Comparison of Antibiotic treatment and Appendectomy for non-complicated Acute Appendicitis during Covid-19 pandemic

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic treatment as the primary option for non-complicated acute appendicitis in pandemic situation. Study Design: Prospective interventional study. Setting & Duration of Study: CMH Lahore, a 700 bedded tertiary care hospital, for 4 months from 15th April 2020 to 15th august 2020. Methodology: A total of 110 cases meeting inclusion criteria, aged 13-65 years of both genders with suspicion of non-complicated appendicitis were included in the study, using probability sampling. They were divided in two groups on randomization basis. Group A for antibiotic therapy and Group B for appendectomy. Group A patients admitted in the ward 48 hours for IV antibiotics, were re-evaluated after 24 hours. If condition improves, the patient was discharged on oral antibiotics for next 10 days & if condition does not improve, antibiotics were prolonged for 48 hours. If deteriorating or patient. .chooses to change group, they underwent appendectomy. If condition improved, they were discharged on oral antibiotics for next 10 days. Group B patient were discharged after 2 post-operative doses of I/V antibiotics. Post-operative I/V antibiotics for 48 hours & 3 days oral antibiotics were given when appendix was gangrenous or perforated. Results: In a population of 110 patients, we studied the comparison of the groups having antibiotics and appendectomy as treatment for acute appendicitis. There is no significant difference in outcomes on basis of mean pain score and mean duration of hospital stay. Both ways of treatment can be adapted accordingly. Conclusion: Non-complicated acute appendicitis can be managed non-operatively in crisis situations like COVID-19 pandemic causing overburdening of hospitals. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, antibiotic therapy, appendectomy, pandemic.

Periappendiceal fat-stranding models for discriminating between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a diagnostic and validation study

Background Recent studies have reported promising outcomes of non-operative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis; however, the preoperative prediction of complicated appendicitis is challenging. We developed models by incorporating fat stranding (FS), which is commonly observed in perforated appendicitis. Material and methods We reviewed the data of 402 consecutive patients with confirmed acute appendicitis from our prospective registry. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to select clinical and radiographic factors predicting complicated acute appendicitis in our model 1 (involving backward elimination) and model 2 (involving stepwise selection). We compared c statistics among scoring systems developed by Bröker et al. (in J Surg Res 176(1):79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.049, 2012), Imaoka et al. (in World J Emerg Surg 11(1):1–5, 2016), Khan et al. (in Cureus. https://doi.org/1010.7759/cureus.4765, 2019), Kim et al. (in Ann Coloproctol 31(5):192, 2015), Kang et al. (in Medicine 98(23): e15768, 2019), Atema et al. (in Br J Surg 102(8):979–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9835, 2015), Avanesov et al. (in Eur Radiol 28(9):3601–3610, 2018), and Kim et al. (in Abdom Radiol 46:1–12, 2020). Finally, we examined our models by performing the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) test. Results Among enrolled patients, 64 (15.9%) had complicated acute appendicitis. We developed new 10-point scoring models by including the following variables: C-reactive protein, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and computed tomography features of FS, ascites, and appendicolith. A cutoff score of ≥ 6 exhibited a high sensitivity of 82.8% and a specificity of 82.8% for model 1 and 81.3% and 82.3% for model 2, respectively, with c statistics of 0.878 (model 1) and 0.879 (model 2). Compared with the model developed by Bröker et al. which included C-reactive protein and the abdominal pain duration (c statistic: 0.778), the models developed by Atema et al. (c statistic: 0.826, IDI: 5.92%, P = 0.0248), H.Y Kim et al. (c statistics: 0.838, IDI: 13.82%, P = 0.0248), and our two models (IDI: 18.29%, P < 0.0001) demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion Our models and the scoring systems developed by Atema et al. and Kim et al. were validated to have a high diagnostic accuracy; moreover, our models included the lowest number of variables.

Correction to: The decrease of non-complicated acute appendicitis and the negative appendectomy rate during pandemic

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01683-3

Increased incidence of complicated acute appendicitis after the first COVID-19 pandemic peak: Have patients a different attitude towards COVID-hospitals?

Objective The 11 March 2020 the World Health Organisation considered the COVID-19 Infection a pandemic disease. Between March and May 2020, the region of southern Switzerland was affected by the first pandemic peak, which was managed by dividing hospitals in Covid and non Covid facilities and by reducing elective surgery. At the end of the pandemic peak hospitals returned to their original structure but there was concern as to possible avoidance of former COVID facilities by patients because of fear of contracting of COVID-19 infection. For acute situations such as acute appendicitis, this could imply a delay of treatment. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyse the increment in incidence of complicated appendicitis in the post-pandemic period at our institution. Methods Clinical data of patients who underwent appendectomies in the period before and after the COVID-19 pandemic were analysed and compared. Diagnosis was based histopathological examination and/or on intra-operative or CT findings. Complicated appendicitis was defined as the presence of perforated or gangrenous appendicitis on histopathology or the presence of an abscess on CT scan. The incidence of complicated appendicitis, the time between onset of symptoms and patient admission (TOSA), the initial inflammatory blood tests and the complication rate was compared between the two periods. Results 79 patients were included in the study, 31 in the post-COVID-19 peak group (A), April - October 2020, and 48 in the pre-pandemic group (B), April - October 2019. Incidence of complicated appendicitis was significantly higher in group A (55% vs 14% p = 0.02). These findings correlate with a greater TOSA (mean time 35 hours vs 17 hours, p = 0.01) and higher inflammatory values in the initial blood test, (mean WBC count 14.8 G/l vs 12.9 G/l, p = 0.08 and mean CRP value 73 mg/l vs 43 mg/l, p = 0.01) in group A. Conclusion Our data show a clear increase of incidence of complicated acute appendicitis after the pandemic peak in our hospital. Indeed patients tended to wait longer to visit our emergency department after the pandemic peak. One explanation is a possible fear by the patients of contracting COVID-19 infection in a former COVID hospital. Management of surgical emergencies during and after a pandemic peak phase should take into account the fact that patients may wait longer to visit a doctor thus aggravating the degree of their disease.

The decrease of non-complicated acute appendicitis and the negative appendectomy rate during pandemic

Background During pandemic, admissions for surgical emergencies dropped down dramatically. Also acute appendicitis decreased. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the change in volume and clinical presentation of patients with acute appendicitis during pandemic and the variation in treatment. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients admitted in 11 Italian hospital for acute appendicitis during the lockdown period (March–April 2020) compared with the same period of the previous 2 years (2018–2019). The number and the rate of complicated and non-complicated acute appendicitis were recorded and compared between the two study periods; non-operative vs operative treatment and negative appendectomy rate were also recorded. Results The study included 532 patients, 112 in the study period and 420 in the control period; Hospital admission for acute appendicitis dropped by 46% (OR 0.516 95% CI 0.411–0.648 p < 0.001) during the 2020 lockdown. The number of complicated acute appendicitis did not change (− 18%, OR 0.763 95% CI 0.517–1.124 p = 0.1719), whereas the number of non-complicated acute appendicitis significantly decreased (− 56%, OR 0.424 95% CI 0.319–0.564 p < 0.001). Non-operative treatment rate remained similar (12.1% vs. 11.6% p = 0.434). The negative appendectomy rate also significantly decreased (6.1% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.006). Conclusions The present study found a significant reduction of both admissions for non-complicated acute appendicitis and negative appendectomy rate during the pandemic period. Conversely, admissions for complicated acute appendicitis did not change. Trial registration: NCT04649996.