scholarly journals Increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second malignancy

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengshi Wang ◽  
Kejia Hu ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
Wei He ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Second Malignancy ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Radio Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Abstract Background Cancer survivors who develop breast cancer as a second malignancy (BCa-2) are common. Yet, little is known about the prognosis of BCa-2 compared to first primary breast cancer (BCa-1). Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study including 883,881 patients with BCa-1 and 36,313 patients with BCa-2 during 1990–2015. Compared with patients with BCa-1, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer-specific mortality among patients with BCa-2, using multivariable Cox regression. Results During the follow-up (median 5.5 years), 114,964 and 3829 breast cancer-specific deaths were identified among BCa-1 and BCa-2 patients, respectively. Patients with BCa-2 had more favorable tumor characteristics and received less intensive treatment e.g., surgery and chemo−/radio-therapy, compared to patients with BCa-1. When adjusting for demographic factors, patients with BCa-2 were at similar risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.03) compared to patients with BCa-1. However, when additionally controlling for tumor characteristics and treatment modes, BCa-2 patients were at an increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08–1.15). The risk elevation was particularly greater when the first malignancy was lung, bladder, ovarian or blood malignancy (HRs 1.16–1.85), or when the first malignancy was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28–1.63). Conclusions Overall, patients with BCa-2 have worse breast cancer-specific survival, compared with their BCa-1 counterparts, although the risk elevation is mild. High-risk subgroups based on first malignancy’s characteristics may be considered for active clinical management.

scholarly journals Obesity and survival among a cohort of breast cancer patients is partially mediated by tumor characteristics

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy K. Blair ◽  
Charles L. Wiggins ◽  
Andrea M. Nibbe ◽  
Curt B. Storlie ◽  
Eric R. Prossnitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Survival ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Abstract Obesity exerts adverse effects on breast cancer survival, but the means have not been fully elucidated. We evaluated obesity as a contributor to breast cancer survival according to tumor molecular subtypes in a population-based case–cohort study using data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. We determined whether obese women were more likely to be diagnosed with poor prognosis tumor characteristics and quantified the contribution of obesity to survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated via Cox multivariate models. The effect of obesity on survival was evaluated among 859 incident breast cancers (subcohort; 15% random sample; median survival 7.8 years) and 697 deaths from breast cancer (cases; 100% sample). Obese women had a 1.7- and 1.8-fold increased risk of stage III/IV disease and grade 3/4 tumors, respectively. Obese women with Luminal A- and Luminal B-like breast cancer were 1.8 (95% CI 1.3–2.5) and 2.2 (95% CI 0.9–5.0) times more likely to die from their cancer compared to normal weight women. In mediation analyses, the proportion of excess mortality attributable to tumor characteristics was 36.1% overall and 41% and 38% for Luminal A- and Luminal B-like disease, respectively. Obesity was not associated with breast cancer-specific mortality among women who had Her2-overexpressing or triple-negative tumors. Obesity may influence hormone-positive breast cancer-specific mortality in part through fostering poor prognosis tumors. When tumor biology is considered as part of the causal pathway, the public health impact of obesity on breast cancer survival may be greater than previously estimated.

scholarly journals Postdiagnosis Changes in Cigarette Smoking and Survival Following Breast Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Parada ◽  
Patrick T. Bradshaw ◽  
Susan E. Steck ◽  
Lawrence S. Engel ◽  
Kathleen Conway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Never Smokers

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to examine whether at-diagnosis smoking and postdiagnosis changes in smoking within five years after breast cancer were associated with long-term all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Methods A population-based cohort of 1508 women diagnosed with first primary in situ or invasive breast cancer in 1996 to 1997 were interviewed shortly after diagnosis and again approximately five years later to assess smoking history. Participants were followed for vital status through December 31, 2014. After 18+ years of follow-up, 597 deaths were identified, 237 of which were breast cancer related. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Compared with never smokers, risk of all-cause mortality was elevated among the 19% of at-diagnosis smokers (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.36 to 2.11), those who smoked 20 or more cigarettes per day (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.42 to 2.40), women who had smoked for 30 or more years (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.05), and women who had smoked 30 or more pack-years (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.39 to 2.37). Risk of all-cause mortality was further increased among the 8% of women who were at-/postdiagnosis smokers (HR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.56 to 3.39) but was attenuated among the 11% women who quit smoking after diagnosis (HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.32 to 2.52). Compared with never smokers, breast cancer–specific mortality risk was elevated 60% (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.79 to 3.23) among at-/postdiagnosis current smokers, but the confidence interval included the null value and elevated 175% (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.26 to 5.99) when we considered postdiagnosis cumulative pack-years. Conclusions Smoking negatively impacts long-term survival after breast cancer. Postdiagnosis cessation of smoking may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. Breast cancer survivors may benefit from aggressive smoking cessation programs starting as early as the time of diagnosis.

scholarly journals Mortality After Invasive Second Breast Cancers Following Prior Radiotherapy for DCIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1367-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puyao C. Li ◽  
Zilu Zhang ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Rinaa S. Punglia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
The Impact

Background: Women with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are at increased risk for developing a second breast cancer (SBC). A prior meta-analysis of randomized studies of radiotherapy (RT) for DCIS has shown a trend toward increased breast cancer–specific mortality after SBC, but it did not have the power needed to detect a significant difference, due to a limited number of recurrences. This study sought to evaluate the impact of RT for DCIS on mortality after SBC in a larger cohort. Patients and Methods: Using the SEER database, 3,407 patients were identified who received breast-conserving therapy with or without RT for primary DCIS in 2000 through 2013 and subsequently developed a stage I–III invasive SBC within the same time period. Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to study the association between receipt of RT and mortality after SBC. Results: Prior RT was found to be associated with higher rates of breast cancer–specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.18–2.45; P=.005), even after controlling for cancer stage. Interaction analysis suggested that this risk trended higher in patients with ipsilateral versus contralateral SBC (HR, 2.07 vs 1.26; P=.16). Furthermore, compared with patients who developed contralateral SBC, those with ipsilateral SBC were younger (P<.001) and more often lacked estrogen receptor expression (P<.001). Conclusions: Patients who previously received RT for DCIS had higher mortality after developing an invasive SBC than those who did not receive RT. This finding may have implications for initial treatment decisions in the management of DCIS.

scholarly journals Associated Factors and Survival Outcomes for Breast Conserving Surgery versus Mastectomy among New Zealand Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2738
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shoaib Abrahimi ◽  
Mark Elwood ◽  
Ross Lawrenson ◽  
Ian Campbell ◽  
Sandar Tin Tin
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

This study aimed to investigate type of loco-regional treatment received, associated treatment factors and mortality outcomes in New Zealand women with early-stage breast cancer who were eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS). This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Auckland and Waikato Breast Cancer Registers and involves 6972 women who were diagnosed with early-stage primary breast cancer (I-IIIa) between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2015, were eligible for BCS and had received one of four loco-regional treatments: breast conserving surgery (BCS), BCS followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT), mastectomy (MTX) or MTX followed by radiotherapy (MTX + RT), as their primary cancer treatment. About 66.1% of women received BCS + RT, 8.4% received BCS only, 21.6% received MTX alone and 3.9% received MTX + RT. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with the receipt of the BCS + RT (standard treatment). Differences in the uptake of BCS + RT were present across patient demographic and clinical factors. BCS + RT was less likely amongst patients who were older (75+ years old), were of Asian ethnicity, resided in impoverished areas or areas within the Auckland region and were treated in a public healthcare facility. Additionally, BCS + RT was less likely among patients diagnosed symptomatically, diagnosed during 2000–2004, had an unknown tumour grade, negative/unknown oestrogen and progesterone receptor status or tumour sizes ≥ 20 mm, ≤50 mm and had nodal involvement. Competing risk regression analysis was undertaken to estimate the breast cancer-specific mortality associated with each of the four loco-regional treatments received. Over a median follow-up of 8.8 years, women who received MTX alone had a higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.82) compared to women who received BCS + RT. MTX + RT and BCS alone did not have any statistically different risk of mortality when compared to BCS + RT. Further inquiry is needed as to any advantages BCS + RT may have over MTX alternatives.

scholarly journals Elevated Cancer-Specific Mortality Among HIV-Infected Patients in the United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (21) ◽  
pp. 2376-2383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna E. Coghill ◽  
Meredith S. Shiels ◽  
Gita Suneja ◽  
Eric A. Engels
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Infected People ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Purpose Despite advances in the treatment of HIV, HIV-infected people remain at increased risk for many cancers, and the number of non–AIDS-defining cancers is increasing with the aging of the HIV-infected population. No prior study has comprehensively evaluated the effect of HIV on cancer-specific mortality. Patients and Methods We identified cases of 14 common cancers occurring from 1996 to 2010 in six US states participating in a linkage of cancer and HIV/AIDS registries. We used Cox regression to examine the association between patient HIV status and death resulting from the presenting cancer (ascertained from death certificates), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, year of cancer diagnosis, and cancer stage. We included 1,816,461 patients with cancer, 6,459 (0.36%) of whom were HIV infected. Results Cancer-specific mortality was significantly elevated in HIV-infected compared with HIV-uninfected patients for many cancers: colorectum (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.84), pancreas (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.35 to 2.18), larynx (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.47), lung (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.39), melanoma (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.70), breast (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.06 to 3.31), and prostate (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.41). HIV was not associated with increased cancer-specific mortality for anal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. After further adjustment for cancer treatment, HIV remained associated with elevated cancer-specific mortality for common non–AIDS-defining cancers: colorectum (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.80), lung (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44), melanoma (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.27), and breast (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.86 to 3.73). Conclusion HIV-infected patients with cancer experienced higher cancer-specific mortality than HIV-uninfected patients, independent of cancer stage or receipt of cancer treatment. The elevation in cancer-specific mortality among HIV-infected patients may be attributable to unmeasured stage or treatment differences as well as a direct relationship between immunosuppression and tumor progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document