scholarly journals Palliative Gastrectomy versus Gastrojejunostomy for advanced Gastric cancer with outlet obstruction: a propensity score matching analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jiang Chen ◽  
Guo-Ming Chen ◽  
Yi-Cheng Wei ◽  
Hong Yu ◽  
Xi-Cheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Palliative Gastrectomy

Abstract Background Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a late complication of advanced gastric cancer, and it is controversial how to select the therapeutic strategies: gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy? Therefore, this study was to compare the surgical and survival outcomes of gastrojejunostomy and palliative gastrectomy. Methods In total, 199 gastric cancer patients with outlet obstruction treated by surgery between January 2000 and December 2015 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into gastrojejunostomy group and palliative gastrectomy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the selection bias. Results After 1:1 PSM, a total of 104 patients were included for final analysis. The median overall survival (OS) times in the gastrojejunostomy group and palliative gastrectomy group were 8.50 and 11.87 months, respectively (P = 0.243). The postoperative complication rates in the gastrojejunostomy group and palliative gastrectomy group were 19.23% (10/52) and 17.31% (9/52), respectively (P = 0.800), and no treatment-related death was observed. Multivariate analysis showed that periton0eal seeding (P = 0.014) and chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Among them, peritoneal seeding was a risk factor and postoperative chemotherapy was a protective factor. Conclusions Our results indicated that although the surgical complications of palliative gastrectomy were manageable, it showed no survival benefit. Therefore, relieving obstruction symptom, improving patients’ quality of life and creating better conditions for chemotherapy appear to be the main therapeutic strategies for advanced gastric cancer with GOO.

scholarly journals The Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapies for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-386
Author(s):  
Tongbo Wang ◽  
Yingtai Chen ◽  
Lulu Zhao ◽  
Hong Zhou ◽  
Chaorui Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Robotic- versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changdong Yang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Shaohui Xie ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Yongliang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of RATG compared with LATG for AGC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 126 and 257 patients who underwent RATG or LATG, respectively. In addition, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between RATG and LATG for clinicopathological characteristics to reduce bias and compared short-term surgical outcomes. Results: After PSM, the RATG group had a longer mean operation time (291.14±59.18 vs. 270.34±52.22 min, p=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (154.37±89.68 vs. 183.77±95.39 ml, p=0.004) and more N2 tier RLNs (9.07±5.34 vs. 7.56±4.50, p=0.016) than the LATG group. Additionally, the total RLNs of the RATG group were almost significantly different compared to that of the LATG group (34.90±13.05 vs. 31.91±12.46, p=0.065).Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the length of incision, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, residual disease and postoperative hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the RATG and LATG groups after PSM (23.8% vs. 28.6%, p=0.390). Grade II complications accounted for most of the complications in the two cohorts after PSM. The conversion rates were 4.55% and 8.54% in the RATG and LATG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.145), and the ratio of splenectomy were 1.59% and 0.39% (p=0.253). The mortality rates were 0.8% and 0.4% for the RATG and LATG groups, respectively (p=1.000). Conclusion : This study demonstrates that RATG is comparable to LATG in terms of short-term surgical outcomes.

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Robotic- versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changdong Yang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Shaohui Xie ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Yongliang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of RATG compared with LATG for AGC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 126 and 257 patients who underwent RATG or LATG, respectively. In addition, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between RATG and LATG for clinicopathological characteristics to reduce bias and compared short-term surgical outcomes. Results: After PSM, the RATG group had a longer mean operation time (291.14±59.18 vs. 270.34±52.22 min, p=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (154.37±89.68 vs. 183.77±95.39 ml, p=0.004) and more N2 tier RLNs (9.07±5.34 vs. 7.56±4.50, p=0.016) than the LATG group. Additionally, the total RLNs of the RATG group were almost significantly different compared to that of the LATG group (34.90±13.05 vs. 31.91±12.46, p=0.065).Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the length of incision, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, residual disease and postoperative hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the RATG and LATG groups after PSM (23.8% vs. 28.6%, p=0.390). Grade II complications accounted for most of the complications in the two cohorts after PSM. The conversion rates were 4.55% and 8.54% in the RATG and LATG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.145), and the ratio of splenectomy were 1.59% and 0.39% (p=0.253). The mortality rates were 0.8% and 0.4% for the RATG and LATG groups, respectively (p=1.000).Conclusion: This study demonstrates that RATG is comparable to LATG in terms of short-term surgical outcomes.

scholarly journals Short-term Outcomes of Robotic- versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changdong Yang ◽  
Yan Shi ◽  
Shaohui Xie ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Yongliang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Few studies have been designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes between robotic-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of RATG compared with LATG for AGC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 126 and 257 patients who underwent RATG or LATG, respectively. In addition, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between RATG and LATG for clinicopathological characteristics to reduce bias and compared short-term surgical outcomes. Results: After PSM, the RATG group had a longer mean operation time (291.14±59.18 vs. 270.34±52.22 min, p=0.003), less intraoperative bleeding (154.37±89.68 vs. 183.77±95.39 ml, p=0.004) and more N2 tier RLNs (9.07±5.34 vs. 7.56±4.50, p=0.016) than the LATG group. Additionally, the total RLNs of the RATG group were almost significantly different compared to that of the LATG group (34.90±13.05 vs. 31.91±12.46, p=0.065).Moreover, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the length of incision, proximal resection margin, distal resection margin, residual disease and postoperative hospital stay. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between the RATG and LATG groups after PSM (23.8% vs. 28.6%, p=0.390). Grade II complications accounted for most of the complications in the two cohorts after PSM. The conversion rates were 4.55% and 8.54% in the RATG and LATG groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.145), and the ratio of splenectomy were 1.59% and 0.39% (p=0.253). The mortality rates were 0.8% and 0.4% for the RATG and LATG groups, respectively (p=1.000). Conclusion : This study demonstrates that RATG is comparable to LATG in terms of short-term surgical outcomes.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Gastric Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 225s-225s
Author(s):  
Z. Li
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
D2 Lymph Node Dissection

Background: Technical safety and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have been investigated in many clinical trials. However, studies with large sample size and sufficient follow-up comparing LAG and open gastrectomy (OG) for AGC have seldom been reported. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of LAG vs open OG for AGC using a propensity score matching analysis. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 459 and 856 patients who underwent LG or OG with D2 lymph node dissection, respectively, for AGC between June 2007 and June 2012. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups. We compared long-term outcomes between the 2 groups after propensity score matching. Results: In the propensity score-matched cohort, no significant differences were observed in 5-year overall survival (OS) (52.0% vs 53.4%; P = 0.805) and disease-free survival (DFS) (46.8% vs 47.3%; P = 0.963) between the LAG group and OG group. Stratified analysis showed that the 5-year OS and DFS rates were comparable between the 2 groups in each tumor stage ( P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the operation method was not an independent prognostic factor for OS or DFS. Further analysis showed that the recurrence pattern was similar between the LAG group the OG group ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: LAG is a feasible surgical procedure for AGC in comparison with OG in terms of long-term prognosis, although the results should be confirmed by the ongoing randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document