A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study

Abstract Background Evidence-based health information (EBHI) is a prerequisite for informed and shared decision-making. The criteria for EBHI have been described comprehensively but the implementation in practice is still insufficient. The guideline evidence-based health information addresses providers of health information. Its goal is to improve the quality of health information. The evidence-based guideline emerged from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (DNEbM) and was published in February 2017. In addition, the competences of providers of health information were explored and a training programme was developed. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a training programme addressing providers of health information to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information. We expect the intervention to improve the quality of health information in comparison to provision of the guideline only. Methods The trial uses a superiority randomised control group design with ten months follow-up. 26 providers of health information (groups with up to ten members) will be enrolled to compare the intervention (guideline & training programme) with usual care (guideline publicly available). The 5-day training programme comprises an evidence-based medicine training module and a module to prepare the application of the guideline. The primary outcome parameter is the quality of the health information. Quality is operationalised as the extent of adherence to the guideline’s recommendations. Each provider will prepare a single health information informing a health-related decision on a freely chosen topic. The quality of this information will be rated using the Mapping Health Information Quality (MAPPinfo) checklist. An accompanying process evaluation will then be conducted. Discussion The study results will show whether the efficacy of the intervention justifies implementation of the training programme to enhance health information developers’ competences in evidence-based medicine and to ensure high quality EBHI in the long-term. Trial registration ISRCTN registry, registration number: ISRCTN96941060, Date: 7 March 2019, URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN96941060

Download Full-text

Efficacy of a complex intervention comprising the guideline evidence-based health information and a training programme on the quality of health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

10.21203/rs.2.12577/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Julia Lühnen ◽

Birte Berger-Höger ◽

Burkhard Haastert ◽

Jana Hinneburg ◽

Jürgen Kasper ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Health Information ◽

Evidence Based Medicine ◽

Information Quality ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Training Programme ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Based Medicine

Abstract Background Evidence-based health information (EBHI) is a prerequisite for informed and shared decision-making. The criteria for EBHI have been described comprehensively but the implementation in practice is still insufficient. The guideline evidence-based health information addresses providers of health information. Its goal is to improve the quality of health information. The evidence-based guideline emerged from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (DNEbM) and was published in February 2017. In addition, the competences of providers of health information were explored and a training programme was developed. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention comprising the guideline evidence-based health information and a training programme addressing providers of health information in a randomised controlled trial. We expect the intervention to improve the quality of health information in comparison to provision of the guideline only. Methods The trial uses a superiority randomised control group design with ten months follow-up. 26 providers of health information (groups with up to ten members) will be enrolled to compare the intervention (guideline & training programme) with usual care (guideline publicly available). The 5-day training programme comprises an evidence-based medicine training module and a module to prepare the application of the guideline. The primary outcome measure is the quality of the health information. Quality is operationalised as the extent of adherence to the guideline’s recommendations. Each provider will prepare a single health information informing a health-related decision. The quality of this information will be rated using the MAPPIN Health Information Quality instrument. An accompanying process evaluation will then be conducted. Discussion The study results will show whether the efficacy of the intervention justifies implementation of the training programme to enhance health information developers’ competences in evidence-based medicine and to ensure high quality EBHI in the long-term. Trial registration ISRCTN registry, registration number: ISRCTN96941060, Date: 7 March 2019, URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN96941060 Keywords health information; guideline implementation, training programme; evidence-based medicine; guideline evidence-based health information

Download Full-text

Development and piloting of a blended learning training programme for physicians and medical students to enhance their competences in evidence-based decision-making

Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen ◽

10.1016/j.zefq.2020.02.004 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 150-152 ◽

pp. 104-111

Author(s):

Jana Hinneburg ◽

Lars Hecht ◽

Birte Berger-Höger ◽

Susanne Buhse ◽

Julia Lühnen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Medical Students ◽

Blended Learning ◽

Training Programme ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Evidence Based Decision Making

Download Full-text

Efficacy of a training programme to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

10.21203/rs.2.12577/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Julia Lühnen ◽

Birte Berger-Höger ◽

Burkhard Haastert ◽

Jana Hinneburg ◽

Jürgen Kasper ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Information ◽

Evidence Based Medicine ◽

Information Quality ◽

Guideline Implementation ◽

Training Programme ◽

Control Group ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Study Results ◽

Based Medicine

Abstract Background The evidence-based guideline entitled guideline evidence-based health information emerged from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (DNEbM) and was published in February 2017. The guideline addresses providers of health information and its goal is to improve the quality of health information. In addition, we explored the competences of providers of health information and developed a training programme. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a training programme addressing providers of health information to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information. We expected the intervention to improve the quality of health information in comparison to the provision of the guideline on its own. Methods The trial uses a superiority randomised control group design with ten months follow-up. 26 providers of health information (groups with up to ten members) will be enrolled to compare the intervention (guideline & training programme) with usual care ( a publicly available guideline). The 5-day training programme comprises an evidence-based medicine training module and a module to prepare the application of the guideline. The primary outcome parameter is the quality of the health information. Quality is operationalised as the extent of adherence to the guideline’s recommendations. Each provider will prepare a single health information informing a health-related decision on a topic freely chosen before randomisation. The quality of this information will be rated using the Mapping Health Information Quality (MAPPinfo) checklist. An accompanying process evaluation will then be conducted. Discussion The study results will show whether the efficacy of the intervention justifies implementation of the training programme to enhance health information developers’ competences in evidence-based medicine and to ensure high-quality EBHI in the long-term. Trial registration ISRCTN registry, registration number: ISRCTN96941060, Date: 7 March 2019, URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN96941060 Keywords health information; guideline implementation, training programme; evidence-based medicine; guideline evidence-based health information

Download Full-text

Brief Behavioural Activation (Brief BA) for Adolescent Depression: A Pilot Study

Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy ◽

10.1017/s1352465817000443 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 46 (2) ◽

pp. 182-194 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Laura Pass ◽

Carl W. Lejuez ◽

Shirley Reynolds

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Pilot Study ◽

Young People ◽

Adolescent Depression ◽

Psychological Intervention ◽

Clinical Effectiveness ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Behavioural Activation ◽

Evidence Based Treatments ◽

The Uk

Background: Depression in adolescence is a common and serious mental health problem. In the UK, access to evidence-based psychological treatments is limited, and training and employing therapists to deliver these is expensive. Brief behavioural activation for the treatment of depression (BATD) has great potential for use with adolescents and to be delivered by a range of healthcare professionals, but there is limited empirical investigation with this group. Aims: To adapt BATD for depressed adolescents (Brief BA) and conduct a pilot study to assess feasibility, acceptability and clinical effectiveness. Method: Twenty depressed adolescents referred to the local NHS Child and Adolescent Mental Health service (CAMHs) were offered eight sessions of Brief BA followed by a review around one month later. Self- and parent-reported routine outcome measures (ROMs) were collected at every session. Results: Nineteen of the 20 young people fully engaged with the treatment and all reported finding some aspect of Brief BA helpful. Thirteen (65%) required no further psychological intervention following Brief BA, and both young people and parents reported high levels of acceptability and satisfaction with the approach. The pre–post effect size of Brief BA treatment was large. Conclusions: Brief BA is a promising innovation in the treatment of adolescent depression. This approach requires further evaluation to establish effectiveness and cost effectiveness compared with existing evidence-based treatments for adolescent depression. Other questions concern the effectiveness of delivery in other settings and when delivered by a range of professionals.

Download Full-text