scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence and severity of acute appendicitis: a comparison between 2019 and 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jochem C. G. Scheijmans ◽  
◽  
Alexander B. J. Borgstein ◽  
Carl A. J. Puylaert ◽  
Wouter J. Bom ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in the number of patients presenting with acute appendicitis was observed. It is unclear whether this caused a shift towards more complicated cases of acute appendicitis. We compared a cohort of patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic with a 2019 control cohort. Methods We retrospectively included consecutive adult patients in 21 hospitals presenting with acute appendicitis in a COVID-19 pandemic cohort (March 15 – April 30, 2020) and a control cohort (March 15 – April 30, 2019). Primary outcome was the proportion of complicated appendicitis. Secondary outcomes included prehospital delay, appendicitis severity, and postoperative complication rates. Results The COVID-19 pandemic cohort comprised 607 patients vs. 642 patients in the control cohort. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a higher proportion of complicated appendicitis was seen (46.9% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.003). More patients had symptoms exceeding 24 h (61.1% vs. 56.2%, respectively, p = 0.048). After correction for prehospital delay, presentation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was still associated with a higher rate of complicated appendicitis. Patients presenting > 24 h after onset of symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic were older (median 45 vs. 37 years; p = 0.001) and had more postoperative complications (15.3% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002). Conclusions Although the incidence of acute appendicitis was slightly lower during the first wave of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, more patients presented with a delay and with complicated appendicitis than in a corresponding period in 2019. Spontaneous resolution of mild appendicitis may have contributed to the increased proportion of patients with complicated appendicitis. Late presenting patients were older and experienced more postoperative complications compared to the control cohort.

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 1234
Author(s):  
Idilė Vansevičienė ◽  
Danielė Bučinskaitė ◽  
Dalius Malcius ◽  
Aušra Lukošiūtė-Urbonienė ◽  
Mindaugas Beržanskis ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Our aim was to see if the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase of time until diagnosis, operation, and time spent in Emergency room (ER), and if it resulted in more cases of complicated appendicitis and complication rates in children. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the Pediatric Surgery Department with acute appendicitis during a 4-month period of the first COVID-19 pandemic and compared it to the previous year data—the same 4-month period in 2019. Results: During the pandemic, the time spent in the ER until arriving at the department increased significantly 2.85 vs. 0.98 h p < 0.001, and the time spent in the department until the operation 5.31 vs. 2.66 h, p = 0.03. However, the time from the beginning of symptoms till ER, operation time and the length of stay at the hospital, as well as the overall time until operation did not differ and did not result in an increase of complicated appendicitis cases or postoperative complications. Conclusions: The COVID-19-implemented quarantine led to an increase of the time from the emergency room to the operating room by 4 h. This delay did not result in a higher rate of complicated appendicitis and complication rates, allowing for surgery to be postponed to daytime hours if needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
V. G. Svarich ◽  
I. M. Kagantsov ◽  
V. A. Svarich ◽  
E. G. Perevozchikov

Introduction. The first publications about acute appendicitis in the conditions of the new COVID-19 coronavirus infection have appeared. Most authors point to the increased time of seeking medical help in such patients and an increase in the level of postoperative complications.Material and methods. A retrospective study of 192 case histories of patients aged 3 to 17 years with various forms of acute appendicitis who were treated in the surgical Department of the Republican children’s clinical hospital in the period from 2019 to November 2020 was conducted. Children operated on during 2019 before the start of the new coronavirus pandemic were included in the first group (n = 114). Children operated on in 2020 after the development of a new coronavirus pandemic were included in the second group (n = 78).Results. The age of patients in both groups compared did not differ significantly. The course of the disease was within the average accumulated indicators and the terms of hospitalization did not change significantly. According to our observations, the time of admission to the surgical hospital from the time of the disease in the pre-coronavirus period and during it also did not differ significantly, which indicates that the same availability of medical care remains even during the epidemic. Our study also showed that the number of requests for complicated appendicitis in children during the COVID-19 epidemic even decreased, which ultimately led to a decrease in the level of postoperative complications. The study did not establish a significant difference between the main results of treatment of children with acute appendicitis before and during the new COVID-19 coronavirus infection. Only the level of postoperative complications significantly decreased in patients operated during the COVID-19 epidemic, which is associated with a lower admission of children with complicated appendicitis.Conclusion. With the onset of the pandemic, the organization of medical care for the child population with acute pathology in the Komi Republic did not change and did not have any restrictions, which made it possible to maintain the timely provision of surgical care to children with acute appendicitis at the proper level.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Sartori ◽  
Mauro Podda ◽  
Emanuele Botteri ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Alberto Arezzo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To determine on a national basis the surgical activity regarding appendectomies during the first Italian wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Major surgical societies advised using non-operative management of appendicitis and suggested against laparoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Multicenter, observational study investigating the outcomes of patients undergoing appendectomy in the two months of March-April 2019 vs. March-April 2020. The primary outcome was the number of appendectomies performed during each of the two months, classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score. Secondary outcomes were the type of surgical technique employed (laparoscopic vs. open), and the complication rates. Results 1541 patients with acute appendicitis underwent surgery during the two study periods. 1337 (86.8%) patients met the study inclusion criteria. 546 (40.8%) patients underwent surgery for acute appendicitis in 2020 and 791 (59.8%) in 2019. Patients with complicated appendicitis operated in 2019 were 76 (9.6%) vs. 87 (15.9%) in 2020 (p = 0.001). An increase in the number of post-operative complications was found in 2020 (15.9%) compared to 2019 (9.6%) (p < 0.001). The following determinants increased the likelihood of complication occurrence: undergoing surgery during 2020 (+ 67%), having a unit AAST (+ 26%) increase, having waited for surgery > 24 h (+ 58%), being the surgeon aged > 40 years (+ 47%), undergoing open surgery (+ 112%) and being converted to open surgery (+ 166%). Conclusions In Italian hospitals, in March and April 2020, the number of appendectomies has drastically dropped. Patients undergoing surgery during the first pandemic wave were more frequently affected by more severe appendicitis than the previous year's timeframe and a higher complication rate was reported. Trial registration: ResearchRegistry ID 5789.


Author(s):  
Alberto Sartori ◽  
Mauro Podda ◽  
Emanuele Botteri ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Ferdinando Agresta ◽  
...  

AbstractMajor surgical societies advised using non-operative management of appendicitis and suggested against laparoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis is that a significant reduction in the number of emergent appendectomies was observed during the pandemic, restricted to complex cases. The study aimed to analyse emergent surgical appendectomies during pandemic on a national basis and compare it to the same period of the previous year. This is a multicentre, retrospective, observational study investigating the outcomes of patients undergoing emergent appendectomy in March–April 2019 vs March–April 2020. The primary outcome was the number of appendectomies performed, classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score. Secondary outcomes were the type of surgical technique employed (laparoscopic vs open) and the complication rates. One thousand five hundred forty one patients with acute appendicitis underwent surgery during the two study periods. 1337 (86.8%) patients met the inclusion criteria: 546 (40.8%) patients underwent surgery for acute appendicitis in 2020 and 791 (59.2%) in 2019. According to AAST, patients with complicated appendicitis operated in 2019 were 30.3% vs 39.9% in 2020 (p = 0.001). We observed an increase in the number of post-operative complications in 2020 (15.9%) compared to 2019 (9.6%) (p < 0.001). The following determinants increased the likelihood of complication occurrence: undergoing surgery during 2020 (+ 67%), the increase of a unit in the AAST score (+ 26%), surgery performed > 24 h after admission (+ 58%), open surgery (+ 112%) and conversion to open surgery (+ 166%). In Italian hospitals, in March and April 2020, the number of appendectomies has drastically dropped. During the first pandemic wave, patients undergoing surgery were more frequently affected by more severe appendicitis than the previous year's timeframe and experienced a higher number of complications. Trial registration number and date: Research Registry ID 5789, May 7th, 2020


Author(s):  
Carlos Delgado-Miguel ◽  
Antonio J. Muñoz-Serrano ◽  
Miriam Miguel-Ferrero ◽  
María De Ceano-Vivas ◽  
Cristina Calvo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Since home confinement for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began, pediatric visits to the emergency department (ED) have decreased, including consultation for abdominal pain. Our aim is to investigate the incidence of complicated acute appendicitis (AA; peritonitis or appendicular mass) during confinement for COVID-19 pandemic and to compare it with the previous 5 years. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was performed in children with AA who underwent surgery between March 9 and April 13 from 2015 to 2020; patients were divided into six groups according to the year of surgery. We analyzed demographic variables, time from onset of symptoms, mean hospital stay, cumulative incidence, and incidence rate of complicated appendicitis. Results A total of 168 patients were included with no differences in the number of patients, gender, and age between groups. Patients in 2020 (COVID-19 group) presented longer symptom progression time (46.8 hours; p = 0.046), higher rate of complicated appendicitis (48.4%; p = 0.004), longer mean hospital stay (4.9 days; p < 0.001), increased cumulative incidence (8.27 cases per 100,000 children per 0.1 years; p < 0.001), and increased incidence rate of complicated appendicitis (83 cases per 100,000 children; p < 0.001) when compared with other groups. Conclusion Delayed ED visit of children with AA during home confinement lead to an increased rate of complicated appendicitis. It is crucial to make parents aware of the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain.


2020 ◽  
pp. 084653712091426
Author(s):  
Craig R. Gibson ◽  
Afsaneh Amirabadi ◽  
Simal Goman ◽  
Nicholas C. Armstrong ◽  
Jacob C. Langer ◽  
...  

Purpose: To establish the efficacy of once-per-day intracavitary tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in the treatment of pediatric intra-abdominal abscesses. Methods: A single-center prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of the use of intracavitary tPA in abdominal abscesses in children. Patients were randomized to either tPA-treatment or saline-treatment groups. Primary outcome was drainage catheter dwell (hours). Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, times to discharge, clinical and sonographic resolution, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Twenty-eight children were randomized to either group (n = 14 each). Demographics between groups were not significantly different (age P = .28; weight P = .40; gender P = .44). There were significantly more abscesses in the tPA-treated group ( P = .03). Abscesses were secondary to perforated appendicitis (n = 25) or postappendectomy (n = 3). Thirty-four abscesses were drained, 4 aspirated, 3 neither drained/aspirated. There was no significant difference in number of drains ( P = .14), drain size ( P = .19), primary outcome ( P = .077), or secondary outcomes found. No procedural or intervention drug-related AEs occurred. No patient in the saline-treated group required to be switched/treated with tPA. Conclusion: No significant difference in the length of catheter dwell time, procedure time to discharge, or time to resolution was found. Intracavitary tPA was not associated with morbidity or mortality. The results neither support nor negate routine use of tPA in the drainage of intra-abdominal abscess in children. It is possible that a multicentre study with a larger number of patients may answer this question more definitively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaž Križaj ◽  
Erik Štrumbelj ◽  
Stanislav Mahne

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has been gaining ground as a gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis. For complex inflammation there is no common opinion. A higher conversion rate, longer operative time, higher incidence of abscess formation and longer hospitalization are being reported. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic modalities, treatment and postoperative complications in uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.Methods: In our institution laparoscopic appendectomy is the method of choice for the treatment of every type of appendicitis. In our retrospective analysis, all patients with acute appendicitis operated on in the years 2013 and 2014 were included. Among 273 patients, 19 were excluded due to primary open procedure and one who underwent revision surgery for other disease and had appendectomy performed. In 253 patients we observed the proportion of the postoperative complications in uncomplicated and complicated cases with respect to patients’ age, period of the year, duration of hospital stay, diagnostic modalities, drainage of the abdominal cavity, conversion rate and stump closure.Results: The analysis showed a steep increase of complicated appendicitis in elderly population, but there were no significant differences regarding period of the year (χ2 test, p = 0.158). The hospital stay was longer in complicated cases (5.94 days v. 3.049 days). When a preoperative CT scan was performed, cases were more often complicated (CT 0.654, no CT 0.229; χ2 test, p < 0.001), as was the proportion of drain insertions during surgery (0.5490 v. 0.065; χ2 test, p < 0.001). The proportion of clips for the stump closure was higher in the uncomplicated group (0.717 v. 0.521; χ2 test, p = 0.005). The rate of early postoperative complications and conversion rate revealed no significant difference.Conclusions: We have found out there is a difference in diagnostic modalities and treatment options in uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, but no significant difference in the conversion rate and early postoperative complications. Our analysis suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe method in all types of appendicitis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Guanà ◽  
L. Lonati ◽  
S. Garofalo ◽  
N. Tommasoni ◽  
L. Ferrero ◽  
...  

Introduction. Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in the pediatric population. The peak incidence occurs in the first decade of life, while it is uncommon to face appendicitis in children younger than 5 years of age. Laparoscopy is now demonstrated to be the optimal approach also to treat complicated appendicitis, but in very young children this standardized operation is not always easy to perform.Material and Methods. From January 2009 to December 2015 we operated on 525 acute appendicitis, with 120 patients less than 5 years of age.Results. 90 children had a complicated appendicitis (localized or diffuse peritonitis): 43 (48%) were operated on by open approach and 47 (52%) by laparoscopy. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was greater in the open appendectomy group (63% versus 26%) and all severe complications requiring reintervention (6% of cases: 3 postoperative abscesses resolved with ultrasound guided percutaneous abscess drainage; 1 tubal surgery for salpingitis; 1 adhesion-related ileus requiring relaparotomy) were mostly associated with open surgery.Conclusions. Laparoscopic surgery resulted as the best approach for treating complicated appendicitis also in younger children, with minor and less severe postoperative complications compared to open surgery.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-198
Author(s):  
Laura L. Bio ◽  
Vincent J. Willey ◽  
Cathy Y. Poon

OBJECTIVE To compare the cardiac effects of levalbuterol with those of racemic albuterol based on changes in heart rate (HR) in pediatric patients. METHODS The medical records of hospitalized children ages 1 month to 12 years, who received either levalbuterol or racemic albuterol via nebulizer for 3 consecutive doses between January 2006 and December 2008 were reviewed. The documented HR was collected prior to and after each administered dose of bronchodilator. The primary outcome was the largest percentage of change in HR between groups. Secondary outcomes of comparisons of the number of patients who had more than a 10% change in HR and incidence of tachycardia were included. RESULTS A total of 50 patients, 25 in each group, was included in the study. All patients in the racemic albuterol group received 2.5 mg per dose, while most of the patients in the levalbuterol group received 0.63 mg per dose (19 patients, 76%). Only 6 levalbuterol patients received a dose of 1.25 mg. Nineteen of 25 patients (76%) in the levalbuterol group were tachycardic prior to the first recorded dose compared to 15 patients (60%) in the racemic albuterol group (p = 0.36). The median of the largest percentage of change in HR was 4.1% (interquartile range [IQR], 1.8–8.7) in the levalbuterol group compared to 5% (IQR, 1.9–7.8) in the racemic albuterol group (p = 0.763). Four patients in the levalbuterol group experienced an HR increase of more than 10% compared to 5 patients in the racemic albuterol group (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION Levalbuterol and racemic albuterol bronchodilator therapies produced similar effects on HR. No clinically significant differences were detected in HR changes between the two treatment groups, despite administration of a larger equipotent albuterol dose in the racemic albuterol group than in the levalbuterol group.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nivetha Saravanan ◽  
Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi ◽  
Jonathan Lund ◽  
Gillian Tierney

Abstract Aims Acute appendicitis is a common general surgical emergency, occurring in 90-100 per 100,000 patients per year. Clinical practice in the UK involves either a clinical or ultrasound (US) diagnosis, with computed tomography (CT) reserved for cases of suspected complicated appendicitis. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic management pathways were altered, this study sought to capture that. Methods This prospective study included adult patients with suspected appendicitis at a single UK centre from March-June 2020. The primary outcome measures were rates of US and CT imaging. Secondary outcomes included subsequent operative and histological findings. Results Seventy-five patients were included. A clinical diagnosis of appendicitis was made in 11 (15%). Thirty-five (47%) patients had CT, 22 (29%) had an US and 7 (9%) had both. The appendix was visualised in only 10 patients and a radiological diagnosis of appendicitis was made in 6 cases. Appendicitis was confirmed on histology in 67% of subsequently operated cases. CT evidence of appendicitis correlated with operative appendicitis in 93% (28/30) of cases. There were two cases of appendiceal malignancy not demonstrated on CT. Correlation of complicated appendicitis between CT and operative findings was poor; one third (10/28) of patients had appendiceal perforation not identified on CT. Conclusions The use of CT for diagnosing appendicitis was markedly increased during the first wave of the pandemic. The appendix was visualised infrequently on ultrasound, but when seen correlated well with histological findings. CT was superior at detecting appendicitis but failed to differentiate well between complicated and uncomplicated disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document