Effectiveness of brief psychotherapy in the treatment of common mental disorders in public mental health centers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Fernandez Méndez ◽  
Marco Antonio Luengo Castro
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Brief Psychotherapy ◽  
Mental Health Centers

scholarly journals The epidemiological burden of major psychiatric disorders

2018 ◽  
pp. 73-84
Author(s):  
Jennifer Dykxhoorn ◽  
James B. Kirkbride
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Psychiatric Disorders ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Premature Mortality ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Key Issues

Psychiatric disorders, including common mental disorders, schizophrenia, and suicide, contribute substantially to the global burden of disease in terms of both morbidity and premature mortality, making them an important issue for public mental health. Epidemiological tools quantifying the burden of psychiatric disorders are important in furthering our understanding of psychiatric disorders and informing decision-making. In this chapter, we review major epidemiological studies from the past 30 years of psychiatric epidemiology to provide an overview of the burden of common mental disorders (depression and anxiety), psychotic disorders (schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders), and suicide. We also describe how the incidence and prevalence of these disorder vary by person and place, with a particular focus on the patterns of psychiatric disorders by ethnicity. Finally, we discuss the challenge of applying epidemiological evidence to public health, highlighting key issues facing public health professionals, researchers, and policymakers working in public mental health.

scholarly journals Predictors of high and low mental well-being and common mental disorders: findings from a Danish population-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziggi Ivan Santini ◽  
Sarah Stougaard ◽  
Ai Koyanagi ◽  
Annette Kjær Ersbøll ◽  
Line Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Lower Socioeconomic ◽  
Patient Health ◽  
Mental Well Being ◽  
Different Levels

Abstract Background Mental well-being is fundamental for a good life. Previous literature has examined the predictors of mental disorders and continuous measures of positive mental health. Very few studies have specifically focused on the predictors of different levels of mental well-being, but those that have suggest a different picture. This study aimed to compare socioeconomic and relational/recreational behaviour predictors of different levels of mental well-being as well as common mental disorders (CMDs). Methods Data from 3508 adults aged 16+ years old from the Danish Mental Health and Well-Being Survey 2016 were linked to Danish national register-based data. Mental well-being was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, and information on CMDs was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4). Regression analyses were conducted to estimate the predictors of low and high mental well-being compared to moderate mental well-being and also of CMDs. Results Lower socioeconomic position (education, income and employment status) was associated with increased odds of low mental well-being and the presence of CMDs, but did not significantly predict high mental well-being. Relational/recreational behaviours (informal and formal social participation, social support and recreational activity) were associated with reduced odds of low mental well-being and CMDs, and also with increased odds of high mental well-being. Conclusions Socioeconomic predictors of high mental well-being do not mirror those of low mental well-being and CMDs, whereas relational/recreational predictors of high mental well-being do mirror those of low mental well-being and CMDs. These findings have important implications for public mental health strategies.

scholarly journals A Multi-Site Study of Mental Disorders in the Mozambican Health Care System

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Gouveia ◽  
Kathryn Lovero ◽  
Wilza Fumo ◽  
Afonso Mazine Tiago Fumo ◽  
Palmira Dos Santos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Public Mental Health

Abstract BackgroundIn Mozambique, human and financial resources for public mental health services are extremely limited. Understanding the mental health needs of those seeking healthcare can inform efficient targeting of mental health services. We examined if the frequency of mental disorders in a health facility varied based on the level of specialization of such facility, from primary care without mental health specialists (PrCMH-), to those with mental health specialists (PrCMH+) and tertiary care (TerC), where both inpatient and outpatient mental health services are available.MethodsParticipants were adults seeking health or mental health services at six facilities (2 PrCMH+, 3 PrCMH-, and 1 TerC) in the cities of Maputo and Nampula in Mozambique. Mental disorders were assessed by the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 4.0.0. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics and MINI diagnoses across the three types of health facilities. Multiple logistic regression models determined the likelihood that a person seeking services at each type of facility would have any mental disorder, common mental disorders (CMD), severe mental disorders (SMD), substance use disorders (SUD), and moderate-to-high suicide risk, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. ResultsOf the 612 total participants, 52.6% (n=322) were positive for at least one mental disorder: 37.1% were positive for CMD, 28.9% for SMD, 13.2% for SUD, and 10.5% had suicide risk. Presence of any mental disorder was highest in TerC (62.5%) and lowest in PrCMH- (48.4%). Adjusting for sociodemographic covariates, participants in PrCMH+ were significantly more likely to have SMD (OR: 1.85, 95%CI: 1.10-3.11) and SUD (OR: 2.79, 95%CI: 1.31-5.94) than participants in PrCMH-; participants in TerC were more likely to have CMD (OR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.01-2.87) and SUD (OR: 2.57, 95%CI: 1.14-5.79) than in PrCMH-. Suicide risk was the only condition that did not differ across facility types.ConclusionsAs anticipated, people with mental disorders were more likely to be cared for at facilities with mental health specialists. However, our study suggests there is a remarkably high frequency of mental disorders across different types of facilities within the Mozambican healthcare system. These results suggest a need to increase mental health services at the primary care level.

scholarly journals Specialized Outpatient: Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandad Sharifi ◽  
Ahmad Hajebi ◽  
Behzad Damar ◽  
Atefeh Mohammadjafari
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Service Planning ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Community Mental Health Centers ◽  
Severe Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Health Centers

Objective: The Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS) in 2011 has demonstrated that almost 1 out of 4 adult individuals suffer from psychiatric disorders; however, more than two-thirds are left unrecognized and untreated and many of the services have poor quality of care. In this paper we present our experience in developing and employing community-based mental health services through community mental health centers (CMHCs), which has been incorporated in Iran's comprehensive mental and social health services (the Seraj program). Method: The service model of the CMHCs was developed though an evidence-based service planning approach and was then incorporated as the specialized outpatient services model into the Seraj program in 2015. Results: The CMHCs in the Seraj program provide mental health care to patients with common mental and severe mental disorders in a defined catchment area. The services include the collaborative care, the aftercare, and day rehabilitation. The collaborative care model works with primary care providers in the health centers to provide detection and treatment of common mental illnesses. In the aftercare, services are offered to patients with severe mental disorders following discharge from the hospital and include telephone follow-ups and home visits. Day rehabilitation is mostly focused on providing psychoeducation and skill trainings. During the first 4 years of implementation in 2 pilot areas, more than 6200 patients (10% having severe mental disorders) received care at CMHCs. Conclusion: The main challenge of the implementation of the CMHC component in the Seraj program is to secure funds and employ skilled personnel. We need to incorporate Seraj in the existing national health system, and if successful, it can fill the treatment gap that has been so huge in the country.

The WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys

2009 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Aguilar-Gaxiola ◽  
J. Alonso ◽  
S. Chatterji ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
T. B. Üstün ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Health Policy ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
World Mental Health ◽  
Prevalence Estimates

SummaryThe paper presents an overview of the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative and summarizes recent WMH results regarding the prevalence and societal costs of mental disorders. The WMH surveys are representative community surveys that were carried out in 28 countries throughout the world aimed at providing information to mental health policy makers about the prevalence, burden, and unmet need for treatment of common mental disorders. Results show that mental disorders are commonly occurring in all participating countries. The inter-quartile range (IQR: 25th-75th percentiles) of lifetime DSM-IV disorder prevalence estimates (combining anxiety, mood, disruptive behavior, and substance disorders) is 18.1-36.1%. The IQR of 12-month prevalence estimates is 9.8-19.1%. Analysis of age-of-onset reports shows that many mental disorders begin in childhood-adolescence and have significant adverse effects on subsequent role transitions. Adult mental disorders are found in the WMH data to be associated with high levels of role impairment. Despite this burden, the majority of mental disorders go untreated. Although these results suggest that expansion of treatment could be cost-effective from both the employer perspective and the societal perspective, treatment effectiveness trials are needed to confirm this suspicion. The WMH results regarding impairments are being used to target several such interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document