scholarly journals Pain sensitivity in men who have never experienced a headache: an observer blinded case control study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isa Amalie Olofsson ◽  
Jeppe Hvedstrup ◽  
Katrine Falkenberg ◽  
Mona Ameri Chalmer ◽  
Henrik Winther Schytz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Headache affects 90–99% of the population. Based on the question “Do you think that you never ever in your whole life have had a headache?” 4% of the population say that they have never experienced a headache. The rarity of never having had a headache suggests that distinct biological and environmental factors may be at play. We hypothesized that people who have never experienced a headache had a lower general pain sensitivity than controls. Methods We included 99 male participants, 47 headache free participants and 52 controls, in an observer blinded nested case-control study. We investigated cold pain threshold and heat pain threshold using a standardized quantitative sensory testing protocol, pericranial tenderness with total tenderness score and pain tolerance with the cold pressor test. Differences between the two groups were assessed with the unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Results There was no difference in age, weight or mean arterial pressure between headache free participants and controls. We found no difference in pain detection threshold, pericranial tenderness or pain tolerance between headache free participants and controls. Conclusion Our study clearly shows that freedom from headache is not caused by a lower general pain sensitivity. The results support the hypothesis that headache is caused by specific mechanisms, which are present in the primary headache disorders, rather than by a decreased general sensitivity to painful stimuli. Trial registration Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04217616), 3rd January 2020, retrospectively registered.

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. T61-T74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel D. Greenspan ◽  
Gary D. Slade ◽  
Eric Bair ◽  
Ronald Dubner ◽  
Roger B. Fillingim ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e029194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingsheng Sun ◽  
Siyuan Tao ◽  
Guoyan Geng ◽  
Jieru Peng ◽  
Xingsha Ma ◽  
...  

IntroductionNeck pain (NP) is a common condition that can be effectively treated by acupuncture. However, several treatment point prescriptions (ie, local acupoints, distal acupoints, and sensitised acupoints) may be used. The present study aims to identify the types of sensitisation and the distribution of sensitised points in patients with NP, to analyse the cut-off values and sensitisation rate for acupoint sensitisation, and to summarise the dominant forms of optimally sensitised points. This information will be helpful when choosing the optimal points to treat NP.Methods and analysisThis multicentre, matched, case–control study will enrol 224 patients with NP, and 224 age-matched and sex-matched healthy participants as controls. Body surface temperature, mechanical pain threshold, pressure pain threshold and skin resistance will be assessed at the 15 acupoints most frequently used to treat NP, and at the five body regions in which pain occurs most frequently. Hypothesis testing will be used to compare the differences in variables between cases and controls. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis will be used to explore the cut-off values of the sensitive states of heat, pain and electrical resistance, which indicate sensitisation of the acupoint. The optimal points will be comprehensively determined by the acupoint sensitisation rate and OR.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval of this study has been granted by the Research Ethical Committee of the Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (ID: 2018 KL-016). The outcomes of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.Trial registrationChiCTR1800016220.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan El-Tumi ◽  
Mark I. Johnson ◽  
Osama A. Tashani

Background: Ageing is associated with alterations of the structure and function of somatosensory tissue that can impact on pain perception. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between age and pain sensitivity responses to noxious thermal and mechanical stimuli in healthy adults. Methods: 56 unpaid volunteers (28 women) aged between 20 and 55 years were categorised according to age into one of seven possible groups. The following measurements were taken: thermal detection thresholds, heat pain threshold and tolerance using a TSA-II NeuroSensory Analyzer; pressure pain threshold using a handheld electronic pressure algometer; and cold pressor pain threshold, tolerance, intensity and unpleasantness. Results: There was a positive correlation between heat pain tolerance and age (r = 0.228, P = 0.046), but no statistically significant differences between age groups for cold or warm detection thresholds, or heat pain threshold or tolerance. Forward regression found increasing age to be a predictor of increased pressure pain threshold (B = 0.378, P = 0.002), and sex/gender to be a predictor of cold pressor pain tolerance, with women having lower tolerance than men (B = -0.332, P = 0.006). Conclusion: The findings of this experimental study provide further evidence that pressure pain threshold increases with age and that women have lower thresholds and tolerances to innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli. Significance: The findings demonstrate that variations in pain sensitivity response to experimental stimuli in adults vary according to stimulus modality, age and sex and gender.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 967-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Nascimento Rebelatto ◽  
Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín ◽  
João Flavio Guimarães ◽  
Tania Fatima Salvini

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
Amanda M Brandow ◽  
Rebecca Farley ◽  
Julie A. Panepinto

Abstract Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) display hypersensitivity to thermal and/or mechanical stimuli compared to healthy controls when assessed with quantitative sensory testing (QST) suggesting impaired pain sensitivity. Impaired pain sensitivity is present when a defined stimulus (cold, heat, mechanical) produces exaggerated pain in a patient compared to healthy controls and suggests pain processing abnormalities in the peripheral and/or central nervous system. Existing studies report significant differences in mean/median thermal and/or mechanical pain thresholds between SCD patients and healthy controls. However, for clinical purposes it is important to understand if an individual patient meets criteria for impaired pain sensitivity. To date, thresholds above or below which a patient is defined as having impaired pain sensitivity have not been established in pediatric SCD patients. We sought to: 1) define thresholds for impaired cold, heat, and mechanical pain sensitivity in SCD patients ages ≥7 years and 2) determine the proportion of SCD patients meeting criteria for impaired pain sensitivity with each testing modality. Our secondary objective was to compare age, gender and prior history of pain between patients with and without impaired pain sensitivity. We conducted a cross-sectional study of SCD patients and healthy African American controls ages ≥ 7 years. Using QST we assessed cold, heat, and mechanical pain thresholds via the method of limits on the thenar eminence of the non-dominant hand and lateral dorsum of foot (randomized). Our primary outcome was threshold for impaired pain sensitivity defined as: 1) cold pain threshold that was one standard deviation (SD) above median cold pain threshold in the control group; 2) heat pain threshold that was one SD below median heat pain threshold in the control group; 3) mechanical pain threshold that was one SD below median mechanical pain threshold in the control group. Data were skewed so bootstrap resampling was used to obtain the 95% CI for the median that is congruent with the SD of the median. Mann-Whitney Test and Pearson Chi-square were used to compare age, gender, and prior history of pain (total number of lifetime emergency department visits and/or hospitalizations) between those with and without impaired pain sensitivity. A total of 55 SCD patients and 57 African American controls completed QST. There were no differences in mean±SD age (15.4±6.3 vs. 16.3±10.2 yrs, p=0.59) or gender (60% vs. 56% female, p=0.68) between groups. SCD genotypes were: 67% SS, 18% SC, 11% Sβ+ thal, 4% other. Table 1 displays thresholds for impaired pain sensitivity and proportions of SCD patients meeting criteria for impaired pain sensitivity. We found 21.8% (n=12) of SCD patients had impaired pain sensitivity with all 3 testing modalities and the majority (81.8%, n=45) had impaired pain sensitivity with one or more testing modalities. Only 18.2% (n=20) had no evidence of impaired pain sensitivity. There was no difference in median age, gender, or median number of pain encounters between those with and without impaired pain sensitivity (15 (IQR 10.5-19) vs. 13.5 yrs (IQR 11-21.5), p=0.939; 60% female in both groups; number of pain encounters: 9 (IQR 4-23.5) vs. 3 (IQR 0.25-19.8), p=0.132). Determining a threshold for impaired pain sensitivity is clinically meaningful. Using QST data, we established thresholds for impaired cold, heat and mechanical pain sensitivity. Based on these thresholds, almost a quarter of SCD patients were impaired in all 3 modalities tested and the majority were impaired in at least one modality. Impaired cold pain sensitivity was the most common finding supporting epidemiological data that increased numbers of pain events are associated with colder temperatures. If used clinically, QST could serve as a screening tool to phenotype SCD pain, guide further evaluation of the etiology of pain, guide treatment decisions, or serve as an outcome for an intervention aimed at altering pain sensitivity. Table 1. Thresholds for Impaired Pain Sensitivity and Proportion of SCD Patients with Impaired Pain Sensitivity (n=55) Threshold* Proportion Impaired Hand Cold Pain Threshold >17.01ºC 63.6% (n=35) Heat Pain Threshold <43.91ºC 60% (n=33) Mechanical Pain Threshold <4.42 g 41.8% (n=23) Foot Cold Pain Threshold >21.75ºC 58.2% (n=32) Heat Pain Threshold <42.39ºC 40% (n=22) Mechanical Pain Threshold <7.29 g 54.5% (n=30) *1 SD from Control Median Disclosures Brandow: NIH, ASH: Research Funding. Panepinto:HRSA, NIH: Research Funding; NKT Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document