The analysis of fertility quality of life and the influencing factors of patients with repeated implantation failure

Abstract Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the current status of fertility quality of life (QoL) and explore the influencing factors for infertile women with repeated implantation failure (RIF).Methods: The sample consisted of 137 infertile women with RIF who were under treatment from January 2019 to December 2019 in the Reproductive Medical Center of Ruijin Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine in China. A general information questionnaire, FertiQoL scale, perceived social support scale (PSSS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to analyse the fertility QoL and related factors of RIF patients.Results: The total fertility QoL score of RIF patients was 60.44 ± 11.60. The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that residence, financial difficulties, male infertility, BMI index, depression, and family social support were the main factors that influenced the fertility QoL of RIF patients (adjusted R2 = 0.762).Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, RIF patients’ psychological status must be addressed. Corresponding interventions such as building a sound family and social support system, creating a good medical environment and offering diverse health education should be provided to improve the fertility QoL of RIF patients.

Download Full-text

The Analysis of Fertility Quality of Life and the Influencing Factors of Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure

10.21203/rs.3.rs-68411/v3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ying Ni ◽

Chenye Tong ◽

Limin Huang ◽

Wenjie Zhou ◽

Aijun Zhang

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Social Support ◽

Influencing Factors ◽

Psychological Status ◽

Current Status ◽

Implantation Failure ◽

Repeated Implantation Failure ◽

Infertile Women ◽

Self Rating

Abstract Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the current status of fertility quality of life (QoL) and explore the influencing factors for infertile women with repeated implantation failure (RIF).Methods: The sample consisted of 137 infertile women with RIF who were under treatment from January 2019 to December 2019 in the Reproductive Medical Center of Ruijin Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine in China. A general information questionnaire, FertiQoL scale, perceived social support scale (PSSS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to analyse the fertility QoL and related factors of RIF patients.Results: The total fertility QoL score of RIF patients was 60.44 ± 11.60. The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that residence, financial difficulties, male infertility, BMI index, depression, and family social support were the main factors that influenced the fertility QoL of RIF patients (adjusted R2 = 0.762).Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, RIF patients’ psychological status must be addressed. Corresponding interventions such as building a sound family and social support system, creating a good medical environment and offering diverse health education should be provided to improve the fertility QoL of RIF patients.

Download Full-text

The Analysis of Fertility Quality of Life and the Influencing Factors of Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure

10.21203/rs.3.rs-68411/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ying Ni ◽

Chenye Tong ◽

Limin Huang ◽

Wenjie Zhou ◽

Aijun Zhang

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Social Support ◽

Male Infertility ◽

Implantation Failure ◽

Repeated Implantation Failure ◽

Financial Difficulties ◽

Factors Influencing ◽

Family Social Support ◽

Main Factors

Abstract BackgroundAt present, the incidence of RIF reaches 5% -10% during IVF/ICSI assisted pregnancy treatment. RIF causes heavy financial burden and mental stress on patients and families and affects the quality of their lives. This study is aimed to investigate the current status of fertility quality of life (feritility QOL) and explore the factors influencing in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF), thereby providing scientific basis for effective clinic interventional measures and helping to improve the feritility QOL of RIF patients.MethodsRIF patients were selected from the Reproductive Medical Center of Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 2019 to December 2019. The General information questionnaire, FertiQoL scale, perceived social support scale (PSSS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to analyze the feritility QOL and related factors of RIF patients. ResultsThe total score of feritility QOL of RIF patients is (60.44 ± 11.60). The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that residence, financial difficulties, male infertility, BMI index, depression, family social support are the main factors that influence the feritility QOL of RIF patients (adjusted R2 = 0.762). ConclusionAmong the factors influencing the feritility QOL of RIF patients, residence, financial difficulties, male infertility, BMI index, depression and family social support are the main factors. Therefore, medical practioners should take specific interventional measures to improve the RIF patients’ feritility QOL.

Download Full-text

The correlations of psychological status, quality of life, self-esteem, social support and body image disturbance in Chinese patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Psychology Health & Medicine ◽

10.1080/13548506.2018.1434214 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 23 (7) ◽

pp. 779-787 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Qian Zhao ◽

Haoyang Chen ◽

Hongyan Yan ◽

Yan He ◽

Li Zhu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Social Support ◽

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Self Esteem ◽

Body Image Disturbance ◽

Psychological Status ◽

Chinese Patients ◽

Systemic Lupus

Download Full-text

A Cry for Help: Exploring the Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life in Infertile Women of South India

10.36295/asro.2020.2323123 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (23) ◽

Author(s):

Siddharth R ◽

Dr. Nisha B ◽

Dr. Timsi Jain ◽

Dr. Anantha Eashwar ◽

Dr Ruma Dutta

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Social Support ◽

South India ◽

Perceived Social Support ◽

Infertile Women ◽

Cry For Help ◽

The Relationship

Download Full-text

Efficacy of psychological intervention for patients with psoriasis vulgaris: a prospective study

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060520961674 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 48 (10) ◽

pp. 030006052096167

Author(s):

Xiaoli Li ◽

Liangliang Liu ◽

Yanfei Zhang ◽

Li Li

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Psoriasis Vulgaris ◽

Psychological Intervention ◽

Compliance Rate ◽

Psychological Status ◽

Control Group ◽

Study Group ◽

Self Rating

Objective The study aim was to examine the effect of a psychological intervention on patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Methods Participants in this prospective study were 205 patients with psoriasis vulgaris, 104 who received a psychological intervention (study group) and 101 who received routine nursing care (control group). An additional 291 healthy subjects formed a non-psoriasis group. The Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), Generic Quality of Life Inventory (GQOLI), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used to evaluate psychological status and quality of life. Results There were significant differences in SCL-90 and GQOLI scores between the study and non-psoriasis groups. After treatment, the study group showed significantly improved scores on the SCL-90 and GQOLI compared with the control group. Scores on the SDS (mean ± standard deviation: 31.99 ± 4.54 vs. 44.08 ± 4.52) and SAS (28.36 ± 4.52 vs. 40.14 ± 6.33) were improved in the study group. In addition, patients in the study group showed higher satisfaction rate and compliance rate than those in the control group. Conclusion Psychological intervention may be beneficial for improving quality of life and the therapeutic efficacy of drugs in patients with psoriasis.

Download Full-text

Interaction of anxiety, depression and hypertension on quality of life in patients with gynecological tumor and the moderating effect of social support

10.22541/au.162332698.83379397/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

ZhiHui Gu ◽

Hui Wu

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Social Support ◽

Gynecological Cancer ◽

Moderating Effect ◽

The Self ◽

Self Rating ◽

Gynecological Tumor ◽

Interaction Term ◽

Anxiety Depression

Objective: To explore the effect of anxiety, depression and hypertension on quality of life (QOL) of patients with gynecological tumor and the interaction among them, and the moderating effect of social support. Design: Cross-sectional design Setting: December 2019 to July 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak phase. Population or Sample: A total of 695 gynecological cancer patients were collected. Methods: The study used the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Genera tool (FACT-G), and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS). Regression analysis and the simple slope analysis were conducted. Results: QOL of patients with anxiety and hypertension had seriously deteriorated [OR=10.297, 95%CI (5.647-18.775)]. And QOL of patients with depression and hypertension also had seriously deteriorated [OR=11.846, 95%CI (6.597-21.271)]. Calculated by crossover analysis, the synergy index, attributable proportion and relative excess risk due to interact of anxiety and hypertension were1.698,0.371 and 3.822, and the correlation index of interaction between depression and hypertension were 1.475, 0.295, and 3.493. The Social Support &Depression interaction term and Social Support &Anxiety interaction term were negatively correlated with QOL (p<0.01), and explained an extra 5.7% and 5.6% of the variance respectively (p<0.01). Conclusion: Anxiety, depression and hypertension have interaction on the QOL of patients with gynecological tumors. Social support can significantly moderate the relationship between depression, anxiety and QOL respectively. Funding: National Key R&D Program of China (Grant #2018YFC1311600). Keywords: quality of life, depression, anxiety, social support, hypertension, moderating effect

Download Full-text

Investigation into Quality of Life and Psychological Status of Different Populations during COVID-19 : A study concerning Surrounding Areas of Wuhan

10.1101/2020.08.15.20158725 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Zheng Liu ◽

Jingsong Mu ◽

Wenxiang Fan

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Medical Staff ◽

World Health ◽

Psychological Status ◽

World Health Organization Quality ◽

Self Rating ◽

Different Populations ◽

Health Organization ◽

Surrounding Areas

Objective To investigate different populations' quality of life and psychological status in surrounding areas of Wuhan during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The data of 248 residents living in Anhui from February 4 to 6 of 2020 were collected through network survey including age, gender, occupation, the World Health Organization Quality of Life measurement Scale short form (World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument - brief, WHOQOL BREF), Zung Self rating Anxiety Scale (Self- rating Anxiety Scale, SAS and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Those surveyed, divided into two groups: medical staff (129 cases) and non-medical staff (119 cases), were made statistic analysis according to the factors mentioned above. Results The WHOQOL-BREF of medical staff in this region was lower than that of non-medical staff in the fields of physiology, psychology, social relations and environment, among whom female medical staff scored significantly lower than that of male medical staff in four fields. There was no significant statistical difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups, and gender had no significant influence on SAS and SDS scores of medical staff. Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, medical staff enjoyed a lower quality of life of in surrounding areas of Wuhan than that of non-medical staff, and female medical staff even lower, which should arouse social concern.

Download Full-text