scholarly journals Phase II randomized trial of capecitabine + radiation therapy with/without bevacizumab as preoperative treatment for patients with resectable locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: Final results of 3 and 5-year disease free survival, distant relapse free survival and overall survival

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v172
Author(s):  
C. Gravalos ◽  
J. Capdevila ◽  
L. Layos ◽  
C. Pericay ◽  
M. Martínez-Villacampa ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramón Salazar ◽  
◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Jose Luis Manzano ◽  
Carles Pericay ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine is considered as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The “Tratamiento de Tumores Digestivos” group (TTD) previously reported in a randomized Ph II study that the addition of Bevacizumab to capecitabine-RT conferred no differences in the pre-defined efficacy endpoint (pathological complete response). We present the follow-up results of progression-free survival, distant relapse-free survival, and overall survival data at 3 and 5 years. Methods Patients (pts) were randomized to receive 5 weeks of radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, 5 days per week with (arm A) or without (arm b) bevacizumab (5 mg/kg once every 2 weeks). Results In our study, the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting shows no differences in pathological complete response (15.9% vs 10.9%), distant relapse-free survival (81.0 vs 80.4 and 76.2% vs 78.2% at 3 and 5 years respectively), disease-free survival (75% vs 71.7 and 68.1% vs 69.57% at 3 and 5 years respectively) nor overall survival at 5-years of follow-up (81.8% vs 86.9%). Conclusions the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine plus radiotherapy does not confer statistically significant advantages neither in distant relapse-free survival nor in disease-free survival nor in Overall Survival in the short or long term. Trial registration EudraCT number: 2009–010192-24. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01043484.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia J. Eifel ◽  
Kathryn Winter ◽  
Mitchell Morris ◽  
Charles Levenback ◽  
Perry W. Grigsby ◽  
...  

Purpose To report mature results of a randomized trial that compared extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) versus pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant fluorouracil and cisplatin (CTRT) in women with locoregionally advanced carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Patients and Methods Four hundred three women with cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive either EFRT or CTRT. Patients were eligible if they had stage IIB to IVA disease, stage IB to IIA disease with a tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, or positive pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were stratified by stage and by method of lymph node evaluation. Results The median follow-up time for 228 surviving patients was 6.6 years. The overall survival rate for patients treated with CTRT was significantly greater than that for patients treated with EFRT (67% v 41% at 8 years; P < .0001). There was an overall reduction in the risk of disease recurrence of 51% (95% CI, 36% to 66%) for patients who received CTRT. Patients with stage IB to IIB disease who received CTRT had better overall and disease-free survival than those treated with EFRT (P < .0001); 116 patients with stage III to IVA disease had better disease-free survival (P = .05) and a trend toward better overall survival (P = .07) if they were randomly assigned to CTRT. The rate of serious late complications of treatment was similar for the two treatment arms. Conclusion Mature analysis confirms that the addition of fluorouracil and cisplatin to radiotherapy significantly improved the survival rate of women with locally advanced cervical cancer without increasing the rate of late treatment-related side effects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15167-e15167
Author(s):  
Jay Rashmi Anam ◽  
Mihir Chandarana ◽  
Supreeta Arya ◽  
Ashwin Luis Desouza ◽  
Vikas S. Ostwal ◽  
...  

e15167 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation has become the standard approach for treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers. Magnetic Resonence Imaging (MRI) is the staging modality of choice in rectal carcinoma. Recent reports have studied the impact of MRI on local recurrence and survival both in treatment naïve and post treatment settings Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospective database was performed over a period of 1 year. All pretreatment patients with carcinoma of rectum were included in the study. The status of CRM on MRI was compared to that on the histopathology and as a predictor of recurrence and survival. For analysis, the MRI scans done for patients at presentation were labeled as MRIT. This included all patients irrespective of further treatment received. Patients who were treated with NACTRT had two MRI scans. The MRI at presentation in this subset of patients was labeled as MRI1 and the reassessment MRI after NACTRT was labeled as MRI2. Thus, MRI1 represented a subset of MRIT with locally advanced tumors treated with NACTRT. All the sets of MRI scans were analyzed separately for prediction of CRM involvement and for their effect on local recurrence and survival rates. Results: 221 patients were included with a median follow-up 30 months. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of MRIT, MRI1 and MRI2 to predict CRM status were 50%, 62.3%, 96.5%, 5.6% and 61.8%, 50%, 55%, 95%, 6% and 54.7% and 77.8%, 63.7%, 98%, 11%, 64.5% respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological positive margins alone predicted a poor overall survival (OS) whereas involved CRM on pathology and pretreatment MRI predicted poorer disease free survival and OS Conclusions: CRM status on pathology remains the most important prognostic factor to impact overall survival, disease free survival and local recurrence. CRM status on MRI at presentation alone has significant impact on disease free survival and local recurrence. Although MRI done after neoadjuvant treatment may not predict survival, it has a role in helping modify the surgical approach with a goal to achieve a negative CRM on pathology.


2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Sirák ◽  
Jiří Petera ◽  
Zdeněk Zoul

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of cisplatin dose upon 3-year overall and disease-free survival rate of patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin. Seventy-three patients with stage IIB – IVA cervical carcinoma were treated with pelvic (or pelvic + paraaortic) externalbeam radiotherapy, high-dose rate brachytherapy and concomitant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin of 40 mg/m2 in the time period form January 2000 to December 2006 at our department. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free suvival rates were evaluated with regard to the number of cisplatin cycles applied during the external radiotherapy. Only twentyeight patients received the intended five doses of chemotherapy. The most frequent cause of chemotherapy delay was the acute hematological toxicity with leukopenia. The 3-year overall survival was 71 % and the 3-year disease-free survival was 61 %. Survival analyses didn’t prove a statistically significant influence of cisplatin dose upon 3-year survival in cervical carcinoma patients treated by exclusive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 628-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogelio A. Brito ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
Daniel J. Booser ◽  
Frederick Ames ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes in local-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases and who are treated with combined-modality therapy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with regional stage IV LABC, which is defined by our institution as LABC with ipsilateral supraclavicular adenopathy without evidence of distant disease, received treatment on three prospective trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Patients then received local therapy that consisted of either total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or segmental mastectomy and ALND before or after irradiation. Patients with no response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. After completion of local therapy, chemotherapy was continued for four to 15 cycles, followed by radiotherapy. Patients older than 50 years who had estrogen receptor–positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years.RESULTS: Median follow-up was 11.6 years (range, 4.8 to 22.6 years). Disease-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 34% and 32%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 1.9 years. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 41% and 31%, respectively. The median overall survival was 3.5 years. The overall response rate (partial and complete responses) to induction chemotherapy was 89%. No treatment-related deaths occurred.CONCLUSION: Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases but no other evidence of distant metastases warrant therapy administered with curative intent, ie, combined-modality therapy consisting of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases should be included in the stage IIIB category of the tumor-node-metastasis classification because their clinical course and prognosis are similar to those of patients with stage IIIB LABC.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7708-7708 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. de Perrot ◽  
R. Feld ◽  
M. Anraku ◽  
A. Bezjak ◽  
R. Burkes ◽  
...  

7708 Background: Examine the results of tri-modality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: Protocol consisted of induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant hemithoracic radiation therapy (RT) to 54 Gy. Results: A total of 60 patients were suitable candidates for tri-modality therapy between 01/2001 and 01/2007. Induction chemotherapy was administered to 56 patients; 4 patients underwent EPP without induction chemotherapy because of patient refusal (n=2), previous chemotherapy (n=1) and sarcomatoid MPM (n=1). Chemotherapy included vinorelbine/cisplatin (n=26), pemetrexed/cisplatin (n=26) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (n=4). EPP was performed in 47 patients; 13 patients did not undergo EPP because of tumor progression during chemotherapy (n=2), extensive chest wall involvement at surgery (n=6), or involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes at mediastinoscopy (n=5). Three patients (6%) died within 30 days of surgery. Pathological stage was II (n=6), III (n=35), and IV (n=6). Adjuvant RT was administered postoperatively to 36 patients and is ongoing in 5 patients; 6 patients did not receive adjuvant RT because of fatigue (n=5) or previous RT (n=1), and 4 patients did not complete RT up to 54 Gy. Overall survival for the 23 patients who completed the tri-modality therapy was 37% at 3 years with a median survival of 15 months. Eleven of the 23 patients had recurrence after a median of 8 months (range, 2–13 months). Recurrences were locoregional (n=2), in contralateral chest (n=3), abdomen (n=3), contralateral chest and abdomen (n=2), or pericardium (n=1). Among patients undergoing EPP, disease-free survival was longer in patients undergoing adjuvant high dose hemithoracic RT (p=0.07), in epithelial tumors (p=0.03), and in early stage (p=0.07). Overall survival was influenced by histology (p=0.007) and stage (p=0.05), but not by adjuvant high dose hemithoracic RT (p=0.5). The type of chemotherapy had no impact on disease-free and overall survival. Conclusions: Aggressive tri-modality therapy is feasible in selected patient with MPM. Adjuvant high dose hemithoracic RT can improve disease free survival and achieve good local control. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11628-e11628
Author(s):  
M. Gumus ◽  
B. O. Ustaalioglu ◽  
M. Seker ◽  
A. Bilici ◽  
T. Salman ◽  
...  

e11628 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is one of the standard treatment options for patients with locally advanced breast cancer for twenty five years. In this study, we evaluate results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were prescribed mostly for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Before chemotherapy was given, patients were examined for distant metastasis by radiologic methods thereafter if patient had distant metastasis, they were excluded. Patients with breast cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed according to age, menopausal status, type of surgery, response to the treatment, histopathological properties and survival. After 3 to 6 cycle of chemotherapy patients were reevaluated by clinically and radiologically for response. Surgery was performed for appropriate patient thereafter adjuvant locoregional and systemic chemotherapy were continued. Results: Median age was 47 (29–43) years. 17,6 % of them were younger than 35 years and 42,6 % were premenopausal. Median follow-up time was 19 month. After 3 to 6 cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy 64 of patients responded to therapy (94,1 %). Breast conserving surgery was performed for 15,6 % patients. In histopathologic analysis most of patients were invasive ductal carcinoma and there was lymph node invasion for 84,9 %. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status were negative for 18,6 % of patients and cerbB2 was positive for 14,8 % of patients. Median disease free survival time was 44 month (SE: 9; 95% CI: 25–62) but median overall survival time could not be reached. Three years disease free survival rate and overall survival rate were 55,3% and 90,1% respectively. According to Cox regression analyses; we did not find any demographic and pathologic characteristic of breast cancer that is related to prognosis. Conclusions: In recent years neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is increasingly being used for early stage disease. Further study will be facilitated establishment of guidelines for preselecting patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and will provide beneficial effect on treatment option and survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15541-e15541
Author(s):  
George Au-Yeung ◽  
Linda R. Mileshkin ◽  
David Bernshaw ◽  
Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan ◽  
Danny Rischin ◽  
...  

e15541 Background: Definitive treatment with concurrent cisplatin and radiation is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The optimal management of patients with a contraindication to cisplatin has not been established. We conducted a retrospective audit of the impact of concurrent chemoradiation in a cohort of patients (pts) with locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: All pts with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiation were entered into a prospective database. Information regarding their demographics, stage, histology, recurrence and survival were recorded. Pharmacy records were reviewed to determine concurrent chemotherapy use. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were disease free survival and rates of primary, nodal or distant failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, incorporating known prognostic factors of age, FIGO stage, uterine body involvement, tumour volume on MRI and nodal involvement. Results: 442 pts were treated from Jan 1996 to Feb 2011. Median age was 59 (range 22-94); 89% had squamous histology and 64% node-negative disease. 269 pts received cisplatin, 59 received carboplatin because of a contraindication to cisplatin and 114 received no concurrent chemotherapy (most prior to 1999). Overall survival adjusted for other prognostic factors was significantly improved with use of concurrent cisplatin compared to radiation alone (HR 0.53, p=0.001), as was disease free survival and the rate of distant failure. Use of concurrent carboplatin was not associated with any significant benefit compared to radiation alone in terms of overall survival or disease free survival on univariate or multivariate analyses. Conclusions: The results of this audit are consistent with the known significant survival benefit with concurrent cisplatin chemoradiation. However, there did not appear to be any significant benefit associated with concurrent carboplatin although there are potential confounding factors in this small cohort. The available evidence in the literature favors the use of non-platinum chemotherapy rather than carboplatin in pts with contraindications to cisplatin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document