scholarly journals Coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 – Perspectives & Preventive strategies using a biological response modifier Glucan

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobunao Ikewaki ◽  
Kosagi-Sharaf Rao ◽  
Armando Durant Archibold ◽  
Masaru Iwasaki ◽  
Rajappa Senthilkumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Direct endothelial injury by viruses and dysregulation of clotting mechanisms due to cytokine storm are the major precipitating factors of mortality in COVID-19; both are attributed to a fundamental dysregulation of the immune system. While immune dysregulation can be attributed to several factors, the risk of associated thrombogenic disruption varies across individuals. This variation depends on several factors, such as comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases. When considering ethnic variations, the vulnerability of Caucasians, African Americans and Hispanics needs to be addressed before arriving at strategies to handle thromboembolic complications, which have been identified in recent reports as the leading causes of mortality in COVID-19. Although evaluation of D-dimer and prothrombin during admission is considered to predict prognosis and mortality, there are no preventive or prophylactic strategies before hospital admission. Herein, we present our perspectives on the effect of regular supplementation with the biological response modifier beta glucan based on its relevance to immune modulation. This effect is of paramount importance in decreasing the development of severe COVID-19 and reducing mortality against the background of coagulopathy, especially in vulnerable populations.

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl a) ◽  
pp. 5A-8A
Author(s):  
Jay P Siegel

OBJECTIVE: To present perspectives on selected issues that frequently arise during the clinical development of biological response modifier (BRM) therapies.DATA SOURCES: The perspectives and opinions presented herein were developed over several years of reviewing and consulting on the clinical development of BRM therapies at the United States Food and Drug Administration.CONCLUSIONS: BRM therapies encompass a broad spectrum of products used to treat a wide variety of diseases. Due to this diversity. most principles of clinical trial design and conduct applicable to the majority of BRMS are those that are applicable to all therapies. Nevertheless, the clinical development of BRM therapies often raises specific issues and problems in the areas of selecting animal models, defining the study population, adverse reactions, dosing and defining end-points. Over 10 years’ experience in testing biotechnology derived BRMS in clinical trials has created a database from which we can draw valuable generalizations for guidance in future studies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Pelz ◽  
Sonja Häckel ◽  
Geo Semini ◽  
Sandra Schrötter ◽  
Willem Bintig ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Williams ◽  
Henry A. Pretus ◽  
Rose B. McNamee ◽  
Ernest L. Jones ◽  
Harry E. Ensley ◽  
...  

Oncology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Matsunaga ◽  
Mika Aota ◽  
Yuko Nyunoya ◽  
Mitsunori Hakozaki ◽  
Yoshiaki Ishikawa ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Sänger ◽  
Andreas Busche ◽  
Gabriele Bentien ◽  
Ralf Spallek ◽  
Fatima Jonas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document