patients with brain metastases might be best achieved by addressing earlier identification and intervention in those who currently receive no treatment


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daem Roshani ◽  
Ghobad Moradi ◽  
Mohammad Rasouli

Abstract Introduction: If colorectal cancer (CRC) is diagnosed in the early stages, the patients will have higher survival rates. Although there might be some other factors which affect the survival rate, the kind of treatment available based on existing health and therapeutic facilities, is very important as well. The aim of this study was to explore the best type of treatment in colorectal cancer patients.Methods: The data of 335 patients with CRC in Kurdistan province were collected using population-based cancer registration system from first of March 2009 to 2014. Demographic and clinical- pathologic data of the patients were gathered through their medical and pathology records and going to the door of their houses. The cancer-specific survival rate were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curve, log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The data was analyzed using Stata 12 software. Results: One-year, three-year and five-year survival rates were %87, %57 and %33 respectively. The median of survival was 42.6 months. The five-year survival rate for those patients who had received both surgical and chemotherapy treatments was %55.8. There was less mortality rate among the patients who had received both surgical and chemotherapy treatments compared to those who had not received any treatment (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.24-0.93).Conclusion: When CRC patients are treated using both surgical and chemotherapy treatments, they will have higher survival rate. Therefore, it is suggested to use both treatments for CRC patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document