scholarly journals Stable disease after high dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) immunotherapy: observations on long term survival and clinical benefit of additional HD IL-2

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. P88
Author(s):  
Howard L Kaufman ◽  
Sandra Aung ◽  
Michael Morse ◽  
Michael Wong ◽  
James Lowder ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22) ◽  
pp. 3740-3749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsila Zuckerman ◽  
Ron Ram ◽  
Luiza Akria ◽  
Maya Koren-Michowitz ◽  
Ron Hoffman ◽  
...  

Key Points The majority of older adults or unfit acute leukemia patients are not offered intensive therapy, resulting in dismal long-term survival. A novel cytarabine prodrug BST-236 enables delivery of high-dose cytarabine and appears to be safe and efficacious in these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 2056-2067
Author(s):  
Brian K. Flesner ◽  
Gary W. Wood ◽  
Pamela Gayheart‐Walsten ◽  
F. Lynn Sonderegger ◽  
Carolyn J. Henry ◽  
...  

Head & Neck ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Fakhry ◽  
Gopal Bajaj ◽  
Nafi Aygun ◽  
William Westra ◽  
Maura Gillison

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2168-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Terezakis ◽  
Lisa Morikawa ◽  
Abraham Wu ◽  
Zhigang Zhang ◽  
Weiji Shi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3094-3094
Author(s):  
David C. Seldin ◽  
Martha Skinner ◽  
Betul Oran ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
Kathleen T. Finn ◽  
...  

Abstract AL amyloidosis is a plasma cell dyscrasia in which clonal immunoglobulin light chains misfold and are deposited in tissues, leading to organ failure in untreated patients, with median survival of only ~1 year. Oral melphalan and prednisone is minimally effective for the disease, with an increase in median survival to ~1.5 years, and a low rate of hematologic complete responses (CRs). Twelve years ago, we began treating patients with AL amyloidosis with HDM/SCT. In the plasma cell malignancy multiple myeloma, this approach produces hematologic CRs and improves survival, but is not curative, as all patients eventually relapse. In AL amyloidosis, the relapse rate and long-term survival have not been studied, but early results are promising, with most centers reporting CR rates of ~40% and excellent survival in responding patients. To address the durability and long-term results of treatment with HDM/SCT, here we report on the outcome for AL amyloidosis patients treated at Boston Medical Center with HDM/SCT >10 years ago. The first autologous transplant took place on July 18, 1994 in two years, by July 18, 1996, 43 patients with AL amyloidosis without myeloma or other hematologic disease had been treated with HDM/SCT, receiving 100–200 mg/m2 melphalan depending upon age and protocol. Of the 43 patients treated in this 2 yr period, 76% of the patients were male, 81% had a lambda monoclonal disease, and their median age was 52 (range, 29–71). In these first 43 patients, the 100 day peri-transplant mortality rate was 16%. Nineteen of the 43 patients (44%) achieved a hematologic CR after treatment. In annual followup, 4 of 19 patients (21%) eventually relapsed. Fourteen of 43 patients (33%) are still alive; 12 of 19 patients who achieved a CR (63%) are still alive, while only 2 of 34 patients who did not (6%) are still alive. Although there were fewer (8) patients with kappa clonal disease, they had a better outcome, with an 87% CR rate vs. 34% for lambda (P=0.006); 75% of the kappa patients are still alive, vs. 23% of the lambda patients (P=0.005). The median survival of all 43 patients is 4.7 years. Thus, treatment of AL amyloidosis patients with HDM/SCT produces a high CR rate that is durable and is associated with excellent 10 year survival, particularly for those patients achieving a hematologic CR and for patients with kappa clonal disease. Ongoing clinical trials of HDM/SCT, along with strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality and to improve the CR rate, incorporating additional cycles of HDM/SCT or new anti-plasma cell agents, appear to be well-justified by these results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2585-2585
Author(s):  
Louis Everest ◽  
Monica Shah ◽  
Kelvin K. Chan

2585 Background: Recently, anti-cancer agents have generated excitement due to their capacity to preserve long-term survival in some patients, represented by a “tail of the survival curve”. However, as traditional measures of clinical benefit may not accurately capture long-term survival, amendments to various valuation frameworks have been proposed to capture this benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine how frequently immune checkpoint inhibitor vs. non-immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-cancer agents, displayed trends of long-term survival, as defined by the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF) and European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS), as well as to analyze the degree of agreement between ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Methods: Anti-cancer agents from phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cited for clinical efficacy evidence in drug approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between January 2011 and March 2018 were identified. Data required for ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS were extracted. Difference in how often long-term survival bonuses were awarded were calculated in all RCTs, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitor and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor RCTs individually. Cohen’s Kappa statistic was calculated to evaluate agreement between ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS. Results: 100 RCTs were analyzed. RCTs were awarded ASCO-VF version 2 (v2) “tail of the curve” bonuses more often than ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) “immunotherapy-triggered” long-term plateau adjustments (45% vs. 2.6%). Comparing to non-immune checkpoint inhibitor RCTs, immune checkpoint inhibitor RCTs were not more likely to receive ASCO-VF v2 bonuses/ESMO-MCBS v1.1 adjustments (p = 0.32/ p = 0.40). Long-term survival agreement between the two frameworks was poor (kappa: 0.01; p = 0.50). Conclusions: The ASCO-VF v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 may require additional refinement in order to accurately capture the benefit of long-term survival or immune checkpoint inhibitor and non-immune checkpoint inhibitor agents may not preserve substantially different long-term survival populations.


2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S27-S28
Author(s):  
F. Duprez ◽  
I. Madani ◽  
D. Berwouts ◽  
K. Bonte ◽  
T. Boterberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document