scholarly journals Clinical and bacteriological profile of diabetic foot infections in a tertiary care

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teik Chiang Goh ◽  
Mohd Yazid Bajuri ◽  
Sivapathasundaram C. Nadarajah ◽  
Abdul Halim Abdul Rashid ◽  
Suhaila Baharuddin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Farah Nobi ◽  
Syed Al Nahian ◽  
Afrin Sultana ◽  
Rokhsana Sarmin ◽  
Ayesha Rahman ◽  
...  

Background: Foot infection is a common problem affecting diabetics. Ischemia is a major factor contributing to progress and morbidity of the disease. The prevalence of peripheral vascular disease is higher in diabetics with faster progression. Aim: This study aimed to observe the prevalence of peripheral vascular disease in patients with diabetic foot infections presenting to this tertiary care centre. Methods: This prospective observational study evaluated 250 patients with diabetic foot infection admitted to Ibrahim Medical College and BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2015.Total 72 patients were selected for Duplex study of lower limb vessels, Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) and Pulse oxymetrywhich established the diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease and all patients were treated according to the standard protocol. Results: Of the 72 patients peripheral vascular disease was found in 25 patients (34.7%) and majority of them (88%) had distal below the knee vessel stenosis. There was significant correlation with older age (75%) and history of tobacco use (64%). The clinical presentations and outcomes such as hospital stay, healing time, pain were worse in individuals with peripheral vascular compromise on Duplex study of lower limb vessels, ABPI and pulse oxymetry. Conclusion: In this study we observed that significant number of diabetics presenting with foot infections have underlying peripheral vascular disease .The patients might not all be symptomatic or show obvious signs of PVD but need to be investigated for the same. Early detection of peripheral vascular disease in patients presenting with diabetic foot infection, using Duplex study,ABPI and Pulse oxymetrywith routine clinical and laboratory assessment can be of great value in long term care of these individuals. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2020; 38(1): 12-17


Author(s):  
DASARAJU RAJESH ◽  
M. V. ADVAITHA ◽  
RAJENDRA HOLLA

Objective: Due to the uncertainty about optimal antibiotic treatment, and probably substantial variation in practice, the present study was carried out to determine the bacterial profiles of infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and also to analyze the prescribing pattern of antibiotics used. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in the department of General surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital, Mangalore. Demographic details and treatment data of 78 patients were collected in a specially designed Proforma, and the data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: According to Meggit-Wagner's classification, patients admitted with DFUs predominantly belonged to WAGNER 1 category (36%), followed by WAGNER 4 (26%) and WAGNER 2 (22%) categories. Out of 66 culture-positive specimens, 21 (31.8%) had monomicrobial flora, and 45 (68.2%) had polymicrobial flora. A total of 148 organisms were obtained from the specimens. The most common isolates were Staphylococcus aureus (22.3%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.5%). Ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed empirical antibiotic (29%), followed by linezolid (20%), piperacillin-tazobactam (20%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (13%), cefoperazone-sulbactam (11%). After the culture and sensitivity (C/S) results, antimicrobials were changed in 74.61% of patients in the preference of Linezolid (51%), Amikacin (27%), Levofloxacin (19%), Ciprofloxacin (17%), Piperacillin-tazobactam (13%), Cefixime (15%), Ceftriaxone (11%) among others. Clindamycin and metronidazole were used to cover anaerobic microorganisms. Conclusion: Most of the microorganisms isolated from DFUs were resistant to many types of antibiotics. Gram-positive organisms were largely sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin, while Gram-negative organisms to amikacin and imipenem. Local treatment of wounds is essential.


Author(s):  
Ashish Jitendranath ◽  
Sneha Hegadi ◽  
Geetha Bhai ◽  
L. Bhargavi ◽  
Ramani Bai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 931
Author(s):  
A. Tyagi ◽  
S. Lavanya ◽  
S. Lavanya ◽  
G. Hari Prasad ◽  
G. Hari Prasad

Background: Foot infection is a common problem affecting diabetics. Ischemia is a major factor contributing to progress and morbidity of the disease. The prevalence of peripheral vascular disease is higher in diabetics, with faster progression. The prevalence differs among populations. This study aimed to clinical prevalence of peripheral vascular disease due to atherosclerosis in patients with diabetic foot infections presenting to this tertiary care centre.Methods: This clinical study was conducted in ASRAM hospital, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India. All patients admitted with a diagnosis of diabetic foot infection to the department of general surgery during a period between October 2015 to October 2017, who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled for the study. After recording the pertinent information (as per performa), patients were subjected to a lower limb arterial Doppler and ABPI findings were tabulated.Results: Peripheral vascular disease was found in 35% of patients studied. Majority had distal below the knee vessels stenosis or occlusion. There was significant correlation with age, history of tobacco use and various risk factors. The clinical presentations and outcomes were worse in individuals found to have peripheral vascular compromise on arterial Doppler study.Conclusions: The care of diabetic patients should start with preventive measures which include proper foot care, glycaemic control and education about diabetic foot are key factors for better out come and quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 040-047
Author(s):  
Javedh Shareef ◽  
Sandra Sunny ◽  
K Bhagavan

Introduction:Diabetic foot ulcer and infections are one of the major complications in diabetic patients leading to frequent hospitalization and increased mortality. Knowledge about the microbes that cause infections will be helpful for providing appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Aim:To evaluate the bacteriological profile of patients with diabetic foot ulcers and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern. Methodology:A cross-sectional study was carried out for a period of eight months in the Department of surgery in patients with diabetic foot ulcer at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Patient data relevant to the study were collected using a standard data collection form designed as per the need of the study. Details of the organisms isolated and susceptibility pattern were collected from microbiology department. Results:A total of 122 pathogens were identified from 71 patients with male (63.38%) predominance over females (36.61%). Out of the 71 patients, 38 (53.52%) patients had monomicrobial infections and 33 (46.47%) patients had polymicrobial infections. Of the total 122 organisms, 79(64.75%) organisms were found to be gram negative organisms and 43(35.24%) were gram positive. Pseudomonas aeruginosa found in 22 (18.03%) patients was the predominant pathogen isolated followed by Klebsiella pneumonia found in 18 (14.75%) patients. The gram-positive organisms isolated showed maximum susceptibility towards antibiotics Teicoplanin and Linezolid while the gram-negative organisms showed susceptibility to Imipenem, Meropenem, and Piperacillin/Tazobactum combination. Conclusion:The study showed a preponderance of gram-negative bacilli among the isolates from the diabetic foot ulcers. It is recommended that antimicrobial sensitivity testing is necessary for initiating appropriate antibiotic regimen which will help to reduce the drug resistance and minimize the healthcare costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document