scholarly journals Socioeconomic position and prognosis in premenopausal breast cancer: a population-based cohort study in Denmark

BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrine Fonnesbech Hjorth ◽  
Per Damkier ◽  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Timothy Lash ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Single Women ◽  
Premenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Background To investigate how socioeconomic position (SEP) influences the effectiveness of cancer-directed treatment in premenopausal breast cancer patients in terms of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. Methods We conducted a cohort study nested in the ProBeCaRe (Predictors of Breast Cancer Recurrence) cohort (n = 5959). We identified all premenopausal women aged 18–55 years diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer and prescribed docetaxel-based chemotherapy in Denmark during 2007–2011. Population-based administrative registries provided data on SEP: marital status (married including registered partnership or single including divorced or widowed), cohabitation (cohabiting or living alone), education (low, intermediate, or high), income (low, medium, or high), and employment status (employed, unemployed, or health-related absenteeism). For each SEP measure, we computed incidence rates, cumulative incidence proportions (CIPs), and used Poisson regression to compute incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of recurrence and death. We stratified on estrogen receptor (ER) status/tamoxifen to evaluate interaction. Results Our study cohort included 2616 women; 286 (CIP 13%) experienced recurrence and 223 (CIP 11%) died during follow-up (median 6.6 and 7.2 years, respectively). Single women had both increased 5-year risks of recurrence (IRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11–1.89) and mortality (IRR 1.83, 95% CI 1.32–2.52). Furthermore, we observed increased 5-year mortality in women with low education (IRR 1.49, 95% CI 0.95–2.33), low income (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 0.83–2.28), unemployment (IRR 1.61, 95% CI 0.83–3.13), or health-related work absenteeism (IRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.14–2.82), but smaller or no increased risk of recurrence. These findings were especially evident among women with ER+ tumors prescribed tamoxifen. Overall analyses (follow-up max. 10 years) provided similar results. Conclusions Low SEP in premenopausal women with non-metastatic breast cancer was associated with increased mortality, but not always recurrence. This suggests underdetection of recurrences in certain groups. Poor prognosis in women with low SEP, especially single women, may partly be explained by tamoxifen adherence.

scholarly journals Risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers following incident non-metastatic breast cancer: a Danish population-based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000413
Author(s):  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Jens Sundbøll ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Suzanne Tamang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancers ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveWe examined the risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers in women with breast cancer and compared this risk with that of the general population.DesignUsing population-based Danish registries, we conducted a cohort study of women with incident non-metastatic breast cancer (1990–2017). We computed cumulative cancer incidences and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).ResultsAmong 84 972 patients with breast cancer, we observed 2340 gastrointestinal cancers. After 20 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal cancers was 4%, driven mainly by colon cancers. Only risk of stomach cancer was continually increased beyond 1 year following breast cancer. The SIR for colon cancer was neutral during 2–5 years of follow-up and approximately 1.2-fold increased thereafter. For cancer of the oesophagus, the SIR was increased only during 6–10 years. There was a weak association with pancreas cancer beyond 10 years. Between 1990–2006 and 2007–2017, the 1–10 years SIR estimate decreased and reached unity for upper gastrointestinal cancers (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine). For lower gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectum, and anal canal), the SIR estimate was increased only after 2007. No temporal effects were observed for the remaining gastrointestinal cancers. Treatment effects were negligible.ConclusionBreast cancer survivors were at increased risk of oesophagus and stomach cancer, but only before 2007. The risk of colon cancer was increased, but only after 2007.

P–455 Breast cancer recurrence in women with and without controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. Cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Pesce ◽  
A F Vinacur ◽  
V Taboada ◽  
C Allemand ◽  
S Marciano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Ovarian Stimulation ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Study question Do patients diagnosed with breast cancer who undergo ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to chemotherapy have a higher risk of recurrence of the disease? Summary answer There was no statistically significant difference in the hazard ratio for breast cancer recurrence in fertility preservation-stimulated women compared to non-stimulated ones What is known already While many women with early breast cancer benefit from chemotherapy treatments in increasing disease-free survival, they are also at risk of permanent chemotherapy induced ovarian failure. Oocyte cryopreservation with an adapted protocol with letrozole may reduce the possible deleterious effect of the hyper estrogenic state during the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Although fertility preservation in women diagnosed with breast cancer seems safe, the follow-up periods of most studies are short in time. In addition, follow-up data of COH before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with hormone negative tumor receptors is still scarce and briefly reported. Study design, size, duration It was a retrospective cohort study, where 208 women with non-metastatic breast cancer were included. The recruitment period was from 01/01/2009 to 01/12/2019. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months, and the maximum, 130 months. Participants were divided into two cohorts, those who received controlled ovarian hyperstimulation prior to their cancer treatment and those who did not. Patients were followed until disease recurrence, death, loss to follow-up, or end of the study Participants/materials, setting, methods Setting: university hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We included women aged 18 to 45 years with a recent histological diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer who had to receive chemotherapy with gonadal toxicity. We excluded patients with a history of previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for another cancer disease, or menopause. Follow-up was at least an annual clinical check-up and breast imaging. Cohorts were analysed using a Cox-proportional hazards model, adjusted for propensity score for receiving stimulation. Main results and the role of chance We included 208 women, 39 in the COH group and 169 in the non-stimulated group (NSG). The only statistically significant difference was in age: median years 33.7 (interquartile range -IQR- 30.9 to 36.9) and 40.0 years (IQR 36.8 to 44.0), respectively. The median size of cancer nodules was 19.0 millimetres (IQR 10.0–30.0) and 17.0 (IQR 11.0–25.0), p 0.547; percentage of positive lymph nodes: 41.0% vs 39.3%, p 0.841; positive hormonal receptors: 84.6% vs 85.2%, p 0.925; percentage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 20.5% vs 11.4%, p 0.128. There were also no statistically significant differences regarding tumour stage, high Ki–67 labelling index, positive breast cancer genes (BRCA 1 or 2), and radiotherapy. Overall, 18.0% of patients had cancer recurrence in the COH group and 20.7% in the NSG (p 0.699). Crude cancer recurrence rates were similar: 5.96 per 100 patients/year (95%CI 2.84–12.50), and 4.65 per 100 patients/year (95%CI 3.34–6.47), respectively. The crude hazard ratio (HR), comparing the COH group vs the NSG was 1.32 (95%CI 0.58–2.97; p 0.507). The adjusted HR using a propensity score for receiving ovarian stimulation treatment was 1.08 (95%CI 0.39–2.98; p 0.887). Results were similar if adjusted for age, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and other confounders. Limitations, reasons for caution This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. There might be unknown or residual confounders that could influence results. Nevertheless, we accounted for treatment bias using a propensity score for ovarian stimulation. Results should be extrapolated with caution, especially in other non-university institutions and populations. Wider implications of the findings: This study provides new evidence on the safety of controlled ovarian stimulation in breast cancer patients prior to chemotherapy treatment, in a Latin American population. Letrozole continues to show safety and efficacy as an adapted protocol in breast cancer. Trial registration number Not applicable

Changes in health-related quality of life by occupational status among women diagnosed with breast cancer-a population-based cohort study

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2321-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Høyer Lundh ◽  
Claudia Lampic ◽  
Karin Nordin ◽  
Johan Ahlgren ◽  
Leif Bergkvist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Occupational Status ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Evidence of a castration-mediated effect of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1771-1778 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Brincker ◽  
C Rose ◽  
F Rank ◽  
H T Mouridsen ◽  
A Jakobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Similar Degree ◽  
Premenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Trial

This prospective randomized trial, conducted by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, is the largest study, so far, of adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer. The trial is unique in that it is nationwide and based on a nonselected population of patients, and is the only adjuvant trial studying the effect of cyclophosphamide monotherapy. After total mastectomy with axillary node sampling, followed by local radiotherapy, 1,032 pre- and perimenopausal women with operable breast cancer were randomized to observation alone, or to adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year with either cyclophosphamide monotherapy or with a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF). As of January 1987, median follow-up was 68 months. From early on both cyclophosphamide alone and CMF were found to improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) significantly and to a similar degree (P = .0001). However, an overall survival advantage did not become evident until 5 years after the start of treatment. So far, this advantage appears to be more pronounced in CMF (P = .0065) than in cyclophosphamide-only patients (P = .08). Thus, the study confirms the findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) and Milan trials that adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs the survival of premenopausal women with early breast cancer. A retrospective analysis revealed that, in contrast with CMF, cyclophosphamide alone did not improve RFS significantly in subsets of patients without amenorrhea, with estrogen-receptor (ER) negative tumors, and with tumors of low histological differentiation. Assuming that cyclophosphamide alone is a less tumoricidal treatment than CMF, these findings suggest that the effect of adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy is mediated partly through chemical castration, and partly through a purely cytotoxic effect.

Breast cancer risk in hyperprolactinemia: a population-based cohort study and meta-analysis of the literature

2015 ◽  
Vol 173 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
O M Dekkers ◽  
V Ehrenstein ◽  
M Bengtsen ◽  
D Kormendine Farkas ◽  
A M Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Combining Data ◽  
First Time ◽  
Time Diagnosis

ObjectiveTo enhance the precision of the risk estimate for breast cancer in hyperprolactinemia patients by collecting more data and pooling our results with available data from former studies in a meta-analysis.DesignPopulation-based cohort study and meta-analysis of the literature.MethodsUsing nationwide registries, we identified all patients with a first-time diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia during 1994–2012 including those with a new breast cancer diagnoses after the start of follow-up. We calculated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) as a measure of relative risk (RR) using national cancer incidence rates. We performed a meta-analysis, combining data from our study with data in the existing literature.ResultsWe identified 2457 patients with hyperprolactinemia and 20 breast cancer cases during 19 411 person-years of follow-up, yielding a SIR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.60–1.52). Data from two additional cohort studies were retrieved and analyzed. When the three risk estimates were pooled, the combined RR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.75–1.43).ConclusionsWe found no increased risk of breast cancer among patients with hyperprolactinemia.

scholarly journals Hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism and breast cancer risk: a nationwide cohort study

2016 ◽  
Vol 174 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Søgaard ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Vera Ehrenstein ◽  
Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen ◽  
Olaf M Dekkers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Thyroid Disease ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Status ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveThe association between thyroid disease and breast cancer risk remains unclear. We, therefore examined the association between hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism and breast cancer risk.DesignThis was a population-based cohort study.MethodsUsing nationwide registries, we identified all women in Denmark with a first-time hospital diagnosis of hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, 1978–2013. We estimated the excess risk of breast cancer among patients with hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism compared with the expected risk in the general population, using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) as a measure of risk ratio. Breast cancer diagnoses in the first 12 months following diagnosis of thyroid disease were excluded from the calculations to avoid diagnostic work-up bias.ResultsWe included 61 873 women diagnosed with hypothyroidism and 80 343 women diagnosed with hyperthyroidism. Median follow-up time was 4.9 years (interquartile range (IQR): 1.8–9.5 years) for hypothyroidism and 7.4 years (IQR: 3.1–13.5 years) for hyperthyroidism. Hyperthyroidism was associated with a slightly increased breast cancer risk compared with the general population (SIR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07–1.16), which persisted beyond 5 years of follow-up (SIR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08–1.19). In comparison, hypothyroidism was associated with a slightly lower risk of breast cancer (SIR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.88–1.00). Stratification by cancer stage at diagnosis, estrogen receptor status, age, comorbidity, history of alcohol-related disease and clinical diagnoses of obesity produced little change in cancer risk.ConclusionsWe found an increased risk of breast cancer in women with hyperthyroidism and a slightly decreased risk in women with hypothyroidism indicating an association between thyroid function level and breast cancer risk.

scholarly journals 49P Socioeconomic status and survivorship in premenopausal breast cancer patients: A population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S42
Author(s):  
C. Hjorth ◽  
D. Cronin-Fenton ◽  
P. Damkier ◽  
T.L. Lash ◽  
H.T. Sørensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Premenopausal Breast Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document