scholarly journals Elevated Cancer-Specific Mortality Among HIV-Infected Patients in the United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (21) ◽  
pp. 2376-2383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna E. Coghill ◽  
Meredith S. Shiels ◽  
Gita Suneja ◽  
Eric A. Engels
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Infected People ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Purpose Despite advances in the treatment of HIV, HIV-infected people remain at increased risk for many cancers, and the number of non–AIDS-defining cancers is increasing with the aging of the HIV-infected population. No prior study has comprehensively evaluated the effect of HIV on cancer-specific mortality. Patients and Methods We identified cases of 14 common cancers occurring from 1996 to 2010 in six US states participating in a linkage of cancer and HIV/AIDS registries. We used Cox regression to examine the association between patient HIV status and death resulting from the presenting cancer (ascertained from death certificates), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, year of cancer diagnosis, and cancer stage. We included 1,816,461 patients with cancer, 6,459 (0.36%) of whom were HIV infected. Results Cancer-specific mortality was significantly elevated in HIV-infected compared with HIV-uninfected patients for many cancers: colorectum (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.84), pancreas (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.35 to 2.18), larynx (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.47), lung (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.39), melanoma (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.70), breast (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.06 to 3.31), and prostate (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.41). HIV was not associated with increased cancer-specific mortality for anal cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. After further adjustment for cancer treatment, HIV remained associated with elevated cancer-specific mortality for common non–AIDS-defining cancers: colorectum (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.80), lung (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44), melanoma (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.27), and breast (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.86 to 3.73). Conclusion HIV-infected patients with cancer experienced higher cancer-specific mortality than HIV-uninfected patients, independent of cancer stage or receipt of cancer treatment. The elevation in cancer-specific mortality among HIV-infected patients may be attributable to unmeasured stage or treatment differences as well as a direct relationship between immunosuppression and tumor progression.

Disparities in the treatment and outcomes of lung cancer among HIV-infected people in Texas.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6070-6070
Author(s):  
Gita Suneja ◽  
Meredith S. Shiels ◽  
Sharon K. Melville ◽  
Melanie A. Williams ◽  
Ramesh Rengan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Lung Cancer Mortality ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Infected People ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
To Receive

6070 Background: HIV-infected (HIV+) people are at elevated risk for lung cancer and have higher mortality following lung cancer diagnosis than uninfected (HIV-) individuals. The disparity in survival is partly due to advanced stage at diagnosis, but it is unclear whether HIV+ people with lung cancer are less likely to receive cancer treatment, which could worsen survival. Methods: We included adults ≥ 18 years of age with lung cancer reported to the Texas cancer registry (N=156,930). HIV status was determined by linkage with the enhanced Texas HIV/AIDS Reporting System. We compared HIV+ and HIV- lung cancer cases with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, we identified predictors of cancer treatment (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) using logistic regression. We used Cox regression to evaluate the effects of HIV and treatment on lung cancer-specific mortality. Results: Compared with HIV- lung cancer cases (N=156,593), HIV+ lung cancer cases (N=337) were more likely to be young, non-Hispanic black, male, and to have distant stage disease (53.7% vs. 44.4%). HIV+ cases were less likely to receive cancer treatment than HIV- cases (60.3% vs. 77.5%; odds ratio 0.39, 95%CI 0.30-0.52 after adjustment for diagnosis year, age, sex, race, stage, and histologic subtype). In Cox models adjusted for these variables, both HIV infection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34, 95%CI 1.15-1.56) and lack of cancer treatment (HR 1.69, 95%CI 1.66-1.72) were associated with higher lung cancer-specific mortality. After adjustment for cancer treatment, the association between HIV and lung cancer mortality was attenuated (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.06-1.47). The association between HIV and lung cancer-specific mortality was stronger among untreated lung cancer cases (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1.01-1.72) than treated cases (adjusted HR 1.16, 95%CI 0.94-1.43; p-interaction=0.34). Conclusions: In this population-based study, HIV+ people with NSCLC were less likely to be treated for lung cancer than their HIV- counterparts. This lack of treatment may be partly responsible for higher cancer-related mortality in HIV+ cases. Further investigation is needed to understand disparities in cancer treatment for HIV+ people.

Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 245-245
Author(s):  
Mahir Khan ◽  
Ryan Huu-Tuan Nguyen ◽  
James Love ◽  
Alexander Krule ◽  
Michael Weinfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Anticancer Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospitalization Rate ◽  
Asian Ethnicity ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

245 Background: Patients with cancer who have been treated with systemic anticancer therapy are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 and have been considered a high-priority group for COVID-19 vaccination in the United States. There is limited guidance and data on the appropriate timing of COVID-19 vaccination relative to receipt of systemic anticancer therapy. Methods: We queried the electronic medical record at the University of Illinois Hospital for patients with gastrointestinal, breast, lung, genitourinary, and head and neck tumors who had received intravenous systemic anticancer therapy between January 1, 2021 and May 25, 2021. Baseline variables were obtained as well as details of cancer treatment, vaccination timing relative to cancer treatment, and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 274 patients received intravenous systemic anticancer therapy during the study period, of which 161 (58.8%) received at least one vaccine dose, and 138 (42.7%) were fully vaccinated. Of the 122 patients who received cancer treatment within 30 days of any vaccine dose, the median age was 64, and 72 (59%) were female gender. Race distribution was 50% Black, 15.6% White, 3.3% Asian; ethnicity was 24.6% Hispanic and 73% not-Hispanic. Treatment regimens consisted of 37.7% chemotherapy, 25.4% immunotherapy, 27.9% combination therapy, and 9.0% targeted therapy. For those who received anticancer therapy within 30 days of a vaccine, median time between any vaccination and treatment was 10 days (range 0-29 days). For those who had at least 60 days of follow-up after first vaccination, all-cause hospitalization rate was 22.4% (23/106). There was no statistical difference in all-cause 60-day hospitalization rate between those who received vaccination within 5 days of anticancer therapy versus those who received it between 6 and 30 days from anticancer therapy (14.3% vs 28.1%, p = 0.1). One patient (0.8%) developed a COVID-19 illness after any vaccine and did not require hospitalization. Conclusions: We observed safe and efficacious COVID-19 vaccination of patients with cancer receiving systemic IV anticancer therapy. COVID-19 infection after vaccination was rare, with no cases requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 illness post-vaccination in this cohort. All-cause hospitalization rates were similar among patients who received a vaccine within or after 5 days of receiving systemic anticancer therapy, suggesting vaccination side effect tolerability. Further quality improvement studies are needed on interventions to increase vaccination rates in this vulnerable population.

scholarly journals Increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors who developed breast cancer as a second malignancy

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengshi Wang ◽  
Kejia Hu ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
Wei He ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Second Malignancy ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Mortality ◽  
Radio Therapy ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cancer Specific Mortality

Abstract Background Cancer survivors who develop breast cancer as a second malignancy (BCa-2) are common. Yet, little is known about the prognosis of BCa-2 compared to first primary breast cancer (BCa-1). Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study including 883,881 patients with BCa-1 and 36,313 patients with BCa-2 during 1990–2015. Compared with patients with BCa-1, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer-specific mortality among patients with BCa-2, using multivariable Cox regression. Results During the follow-up (median 5.5 years), 114,964 and 3829 breast cancer-specific deaths were identified among BCa-1 and BCa-2 patients, respectively. Patients with BCa-2 had more favorable tumor characteristics and received less intensive treatment e.g., surgery and chemo−/radio-therapy, compared to patients with BCa-1. When adjusting for demographic factors, patients with BCa-2 were at similar risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97–1.03) compared to patients with BCa-1. However, when additionally controlling for tumor characteristics and treatment modes, BCa-2 patients were at an increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08–1.15). The risk elevation was particularly greater when the first malignancy was lung, bladder, ovarian or blood malignancy (HRs 1.16–1.85), or when the first malignancy was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28–1.63). Conclusions Overall, patients with BCa-2 have worse breast cancer-specific survival, compared with their BCa-1 counterparts, although the risk elevation is mild. High-risk subgroups based on first malignancy’s characteristics may be considered for active clinical management.

scholarly journals Dietary patterns related to total mortality and cancer mortality in the United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela R. Entwistle ◽  
Donald Schweizer ◽  
Ricardo Cisneros
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Dietary Patterns ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
The United States ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Purpose This study investigated the association between dietary patterns, total mortality, and cancer mortality in the United States. Methods We identified the four major dietary patterns at baseline from 13,466 participants of the NHANES III cohort using principal component analysis (PCA). Dietary patterns were categorized into ‘prudent’ (fruits and vegetables), ‘western’ (red meat, sweets, pastries, oils), ‘traditional’ (red meat, legumes, potatoes, bread), and ‘fish and alcohol’. We estimated hazard ratios for total mortality, and cancer mortality using Cox regression models. Results A total of 4,963 deaths were documented after a mean follow-up of 19.59 years. Higher adherence to the ‘prudent’ pattern was associated with the lowest risk of total mortality (5th vs. 1st quintile HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.98), with evidence that all-cause mortality decreased as consumption of the pattern increased. No evidence was found that the ‘prudent’ pattern reduced cancer mortality. The ‘western’ and the ‘traditional’ patterns were associated with up to 22% and 16% increased risk for total mortality (5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11–1.34; and 5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06–1.27, respectively), and up to 33% and 15% increased risk for cancer mortality (5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10–1.62; and 5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.24, respectively). The associations between adherence to the ‘fish and alcohol’ pattern and total mortality, and cancer mortality were not statistically significant. Conclusion Higher adherence to the ‘prudent’ diet decreased the risk of all-cause mortality but did not affect cancer mortality. Greater adherence to the ‘western’ and ‘traditional’ diet increased the risk of total mortality and mortality due to cancer.

Abstract 14: The Influence of Provider Specialty on Anticoagulation Prescription Fills and Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With History of Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley T O’Neal ◽  
J’Neka Claxton ◽  
Richard MacLehose ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Lindsay G Bengtson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Reduced Risk ◽  
History Of Cancer

Background: Early cardiology involvement within 90 days of atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis is associated with greater likelihood of oral anticoagulant use and a reduced risk of stroke. Due to variation in cardiovascular care for patients with cancer, it is possible that a similar association does not exist for AF patients with cancer. Methods: We examined the association of early cardiology involvement with oral anticoagulation use among non-valvular AF patients with history of cancer (past or active), using data from 388,045 patients (mean age=68±15 years; 59% male) from the MarketScan database (2009-2014). ICD-9 codes in any position were used to identify cancer diagnosis prior to AF diagnosis. Provider specialty and filled anticoagulant prescriptions 3 months prior to and 6 months after AF diagnosis were obtained. Poisson regression models were used to compute the probability of an oral anticoagulant prescription fill and Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of stroke and major bleeding. Results: A total of 64,016 (17%) AF patients had a prior history of cancer. Cardiology involvement was less likely to occur among patients with history of cancer than those without (relative risk=0.92, 95% confidence interval (0.91, 0.93)). Similar differences were observed for cancers of the colon (0.90 (0.88, 0.92)), lung (0.76 (0.74, 0.78)), pancreas (0.74 (0.69, 0.80)), and hematologic system (0.88 (0.87, 0.90)), while no differences were observed for breast or prostate cancers. Patients with cancer were less likely to fill prescriptions for anticoagulants (0.89 (0.88, 0.90)) than those without cancer, and similar results were observed for cancers of the colon, lung, prostate, pancreas, and hematologic system. However, patients with cancer were more likely to fill prescriptions for anticoagulants (1.48 (1.45, 1.52)) if seen by a cardiology provider, regardless of cancer type. A reduced risk of stroke (hazard ratio=0.89 (0.81, 0.99)) was observed among all cancer patients who were seen by a cardiology provider than among those who were not, without an increased risk of bleeding (1.04 (0.95, 1.13)). Conclusion: AF patients with cancer were less likely to see a cardiologist, and less likely to fill an anticoagulant prescription than AF patients without cancer. However, cardiology involvement was associated with increased anticoagulant prescription fills and reduced risk of stroke, suggesting a beneficial role for cardiology providers to improve outcomes in AF patients with history of cancer.

Tobacco use, knowledge of harms, and cessation support among patients with non-tobacco related cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24029-e24029
Author(s):  
Laura Vater ◽  
Anup Trikannad Ashwini Kumar ◽  
Neha Sehgal ◽  
Maria Khan ◽  
Kelsey Bullens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prescribe Medication ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Quit Smoking ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Quit Attempts

e24029 Background: Continued cigarette smoking among patients with cancer leads to numerous adverse health outcomes, even among patients with non-tobacco-related cancers such as breast, colon, and prostate cancer. Continued smoking is associated with poorer response to cancer treatment, increased risk for treatment-related toxicities, and shorter overall survival. While some patients with a smoking-related cancer make efforts to quit smoking at the time of diagnosis, patients with other forms of cancer might not understand the negative effects of continued smoking. In this study, we assessed patient knowledge of the harms of continued smoking, previous cessation attempts, and cessation support. Methods: We surveyed 102 adults with breast, colon, and prostate cancer at three locations: an NCI-designated cancer center, an urban safety-net medical center, and a rural cancer center. Patients were asked about current smoking behaviors, beliefs about the harms of continued smoking, quit attempts and resources used, and cessation support. We also surveyed seven oncologists to assess beliefs about harms of continued smoking, cessation support provided to patients, training and confidence in cessation counseling, and barriers to providing cessation support. Results: Most patients (82%) agreed or strongly agreed that continued smoking may shorten life expectancy, and 70% agreed or strongly agreed that continued smoking increased the risk of getting a different type of cancer. Only 41% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that continued smoking may cause more side effects from cancer treatment, and only 40% agreed or strongly agreed that ongoing smoking may affect treatment response. The majority of patients (86%) had tried to quit smoking for good, with an average 4.1 quit attempts per patient. Patients reported that physicians advised them to quit the majority of the time (92%), prescribed medication 33% of the time, and followed up on cessation attempts 43% of the time. Overall, oncologists had higher knowledge of the harms of continued smoking on treatment outcomes and survival. Those in practice for 20 years or more had higher confidence in cessation counseling than those in practice less than 4 years. Oncologists described lack of time and lack of confidence in cessation counseling as barriers to providing more cessation support. Conclusions: Among 102 patients with breast, colon, and prostate cancer who currently smoke, there was incomplete knowledge of the harms of continued smoking. Oncologists believe that tobacco cessation is important and frequently advise patients to quit, however they less frequently prescribe medication or follow up on cessation efforts. Interventions are needed to educate patients with cancer about the harms of continued smoking and to provide further cessation support.

scholarly journals Stopping 5-aminosalicylates in patients with ulcerative colitis starting biologic therapy does not increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes: analysis of two nationwide population-based cohorts

Gut ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 977-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan C Ungaro ◽  
Berkeley N Limketkai ◽  
Camilla Bjørn Jensen ◽  
Kristine Højgaard Allin ◽  
Manasi Agrawal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Claims ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
National Databases

ObjectiveThe benefit of continuing 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who initiate anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) biologics is unknown. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes in patients with UC already on 5-ASA who started anti-TNF and then either stopped or continued 5-ASA.DesignOur primary outcome was any adverse clinical event defined as a composite of new corticosteroid use, UC-related hospitalisation or surgery. We used two national databases: the United States (US) Truven MarketScan health claims database and the Danish health registers. Patients with UC who started anti-TNF after having been on oral 5-ASA for at least 90 days were included. Patients were classified as stopping 5-ASA if therapy was discontinued within 90 days of starting anti-TNF. We performed multivariable Cox regression models controlling for demographics, clinical factors and healthcare utilisation. Adjusted HRs (aHR) with 95% CI are reported comparing stopping 5-ASA with continuing 5-ASA.ResultsA total of 3589 patients with UC were included (2890 US and 699 Denmark). Stopping 5-ASA after initiating anti-TNF was not associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events in the U.S. cohort (aHR 1.04; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.21, p=0.57) nor in the Danish cohort (aHR 1.09; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.49, p=0.60). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses investigating concomitant immunomodulator use and duration of 5-ASA treatment before initiating anti-TNF.ConclusionIn two national databases, stopping 5-ASA in patients with UC starting anti-TNF therapy did not increase the risk of adverse clinical events. These results should be validated in a prospective clinical trial.

Predictors of high financial distress in a national, multiethnic sample of patients with cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 149-149
Author(s):  
Meera Vimala Ragavan ◽  
Rosie Cunningham ◽  
Andrea Incudine ◽  
Hala Borno ◽  
Thomas Stivers
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Financial Stress ◽  
The United States ◽  
Financial Assistance ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported

149 Background: Financial toxicity is characterized by financial burden that patients face. Patients and providers are seldom aware of available resource to help mitigate this growing problem. To date, our understanding of the myriad of financial repercussions of cancer treatment remains limited. Prior published research has largely been single center, thereby limiting generalizability across the United States. This study leveraged a national, multi-ethnic sample of patients who receive financial support services including comprehensive financial assistance, navigation, planning, and a guidebook with relevant resources from a non-profit entity (Family Reach) to evaluate financial stress in during cancer treatment. Methods: Patients were identified for study participation if they received at least one financial support resource from Family Reach between 1/1/2020-6/30/2020. An 11-item survey was sent electronically to all eligible participants who were given a one-month time frame to complete. A multivariate model was employed to identify sociodemographic predictors of high financial distress. Results: A total of 832 patients were contacted, of whom 330 (40%) completed the survey. Demographic information is included in table. Patient reported financial distress in the prior week was high, with 46% of patients reporting a distress level of seven or higher on a ten-point scale. In a multivariate regression, Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity was associated with a higher distress rating and higher patient reported financial stress. Lower annual household income was associated with lower reports of feeling in financial control, lower reports of meeting monthly expenses, and higher reports of financial stress. Conclusions: Patient-reported financial distress was high in a national sample of patients with cancer who had utilized at least one financial resource provided by Family Reach. Hispanic ethnicity and Lower Annual Income were predictors of higher patient-reported financial distress. Larger samples are needed to confirm these patterns. Delivery systems should develop targeted interventions, including referrals to organizations providing financial assistance, for patient populations at high risk for financial toxicity. [Table: see text]

Abstract 16255: Acute Pericarditis Related Hospitalization and Readmission in the United States

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Acharya ◽  
Farhad Sami ◽  
Omar Al-Taweel ◽  
Sagar Ranka ◽  
Brianna Stack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Acute Pericarditis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Multiple Variables ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Acute pericarditis accounts for one in every twenty emergency department visits for chest pain and a majority of these patients get admitted to a hospital. However, apart from small studies, there is a lack of data regarding the incidence and predictors of readmissions in these patients. Methodology: A secondary analysis of the Nationwide Readmission Database for years 2016-2017 was performed. Patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute pericarditis in the first six months of each year were identified based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), Clinical Modification codes, and were followed for 180 days. A multivariate cox-regression model was utilized to delineate the predictors of pericarditis related readmissions. Results: A total of 21,115 patients were admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute pericarditis. The mean age was 53.3+19 years and 60.83% were males. About 23% of patients had pericardial effusion or tamponade and 19.4% of patients presenting with pericarditis required pericardiocentesis. The mortality rate during index admission was 3.21% and the mean length of stay was 6.4+9 days. The rate of all-cause readmission was 30.8% within 180 days, of which 23.8% were pericarditis related. The mean time to readmission for pericarditis was 37.7+41 days. Females were at higher risk of readmission for pericarditis [OR 1.66, CI (1.38-1.99), p<0.001] after adjustment for multiple variables (including connective tissue disease, congestive heart failure and malignancy). Presence of comorbidities like diabetes mellitus [HR 1.21, CI(1.01-1.45), p=0.04], obesity [HR 1.27, CI(1.05-1.54), p=0.01], and chronic lung disease [HR 1.32, CI(1.12-1.57), p=0.001] also increased risk of pericarditis related readmissions. Moreover, the length of index hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with pericarditis related readmissions [5.4+6 vs1.6+5 days, p<0.001]. Conclusion: Even though the mortality during index admission in patients admitted with pericarditis is low, about 1 in every 3 patients will be readmitted within 180 days. While females account for a minority of initial admissions for pericarditis, their risk of readmission is significantly higher.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19–Infected Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Han Han ◽  
Tianhui He ◽  
Kristen E Labbe ◽  
Adrian V Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Case Fatality Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fatality Rate ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Previous studies have indicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with cancer have a high fatality rate. Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported fatalities in COVID-19 patients with cancer. A comprehensive meta-analysis that assessed the overall case fatality rate and associated risk factors was performed. Using individual patient data, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for each variable with outcomes. Results We included 15 studies with 3019 patients, of which 1628 were men; 41.0% were from the United Kingdom and Europe, followed by the United States and Canada (35.7%), and Asia (China, 23.3%). The overall case fatality rate of COVID-19 patients with cancer measured 22.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.3% to 28.0%). Univariate analysis revealed age (OR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.80 to 7.06), male sex (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.13), and comorbidity (OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.04 to 3.85) were associated with increased risk of severe events (defined as the individuals being admitted to the intensive care unit, or requiring invasive ventilation, or death). In multivariable analysis, only age greater than 65 years (OR = 3.16, 95% CI = 1.45 to 6.88) and being male (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.87) were associated with increased risk of severe events. Conclusions Our analysis demonstrated that COVID-19 patients with cancer have a higher fatality rate compared with that of COVID-19 patients without cancer. Age and sex appear to be risk factors associated with a poorer prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document