scholarly journals Examining primary care physician rationale for not following geriatric choosing wisely recommendations

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa A. Rowe ◽  
Tiffany Brown ◽  
Jason N. Doctor ◽  
Jeffrey A. Linder ◽  
Stephen D. Persell

Abstract Background The objective is to understand why physicians order tests or treatments in older adults contrary to published recommendations. Methods Participants: Physicians above the median for ≥ 1 measures of overuse representing 3 Choosing Wisely topics. Measurements: Participants evaluated decisions in a semi-structured interview regarding: 1) Screening men aged ≥ 76 with prostate specific antigen 2) Ordering urine studies in women ≥ 65 without symptoms 3) Overtreating adults aged ≥ 75 with insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications. Two investigators independently coded transcripts using qualitative analysis. Results Nineteen interviews were conducted across the three topics resulting in four themes. First, physicians were aware and knowledgeable of guidelines. Second, perceived patient preference towards overuse influenced physician action even when physicians felt strongly that testing was not indicated. Third, physicians overestimated benefits of a test and underemphasized potential harms. Fourth, physicians were resistant to change when patients appeared to be doing well. Conclusions Though physicians expressed awareness to avoid overuse, deference to patient preferences and the tendency to distort the chance of benefit over harm influenced decisions to order testing. Approaches for decreasing unnecessary testing must account for perceived patient preferences, make the potential harms of overtesting salient, and address clinical inertia among patients who appear to be doing well.

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry S. Field ◽  
Jessica Ogarek ◽  
Lawrence Garber ◽  
George Reed ◽  
Jerry H. Gurwitz

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharron Hinchliff ◽  
Ana Alexandra Carvalheira ◽  
Aleksandar Štulhofer ◽  
Erick Janssen ◽  
Gert Martin Hald ◽  
...  

Abstract Sexual well-being is an important part of life for many people aged 60 and older. However, older adults often face barriers to seeking and receiving help for sexual difficulties. This study used data from a probability survey (n = 3820) on sexuality and ageing to examine help-seeking in 60–75-year-olds in Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and Portugal. More men (12.2%) than women (6.8%) had sought professional help for a sexual difficulty in the past 5 years. The main reason for help-seeking was that sex was important to the participant and/or their relationship. The main source of professional help was the primary care physician. Of those who had sought professional help, 48% were satisfied or very satisfied with the help received, 31.6% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 20.4% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Others had sought help from informal sources, particularly partners, friends, or websites. The main reasons for not seeking professional help included not being distressed by the symptoms, and thinking that the difficulty would clear up on its own. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that significant correlates of seeking professional help for women and men were level of distress about the sexual difficulty. With regard to women, those who were married, and/or from Portugal were more likely to have sought help. And regarding men, those who attended religious services were more likely to have sought professional help. These results have important implications for healthcare and can be used to inform the development and delivery of services for older adults who experience sexual difficulties.


2009 ◽  
Vol 65A (4) ◽  
pp. 421-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. D. Wolinsky ◽  
S. E. Bentler ◽  
L. Liu ◽  
J. F. Geweke ◽  
E. A. Cook ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-61
Author(s):  
Yuki Moriki ◽  
Maho Haseda ◽  
Naoki Kondo ◽  
Toshiyuki Ojima ◽  
Katsunori Kondo ◽  
...  

In Japan, many adults prefer to die at home; however, few have their preferences actually come true. While discussions regarding place of death preferences (DPDPs) are important for older adults, they are poorly documented. Therefore, we investigated the factors associated with older Japanese men and women having DPDPs. We used cross-sectional survey data collected for the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES). We applied multivariable logistic regression analysis to calculate the odds ratio (ORs) of having DPDPs separately between men (n = 2,770) and women (n = 3,038) aged ≥ 75 years. We considered 17 potential factors associated with having DPDPs, which were classified as either demographic, healthcare, family, or community factors. Among participants, 50.1% had DPDPs: 1,288 men (44.3%) and 1,619 women (55.7%). Older adults, DPDPs were associated with 5 additional factors; e.g. having a primary care physician (ORs = 1.47 [men] and 1.45 [women]), as were those who gave family and friends advice (ORs = 1.26 [men] and 1.62 [women]), and having people who listened to their concerns (ORs = 1.70 [men] and 1.81 [women]). Among men, DPDPs were associated with 3 additional factors; e.g. humorous conversations with their spouse (OR = 1.60). Among women, only one factor—reading newspapers (OR = 1.43) was associated with having DPDPs. Social networks with primary care physicians, family members, and friends may be important factors in promoting DPDPs. These gender-based differences in older adults relating to DPDPs should be considered when developing interventions to promote advance care planning that includes DPDPs.


Author(s):  
David E Winchester ◽  
Linda Nguyen ◽  
Kristopher Kline ◽  
Jared Plumb ◽  
Tianyao Huo ◽  
...  

Background: A substantial portion of medical spending, such as unnecessary cardiac imaging tests, does not benefit patients and is therefore wasteful. While estimates of wasteful spending and unnecessary testing are reported in the literature, the degree to which those facts are known by patients and health care providers is not well described. We conducted a survey of patients and providers awareness about waste and hypothesize that patient awareness will be less than providers. Methods: We developed an anonymous survey for patients and healthcare providers. Recruitment was done in primary care and cardiology clinics, in the nuclear cardiology laboratory, and included sites both at our academic medical center and our affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. We recruited patients who either have had nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or may have one ordered for them. We recruited healthcare providers who commonly order nuclear MPI from primary care, hospital medicine, and cardiology including both physicians and advanced providers. Survey questions were in a variety of formats including yes/no, scale responses, multiple choice, and narrative. When possible, identical questions were asked of patients and providers. Comparisons between the groups were made by chi square test. Results: The survey was completed by 338 patients and 111 providers. Patients were evenly distributed between primary care (36.0%), nuclear medicine (31.9%), and cardiology (32.2%) recruitment sites, with 55.6% being Veterans. Providers were also well distributed among primary care (37.7%), hospital medicine (22.8%), and cardiology (35.1%). Providers more frequently identified the correct total cost (20.9% versus 10.4% by patients, p<0.0001) and percentage of costs (77.5% versus 39.3% by patients, p<0.0001) of wasteful spending. Patients were less likely than providers to be aware of the Choosing Wisely campaign (2.7% versus 37.2%, p<0.0001). Nearly half (137, 43.5%) of patients indicated that sometimes it is “a bad idea to get a test”; the most common narrative reasons included risk of the test (n=11), lack of symptoms (n=10), and the test not being necessary (n=10). Responses from providers regarding inappropriate reasons to order tests included lack of symptoms (n=26), patient or family demands (n=16), and malpractice fears (n=12). Conclusion: Both patients and healthcare providers underestimate the costs of wasteful medical spending, patients to a greater degree. Awareness in both groups of the Choosing Wisely campaign is low. Many patients and providers are cognizant of accurate reasons why a test might be unnecessary.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole R. Fowler ◽  
Lisa A. Morrow ◽  
Li-Chuan Tu ◽  
Douglas P. Landsittel ◽  
Beth E. Snitz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Sanders ◽  
Lance D. Erickson ◽  
Vaughn R. A. Call ◽  
Matthew L. McKnight

This study assesses the prevalence of primary-care physician (PCP) bypass among rural middle-aged and older adults. Bypass is a behavior where people travel beyond local providers to obtain health care. This article applies a precise Geographic Information System (GIS)-based measure of bypass and examines the role of community and non-health-care-related characteristics on bypass. Our results indicate that bypass behavior among rural middle-aged and older adults is multifaceted. In addition to the perceived quality of local primary care, dissatisfaction with local services, such as shopping, creates an effect that increases the likelihood of bypass, whereas strong community ties decrease the likelihood of bypass. The results suggest that the “outshopping theory,” where respondents select services in larger regional economic centers rather than local “mom and pop” providers, now extends to older adult health care selection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 745-745
Author(s):  
Kathleen Obuchon

Abstract The nurse practitioner’s (NP) clinical activities during the 12-month intervention period include 4 monthly in-home visits and 8 monthly telephone contacts. This presentation will detail the clinical assessments and activities conducted during the initial home visit, and how subsequent home visit activities and interventions are structured for older adults and their informal caregivers depending on whether older adults have dementia, depression, and/or recent delirium. Because the potential for medication-related problems is a critical concern for older adults with cognitive vulnerability, this presentation also will detail how the NP works with the 3D Team pharmacist to determine potential inappropriate medications through a review and reconciliation process, and how the NP and pharmacist summarize these results and correspond accordingly with the older adult’s primary care physician. Finally, this presentation will explain how the NP manages communication among members of the 3D Team who provide interventions to the same older adult and caregiver.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document