scholarly journals Tissue-specific gene expression and protein abundance patterns are associated with fractionation bias in maize

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse R. Walsh ◽  
Margaret R. Woodhouse ◽  
Carson M. Andorf ◽  
Taner Z. Sen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Agronomic Traits ◽  
Functional Divergence ◽  
Duplication Event ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Protein Abundance ◽  
Genome Duplication Event ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Gene Functions

Abstract Background Maize experienced a whole-genome duplication event approximately 5 to 12 million years ago. Because this event occurred after speciation from sorghum, the pre-duplication subgenomes can be partially reconstructed by mapping syntenic regions to the sorghum chromosomes. During evolution, maize has had uneven gene loss between each ancient subgenome. Fractionation and divergence between these genomes continue today, constantly changing genetic make-up and phenotypes and influencing agronomic traits. Results Here we regenerate the subgenome reconstructions for the most recent maize reference genome assembly. Based on both expression and abundance data for homeologous gene pairs across multiple tissues, we observed functional divergence of genes across subgenomes. Although the genes in the larger maize subgenome are often expressing more highly than their homeologs in the smaller subgenome, we observed cases where homeolog expression dominance switches in different tissues. We demonstrate for the first time that protein abundances are higher in the larger subgenome, but they also show tissue-specific dominance, a pattern similar to RNA expression dominance. We also find that pollen expression is uniquely decoupled from protein abundance. Conclusion Our study shows that the larger subgenome has a greater range of functional assignments and that there is a relative lack of overlap between the subgenomes in terms of gene functions than would be suggested by similar patterns of gene expression and protein abundance. Our study also revealed that some reactions are catalyzed uniquely by the larger and smaller subgenomes. The tissue-specific, nonequivalent expression-level dominance pattern observed here implies a change in regulatory control which favors differentiated selective pressure on the retained duplicates leading to eventual change in gene functions.

scholarly journals Global assessment of organ specific basal gene expression over a diurnal cycle with analyses of gene copies exhibiting cyclic expression patterns

BMC Genomics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Lu ◽  
Mikki Boswell ◽  
William Boswell ◽  
Raquel Ybanez Salinas ◽  
Markita Savage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Genome Duplication ◽  
Functional Divergence ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Duplication Event ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Genome Duplication Event ◽  
Gene Copies ◽  
Cyclic Expression

Abstract Background Studying functional divergences between paralogs that originated from genome duplication is a significant topic in investigating molecular evolution. Genes that exhibit basal level cyclic expression patterns including circadian and light responsive genes are important physiological regulators. Temporal shifts in basal gene expression patterns are important factors to be considered when studying genetic functions. However, adequate efforts have not been applied to studying basal gene expression variation on a global scale to establish transcriptional activity baselines for each organ. Furthermore, the investigation of cyclic expression pattern comparisons between genome duplication created paralogs, and potential functional divergence between them has been neglected. To address these questions, we utilized a teleost fish species, Xiphophorus maculatus, and profiled gene expression within 9 organs at 3-h intervals throughout a 24-h diurnal period. Results Our results showed 1.3–21.9% of genes in different organs exhibited cyclic expression patterns, with eye showing the highest fraction of cycling genes while gonads yielded the lowest. A majority of the duplicated gene pairs exhibited divergences in their basal level expression patterns wherein only one paralog exhibited an oscillating expression pattern, or both paralogs exhibit oscillating expression patterns, but each gene duplicate showed a different peak expression time, and/or in different organs. Conclusions These observations suggest cyclic genes experienced significant sub-, neo-, or non-functionalization following the teleost genome duplication event. In addition, we developed a customized, web-accessible, gene expression browser to facilitate data mining and data visualization for the scientific community.

scholarly journals Methylation of the Cyclin A1 Promoter Correlates with Gene Silencing in Somatic Cell Lines, while Tissue-Specific Expression of Cyclin A1 Is Methylation Independent

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3316-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Müller ◽  
Carol Readhead ◽  
Sven Diederichs ◽  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Rong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Cpg Island ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cyclin A1 ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression

ABSTRACT Gene expression in mammalian organisms is regulated at multiple levels, including DNA accessibility for transcription factors and chromatin structure. Methylation of CpG dinucleotides is thought to be involved in imprinting and in the pathogenesis of cancer. However, the relevance of methylation for directing tissue-specific gene expression is highly controversial. The cyclin A1 gene is expressed in very few tissues, with high levels restricted to spermatogenesis and leukemic blasts. Here, we show that methylation of the CpG island of the human cyclin A1 promoter was correlated with nonexpression in cell lines, and the methyl-CpG binding protein MeCP2 suppressed transcription from the methylated cyclin A1 promoter. Repression could be relieved by trichostatin A. Silencing of a cyclin A1 promoter-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgene in stable transfected MG63 osteosarcoma cells was also closely associated with de novo promoter methylation. Cyclin A1 could be strongly induced in nonexpressing cell lines by trichostatin A but not by 5-aza-cytidine. The cyclin A1 promoter-EGFP construct directed tissue-specific expression in male germ cells of transgenic mice. Expression in the testes of these mice was independent of promoter methylation, and even strong promoter methylation did not suppress promoter activity. MeCP2 expression was notably absent in EGFP-expressing cells. Transcription from the transgenic cyclin A1 promoter was repressed in most organs outside the testis, even when the promoter was not methylated. These data show the association of methylation with silencing of the cyclin A1 gene in cancer cell lines. However, appropriate tissue-specific repression of the cyclin A1 promoter occurs independently of CpG methylation.

Histones: genetic diversity and tissue-specific gene expression

1997 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Doenecke ◽  
W. Albig ◽  
C. Bode ◽  
B. Drabent ◽  
K. Franke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Genetic Diversity ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression

scholarly journals Blood—Brain Barrier Genomics

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Yi Li ◽  
Ruben J. Boado ◽  
William M. Pardridge
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Blood Brain Barrier ◽  
Brain Barrier ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Microvascular Endothelium ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Blood Brain ◽  
Tester Cdna

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is formed by the brain microvascular endothelium, and the unique transport properties of the BBB are derived from tissue-specific gene expression within this cell. The current studies developed a gene microarray approach specific for the BBB by purifying the initial mRNA from isolated rat brain capillaries to generate tester cDNA. A polymerase chain reaction–based subtraction cloning method, suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH), was used, and the BBB cDNA was subtracted with driver cDNA produced from mRNA isolated from rat liver and kidney. Screening 5% of the subtracted tester cDNA resulted in identification of 50 gene products and more than 80% of those were selectively expressed at the BBB; these included novel gene sequences not found in existing databases, ESTs, and known genes that were not known to be selectively expressed at the BBB. Genes in the latter category include tissue plasminogen activator, insulin-like growth factor-2, PC-3 gene product, myelin basic protein, regulator of G protein signaling 5, utrophin, IκB, connexin-45, the class I major histocompatibility complex, the rat homologue of the transcription factors hbrm or EZH1, and organic anion transporting polypeptide type 2. Knowledge of tissue-specific gene expression at the BBB could lead to new targets for brain drug delivery and could elucidate mechanisms of brain pathology at the microvascular level.

scholarly journals Classification of topological domains based on gene expression and regulation

Genome ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Zhao ◽  
Hongbo Shi ◽  
Nadav Ahituv
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Ontology ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Expression And Regulation ◽  
Genome Chromosome ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Topological Domains ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Mouse Tissues

Tissue-specific gene expression is thought to be one of the major forces shaping mammalian gene order. A recent study that used whole-genome chromosome conformation assays has shown that the mammalian genome is divided into specific topological domains that are shared between different tissues and organisms. Here, we wanted to assess whether gene expression and regulation are involved in shaping these domains and can be used to classify them. We analyzed gene expression and regulation levels in these domains by using RNA-seq and enhancer-associated ChIP-seq datasets for 17 different mouse tissues. We found 162 domains that are active (high gene expression and regulation) in all 17 tissues. These domains are significantly shorter, contain less repeats, and have more housekeeping genes. In contrast, we found 29 domains that are inactive (low gene expression and regulation) in all analyzed tissues and are significantly longer, have more repeats, and gene deserts. Tissue-specific active domains showed some correlation with tissue-type and gene ontology. Domain temporal gene regulation and expression differences also displayed some gene ontology terms fitting their temporal function. Combined, our results provide a catalog of shared and tissue-specific topological domains and suggest that gene expression and regulation could have a role in shaping them.

scholarly journals A new function for methyl CpG: Creating a C/EBPα binding site & mediating tissue‐specific gene expression

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghunath Chatterjee ◽  
Vikas Rishi ◽  
Julian Rozenberg ◽  
Paramita Bhattacharya ◽  
Kimberly Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression

scholarly journals Tissue-specific Gene Expression in Rat Hearts and Aortas in a Model of Vascular Nitrate Tolerance

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamás Csont ◽  
Zsolt Murlasits ◽  
Dalma Ménesi ◽  
János Z. Kelemen ◽  
Péter Bencsik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Nitrate Tolerance ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Rat Hearts
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document