scholarly journals Promoting physical therapists’ use of research evidence to inform clinical practice: part 3 – long term feasibility assessment of the PEAK program

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie K. Tilson ◽  
Sharon Mickan ◽  
Robbin Howard ◽  
Jonathan C. Sum ◽  
Maria Zibell ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet E. Squires ◽  
Laura D. Aloisio ◽  
Jeremy M. Grimshaw ◽  
Kainat Bashir ◽  
Kristin Dorrance ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Susanne Heiwe ◽  
Eva Johansson ◽  
Kerstin Nilsson-Kajermo ◽  
Karin Säflund ◽  
Ann Ödlund Olin

Background: Education is a commonly used intervention in the development of evidence-based practice (EBP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of an educational intervention on healthcare professionals’ perceived skills in finding, reviewing, and using research evidence in clinical practice. A further aim was to identify potential determinants for the outcome.Methods and Findings: A three-day course in EBP was designed for registered nurses, medical social workers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and dieticians. The Developing Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (DEBP) questionnaire was administered before and six months after the intervention (N = 274). Non-parametric statistics were used. The results showed an overall effect on ability to find research evidence (p = .0005) and ability to review research evidence (p = .0005), whereas there was no overall effect on use of research evidence in clinical practice (p = .18). However, some subgroups showed a significant improvement over time, for example, those whose profession was nursing or midwifery and those who had experience using evidence-based practice prior to the educational intervention.Conclusions: The results showed that a three-day course in EBP improved the participants’ ability to find and review research evidence, but it did not have an overall effect on the use of research evidence in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 688-704
Author(s):  
Katrina Fulcher-Rood ◽  
Anny Castilla-Earls ◽  
Jeff Higginbotham

Purpose The current investigation is a follow-up from a previous study examining child language diagnostic decision making in school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of this study was to examine the SLPs' perspectives regarding the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in their clinical work. Method Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 25 school-based SLPs who previously participated in an earlier study by Fulcher-Rood et al. 2018). SLPs were asked questions regarding their definition of EBP, the value of research evidence, contexts in which they implement scientific literature in clinical practice, and the barriers to implementing EBP. Results SLPs' definitions of EBP differed from current definitions, in that SLPs only included the use of research findings. SLPs seem to discuss EBP as it relates to treatment and not assessment. Reported barriers to EBP implementation were insufficient time, limited funding, and restrictions from their employment setting. SLPs found it difficult to translate research findings to clinical practice. SLPs implemented external research evidence when they did not have enough clinical expertise regarding a specific client or when they needed scientific evidence to support a strategy they used. Conclusions SLPs appear to use EBP for specific reasons and not for every clinical decision they make. In addition, SLPs rely on EBP for treatment decisions and not for assessment decisions. Educational systems potentially present other challenges that need to be considered for EBP implementation. Considerations for implementation science and the research-to-practice gap are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
Paula Corabian ◽  
Charles Yan ◽  
Susan Armijo-Olivo ◽  
Bing Guo

IntroductionThe objectives of this study were to systematically review published research on the relationship between nursing staff coverage, care hours, and quality of care (QoC) in long-term care (LTC) facilities; and to conduct a real world evidence (RWE) analysis using Alberta real world data (RWD) to inform policy makers on whether any amendments could be made to current regulations.MethodsA systematic review (SR) of research evidence published between January 2000 and May 2018 on the relationship between nursing staff coverage, care hours, and QoC in LTC facilities was conducted. Panel data regressions using available RWD from Alberta, Canada, were performed to assess associations between nursing care hours and LTC outcomes. Outcomes of interest included quality indicators related to resident outcomes, hospital admissions, emergency room visits and family satisfaction. Nursing care hours considered in SR and RWE analysis included those provided by registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs).ResultsThe SR found inconsistent and poor quality evidence relevant to the questions of interest, indicating a great uncertainty about the association between nursing staff time and type of coverage and QoC. Although some positive indications were suggested, major weaknesses of reviewed studies limited interpretation of SR results. RWE analysis found that impact of care hours on LTC outcomes was heterogeneous, dependent on outcome measurements. There was evidence that total staff, RN, and LPN hours had positive effects on some resident outcomes and magnitude of effect differed for different nursing staff.ConclusionsNo definitive conclusion could be drawn on whether changing nursing staff time or nursing staff coverage models would affect residents’ outcomes based on the research evidence gathered in the SR. RWE analysis helped to fill a gap in the available published literature and allowed policy makers to better understand the impact of revising current regulations based on actual outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Guedeney ◽  
J Silvain ◽  
F Hidden-Lucet ◽  
C Maupain ◽  
S Dinanian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are only limited options for long-term cardiac monitoring devices readily available in clinical practice for outpatients. Holter monitoring devices are limited by the uncomfort of wires and patches, the small number of leads for analysis, the quality of recordings or the monitoring duration while insertable cardiac monitors are costly and exposed to potential local complication. Purpose To describe a single center experience with a novel wearable device for cardiac rhythm monitoring. Methods The Cardioskin™ system is a patch-free, wire-free, wearable device with rechargeable batteries that provides a high quality 15-lead electrocardiogram monitoring over 1 month (Figure 1). Data are sent using a mobile application downloaded in the patient smartphone to a central Corelab where they can be interpreted by an expert and/or the prescribing physician. An alarm signal is readily available within the Cardioskin™ device, to allow patients to indicate the presence of symptoms. In this single center retrospective registry, we provide a first report of the use of this novel device in real world practice, with indication and duration of cardiac monitoring left at the physicans “discretion”. Results From January 2019 to December 2019, the Cardioskin™ system was prescribed in 60 patients for an overall median duration of 26.5 (14–32) days. The mean age of the patients was 45±12.2 years and 24 (40%) were male. Indications for cardiac monitoring were post-Stroke, palpitation, syncope and cardiomyopathy assessment in 56%, 30%, 7% and 7% of the cases, respectively. A sustained (>30 seconds) supraventricular tachycardia was detected in 4 cases, including one case of atrial fibrillation, two case of atrial tachycardia and on case of junctional tachycardia. Unsustained ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation burst were detected in another 2 cases (Figure 1). There was no reported case of skin irritation by the Cardioskin™ system or abrupt interruption of the monitoring by the patients. Conclusion The Cardioskin™ system is a novel, discreet and comfortable cardiac rhythm wearable long-term monitoring device which can be used in clinical practice for broad diagnostic indications. Figure 1. Cardioskin system Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): ACTION coeur


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document