Axillary Adenopathy Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: a Case Report

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective for the prevention of COVID-19 infection, though local reactions are commonly reported. Axillary lymphadenopathy has also been reported, which has the potential of causing diagnostic confusion and unnecessary testing and procedures. Case Description: A 58 year-old female with untreated latent tuberculosis was noted to have a pulmonary nodule on chest radiograph. Evaluation for Mycobacterium tuberculosis was undertaken, and a FDG PET/CT was performed to rule out malignancy. While the nodule demonstrated low avidity, highly avid lymph nodes were noted in the left axillary region. Further questioning elicited a recent history of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccination in her left deltoid muscle three weeks prior, and a sensation of axillary fullness. She was managed conservatively with spontaneous resolution of her lymphadenopathy. Conclusions: Axillary lymphadenopathy following mRNA vaccination has been reported, and appears to be more common with mRNA-1273 (Moderna) than BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech), in those aged 18 to 64 as compared to age ≥65, and following the second vaccine dose compared to the first dose. Vaccination should be considered in the differential diagnosis of axillary lymphadenopathy, particularly ipsilateral to the vaccination site, to avoid unnecessary testing, treatment, and patient anxiety.

85. Evaluation of Urinalysis and Urine Culture Use at a Community Health-system

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) guidelines recommend against screening for or treating ASB in most patients without symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI). The purpose of this study was to characterize current urine testing practices and their potential impact on identification and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria on hospitalized adults. Methods This retrospective, point prevalence study conducted at a 4 hospital community health-system that included all inpatients ≥ 18 years old present on November 13th, 2019. Patients were excluded if they were admitted or transferred to either a labor & delivery or mother-baby unit. A chart review was performed for a sub-group of patients with abnormal urine testing, with a target sample size of 200 (n=50 from each hospital). The primary outcome was the prevalence of patients with a urinalysis, urine culture, or both performed during their admission. Secondary outcomes included abnormal urine testing in the overall cohort and symptomatology and antibiotic use in the sub-group (Figure 1). Results 947 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 516 (54%) had urine testing performed during their admission. 322 (34%) patients had abnormal urine testing results (Table 1). In the sub-group, 192 patients with abnormal urine tests were included. Antibiotics with a documented indication of UTI were administered to 66 (34%) patients. Of those given antibiotics with a UTI indication, 49/66 (74%) did not have documented signs or symptoms of a UTI (Figure 2). Conclusion Urine testing was performed on the majority of admitted adult patients. Unnecessary testing likely contributes to guideline discordant screening and treatment of ASB. Future studies are needed to identify effective diagnostic stewardship interventions to decrease screening and treatment of ASB. Disclosures Ashley Wilde, PharmD, BCPS-AQ ID, Nothing to disclose

89. Follow-Up Blood Cultures (FUBC) in the Management of Gram-Negative Bacilli (GNB) Bloodstream Infections (BSIs): Frequently Obtained and Rarely Helpful

Background While GNB BSIs remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, no clear guidelines exist on the utilization of FUBCs to guide management. Despite the recognition of persistent bacteremia as a risk factor for increased mortality, early studies suggested FUBCs were low yield in this setting, and thus had low utility. More recently, some controversy has arisen with multivariate analyses suggesting FUBC acquisition may be associated with lower mortality. We sought to characterize the utilization and yield of FUBCs for GNB BSIs at our institution. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 514 episodes of consecutive blood cultures from unique adult inpatients with GNB BSI between July 2017-July 2019. Exclusion criteria included prior positive culture, polymicrobial Gram stain, or discharge, death, or comfort measures only within 24 hours of Gram stain. FUBCs were defined as blood cultures collected between 24 hours to 7 days after the index blood culture. Baseline clinical and microbiologic characteristics were compared between groups, as well as clinical outcomes. Results Of 514 episodes, 338 (66%) had FUBCs performed, with a median of 2 FUBCs/episode. The majority of FUBCs (322/338; 95%) were negative, with 9 (3%) yielding the same organism and 9 (3%) yielding a different organism. Most initial FUBCs were obtained prior to index antimicrobial susceptibility results (227/338; 67%). Patients with FUBCs performed had a higher median Pitt bacteremia score (2 vs 1; p = 0.015) and were more likely to have hospital onset (36% vs 22%; p = 0.002), severe neutropenia (16% vs 4%; p < 0.001) and a catheter-associated source (13% vs 4%; p = 0.001). 30-day mortality did not differ between patients with or without FUBCs (10% vs 11%; p = 0.84). Conclusion FUBCs were frequently obtained, but were of low yield even in comparison to recent similar studies. Though FUBCs were performed in more severe cases, a difference in mortality was not observed. Delaying the decision of whether to obtain FUBCs until after index antimicrobial susceptibility results are available would reduce unnecessary testing in most cases. Further study could better define where FUBCs after antimicrobial susceptibility testing would be most helpful. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Adherence to Choosing Wisely Campaign Guidelines at Three Health Systems

Introduction/Objective With rising healthcare costs in the United States, there has been a push for lab stewardship to improve the quality of patient care while reducing costs. To optimize the use of clinical laboratory testing, the ASCP working with other medical specialty organizations, developed the Choosing Wisely Campaign to promulgate evidence-based guidelines to optimize clinical laboratory testing. Methods/Case Report We examined adherence to three Choosing Wisely guidelines over a four-year period (2017- 2020), through queries of internal cost accounting databases to return aggregate volumes as well as variable and total costs at three large academic health systems. We measured concurrent orders for: 1) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with C-reactive protein (CRP), 2) serum/plasma amylase with lipase, and 3) free thyroxine (FT4) and/or total triiodothyronine (TT3) with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) when the TSH is within the reference range (using an frequency estimate of 85% based on other studies). We also examined another guideline for concurrent orders for serum aldolase with creatine kinase (CK). We also quantified aggregate variable costs for the non-recommended test in each Choosing Wisely guideline (amylase, ESR, FT4 and/or TT3), and for serum aldolase when ordered with CK. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Over the four-year period, there were 322,853 unnecessary tests based on these four guidelines (120,587 ESR and CRP, 30,444 amylase and lipase, 164,818 FT4 and/or TT3 with TSH, and 7,004 aldolase). Overall, unnecessary testing decreased between 2017 and 2020 for amylase with lipase, remained essentially unchanged for aldolase, and increased for the other two test guideline scenarios. The largest changes were concurrent orders for amylase and lipase at one health system (38% decrease), and orders for TT3 with a normal TSH result at another health system (324% increase). The four-year variable cost of these unnecessary tests was $1,215,309 ($303,827 mean annual cost), resulting in potential annual variable cost savings of $101,276 for each health system for the four guidelines we examined. Variable costs for unnecessary testing increased by 16.5% ($45,571) over the four-year period. Conclusion Guideline-based unnecessary testing remains as a target to improve laboratory diagnostic testing. There is potential to realize significant achievable cost savings if guidelines are implemented and maintained.

OpenClinicalAI: enabling AI to diagnose diseases in real-world clinical settings

This paper quantitatively reveals the state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice AI systems only achieve acceptable performance on the stringent conditions that all categories of subjects are known, which we call closed clinical settings, but fail to work in real-world clinical settings. Compared to the diagnosis task in the closed setting, real-world clinical settings pose severe challenges, and we must treat them differently. We build a clinical AI benchmark named Clinical AIBench to set up real-world clinical settings to facilitate researches. We propose an open, dynamic machine learning framework and develop an AI system named OpenClinicalAI to diagnose diseases in real-world clinical settings. The first versions of Clinical AIBench and OpenClinicalAI target Alzheimer's disease. In the real-world clinical setting, OpenClinicalAI significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art AI system. In addition, OpenClinicalAI develops personalized diagnosis strategies to avoid unnecessary testing and seamlessly collaborates with clinicians. It is promising to be embedded in the current medical systems to improve medical services.

Exploration of a quality improvement process to standardised preoperative tests for a surgical procedure to reduce waste

BackgroundPreoperative tests are done to determine a patient’s fitness for anaesthesia and surgery.Local problemAlthough routine tests before surgery in the absence of specific clinical indications are not recommended, we observed high volumes of routine preoperative tests were performed in our institution. We describe a process to implement a standardised preoperative investigational approach to reduce unnecessary testing before surgeries.MethodsA series of six Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles was conducted for root cause analysis and process mapping, development of standardised tool (GRID), collection of baseline data, education and feedback, pilot testing and implementation and uptake of GRID.Root cause analysis revealed a lack of awareness of guidelines and a lack of a standardised tool to guide preoperative testing. We undertook a pilot quality improvement project to reduce unnecessary testing before knee and hip arthroplasty by developing and implementing a standardised tool (GRID) and engaging all stakeholders.InterventionsA clinical development team (CDT) was formed, including all the stakeholders. Our CDT focused on a continuous rapid cycle improvement strategy.ResultsAfter implementation of the tool in a subgroup of patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty, unnecessary coagulation tests (activated partial thromboplastin time and the international normalised ratio), electrolyte/renal panel tests and electrocardiograms were reduced by 81% (91%–17%), 81% (41%–7%) and 68% (35%–11%), respectively. No surgery was delayed or cancelled due to tests not performed before surgery.ConclusionsA standardised preoperative investigational approach based on patients’ medical conditions rather than routine testing can reduce unnecessary tests before surgery. Further, implementing guidelines is more complex than developing guidelines. Hence, continuous PDSA cycles are essential to evaluate the processes in a quality improvement project. It can take time to build teams and have shared goals; however, once this is achieved, the success of a quality improvement project is certain.

Characteristics of Inpatients with False-Negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR Test Results

Background: At our institution, the concern for false-negative nasopharyngeal testing for SARS-CoV-2 at the onset of illness led to a general policy of retesting inpatients at 48 hours. For such patients, 2 negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results were required prior to discontinuation of COVID-19 control precautions. To assess the utility of routine repeat testing We analyzed patients presenting to our hospital who initially tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 but were found to be positive on repeated testing. Methods: All inpatients with symptoms concerning for COVID-19 were tested via nasopharyngeal sample for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR on admission. Patients with continued symptoms and no alternative diagnosis were retested 48 hours later. Testing was performed using either the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay or the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 test. Between March 17, 2020, and May 10, 2020, we retrospectively analyzed data from patients with false-negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results who were subsequently confirmed positive 48 hours later. We evaluated demographic information, days since symptom onset, symptomatology, chest imaging, vital sign trends, and the overall clinical course of each patient. Results: During the study period, 14,683 tests were performed, almost half (n = 7,124) were performed through the ED and in the inpatient setting. Of 2,283 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, only 19 (0.01%) initially tested negative. Patients with initial false-negative test results presented with symptoms that ranged from fever and dyspnea to fatigue and vomiting. Notably, few patients presented “early” in their disease (median, 6 days; range, 0–10 days). However, patients with initial false-negative PCR test results did seem to have consistent imaging findings, specifically bilateral bibasilar ground glass opacities on chest radiograph or computed tomography scan. Conclusions: Among inpatients with COVID-19, we found a very low rate of initial false-negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results, which were not consistently related to premature testing. We also identified common radiographic findings among patients with initially false-negative test results, which could be useful in triaging patients who may merit retesting. Based on these data, we revised our existing clearance criteria to allow for single-test removal of COVID-19 precautions. Evaluating subsequent reduction in unnecessary testing is difficult given changing community prevalence, increased census, and increased opening to elective procedures. However, given the significant percentage of ED and inpatient testing, removal of repeated testing has likely resulted in a reduction of several thousand unnecessary COVID-19 tests monthly.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Examining primary care physician rationale for not following geriatric choosing wisely recommendations

Background The objective is to understand why physicians order tests or treatments in older adults contrary to published recommendations. Methods Participants: Physicians above the median for ≥ 1 measures of overuse representing 3 Choosing Wisely topics. Measurements: Participants evaluated decisions in a semi-structured interview regarding: 1) Screening men aged ≥ 76 with prostate specific antigen 2) Ordering urine studies in women ≥ 65 without symptoms 3) Overtreating adults aged ≥ 75 with insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications. Two investigators independently coded transcripts using qualitative analysis. Results Nineteen interviews were conducted across the three topics resulting in four themes. First, physicians were aware and knowledgeable of guidelines. Second, perceived patient preference towards overuse influenced physician action even when physicians felt strongly that testing was not indicated. Third, physicians overestimated benefits of a test and underemphasized potential harms. Fourth, physicians were resistant to change when patients appeared to be doing well. Conclusions Though physicians expressed awareness to avoid overuse, deference to patient preferences and the tendency to distort the chance of benefit over harm influenced decisions to order testing. Approaches for decreasing unnecessary testing must account for perceived patient preferences, make the potential harms of overtesting salient, and address clinical inertia among patients who appear to be doing well.

Should Mode of Presentation Influence Interpretation of Thyroid Nodule Ultrasounds?

Background: The American College of Radiology (ACR) TI-RADS is a standardized scoring system for thyroid ultrasound reports providing recommendations on the need for fine needle aspirations (FNAs) independent of patient presentation. Aim: The aim of this audit was to determine if the initial presentation of the patient should be considered during the work-up of thyroid nodules. Methods: Data was collected from electronic medical records on 133 patients who underwent thyroid FNAs (165 FNAs in total) and 98 patients who had thyroid surgery for the management of thyroid nodules at Gold Coast University Hospital from Jan 1st 2019 – Dec 31st 2019. Patient presentation, adequacy of the ultrasound report and FNA results were recorded. These results were aligned with final diagnosis after surgery. Results: 98 patients underwent surgery and 29 (29.6%) were found to have malignant nodules, including 12 (12.2%) with microcarcinomas. Of the 29 malignancies, 16 patients presented with a palpable neck lump. Conclusions: Our data suggests a palpable neck lump is a significant factor in determining the risk of malignancy. It may be possible to adjust the current TI-RADS algorithm used to interpret thyroid ultrasounds to include patient presentation. This would reduce unnecessary testing and burden on the healthcare system.

Supine-Related Pseudoanemia in Hospitalized Patients

A patient’s supine posture redistributes plasma into the vascular space, leading to dilution of blood constituents. The extent to which posture may influence identification of hospital-acquired anemia is unknown. Patients in this quasi-experimental study had blood obtained for hemoglobin measurement while recumbent for at least 6 hours, and then again after sitting upright for at least 1 hour. Of the 35 patients who completed the study, 13 were women (37%). Patients had a median increase in hemoglobin of 0.60 g/dL (range, –0.6 to 1.4 g/dL) with sitting, a 5.2% (range, (–4.5% to 15.1%) relative change (P < .001). Ten of 35 patients (29%) exhibited an increase in hemoglobin of 1.0 g/dL or more. Posture influences hemoglobin levels in hospitalized patients on general medicine wards; this knowledge may help curb unnecessary testing to evaluate small changes in hemoglobin concentration.