scholarly journals What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanlan Mao ◽  
Maria Fernandes-Jesus ◽  
Evangelos Ntontis ◽  
John Drury
Keyword(s):  
Community Engagement ◽  
Social Trust ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
National Level ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Mutual Aid ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background Community engagement and volunteering are essential for the public response to COVID-19. Since March 2020 a large number of people in the UK have been regularly doing unpaid activities to benefit others besides their close relatives. Although most mutual aid groups emerged from local neighbourhoods and communities, official public institutions also fostered community volunteering, namely through the community champions scheme. By considering a broad definition of COVID-19 volunteering, this article describes a systematic review of the literature focused on one broad question: What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering both at the UK national level and the more local community level? Methods A rapid review of the literature in peer-reviewed databases and grey literature was applied in our search, following the PRISMA principles. The search was conducted from 10 to 16 of October 2020, and sources were included on the basis of having been published between January and October 2020, focusing on COVID-19 and addressing community groups, volunteering groups, volunteers, or community champions in the UK. Results After initial screening, a total of 40 relevant sources were identified. From these, 27 were considered eligible. Findings suggest that food shopping and emotional support were the most common activities, but there were diverse models of organisation and coordination in COVID-19 volunteering. Additionally, community support groups seem to be adjusting their activities and scope of action to current needs and challenges. Volunteers were mostly women, middle-class, highly educated, and working-age people. Social networks and connections, local knowledge, and social trust were key dimensions associated with community organising and volunteering. Furthermore, despite the efforts of a few official public institutions and councils, there has been limited community engagement and collaboration with volunteering groups and other community-based organisations. Conclusions We identified important factors for fostering community engagement and COVID-19 volunteering as well as gaps in the current literature. We suggest that future research should be directed towards deepening knowledge on sustaining community engagement, collaboration and community participation over time, during and beyond this pandemic.

scholarly journals What have we learned so far about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanlan Mao ◽  
Maria Fernandes-Jesus ◽  
Evangelos Ntontis ◽  
John Drury
Keyword(s):  
Community Engagement ◽  
Social Trust ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
National Level ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Mutual Aid ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
The Uk

AbstractBackgroundCommunity engagement and volunteering are essential for the public response to COVID-19. Since March 2020 a large number of people in the UK have been regularly doing unpaid activities to benefit others besides their close relatives. Although most mutual aid groups emerged from local neighbourhoods and communities, official public institutions also fostered community volunteering, namely through the community champions scheme. By considering a broad definition of COVID-19 volunteering, this article describes a systematic review of the literature focused on two broad questions: What have we learned so far from COVID-19 volunteering both at the UK national level and the more local community level? What have we learned from engagement with local communities and community champions during the COVID-19 period?MethodsA rapid review of the literature in peer-reviewed databases and grey literature was applied in our search, following the PRISMA principles. The search was conducted from 10 to 16 of October 2020, and sources were included on the basis of having been published between January and October 2020, focusing on COVID-19 and addressing community groups, volunteering groups, volunteers, or community champions in the UK.ResultsAfter initial screening, a total of 40 relevant sources were identified. From these, 28 were considered eligible. Findings suggest that food shopping and emotional support were the most common activities, but there were diverse models of organisation and coordination in COVID-19 volunteering. Additionally, community support groups seem to be adjusting their activities and scope of action to current needs and challenges. Volunteers were mostly women, middle-class, highly educated, and working-age people. Social networks and connections, local knowledge, and social trust were key dimensions associated with community organising and volunteering. Furthermore, despite the efforts of a few official public institutions and councils, there has been limited community engagement and collaboration with volunteering groups and other community-based organisations.ConclusionsWe identified important factors for fostering community engagement and COVID volunteering as well as gaps in the current literature. We suggest that future research should be directed towards deepening knowledge on sustaining community engagement, collaboration and community participation over time, during and beyond this pandemic.

scholarly journals Determining the period of communicability of SARS-CoV-2: A rapid review of the literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Park ◽  
Colleen Pawliuk ◽  
Tribesty Nguyen ◽  
Amanda Griffitt ◽  
Linda Dix-Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grey Literature ◽  
Viral Clearance ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Viral Isolation ◽  
Viral Shedding ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Contact Transmission

Introduction: How long individuals may transmit virus after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unclear. Understanding the communicability period of SARS-CoV-2 is important to inform the period of isolation required to prevent nosocomial and community spread. The objective of this study was to identify the reported communicable period of SARS-CoV-2, based on a rapid review of existing literature. Methods: Studies reporting empirical data on the period of communicability of SARS-CoV-2 through investigations of duration of communicability based on in-person contact ('contact transmission'), isolation and culture of virus ('viral isolation'), and viral shedding by detection of nucleic acids by RT-PCR ('viral shedding') were identified through searches of peer-reviewed and pre-print health sciences literature databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, medRxiv and arXiv) and the grey literature. Articles were screened for relevance, then data were extracted, analyzed, and synthesized. Results: Out of the 165 studies included for qualitative analysis, one study investigated contact transmission, three investigated viral isolation, 144 investigated viral shedding, and 17 studies focused on both viral shedding and viral isolation. The median length of time until viral clearance across all viral isolation studies was nine days; however, the maximum identified duration was 32 days. Studies with data on both viral isolation and viral shedding showed a prolonged maximum time until viral clearance for viral shedding (9 days vs 24 days). Discussion: Findings from this review support a minimum 10-day period of isolation; however, additional observation should be considered for individuals being released into high-risk settings.

scholarly journals The Size and Growth Potential of the Digital Economy in ODA-eligible Countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Herbert ◽  
Lucas Loudon
Keyword(s):  
Low Income ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Telecommunications Industry ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
National Accounts ◽  
Business Interests ◽  
The Uk

This rapid review synthesises evidence on the current size of the digital market, the countries promoting development of digital business and their approach through Trade Policies or Incentive Frameworks, and the current and potential size of the market with the UK / China / US / other significant countries. It draws on a variety of sources, including reports by international organisations (such as the World Bank and OECD), grey literature produced by think tanks and the private sector, and peer reviewed academic papers. A high proportion of estimates of the size of the digital economy come from research conducted by or for corporations and industry bodies, such as Google and the GSMA (which represents the telecommunications industry). Their research may be influenced by their business interests, the methodologies and data sources they utilise are often opaque, and the information required to critically assess findings is sometimes missing. Given this, the estimates presented in this review are best seen as ballpark figures rather than precise measurements. A limitation of this rapid evidence review stems from the lack of consistent methodologies for estimating the size of the digital economy. The OECD is attempting to develop a standard approach to measuring the digital economy across the national accounts of the G20, but this has not yet been finalised. This makes comparing the results of different studies very challenging. The problem is particularly stark in low income countries, where there are frequently huge gaps in the relevant data.

scholarly journals Rapid Evidence Review of Community Engagement in The UK During The COVID-19 Pandemic: How Can Community Assets Redress Health Inequities?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabya Mughal ◽  
Linda Thomson ◽  
Norma Daykin ◽  
Helen Chatterjee
Keyword(s):  
Community Engagement ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Public Domain ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Vulnerable Groups ◽  
Mutual Aid ◽  
Quality Of Data ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Interest ◽  
Evidence Review

Abstract Background Community-based engagement has been crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic, fostering informal and local mutual aid between individuals, community groups, charities, community interest companies and local authorities. The current rapid evidence review examines the emergence of community-based arts, nature, music, theatre and other types of cultural engagement amongst UK communities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It focuses on all community engagement with a sub-focus on provisions accessed by and targeted towards vulnerable groups. Methods Two hundred and fifty-six resources created between February 2020 and January 2021 were reviewed. Resources were identified through Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, MedRXic, PsycharXiv, and supplemented with searches for grey literature and items in the public domain. The majority reported services that had been adapted to become online, telephone based or delivered at a distance from doorsteps. Over a third of identified resources (37%) were targeted towards socioeconomic outcomes, such as social isolation, financial difficulty or caregiver responsibilities. Over a quarter of resources (28%) were targeted towards psychological outcomes, including individuals with mild to moderate anxiety and depression, acute mental health needs, or neurodevelopmental conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder. Under a fifth of resources (17%) were targeted towards physiological outcomes, including individuals with health conditions such as dementia, chronic pain, immunological conditions, or other conditions requiring shielding. The remaining resources were open to everyone, or targeted towards other groups that did not fall into vulnerability categories such as parents or university students. Several quality assessment frameworks were used to evaluate the quality of data. Whilst a number of peer reviewed, grey literature and public domain items were identified, less than half of the identified literature met quality thresholds. The pace of the response to the pandemic may have meant robust evaluation procedures were not always in place. Conclusions Outreach to vulnerable audiences was generally observed via a plethora of organisations, however more robust and longitudinal evidence is needed as to the efficacy and impact of community programmes, services and activities.

scholarly journals Arts on prescription in Scandinavia: a review of current practice and future possibilities

2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Jensen ◽  
Theodore Stickley ◽  
Wenche Torrissen ◽  
Kjerstin Stigmar
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Research Perspective ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Art And Culture ◽  
Culture And Health ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Public Health Promotion

Aims: This article reviews current practice relating to arts and culture on prescription in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and in the United Kingdom. It considers future possibilities and also each of the Scandinavian countries from a culture and health policy and research perspective. The United Kingdom perhaps leads the field of Arts on Prescription practice, and subsequent research is described in order to help identify what the Scandinavian countries might learn from the UK research. Method: The method adopted for the literature search was a rapid review which included peer-reviewed and grey literature in English and the respective languages of Scandinavia. Results: The discussion considers the evidence to support social prescription and the potential obstacles of the implementation of Arts on Prescription in Scandinavian countries. Conclusion: The article concludes that of the Scandinavian countries, Sweden is ahead in terms of Arts on Prescription and has embraced the use of culture for health benefits on a different scale compared to Norway and Denmark. Denmark, in particular, is behind in recognising ways in which art and culture can benefit patients and for wider public health promotion. All three countries may benefit from the evidence provided by UK researchers.

scholarly journals Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abimbola A. Ayorinde ◽  
Felicity Boardman ◽  
Majel McGranahan ◽  
Lucy Porter ◽  
Nwamaka A. Eze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Behaviour Change ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Behaviour Change Techniques ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Behaviour Change Wheel ◽  
Behavioural Analysis ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background Many pregnancies in the UK are either unplanned or ambivalent. This review aimed to (i) explore barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception in the United Kingdom, and (ii) identify opportunities for behavioural interventions based on examination of interventions that are currently available nationally. Methods Three databases were searched, and experts contacted to identify grey literature for studies presenting barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception, conducted in the UK and published between 2009 and October 2019. Information on barriers and facilitators were coded into overarching themes, which were then coded into Mechanisms of Actions (MoAs) as listed in the Theory and Techniques Tool. National interventions were identified by consulting stakeholders and coded into the Behaviour Change Wheel. The match between barriers/facilitators and intervention content was assessed using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Results We included 32 studies and identified 46 barrier and facilitator themes. The most cited MoA was Environmental Context and Resources, which primarily related to the services women had access to and care they received. Social Influences, Beliefs about Consequences (e.g., side effects) and Knowledge were also key. The behavioural analysis highlighted four priority intervention functions (Modelling, Enablement, Education and Environmental Restructuring) that can be targeted to support women to choose and access their preferred method of contraception. Relevant policy categories and behaviour change techniques are also highlighted. Conclusions This review highlights factors that influence women’s choices and access to contraception and recommends opportunities that may be targeted for future interventions in order to support women to access preferred contraception. Registration Protocol was registered with PROSPERO (an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care) in December 2019, CRD42019161156.

Access to medication and pharmacy services for resettled refugees: a systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Bellamy ◽  
Remo Ostini ◽  
Nataly Martini ◽  
Therese Kairuz
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Pharmacy Services ◽  
Pharmacy Staff ◽  
The Uk

The difficulties that resettled refugees experience in accessing primary health-care services have been widely documented. In most developed countries, pharmacists are often the first health-care professional contacted by consumers; however, the ability of refugees to access community pharmacies and medication may be limited. This review systematically reviewed the literature and synthesised findings of research that explored barriers and/or facilitators of access to medication and pharmacy services for resettled refugees. This review adhered to guidelines for systematic reviews by PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses). Databases were searched during March 2014 and included Scopus, ProQuest Sociological Abstracts, PubMed, Embase and APAIS Health. The Australian and International grey literature was also explored. Nine studies met the quality and inclusion criteria. The research reported in seven of the nine studies was conducted in the US, one was conducted in Australia and the other in the UK. The majority of studies focussed on South-east Asian refugees. Themes identified across the studies included language and the use of interpreters; navigating the Western health-care system; culture and illness beliefs; medication non-adherence; use of traditional medicine; and family, peer and community support. There is a significant paucity of published research exploring barriers to medication and pharmacy services among resettled refugees. This systematic review highlights the need for appropriate interpreting and translation services, as well as pharmacy staff demonstrating effective cross-cultural communication skills.

scholarly journals The Challenge of Promoting the Health of Refugees and Migrants in Europe: A Review of the Literature and Urgent Policy Options

Challenges ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Laverack
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Migrant Health ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Culturally Competent ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Future Policy

This paper provides a rapid review of the literature on the current knowledge on health promotion for improved refugee and migrant health in the European region. The aim of the paper is to identify implications for future policy and practice. The literature review used standard systematic methodologies to search databases followed by data extraction and synthesis. General sources of grey literature were also included in the review as well as consultations with people working in the field. The paper identifies the lack of knowledge on how to engage with refugees and migrants in a culturally competent way, to address fear and violence and the application of health literacy. The review of the literature also identifies evidence to support peer education, working with community-based organisations and the tailoring of interventions to the needs of refugees and migrants. The paper concludes with a discussion of the technical content and future implications for the implementation of health promotion programs.

scholarly journals Perceived enablers and barriers of community engagement for vaccination in India: Using socioecological analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253318
Author(s):  
Tapati Dutta ◽  
Jon Agley ◽  
Beth E. Meyerson ◽  
Priscilla A. Barnes ◽  
Catherine Sherwood-Laughlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Engagement ◽  
National Level ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Policy Documents ◽  
Vaccination Uptake ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
Study Results

Background There is high level policy consensus in India that community engagement (CE) improves vaccination uptake and reduces burden of vaccine preventable diseases. However, to date, vaccination studies in the country have not explicitly focused on CE as an outcome in and of itself. Therefore, this study sought to examine the barriers and enablers of community engagement for vaccination in India. Methods Employing qualitative methods, twenty-five semi-structured elite interviews among vaccine decisionmakers’ were triangulated with twenty-four national-level vaccine policy documents and researcher field notes (December 2017 to February 2018). Data collected for this study included perceptions and examples of enablers of and barriers to CE for vaccination uptake. Concepts, such as the absence of formal procedures or data collection approaches related to CE, were confirmed during document review, and a final convening to review study results was conducted with study respondents in December 2018 and January 2019 to affirm the general set of findings from this study. The Social Ecological Model (SEM) was used to organize and interpret the study findings. Results Although decisionmakers and policy documents generally supported CE, there were more CE barriers than facilitators in the context of vaccination, which were identified at all social-ecological levels. Interviews with vaccine decisionmakers in India revealed complex systemic and structural factors which affect CE for vaccination and are present across each of the SEM levels, from individual to policy. Policy-level enablers included decisionmakers’ political will for CE and policy documents and interviews highlighted social mobilization, whereas barriers were lack of a CE strategy document and a broad understanding of CE by decisionmakers. At the community level, dissemination of Social-behavioral Change Communication (SBCC) materials from the national-level to the states was considered a CE facilitator, while class, and caste-based power relations in the community, lack of family-centric CE strategies, and paternalistic attitude of decisionmakers toward communities (the latter reported by some NGO heads) were considered CE barriers. At the organizational level, partnerships with local organizations were considered CE enablers, while lack of institutionalized support to formalize and incentivize these partnerships highlighted by several decisionmakers, were barriers. At the interpersonal level, SBCC training for healthcare workers, sensitive messaging to communities with low vaccine confidence, and social media messaging were considered CE facilitators. The lack of strategies to manage vaccine related rumors or replicate successful CE interventions during the during the introduction and rollout of new vaccines were perceived as CE barriers by several decisionmakers. Conclusion Data obtained for this study highlighted national-level perceptions of the complexities and challenges of CE across the entire SEM, from individual to systemic levels. Future studies should attempt to associate these enablers and barriers with actual CE outcomes, such as participation or community support in vaccine policy-making, CE implementation for specific vaccines and situations (such as disease outbreaks), or frequency of sub-population-based incidents of community resistance and community facilitation to vaccination uptake. There would likely be value in developing a population-based operational definition of CE, with a step-by-step manual on ‘how to do CE.’ The data from this study also indicate the importance of including CE indicators in national datasets and developing a compendium documenting CE best-practices. Doing so would allow more rigorous analysis of the evidence-base for CE for vaccination in India and other countries with similar immunization programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document