Retrospective cohort study of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Abstract Background Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has shown non-inferiority to paclitaxel (PTX) as second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with fewer infusion-related reactions. The efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus ramucirumab (RAM) was reported in a phase II trial; however, there is no randomized trial comparing this regimen with PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus RAM versus PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC. Methods This study included patients with AGC who received nab-PTX plus RAM from September 2017 to January 2019 or PTX plus RAM from June 2015 to August 2017 as second-line chemotherapy in our hospital. Results A total of 113 and 138 patients who received nab-PTX plus RAM and PTX plus RAM, respectively, were analyzed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–4.3) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.1–4.7) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.83–1.40; P = 0.573). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.3–12.7) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.5–12.0) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.10; P = 0.188). In patients with moderate/massive ascites, favorable outcomes for progression-free survival were observed in the nab-PTX plus RAM group compared with the PTX plus RAM group. Although anemia and fatigue (any grade) were more frequent in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, discontinuation of study treatment was not increased in the nab-PTX plus RAM group. There was no occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, while two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 hypersensitivity reactions in the PTX plus RAM group. Conclusions The combination of nab-PTX plus RAM showed a similar efficacy and safety profile to PTX plus RAM as second-line treatment for patients with AGC.

Download Full-text

Retrospective cohort study of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

10.21203/rs.3.rs-26226/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Mashiro Okunaka ◽

Daisuke Kotani ◽

Ken Demachi ◽

Akihito Kawazoe ◽

Takayuki Yoshino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Similar Efficacy ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has shown non-inferiority to paclitaxel (PTX) as second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with fewer infusion-related reactions. The efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus ramucirumab (RAM) was reported in a phase II trial; however, there is no randomized trial comparing this regimen with PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus RAM versus PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC.Methods: This study included patients with AGC who received nab-PTX plus RAM from September 2017 to January 2019 or PTX plus RAM from June 2015 to August 2017 as second-line chemotherapy in our hospital.Results: A total of 113 and 138 patients who received nab-PTX plus RAM and PTX plus RAM, respectively, were analyzed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–4.3) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.1–4.7) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.83–1.40; P = 0.573). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.3–12.7) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.5–12.0) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.10; P = 0.188). In patients with moderate/massive ascites, favorable outcomes for progression-free survival were observed in the nab-PTX plus RAM group compared with the PTX plus RAM group. Although anemia and fatigue (any grade) were more frequent in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, discontinuation of study treatment was not increased in the nab-PTX plus RAM group. There was no occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, while two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 hypersensitivity reactions in the PTX plus RAM group.Conclusions: The combination of nab-PTX plus RAM showed a similar efficacy and safety profile to PTX plus RAM as second-line treatment for patients with AGC.

Download Full-text

Retrospective cohort study of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

10.21203/rs.3.rs-26226/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Mashiro Okunaka ◽

Daisuke Kotani ◽

Ken Demachi ◽

Akihito Kawazoe ◽

Takayuki Yoshino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Similar Efficacy ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has shown non-inferiority to paclitaxel (PTX) as second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with fewer infusion-related reactions. The efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus ramucirumab (RAM) was reported in a phase II trial; however, there is no randomized trial comparing this regimen with PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-PTX plus RAM versus PTX plus RAM in patients with AGC.Methods: This study included patients with AGC who received nab-PTX plus RAM from September 2017 to January 2019 or PTX plus RAM from June 2015 to August 2017 as second-line chemotherapy in our hospital.Results: A total of 113 and 138 patients who received nab-PTX plus RAM and PTX plus RAM, respectively, were analyzed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4–4.3) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.1–4.7) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.83–1.40; P = 0.573). Median overall survival (OS) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 9.3–12.7) in the nab-PTX plus RAM group and 10.3 months (95% CI: 8.5–12.0) in the PTX plus RAM group (hazard ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.10; P = 0.188). In patients with moderate/massive ascites, favorable outcomes for progression-free survival were observed in the nab-PTX plus RAM group compared with the PTX plus RAM group. Although anemia and fatigue (any grade) were more frequent in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, discontinuation of study treatment was not increased in the nab-PTX plus RAM group. There was no occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction in the nab-PTX plus RAM group, while two patients (1.4%) experienced grade 3 hypersensitivity reactions in the PTX plus RAM group.Conclusions: The combination of nab-PTX plus RAM showed a similar efficacy and safety profile to PTX plus RAM as second-line treatment for patients with AGC.

Download Full-text

Irinotecan Plus Mitomycin C as Second-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer Resistant to Fluoropyrimidine and Cisplatin: A Retrospective Study

Gastroenterology Research and Practice ◽

10.1155/2012/640401 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 2012 ◽

pp. 1-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kohei Ogawa ◽

Ayumu Hosokawa ◽

Akira Ueda ◽

Seiko Saito ◽

Hiroshi Mihara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Mitomycin C ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Second Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Line Chemotherapy

Background. S-1 plus cisplatin has been established to be standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Japan. The optimal second-line treatment refractory to S-1 plus cisplatin remains unclear.Methods. We retrospectively studied the efficacy, toxicity, and survival of irinotecan plus mitomycin C in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to a fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin.Results. Twenty-four patients were studied. Prior chemotherapy was S-1 plus cisplatin in 15 patients, S-1 plus cisplatin and docetaxel in 8, and 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin with radiotherapy in 1. The overall response rate was 17.4%. The median overall survival was 8.6 months, and the median progression-free survival was 3.6 months. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included leukopenia (33%), neutropenia (50%), anemia (33%), thrombocytopenia (4%), anorexia (13%), diarrhea (4%), and febrile neutropenia (13%).Conclusion. A combination of irinotecan and mitomycin C is potentially effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to a fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin.

Download Full-text

HGCSG 1603: Phase II study of ramucirumab and irinotecan combination therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.tps183 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS183-TPS183

Author(s):

Atsushi Ishiguro ◽

Yasuyuki Kawamoto ◽

Satoshi Yuki ◽

Yoshimitsu Kobayashi ◽

Kazuaki Harada ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Dose Intensity ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Free Survival

TPS183 Background: As second-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer, a survival benefit has been shown in several clinical trials. Irinotecan and taxanes are recommended as second-line regimen. However, therapeutic outcomes have remained unsatisfactory and more effective treatment are expected. Ramucirumab (RAM) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) antibody that prevents ligand binding of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D and the receptor-mediated pathway activation in endothelial cells, subsequently inhibiting neovascularization. In the REGARD study, RAM monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma improved median overall survival (mOS) compared with placebo. Moreover, in the RAINBOW study, RAM plus paclitaxel (PTX) versus placebo plus PTX, mOS showed significantly longer in RAM plus PTX group than in placebo plus PTX group. In contrast, there are no data on the efficacy of RAM and irinotecan in the second-line treatment for gastric cancer. The WJOG 4007 study demonstrated an equivalent efficacy between irinotecan and PTX. In this study, we propose to examine the efficacy of RAM plus irinotecan. Methods: This study is carried out as a multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, prospective, phase II study. The patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer that is refractory or intolerance to primary chemotherapy are eligible for this study. RAM and irinotecan combination therapy is administered every two weeks, which is continued until progression or emergence of adverse events requiring discontinuation. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at six months, and the secondary endpoints are OS, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and dose intensity for each drug. A total of 35 cases areplanned for registration. This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030372.

Download Full-text

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽

10.1159/000517244 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Kotone Hayuka ◽

Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽

Akitsu Murakami ◽

Yoshihiro Okita ◽

Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Common Grade ◽

Grade 3

Introduction: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. Results: The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). Conclusions: GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Download Full-text

Multicenter randomized phase II study of weekly docetaxel alone versus weekly docetaxel plus oxaliplatin as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Preliminary response and safety results.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e14570 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14570-e14570 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jin Young Kim ◽

Young Rok Do ◽

Keon Uk Park ◽

Hun-Mo Ryoo ◽

Sung Hwa Bae ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Therapy Group ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Combination Group ◽

Second Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Weekly Docetaxel ◽

Line Chemotherapy

e14570 Background: Gastric cancer is a frequent malignancy with worldwide estimated incidence of 990,000 cases, representing 7.8% of all cancers in 2008. There are limited data suggesting a benefit for doublet second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: The eligibility criteria were patients 1) with prior exposure to cisplatin based chemotherapy and advanced or recurrent stomach cancer 2) with pathologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, 3) with an ECOG performance status 0 to 2, 4) with measurable lesions. Each treatment cycle was consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m2 in docetaxel mono therapy group and docetaxel 36 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 in docetaxel/oxaliplatin doublet therapy group on days 1, 8. The primary end point of this study was response rate, and secondary end points included toxicity, progression free and overall survival. Results: Fifty two patients were enrolled; median age was 63 years; male (n=42) and female (n=10); docetaxel mono therapy (n=27) and docetaxel/oxalliplatin doublet therapy (n=25). The median number of cycles administered was 2.5 (range,1-9). Fourty eight patients were assessable for efficacy. Four partial responses, 7 stable diseases in mono therapy group (RR; 4/27, 14.8%) and 1 complete remission, 4 partial responses, 13 stable diseases in double therapy group (RR; 5/25, 20.0%) were confirmed (p=0.198). Median progression free survival was 1.97 months in the mono therapy group and 4.93 months in doublet therapy group (p=0.007). Median overall survival was 11.57 months in the mono therapy group and 8.13 months in doublet therapy group (p=0.650). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 11 of 52 patients; G3 pain were in 2 patients and G3 pneumonia was in 1 patient in mono group, G3/4 neutropenia were 5 patients in the combination group, G3 nausea, vomiting, general weakness was 1 patient each group in combination group. Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel/oxaliplatin doublet therapy showed superior progression free survival to monotherapy group as second line therapy in cisplatin pretreated advanced gastric cancer patients.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/ramucirumab as the second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15540 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15540-e15540

Author(s):

Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽

Akinori Egashira ◽

Hideto Sonoda ◽

Kenkichi Hashimoto ◽

Hideo Uehara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Weekly Dose ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Second Line Chemotherapy ◽

Line Chemotherapy

e15540 Background: Second-line chemotherapy can now be considered as a proven treatment option for metastatic or locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Two global randomized phase III trials (REGARD and RAINBOW) showed that survival benefit was significantly observed in patients treated with ramucirumab (RAM) alone and in combination with weekly doses of PTX, compared with placebo, respectively. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly dose of PTX combined with RAM practically as the second-line treatment in Japanese patients with AGC refractory to an S-1-containing chemotherapy regimen. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the data of 18 patients with AGC who received more than 2 cycles of PTX/RAM combined chemotherapy as the second-line regimen following S-1-based treatment. The objective response rate (ORR), adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared with PTX monotherapy group. Results: Median number of courses were 5 for the PTX/RAM group and the discontinuation of treatment except for disease progression was found in 2 cases (33.3%). The rates of hematological toxicities of higher than grade 3 were 33.3% in the PTX/RAM group, which were higher than those found in the PTX groups. The tumor responses of the PTX/RAM group were 22% for the ORR and 78% for the DCR, compared with 21% and 48% in the PTX group, respectively. The dose intensities of PTX were 72.4% in the former group. The survival data showed that the MST after second-line exposure was 290 days and the median PFS was 131 days in the PTX/RAM group, compared with 159 days and 90 days in the PTX group, which were not significantly different. Conclusions: PTX/RAM might be one of the best regimens for Japanese patients with AGC as the second-line treatment following S-1-containing chemotherapy.

Download Full-text

A comparison of FOLFIRI (Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil and Irinotecan) Plus Bevacizumab and FLOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

10.21203/rs.3.rs-127099/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Min-Sang Lee ◽

Yong-Pyo Lee ◽

Hongsik Kim ◽

Jung Yong Hong ◽

Jeeyun Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Folinic Acid ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: To date, there are few clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab or aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) pretreated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed the treatment outcomes of patients receiving FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab or aflibercept as second-line treatment for mCRC between October 2017 and March 2020. This analysis included 67 patients receiving FOLFIRI plus aflibercept and 83 receiving FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.6% (95% CI: 4.85-22.34) in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group and 14.7% (95% CI: 6.68-22.71) in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group. This difference in ORR was not statistically significant. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group and 8.5 months in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group (P = 0.752) (Fig. 1). Patients in the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab group showed a median overall survival (OS) of 12.4 months, while patients in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group had a median OS of 13.7 months (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in survival between the two treatment groups. The adverse events were also largely similar between the two groups. However, hypertension of grade 3 or more was more frequent in the FOLFIRI-aflibercept group. Conclusion: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus aflibercept had similar anti-tumor activities and toxicity profiles when used as second-line therapy in mCRC patients. Based on these data, both aflibercept and bevacizumab are suitable anti-angiogenic agents when used in combination with FOLFIRI for mCRC.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis

Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology ◽

10.1177/1758835920923424 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

pp. 175883592092342 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Heejung Chae ◽

Hyehyun Jeong ◽

Jaekyung Cheon ◽

Hong Jae Chon ◽

Hyewon Ryu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Retrospective Analysis ◽

Treatment Option ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3

Background: FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin) is an effective standard first-line treatment option for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There is no clear consensus on the second-line treatment following progression on FOLFIRINOX. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of second-line nab-P/Gem (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) after progression on FOLFIRNOX in PDAC. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic PDAC who received nab-P/Gem after progression on FOLFIRINOX between February 2016 and February 2019 were identified from five referral cancer centers in South Korea. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, survival outcomes, and toxicity profile were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Results: A total of 102 patients treated with second-line nab-P/Gem for advanced PDAC after progression on FOLFIRINOX were included. At the time of nab-P/Gem, the median age was 60 years, with males comprising 49.0%, and most (75.5%) had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1–12) of nab-P/Gem. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second-line nab-P/Gem therapy were 9.8 (95% CI, 8.9–10.6) and 4.6 months (3.7–5.5), respectively. A partial response was achieved in 8.5%, and the disease control rate was 73.6%. From the start of first-line FOLFIRIOX, the OS1+2 and PFS1+2 were 20.9 (15.7–26.1) and 13.9 (10.8–17.0) months, respectively, with a 2-year survival rate of 45.1%. There was no treatment-related mortality and grade ⩾3 toxicity was observed in 60.2%. Conclusion: Our results showed that nab-P/Gem was an effective and tolerable second-line treatment option in medically fit patients with advanced PDAC who progressed on first-line FOLFIRNOX. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04133155

Download Full-text