scholarly journals Immediate and 6-week effects of wearing a knee sleeve following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cross-over laboratory and randomised clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela Sole ◽  
Peter Lamb ◽  
Todd Pataky ◽  
Stefan Klima ◽  
Pierre Navarre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Peak Torque ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Isokinetic Peak Torque

Abstract Background Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is based mainly on comprehensive progressive exercise programmes using a multi-dimensional approach. Elastic knee sleeves may be useful adjuncts to rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to determine the immediate and 6-week effects of wearing a knee sleeve on person-reported outcomes and function in participants who had undergone an ACL reconstruction and who had residual self-reported functional limitations. Methods Individuals with ACL reconstruction in the previous 6 months to 5 years were recruited. Immediate effects of a commercially-available elastic knee sleeve on single-leg horizontal hop distance were explored using a cross-over design. Following this first session, participants were randomised into a Control Group and a Sleeve Group who wore the sleeve for 6 weeks, at least 1 h daily. Outcome measures for the randomised clinical trial (RCT) were the International Knee Documentation Classification Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) score, the single-leg horizontal hop distance, and isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring peak torque. Linear mixed models were used to determine random effects. Where both limbs were measured at multiple time points, a random measurement occasion effect nested within participant was used. Results Thirty-four individuals (16 women) with ACL reconstruction completed the cross-over trial. Hop distance for the injured side during the sleeve condition increased by 3.6 % (95 % CI 0.4–6.8 %, p = 0.025). There was no evidence of differential changes between groups for the IKDC-SKF (Sleeve Group n = 15; Control Group n = 16; p = 0.327), or relative improvement in the injured side compared to the uninjured side for the physical performance measures (Sleeve Group n = 12, Control Group n = 12; three-way interaction p = 0.533 [hop distance], 0.381 [quadriceps isokinetic peak torque], and 0.592 [hamstring isokinetic peak torque]). Conclusions Single-leg hop distance of the ACL reconstructed side improved when wearing a knee sleeve. Wearing the knee sleeve over 6 weeks did not lead to enhanced improvements in self-reported knee function, hop distance and thigh muscle strength compared to the control group. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry No: ACTRN12618001083280, 28 June 2018.

Comparison of the Position-Matching and Position-Reproducing Tasks to Detect Deficits in Knee Position Sense After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
Takuma Hoshiba ◽  
Hiroki Nakata ◽  
Yasuaki Saho ◽  
Kazuyuki Kanosue ◽  
Toru Fukubayashi
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Sport Participation ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Matching Task ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Knee Position ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Context: Deficits in knee position sense following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can delay an athlete’s return to sport participation and increase the risk of reinjury. Deficits in position sense postreconstruction have been evaluated using either a position-reproducing or position-matching task. Objective: The aim of our study was to combine both to determine which assessment would be more effective to identify deficits in knee position sense. Design: Longitudinal laboratory-based study. Participants: Eleven athletes (6 men and 5 women; mean age, 20.5 [1.2] y), who had undergone ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring autograft, and 12 age-matched controls. Interventions: Position sense was evaluated at 6 and 12 months postreconstruction and once for the control group. In addition, peak isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength, at 60°/s and 180°/s, was assessed for the ACL reconstruction group to evaluate possible influences of muscle strength on knee joint position sense. Main Outcome Measures: The variables include the angular differences between the reference limb and indicator limb, and peak torque values of isokinetic knee extension and flexion. Results: Significant matching differences were identified at 6 months postsurgery on the position-matching task, but not at 12 months postsurgery. No significant between-group and within-subject differences were identified on the position-reproducing task. No significant matching errors were identified for the control group. There was no correlation between errors in position sense and maximum isokinetic strength. Conclusion: The position-matching task is more sensitive than the position-reproducing task to identify deficits in knee position sense over the first year following ACL reconstruction surgery.

scholarly journals Strength deficits and flexion range of motion following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ between quadriceps and hamstring autografts

2020 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000481
Author(s):  
Peta T Johnston ◽  
Julian A Feller ◽  
Jodie A McClelland ◽  
Kate E Webster
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Peak Torque ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Isokinetic Strength Testing ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Anterior Knee

ObjectiveTo determine if anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon (QT) could achieve faster postoperative recovery compared with hamstring tendon (HT) ACL reconstruction.MethodsThirty-seven QT patients were matched for gender, age and preinjury activity level with 74 HT patients. A 6-month postoperative assessment included standardised reported outcome measures: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (International Knee Documentation Committee-subjective knee evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-knee related quality of life subscale, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale, Marx activity scale, anterior knee pain), range of motion (active, standing and passive), anterior knee laxity testing, hop tests (single and triple crossover hop for distance) and isokinetic strength testing of the knee extensors and flexors. T-tests or Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare data between groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the PROMs. The HT group had reduced active and standing knee flexion range compared with the QT group (p<0.001). Isokinetic strength testing showed significant deficits in limb symmetry indices for both concentric hamstring peak torque at 60°/s (p<0.001) and 180°/s (p=0.01) in the HT group. There were significantly greater deficits in limb symmetry indices for concentric quadriceps peak torque at 60°/s (p<0.001) and 180°/s (p=0.001) in the QT group.ConclusionThe QT graft does not appear to offer a more rapid recovery in terms of knee symptoms or function which could have allowed for faster progression to the dynamic phases of rehabilitation.Level of evidenceLevel III.

scholarly journals Gait Analysis and Knee Kinematics in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Before and After Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 3378
Author(s):  
Dmitry Skvortsov ◽  
Sergey Kaurkin ◽  
Alexander Akhpashev ◽  
Aljona Altukhova ◽  
Alexander Troitskiy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cycle Duration ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and biomechanical symptoms in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture before and after ACL reconstruction. The study enrolled 20 patients and 20 healthy subjects as controls. Walking biomechanics was assessed at three time points: before surgery and three months and a year or more after surgical reconstruction. Impact loads on both sides differed significantly from the respective values before surgery (p<0.05). Walking cycle duration decreased with time after surgery. On both sides (affected and unaffected), hip movement amplitudes were significantly smaller than in control (p<0.05). They remained so in the follow-up periods after the reconstruction. Before ACL reconstruction, the amplitude of the main flexion of the knee was significantly reduced both on the affected and unaffected sides. The amplitude gradually increased after the reconstruction, and a year post-surgery, it reached, on the operated side, the same values as in the control group. Complete functional recovery of the knee joint was not achieved within a year after the ACL surgical reconstruction. The remaining changes, however, were not clinically pronounced and could only be detected by instrumental gait analysis. The compensatory processes developed bilaterally, in both the hip and knee joints.

scholarly journals Mesenchymal stromal cells and platelet-rich plasma promote tendon allograft healing in ovine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam T. Hexter ◽  
Anita Sanghani-Kerai ◽  
Nima Heidari ◽  
Deepak M. Kalaskar ◽  
Ashleigh Boyd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tendon Allograft ◽  
Tunnel Diameter ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Purpose The effect of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on tendon allograft maturation in a large animal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction model was reported for the first time. It was hypothesised that compared with non-augmented ACL reconstruction, BMSCs and PRP would enhance graft maturation after 12 weeks and this would be detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Fifteen sheep underwent unilateral tendon allograft ACL reconstruction using aperture fixation and were randomised into three groups (n = 5). Group 1 received 10 million allogeneic BMSCs in 2 ml fibrin sealant; Group 2 received 12 ml PRP in a plasma clot injected into the graft and bone tunnels; and Group 3 (control) received no adjunctive treatment. At autopsy at 12 weeks, a graft maturation score was determined by the sum for graft integrity, synovial coverage and vascularisation, graft thickness and apparent tension, and synovial sealing at tunnel apertures. MRI analysis (n = 2 animals per group) of the signal–noise quotient (SNQ) and fibrous interzone (FIZ) was used to evaluate intra-articular graft maturation and tendon–bone healing, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r) of SNQ, autopsy graft maturation score and bone tunnel diameter were analysed. Results The BMSC group (p = 0.01) and PRP group (p = 0.03) had a significantly higher graft maturation score compared with the control group. The BMSC group scored significantly higher for synovial sealing at tunnel apertures (p = 0.03) compared with the control group. The graft maturation score at autopsy significantly correlated with the SNQ (r = − 0.83, p < 0.01). The tunnel diameter of the femoral tunnel at the aperture (r = 0.883, p = 0.03) and mid-portion (r = 0.941, p = 0.02) positively correlated with the SNQ. Conclusions BMSCs and PRP significantly enhanced graft maturation, which indicates that orthobiologics can accelerate the biologic events in tendon allograft incorporation. Femoral tunnel expansion significantly correlated with inferior maturation of the intra-articular graft. The clinical relevance of this study is that BMSCs and PRP enhance allograft healing in a translational model, and biological modulation of graft healing can be evaluated non-invasively using MRI.

scholarly journals The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Goce Andonovski ◽  
Sonja Topuzovska ◽  
Milan Samardziski ◽  
Zoran Bozinovski ◽  
Biljana Andonovska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Proprioceptive Function

BACKGROUND: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) remnants have important biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive function.AIM: To determine the influence of the ACL residual remnants after partial and complete ACL ruptures on postoperative clinical results in patients with remnant preserving ACL reconstruction.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 66 patients divided into two groups. In patients from the investigation group remnant preserving ACL reconstruction was performed, in patients from the control group single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. The results were assessed by Rolimeter measurements, Lysholm and Tegner scores and proprioception evaluation.RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference of anterior tibia displacement (mm) was improved from 4.4 ± 1.06 to 0.4 ± 0.7 in the investigation group, and from 4.6 ± 0.68 to 1.9 ± 0.64 in the control group (p < 0.001). Difference in the angles in which the knee was placed by the device and the patient has improved from 1.5 ± 0.96° to 0.5 ± 0.53° in the investigation group and from 1.8 ± 0.78° to 1.3 ± 0.97° in the control group (p < 0.05).  Tegner and Lysholm scores showed no difference between the groups.CONCLUSION: Preservation of the ACL residual bundle provides a better knee stability and proprioceptive function.

Vancomycin Presoaking of the Graft Appears to Prevent Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110116
Author(s):  
Francisco Figueroa ◽  
David Figueroa ◽  
Rafael Calvo ◽  
Alex Vaisman ◽  
Marilaura Nuñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Reconstruction Methods ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Vancomycin presoaking of the graft has been shown to decrease infection rates in some case series of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: We sought to substantiate the efficacy of vancomycin presoaked grafts for the prevention of infection after ACL reconstruction. Methods: We performed a systematic review of Medline and OVID to assess the incidence of postoperative infection in studies comparing patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with the use of vancomycin presoaked ACL grafts and a control group of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction without the use of presoaked grafts. The efficacy of vancomycin presoaking was calculated using the Agresti-Coull confidence interval. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for every study and the total sample. Results: The 11 studies that met inclusion criteria comprised 24,298 patients. In patients with vancomycin presoaking of the graft, 1 infection was reported in 8764 cases (0.01% rate). In the studies with control groups that did not have vancomycin presoaked grafts, there were 125 infections in 15,534 ACL reconstructions (0.8% rate). The efficacy of vancomycin presoaking in preventing infection after ACL reconstruction was 99.9% (0.999%–1.000% CI). The overall RR obtained was 0.07 (0.03–0.16 CI). All included studies were retrospective cohort studies (level III). Conclusions: Vancomycin presoaking of the graft has been shown to decrease infection rates after ACL reconstruction in studies of low evidence level. This suggests the need for prospective randomized controlled trials addressing this issue so that recommendations on the routine use of vancomycin presoaking of ACL grafts can be made with confidence.

scholarly journals Career Length and Injury Incidence After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Soccer Players

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711775082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Joanna Hanford Arundale ◽  
Holly Jacinda Silvers-Granelli ◽  
Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Career Length ◽  
Major League Soccer ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Background: Little is known about career length after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in Major League Soccer (MLS), the top men’s professional soccer league in the United States. Further, it is unspecified whether athletes returning to soccer after ACL reconstruction are at a higher risk for injuries, beyond new knee injuries. Purpose: To examine career length and the incidence of lower extremity injuries in MLS athletes after ACL reconstruction in comparison with age-matched controls. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Injuries and athletic exposures (AEs; games and training sessions) were recorded in the HealtheAthlete database, the injury surveillance system of MLS. All athletes who had undergone ACL reconstruction and returned to MLS were identified and age-matched with controls. Multivariate analyses of variance were used to compare career length and percentage of regular/postseason games that athletes started, substituted, or did not play. Generalized linear model regressions were used to examine the injury risk. Results: Athletes in the ACL group had shorter careers (1.3 ± 1.3 years) than those in the control group (2.5 ± 1.3 years) ( P < .01), but while they were playing, athletes in the ACL group participated in a similar number of AEs as those in the control group (169.9 ± 129.0 vs 171.6 ± 124.9 AEs, respectively; P = .95). Athletes in the ACL group started fewer regular/postseason games (36.7% ± 34.3% vs 60.1% ± 33.8%, respectively; P < .01) and did not play in more regular/postseason games (47.4% ± 35.5% vs 31.0% ± 34.4%, respectively; P = .03) compared with those in the control group. The ACL group was not at a significantly greater risk for lower extremity injuries compared with the control group (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.55-1.37). Conclusion: Although MLS athletes after ACL reconstruction are not at a greater risk for lower extremity injuries, this study suggests that they are not utilized in regular/postseason games as frequently and that their careers in MLS are shorter than age-matched controls. Further research is necessary to elucidate reasons for these athletes’ shortened MLS careers. This study supports the view of return to sport not as a single time point but as a continuum from return to participation to return to play and return to performance.

scholarly journals Reducing Intra-Articular Haemarthrosis After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0013
Author(s):  
Fatih Karaaslan ◽  
Sinan Karaoğlu ◽  
Musa Uğur Mermerkaya
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Objectives: A significant proportion of surgeons use intra-articular drains after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Haemarthrosis and pain adversely affects the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration to minimize pain and stiffness of knee joint by reducing haemarthrosis. Methods: The study enrolled 123 patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The patients who were randomized into the TXA group (71 patients) received both intravenous and intra-articular TXA. The control group (52 patients) did not receive TXA. The anesthetist, surgeon, and observer were blinded to the study group (double-blinded). TXA was administered as a bolus dose of 15 mg/kg 10 minutes before the inflation of the tourniquet on the first side. This was followed by continued intra-articular administration of 3 g at 10 minutes before the deflation of the tourniquet. Intravenous infusion of 10 mg/kg/h was continued for the next 3 hours. Equal volumes of placebo were administered at the same rate and by the same route. We measured volume of drained blood 48 hours postoperatively. Results: The mean (± SD) postoperative volume of blood loss from the drain in the TXA and control groups was 100.6 ± 72mL and 164.3 ± 75mL ml, respectively. The difference between the two groups was significant (p < 0.005). Conclusion: This prospective randomized study showed that during arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, TXA reduced blood loss and helped to reduce haemarthrosis amount and frequency with negligible side effects. With regard to the administration route, combined intravenous–intra-articular administration of TXA significantly reduces blood loss and the need for puncturing associated with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without enhancing the risk of deepssssssahrombosis.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Autograft Versus Allograft Tissue

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Tibor ◽  
Joy L. Long ◽  
Peter L. Schilling ◽  
Ryan J. Lilly ◽  
James E. Carpenter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Allograft Reconstruction ◽  
Kt 1000 ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Clinical outcomes of autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are mixed, with some reports of excellent to good outcomes and other reports of early graft failure or significant donor site morbidity. Objective: To determine if there is a difference in functional outcomes, failure rates, and stability between autograft and allograft ACL reconstructions. Data Sources: Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Evidence Based Medicine Reviews Collection), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles on ACL reconstruction. Abstracts from annual meetings of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America were searched for relevant studies. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria for studies were as follows: primary unilateral ACL injuries, mean patient age less than 41 years, and follow-up for at least 24 months postreconstruction. Exclusion criteria for studies included the following: skeletally immature patients, multiligament injuries, and publication dates before 1990. Data Extraction: Joint stability measures included Lachman test, pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer assessment, and frequency of graft failures. Functional outcome measures included Tegner activity scores, Cincinnati knee scores, Lysholm scores, and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) total scores. Results: More than 5000 studies were identified. After full text review of 576 studies, 56 were included, of which only 1 directly compared autograft and allograft reconstruction. Allograft ACL reconstructions were more lax when assessed by the KT-1000 arthrometer. For all other outcome measures, there was no statistically significant difference between autograft and allograft ACL reconstruction. For all outcome measures, there was strong evidence of statistical heterogeneity between studies. The sample size necessary for a randomized clinical trial to detect a difference between autograft and allograft reconstruction varied, depending on the outcome. Conclusions: With the current literature, only KT-1000 arthrometer assessment demonstrated more laxity with allograft reconstruction. A randomized clinical trial directly comparing allograft to autograft ACL reconstruction is warranted, but a multicenter study would be required to obtain an adequate sample size.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document