scholarly journals Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma: a retrospective analysis of a Nationwide database in Japan

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Hisaki Aiba ◽  
Norio Yamamoto ◽  
Katsuhiro Hayashi ◽  
Akihiko Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Synovial Sarcoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Wide Resection ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse

Abstract Background Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive but chemosensitive soft-tissue tumor. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma with data from the nationwide database, Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan. Methods This study included 316 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between 2006 and 2012. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a Cox-hazard regression model. Moreover, the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on outcomes were evaluated using a matched-pair analysis. The oncologic outcomes of patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy were compared (cx + and cx-). Results Multivariate analysis revealed significant correlations of age (over 40, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, p = 0.043), margin status (marginal resection, HR = 0.18, p < 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.30, p = 0.013 versus wide resection) with overall survival; surgical margin type (marginal resection, HR = 0.14, p = 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.09, p = 0.035 versus wide resection) with local recurrence; and postoperative local recurrence (HR = 0.30, p = 0.027) and surgical margin (marginal resection, HR = 0.31, p = 0.023 versus wide resection) with distant relapse-free survival. Before propensity score matching, perioperative chemotherapy was mainly administered for young patients and patients with deeper tumor locations, larger tumors, more advanced-stage disease, and trunk location. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 79.8%/89.3% (HR = 0.64, p = 0.114), 89.6%/93.0% (HR = 0.37, p = 0.171) and 71.4%/84.5% (HR = 0.60, p = 0.089) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 152 patients were selected such that the patient demographics were nearly identical in both groups. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 71.5%/86.0% (HR = 0.48, p = 0.055), 92.5%/93.3% (HR = 0.51, p = 0.436) and 68.4%/83.9% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.046) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. Conclusion This large-sample study indicated that the margin status and postoperative disease control were associated directly or indirectly with improved oncologic outcomes. However, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for survival outcomes in synovial sarcoma patients was not proven in this Japanese database analysis.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Synovial Sarcoma: Retrospective Analysis of a Nationwide Database in Japan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Hisaki Aiba ◽  
Norio Yamamoto ◽  
Katsuhiro Hayashi ◽  
Akihiko Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Synovial Sarcoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Wide Resection ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse

Abstract BackgroundSynovial sarcoma is an aggressive but chemosensitive soft-tissue tumor. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma with data from the nationwide database, Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan.MethodsThis study included 316 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between 2006 and 2012. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a Cox-hazard regression model. The effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes were evaluated using a matched-pair analysis. The oncologic outcomes of patients who did or did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared (cx+ and cx-).ResultsMultivariate analysis revealed significant correlations of distant postoperative metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.01, p<0.001) with overall survival; surgical margin type (marginal resection, HR=0.12, p=0.011 and intralesional resection, HR=0.08, p=0.022 versus wide resection) with local recurrence; and postoperative local recurrence (HR=0.30, p=0.027) and surgical margin (marginal resection, HR=0.31, p=0.023 versus wide resection) with distant relapse-free survival. Before propensity score matching, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was mainly administered for the patients with younger age, deeper tumor locations, larger tumors, more advanced-stage disease, and monophasic-type disease. The 3-year overall survival rates, local control rates and distant relapse-free survival rates were 82.9% / 80.7% (HR = 0.79, p = 0.102), 91.2% / 89.8% (HR = 1.04, p = 0.837) and 76.6% / 75.0% (HR = 0.76, p = 0.307) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 172 patients were selected such that the patient demographics were nearly identical for both the groups. The 3-year overall survival rates, local control rates and distant relapse-free survival rates were 80.8% / 81.4% (HR = 0.83, p = 0.563), 93.2% / 89.4% (HR = 0.83, p = 0.491) and 76.9% / 78.7% (HR = 1.01, p = 0.982) in the cx+ and cx- group, respectively.ConclusionThis large-sample study indicated that the margin status and postoperative disease control were associated directly or indirectly with improved oncologic outcomes. However, the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for survival outcomes in synovial sarcoma patients was not proven.

scholarly journals Evaluating Outcomes of Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated on the GMALL Protocol

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
Danielle Fredman ◽  
Yulia Volchek ◽  
Gabriel Heering ◽  
Keren Shichrur ◽  
Ronit Yerushalmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Car T ◽  
Matched Sibling

Background Chemotherapy based approaches still constitute an essential feature in the treatment paradigm of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The German Multicenter Study Group (GMALL) is a well-established and commonly used protocol for ALL (Gökbuget 2012). Over the years evolving versions of the protocol have been developed with the aim of improving patient outcome (Apel 2014). In view of the recent advancements in the treatment of adult ALL we now analyzed our more recent data. Aims Assess the clinical outcomes of adult ALL patients treated on the GMALL protocol in real world settings, and establish prognostic parameters associated with long term survival and risk of relapse. Methods Retrospective analysis of all adult ALL patients who were treated with GMALL in our institution between the years 2008-2020. Demographic, clinical, cytogenetic, treatment, and transplant related data were collected using our institution's electronic medical records system. Baseline characteristics were evaluated by Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were generated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results The analysis comprised 81 evaluable patients with a median age of 36 years (range 18-73), 36% were adolescents and young adults (AYA). Forty-three were B-ALL (53%), 12 (15%) patients were Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (Ph+ ALL), and 26 (32%) were T-ALL. Median duration of follow-up was 24.4 months (range 0.7-112.1 months), at the time of data analysis 51 patients (63.8%) were alive. Seventy patients (88%) attained a first remission (CR1) and 4 (5%) died during the first two induction phases. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 62% and 44%, respectively. Estimated 2-year and 5-year leukemia-free survival rates were 52% and 35%, respectively. Overall, disease relapse (31%), lethal infection (28%), and graft-versus-host disease (14%) accounted for most patient deaths. Of patients achieving CR1, 20 (29%) eventually relapsed after a median time of 9.8 months (range 1.1-69.3). Fifty-five patients (68%) underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplantation using matched sibling (47%), matched unrelated (31%), haploidentical (7%), partially mismatched (12%), and cord blood donors (3%). Of the 50 patients transplanted in CR1, 15 relapsed (30%) after a median time of 10.9 months (range 3.8-32.8). Multivariate analysis revealed that in terms of overall survival, increasing patient age was associated with inferior outcome [Hazard ratio (HR)=1.026, confidence interval (CI) 95%, 1.002-1.05, p=0.035) as was outcome for patients whose baseline cytogenetic analysis detected a higher number of clones (HR=2.69, CI 95%, 1.57-4.62, p=0.0002). T-ALL patients experienced longer survival compared with B-ALL (87 months versus 56 months, p=0.019) while patients transplanted using cord blood donors had inferior survival, 12.8 months, compared with matched sibling donors, 71.3 months, and fully matched unrelated donors, 73.4 months (p=0.001, and p=0.003, respectively). Relapse-free survival was significantly better in patients with T-ALL compared with B-ALL (90 months vs. 50 months, p=0.039), and in patients without t(12;21)(p13;q22) (75 months vs. 11.7 months, p=0.034). Gender, AYA status, extramedullary disease at diagnosis, initial white blood cell count, treatment delays, presence of MLL rearrangement, specific measurable residual disease modality used, GMALL risk category, and cytogenetic hyperdiploidy did not significantly impact on survival or disease relapse. Treatments for relapse following GMALL included blinatumomab (6), inotuzumab (3), nelarabine (3), and CAR-T (2). Conclusions While results are improving for patients treated on GMALL, a substantial patient segment still experiences relapse. It is conceivable that in the near future new novel therapeutic modalities for adult ALL involving the use of monoclonal antibodies and CAR-T cell therapy will help reduce relapse rates and further improve the current outcomes of patients treated on the GMALL protocol. Disclosures Avigdor: Takeda, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, BMS: Research Funding. Canaani:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Impact of gender on the prognosis of carotid body tumor after surgical resection

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanrui Hu ◽  
Yuwei Xiang ◽  
Bin Huang ◽  
Ding Yuan ◽  
Yi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Carotid Body ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Carotid Body Tumor ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Shamblin Classification

Abstract Background Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms, but the prognosis of patients with resected CBTs has seldom been elucidated. This study was conducted to investigate the association between variables, especially sex, and the prognosis of carotid body tumor resection. Methods This was a large-volume single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients who were diagnosed with CBTs between 2009 and 2020 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Their preoperative, surgical, and follow-up data were collected, and the association between variables and outcomes of CBT resection was assessed by correlation analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and multivariate Cox regression as appropriate. Results A total of 326 patients (66.6% were females) were included. Males developed larger CBTs than females (4.3 ± 1.8 cm vs. 3.8 ± 1.4 cm, P = .003). Males were more likely to develop succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) mutations (P = .019) and had worse relapse-free survival rates (P = .024). Although tumor size and Shamblin classification had positive relationships with neurological complications and intraoperative blood loss, they did not affect the overall survival rate of patients, which was only influenced by remote metastasis (P = .007) and local recurrence (P = .008). Conclusions Compared to females, males with CBT resection were found to have more SDHB mutations and worse relapse-free survival rates, which may lead to the deterioration of prognosis. Tumor size and Shamblin classification cannot predict the overall survival rate of patients with excised CBTs. Graphical abstract

scholarly journals Phase II randomized trial of capecitabine with bevacizumab and external beam radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: long term results

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramón Salazar ◽  
◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Jose Luis Manzano ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Distant Relapse

Abstract Background Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine is considered as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The “Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos” group (TTD) previously reported in a randomized Ph II study that the addition of Bevacizumab to capecitabine-RT conferred no differences in the pre-defined efficacy endpoint (pathological complete response). We present the follow-up results of progression-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival data at 3 and 5 years. Methods Patients (pts) were randomized to receive 5 weeks of radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days per week with (arm A) or without (arm b) bevacizumab (5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks). Results In our study, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting shows no differences in pathological complete response (15.9% vs 10.9%), distant relapse-free survival (81.0 vs 80.4 and 76.2% vs 78.2% at 3 and 5 years respectively), disease-free survival (75% vs 71.7 and 68.1% vs 69.57% at 3 and 5 years respectively) nor overall survival at 5-years of follow-up (81.8% vs 86.9%). Conclusions the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine plus radiotherapy does not confer statistically significant advantages neither in distant relapse-free survival nor in disease-free survival nor in Overall Survival in the short or long term. Trial registration EudraCT number: 2009–010192-24. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01043484.

scholarly journals Treatment and Prognosis of Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma in a Nationwide Population

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1002-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuli H. Salminen ◽  
Tom Wiklund ◽  
Mika M. Sampo ◽  
Maija Tarkkanen ◽  
Lea Pulliainen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Data ◽  
Angiosarcoma Of The Breast

Abstract Background Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is an aggressive malignancy that is increasing in incidence. Only a few previous population-based studies have reported the results of RAASB treatment. Methods A search for RAASB patients was carried out in the Finnish Cancer Registry, and treatment data were collected to identify prognostic factors for survival. Results Overall, 50 RAASB patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 0.4–15.6), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 69%. Forty-seven (94%) patients were operated on with curative intent. Among these patients, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival rates were 62%, 75%, and 74%, respectively. A larger planned surgical margin was associated with improved survival. Conclusions We found that the majority of RAASB patients were eligible for radical surgical management in this population-based analysis. With radical surgery, the prognosis is relatively good.

Does lymphadenectomy improve survival in patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer? A multicentric study from the FRANCOGYN Research Group

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-289
Author(s):  
Lilia Bougherara ◽  
Henri Azaïs ◽  
Hélène Béhal ◽  
Geoffroy Canlorbe ◽  
Marcos Ballester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Nodal Staging ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Multicentric Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveThe role of lymphadenectomy in intermediate risk endometrial cancer remains uncertain. We evaluated the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival and relapse-free survival for patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients from the FRANCOGYN database with intermediate risk endometrial cancer, based on pre-operative and post-operative criteria (type 1, grade 1–2 tumors with deep (> 50%) myometrial invasion and no lymphovascular space invasion), who received primary surgical treatment between November 2002 and August 2013. We compared overall survival and relapse-free survival between staged and unstaged patients.ResultsFrom 1235 screened patients, we selected 108 patients with intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Eighty-two (75.9%) patients underwent nodal staging (consisting of pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Among them, 35 (32.4%) had lymph node disease. The median follow-up was 25 months (range 0.4 to 155.0). The overall survival rates were 82.5% for patients staged (CI 64.2 to 91.9) vs 77.9 % for unstaged patients (CI 35.4 to 94.2) (P = 0.73). The relapse-free survival rates were 68.9% for staged patients (CI 51.2 to 81.3) vs 68.8% for unstaged patients (CI 29.1 to 89.3) (P=0.67).ConclusionSystematic nodal staging does not appear to improve overall survival and relapse-free survival for patients with IR EC but could provide information to tailor adjuvant therapy. Sentinel lymph node dissection may be an effective and less invasive alternative staging technique and should provide a future alternative for this population.

scholarly journals Cryoablation of renal tumors: long-term follow-up from a multicenter experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulvio Stacul ◽  
Camilla Sachs ◽  
Fabiola Giudici ◽  
Michele Bertolotto ◽  
Michele Rizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Purpose To retrospectively investigate long-term outcomes of renal cryoablation from a multicenter database. Methods 338 patients with 363 renal tumors underwent cryoablation in 4 centers in North-Eastern Italy. 340/363 tumors (93.7%) were percutaneously treated with CT guidance. 234 (68.8%) were treated after conscious sedation, 76 (22.3%) under local lidocaine anesthesia only and 30 (8.8%) under general anesthesia. Treatment efficacy and complication rate considered all procedures. Oncologic outcomes considered a subset of 159 patients with 159 biopsy proven renal cell carcinoma. Results Mean tumor size was 2.53 cm. Technical success was achieved in 355/363 (97.8%) treatments. Treatment efficacy after the first treatment was achieved in 348/363 (95.9%) tumors. Statistical analysis revealed a significant lower treatment efficacy for ASA score >3, Padua score >8, tumor size >2.5 cm, use of >2 cryoprobes, presence of one single kidney. In the subset of 159 patients, recurrence-free survival rates were 90.5% (95% CI 83.0%, 94.9%) at 3 years and 82.4% (95% CI 72.0%, 89.4%) at 5 years; overall survival rates were 96.0% (95% CI 90.6%, 98.3%) at 3 years and 91.0% (95% CI 81.7%, 95.7%) at 5 years; no patient in this subset developed metastatic disease. Clavien-Dindo >1 complications were recorded in 14/369 procedures (3.8%) and were related to age >70 years, tumor size >4 cm and use of >2 cryoprobes. Conclusion Cryoablation performed across four different centers in a large cohort of predominantly small renal tumors showed that this technique provides good recurrence-free survival rates and overall survival rates at three- and five-year with very low major complications rate.

scholarly journals Primary tumour ulceration in cutaneous melanoma: its role on TNM stages.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Tas ◽  
Kayhan Erturk
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Primary Tumour ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Overall Survival Rates ◽  
Unfavourable Prognostic Factor

Abstract Background Tumour ulceration has unfavourable prognostic factor in stage I–II melanoma. The aim of this study was to question whether tumour ulceration might predict relapse and survival in melanomas of all stages. Methods A total of 911 melanoma patients were analysed. Results The 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 50.0% for ulcerated melanomas and 75.8% for all non-ulcerated melanomas (P = 0.0001). Ulcerated melanomas had lower relapse-free survival rates than non-ulcerated melanomas in all T-stages (P = 0.0001). The relapse-free survival rates were statistically significant for T1 (P = 0.02), T3 (P = 0.01) and T4 (P = 0.004); however, T2 (P = 0.07). There were significant differences between ulcerated melanomas and non-ulcerated melanomas regarding relapse-free survival rates for both N0 (P = 0.0001) and N1 (P = 0.01) patients; poor relapse-free survival rates were found to be in association with ulcerated melanomas (P = 0.06 for N1, P = 0.04 for N2 and P = 0.8 for N3 disease). The 5- year overall survival rates were 55.3 and 81.5% for ulcerated melanomas and non-ulcerated melanomas, respectively (P = 0.0001). Ulcerated melanomas had lower overall survival rates than non-ulcerated melanomas in all T-stages; they were statistically significant for T1 (P = 0.01), T2 (P = 0.03) and T4 (P = 0.006), but not for T3 (P = 0.3). Ulceration predicted poor survival in N0 patients; however, it was not found significant although its overall survival rate was lower in node-positive patients (P = 0.09), and ulceration was a significantly poor prognostic factor only for N3 patients (P = 0.03), but not for N1 (P = 0.9) and N2 patients (P = 0.2). Furthermore, non-metastatic patients with ulcerated melanomas survived significantly less (P = 0.0001), but there were no differences in survivals between ulcerated melanoma and non-ulcerated melanoma metastatic melanoma patients (P = 0.1). Conclusion Primary tumour ulceration has been considered as a poor prognostic factor in local melanomas, but it might also have a potential for predicting survival in loco-regional and advanced melanomas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document