Burden, risk factors and outcomes associated with gestational diabetes in a population-based cohort of pregnant women from North India

Abstract Background The burden of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) appears to be increasing in India and may be related to the double burden of malnutrition. The population-based incidence and risk factors of GDM, particularly in lower socio-economic populations, are not known. We conducted analyses on data from a population-based cohort of pregnant women in South Delhi, India, to determine the incidence of GDM, its risk factors and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes (stillbirth, preterm birth, large for gestational age babies) and need for caesarean section. Methods We analyzed data from the intervention group of the Women and Infants Integrated Interventions for Growth Study (WINGS), an individually randomized factorial design trial. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at the time of confirmation of pregnancy, and for those who had a normal test (≤140 mg), it was repeated at 24–28 and at 34–36 weeks. Logistic regression was performed to ascertain risk factors associated with GDM. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated to find association between GDM and adverse pregnancy outcomes and need for caesarean section. Results 19.2% (95% CI: 17.6 to 20.9) pregnant women who had at least one OGTT were diagnosed to have GDM. Women who had prediabetes at the time of confirmation of pregnancy had a significantly higher risk of developing GDM (RR 2.08, 95%CI 1.45 to 2.97). Other risk factors independently associated with GDM were woman’s age (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.10, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.15) and BMI (AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07). Higher maternal height was found to be protective factor for GDM (AOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00). Women with GDM, received appropriate treatment did not have an increase in adverse outcomes and no increased need for caesarean section Conclusions A substantial proportion of pregnant women from a low to mid socio-economic population in Delhi had GDM, with older age, higher BMI and pre-diabetes as important risk factors. These findings highlight the need for interventions for prevention and provision of appropriate management of GDM in antenatal programmes. Clinical trial registration Clinical Trial Registry – India, #CTRI/2017/06/008908 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=19339&EncHid=&userName=society%20for%20applied%20studies).

Download Full-text

Burden, Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Gestational Diabetes in A Population-Based Cohort of Pregnant Women from North India

10.21203/rs.3.rs-654299/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Stuti Bahl ◽

Neeta Dhabhai ◽

Sunita Taneja ◽

Pratima Mittal ◽

Rupali Dewan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Caesarean Section ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Population Based ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Oral Glucose ◽

Adverse Pregnancy

Abstract Background: The burden of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) appears to be increasing in India and may be related to the double burden of malnutrition. The population-based incidence and risk factors of GDM, particularly in lower socio-economic populations, are not known. We conducted analyses on data from a population-based cohort of pregnant women in South Delhi, India, to determine the incidence of GDM, its risk factors and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes (stillbirth, preterm birth, large for gestational age babies) and need for caesarean section. Methods: We analyzed data from the intervention group of the Women and Infants Integrated Interventions for Growth Study (WINGS), an individually randomized factorial design trial. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at the time of confirmation of pregnancy, and for those who had a normal test (≤140 mg), it was repeated at 24-28 and at 34-36 weeks. Logistic regression was performed to ascertain risk factors associated with GDM. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated to find association between GDM and adverse pregnancy outcomes and need for caesarean section. Results: 19.2% (95% CI: 17.6 to 20.9) pregnant women who had at least one OGTT were diagnosed to have GDM. Women who had prediabetes at the time of confirmation of pregnancy had a significantly higher risk of developing GDM (RR 2.08, 95%CI 1.45 to 2.97). Other risk factors independently associated with GDM were woman’s age (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.10, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.15) and BMI (AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07). Higher maternal height was found to be protective factor for GDM (AOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00). Women with GDM, received appropriate treatment did not have an increase in adverse outcomes. However, GDM increased the need for caesarean section (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.36).Conclusions: A substantial proportion of pregnant women from a low to mid socio-economic population in Delhi had GDM, with older age, higher BMI and pre-diabetes as important risk factors. These findings highlight the need for interventions for prevention and provision of appropriate management of GDM in antenatal programmes.Clinical Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry – India, #CTRI/2017/06/008908 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=19339&EncHid=&userName=society%20for%20applied%20studies)

Download Full-text

Early-pregnancy intermediate hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women without gestational diabetes

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism ◽

10.1210/clinem/dgab841 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yunzhen Ye ◽

Yu Xiong ◽

Qiongjie Zhou ◽

Xirong Xiao ◽

Xiaotian Li

Keyword(s):

Preterm Birth ◽

Caesarean Section ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Early Pregnancy ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Large For Gestational Age ◽

Oral Glucose ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Adverse Pregnancy

Abstract Aims Universal early-pregnancy screening for overt diabetes reveals intermediate hyperglycaemia [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (5.1–6.9 mM)]. We evaluated the association between early-pregnancy intermediate hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women without gestational diabetes. Methods This retrospective cohort study, conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital, Shanghai, China, from 2013-2017. All singleton pregnancies with FPG≤6.9mM in early pregnancy and receiving 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were included. Women with pre-pregnancy diabetes were excluded. Subjects with normal OGTT were analysed. Pregnancy outcomes for FPG<5.1 mM and intermediate hyperglycaemia were evaluated. The primary outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA) and primary caesarean section. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted. Significance was defined as P<0.05. Results Totally, 24479 deliveries were included, of which 23450 (95.8%) had normal OGTTs later in pregnancy (NGT). There were 807 (3.4%) women had FPG=5.1–6.9 mM in early pregnancy. Compared to the NGT group with FPG<5.1 mM in early pregnancy (N=20692), the intermediate hyperglycaemia NGT group (N=693) had a higher age and BMI, and significantly higher rates of LGA, primary caesarean section, preterm birth, preeclampsia and neonatal distress. The rates of primary caesarean section (AOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05–1.45), preterm birth (AOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.29–2.36) and neonatal distress (adjusted OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.57–6.89) remained significantly higher after adjustments for maternal age, BMI and other potential confounding factors. Conclusions Women with intermediate hyperglycaemia in early pregnancy are at an increased risk for adverse maternal-foetal outcomes, even with normal future OGTTs.

Download Full-text

Pre-Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in 6.4 Million Women in Rural China During 2010-2016: A Population-Based, Cohort Study

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.3235629 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Yumei Wei ◽

Ying Yang ◽

Huixia Yang ◽

Huan Chen ◽

Craig Anderson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Rural China ◽

Population Based ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Adverse Pregnancy

Download Full-text

The Need for Personalized Risk-Stratified Approaches to Treatment for Gestational Diabetes: A Narrative Review

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1723778 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Shamil D. Cooray ◽

Jacqueline A. Boyle ◽

Georgia Soldatos ◽

Shakila Thangaratinam ◽

Helena J. Teede

Keyword(s):

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Population Based ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Therapeutic Interventions ◽

Clinical Prediction Model ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Adverse Pregnancy ◽

The Individual ◽

Personalized Risk

AbstractGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is common and is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the prevailing one-size-fits-all approach that treats all women with GDM as having equivalent risk needs revision, given the clinical heterogeneity of GDM, the limitations of a population-based approach to risk, and the need to move beyond a glucocentric focus to address other intersecting risk factors. To address these challenges, we propose using a clinical prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes to guide risk-stratified approaches to treatment tailored to the individual needs of women with GDM. This will allow preventative and therapeutic interventions to be delivered to those who will maximally benefit, sparing expense, and harm for those at a lower risk.

Download Full-text

Maternal obesity influences birth weight more than gestational diabetes

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth ◽

10.1186/s12884-021-03571-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Eman M Alfadhli

Keyword(s):

Birth Weight ◽

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Maternal Obesity ◽

Reference Group ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Antenatal Visit ◽

Oral Glucose ◽

The Mean ◽

Adverse Pregnancy

Abstract Background Maternal obesity and gestational diabetes (GDM) are commonly encountered during pregnancy. Both conditions are independently associated with unfavorable pregnancy consequences. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of obesity and GDM on birth weight, macrosomia, and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods This cohort study involved 531 women with a singleton pregnancy attending the Maternity and Children’s Hospital, Medina, Saudi Arabia, between June 2014 and June 2015. Participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 weeks. The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria were used for GDM diagnosis. BMI was assessed at the first antenatal visit, and obesity was defined as a BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2. All women were followed up until delivery. Women were divided into 4 groups: non-GDM nonobese (reference group), GDM nonobese, obese non-GDM, and obese GDM. Clinical characteristics and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared. Results The mean age and BMI of the participants were 30.5 years and 29.3 kg/m2, respectively. GDM was diagnosed in 50.2% of the participants, and obesity was diagnosed in 47.8% of the participants. Obese women with GDM were the oldest and heaviest among all women. The mean birth weight increased in order among the four groups; it was highest in the infants in the obese GDM group, followed by those in the obese non-GDM, GDM nonobese and reference groups. Obesity and GDM alone or in combination were associated with higher rates of macrosomia and cesarean deliveries than the reference group. Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was higher in infants in the GDM nonobese and obese GDM groups. The frequency of low Apgar score was significantly higher in infants in the obese GDM group than in infants in the reference group. Conclusions Maternal obesity seems to influence birth weight more than GDM, while GDM is associated with a greater risk of admission to the NICU. The combination of both conditions is associated with the greatest risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Download Full-text

Nutritional status of pregnant women: prevalence and associated pregnancy outcomes

Revista de Saúde Pública ◽

10.1590/s0034-89102001000600002 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 35 (6) ◽

pp. 502-507 ◽

Cited By ~ 74

Author(s):

Luciana Bertoldi Nucci ◽

Maria Inês Schmidt ◽

Bruce Bartholow Duncan ◽

Sandra Costa Fuchs ◽

Eni Teresinha Fleck ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gestational Diabetes ◽

Nutritional Status ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Educational Level ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

World Health ◽

Prepregnancy Weight ◽

Adverse Pregnancy ◽

The Impact

INTRODUCTION: Although obesity is well recognized as a current public health problem, its prevalence and impact among pregnant women have been less investigated in Brazil. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of pre-obesity and obesity among pregnant women, describing its prevalence and risk factors, and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 5,564 pregnant women, aged 20 years or more, enrolled at aproximately 20 to 28 weeks of pregnancy, seen in prenatal public clinics of six state capitals in Brazil were followed up, between 1991 and 1995. Prepregnancy weight, age, educational level and parity were obtained from a standard questionnaire. Height was measured in duplicate and the interviewer assigned the skin color. Nutritional status was defined using body mass index (BMI), according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prevalences (and 95% CI) based on prepregnancy weight were: underweight 5.7% (5.1%-6.3%), overweight 19.2% (18.1%-20.3%), and obesity 5.5% (4.9%-6.2%). Obesity was more frequently observed in older black women, with a lower educational level and multiparous. Obese women had higher frequencies of gestational diabetes, macrosomia, hypertensive disorders, and lower risk of microsomia. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight nutritional status (obesity and pre-obesity) was seen in 25% of adult pregnant women and it was associated with increased risk for several adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Training Pregnant Women and Their Husband’s on the Anxiety in Pregnant Women with Previous Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal of Fetal Medicine ◽

10.1007/s40556-019-00193-y ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 17-23 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Bita Asgharian ◽

Fahimeh sehhatie ◽

Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Randomized Clinical Trial ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Adverse Pregnancy

Download Full-text

Maternal glycemic parameters and adverse pregnancy outcomes among high-risk pregnant women

BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care ◽

10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000774 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. e000774

Author(s):

Yanwei Zheng ◽

Yun Shen ◽

Susu Jiang ◽

Xiaojing Ma ◽

Jiangshan Hu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Fasting Glucose ◽

Characteristic Curve ◽

Tolerance Test ◽

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Oral Glucose ◽

Logistic Regression Models ◽

Adverse Pregnancy

ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the association between maternal glycemic parameters and adverse pregnancy outcomes among high-risk pregnant women.Research design and methodsA total of 1976 high-risk pregnant women were enrolled between 2015 and 2017. All participants received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test during the 24–30 gestational weeks and complete birth and delivery information was collected. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as premature birth, birth weight >90th percentile, primary cesarean section, and pre-eclampsia. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between five maternal glycemic parameters during pregnancy (fasting glucose, 1-hour glucose, 2-hour glucose, HbA1c, and serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG)) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.ResultsOf 1976 participants, 498 were diagnosed with gestational diabetes. The multivariable-adjusted ORs of adverse pregnancy outcomes for each one unit increase (1 mmol/L, 1%, or 1 µg/mL) were 2.32 (95% CI 1.85 to 2.92) for fasting glucose, 1.07 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.15) for 1-hour glucose, 1.03 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.10) for 2-hour glucose, 1.77 (95% CI 1.34 to 2.33) for HbA1c, and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98) for 1,5-AG, respectively. When all five glycemic parameters were simultaneously entered into the multivariable-adjusted model, only fasting glucose was significantly associated with total and individual adverse pregnancy outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that fasting glucose plus any one of other four glycemic parameters had significantly enhanced the sensitivity of detecting adverse pregnancy outcomes.ConclusionsFasting glucose at 24–30 gestational weeks was strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fasting glucose combined with one additional glycemic measurement showed non-inferiority indicating that post-load glycemic measurement was not necessary in detecting adverse pregnancy outcomes among high-risk pregnant women.

Download Full-text