Analysis of Reasons For Readmission of Diabetic Patients: 2015-2019

Background: Among patients with diabetes who had been hospitalized, 30% had twice or more hospitalisations rate, accounting for more than 50% of total hospitalizations and hospitalization expense. The purpose of our study was to to find available strategies to reduce the readmission rate of diabetics in rural areas.Methods: This retrospective single-center study used the data from Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The t-test and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. We used the Spearman correlation coefficient to examine the relationship between variables. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyze the influencing factors of hospitalisation time, and dummy variables were set for categorical independent variables. Results: There were a total of 1721 readmissions during a five-year period; among them, 829 were females and 892 males. The readmission rate of diabetic patients in the endocrinology department was 32.40%. The age, times of hospitalisation, and duration of all subjects were 64.67 ± 13.82, 2.69 ± 1.41 and 10.60 ± 6.78, respectively. Among all the diabetic patients, type 2 diabetes accounted for 98.55% (n = 1696). Most of the patients were readmitted due to poor glycemic control, infection, edema, dizziness, and weakness, accounting for approximately 56%. During the 5-year period, the majority of readmitted diabetic patients were hospitalized twice. Times of hospitalisation was weakly positively correlated with age (Rho = 0.206, P≤0.001), diabetic duration (Rho = 0.248, P ≤ 0.001) and hospitalisation expenses (Rho = 0.008, P = 0.035) by Spearman correlation analysis. Age, duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were the main factors affecting times of hospitalisation in diabetes patients (all P < 0.05). Compared with current smokers, non-smokers and cessation smokers had high hospitalisations rate (all P for trend < 0.05). When taking diabetic foot infection as a reference, edema was more accountable than diabetic foot infection for hospitalisation times, which was statistically significant (P for trend = 0.048).Conclusion: Age, duration of diabetes and hospitalisation costs were positively correlated with times of hospitalisation. Age, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, ALT, smoking status and edema are the influencing factors of hospitalisation times. The most common causes of hospitalisation for diabetics are poor glycemic control, infection, edema, dizziness, and weakness. Controlling these factors may be key to developing rational health strategies for rural diabetics.

TATALAKSANA TERKINI INFEKSI KAKI DIABETES

Laporan dari International Diabetes Federation Tahun 2019 menyebutkan bahwa tingkat kejadian Diabetes Melitus (DM) meningkat setiap tahunnya dan diperkirakan sekitar 629 Juta orang di seluruh dunia menderita DM pada tahun 2045. Hal ini tentunya berdampak pada peningkatan dari komplikasi yang ditimbulkan oleh DM salah satunya adalah Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) atau Infeksi Kaki Diabetes (IKD). IKD merupakan komplikasi lanjutan dari kaki diabetik yang ditandai oleh adanya proses invasi mikroorganisme yang berkembang di jaringan dalam seperti kulit, otot, tendon, sendi, tulang pada ekstremitas bawah, tepatnya di bawah malleoli. IKD dapat menimbulkan morbiditas dan mortalitas yang signifikan, termasuk kecacatan, mobilitas berkurang, penurunan kualitas hidup pada aspek fisik dan mental, serta ancaman kehilangan anggota tubuh oleh karena amputasi. Selain itu, penyakit ini juga dikaitkan dengan komplikasi DM lainnya seperti komplikasi neuropati perifer, Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD), dan infeksi pada pasien DM. Dalam melakukan tatalaksana terhadap pasien DM dengan ataupun berisiko IKD, diperlukan perawatan lebih lanjut yang harus didasari dengan tingkat keparahan infeksi. Sebagian besar kasus IKD memiliki kecenderungan amputasi sehingga penting untuk dilakukan penatalaksanaan dan pencegahan secara komprehensif dengan melibatkan manajemen multidisiplin dengan ahli bedah (umum, vaskular, ortopedi), penyakit dalam, dan perawat luka, sehingga dapat mengurangi waktu penyembuhan luka, tingkat, dan keparahan amputasi.

Association Between Dermcidin, Salusin-α, Salusin-β Molecules and Diabetic Foot Infections

Dermcidin, salusin-α, and salusin-β are three recently discovered molecules that confer antimicrobial properties. The present study aims to investigate the association between dermcidin, salusin-α, and salusin-β in the etiopathology of patients with diabetic foot infection. The study included three groups: Group 1 - diabetic foot infection; Group 2 - diabetes without history of diabetic foot; and Group 3 – the control group. Plasma dermcidin, salusin-α, and salusin-β levels were compared across the groups. Median (Q1-Q3) values of plasma dermcidin levels in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 3.45 (0.8-4.4), 5.2 (3.7-6.4), and 5.8 (3.1-10) ng/mL, respectively. Diabetic foot infection group had significantly lower plasma dermcidin levels compared to diabetes only group and control group ( P = .000, ANOVA), whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the Group 2 and Group 3 ( P = .163, ANOVA). Salusin-α and salusin-β levels were significantly higher in the Group 3 compared to the other groups. Based on our findings, diabetic foot infection group had significantly lower plasma dermcidin levels and salusin-α and salusin-β levels were significantly higher in the control group. These molecules (dermcidin specifically) can be researched as an adjuvant therapeutic agent in addition to conventional treatments in diabetic foot diabetic foot infections. Also, it can be searched this may prevent many complications including amputation.

Sonication of Kirschner Wire as a Tool for the Microbiological Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Infection

We hypothesized that biofilm production occurs on stainless steel when incubated with tissue specimens in thioglycolate broth media (TBM). In a diabetic foot infection (DFI) cohort, applying the Kirschner wire and conventional methods were more sensitive than applying only the latter (CI 90%; 0.167 versus 0.375).

Evaluation of Adherence to the Oral Antibiotic Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infection

Introduction: The knowledge about level of adherence to oral antibiotic treatment in diabetic patients with ulcer infection could be essential as a method of evaluation/monitoring of conservative treatment. Aim: To assess the adherence to oral antibiotic treatment in outpatients with diabetic foot infection (soft tissue vs. osteomyelitis) by 8-item structured, self-reported medication adherence scale. Methods: cross-sectional study was carried out with 46 consecutive patients who had diabetic foot infection (soft tissue or bone infection) and required antibiotic oral treatment at outpatient clinical setting. Medication adherence was tested using the Spanish version of the validated eight-item self-report MMAS-8. Results: patients with diabetic ulcer infection, had well level of adherence to antibiotic medication (7 ± 1.2 vs. 7.4 ± 1.5). Patients with lower level of adherence had lower level of satisfaction with the antibiotic medication. The profile of the patients with lower level of adherence were patients with primary level of education and patient who required more help to take the medication. Conclusion: Patients with diabetic foot infection demonstrated well level of adherence to antibiotic medication, independently of type of infection (soft tissue vs. osteomyelitis) by 8-item structured, self-reported medication adherence scale.

Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Diabetic Foot Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Lampung, Indonesia

Background: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and identification of the causative bacteria is an essential step in selecting the appropriate antibiotic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the bacterial pattern and antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria causing DFI in Lampung Province in Indonesia. Methods: This study is a retrospective study reviewing the medical records of DFI patients admitted to the Dr Hi Abdul Moeloek Regional General Hospital in 2017–2019. DFI patients with complete medical record data were included in this study. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, wound culture and antibiotic susceptibility data were collected from the medical records using a short structural chart. The data obtained then reviewed. Results: In this study, 131 DFI patients met the study criteria and were included. Based on the wound culture results, Gram-negative bacteria were obtained in 112 (85.5%) subjects with Enterobacter spp. as the predominant bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria were found in 19 (14.5%) subjects with Staphylococcus spp. as the predominant bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria found in this study showed high susceptibility to amikacin, meropenem and sulbactam/cefoperazone. Meanwhile, the Gram-positive bacteria showed high susceptibility to meropenem, sulbactam/ cefoperazone and amikacin. Conclusion: The findings of the study revealed Enterobacter spp. as the most predominant bacteria causing DFI in the studied population. The highest antibiotic susceptibility was seen for amikacin, meropenem and sulbactam/cefoperazone.

EP.WE.690PPI Prescribing in Vascular Discharges

Aims Aspirin and clopidogrel are ubiquitously seen in prescriptions of most attendees to hospitals, especially those being admitted to a vascular unit. Most, if not all, are on at least one anti-platelet agent, and some are on dual antiplatelets (DAPA) or an anticoagulant. These increase the risk for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeds, which lead to significant morbidity and mortality. In order to prevent this, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended to be prescribed for patients with increased risk of UGI bleeds. Our aim for this audit was to evaluate the prescription of PPIs in vascular patients discharged from a major vascular hub. Methods Data was collected from a prospectively maintained database of consecutive primary vascular discharges between 01/09/2020 and 31/09/2020. Results 87 patients discharged in this period (71% Male, Median age 72 (22-92) yrs). 26% of admissions accounted for Diabetic foot infection management, 25% for Critical Limb Ischaemia management and 20% for Thoracic or Aortic Aneurysm management. 70% of patients were discharged with either a single or DAPA. 94% of patients met the NICE guideline for requirement for a PPI. 49% of those patients were not discharged with a PPI. Of the patients who should have been prescribed a PPI on discharge, 5% suffered UGI bleeds in the follow up period (2/42). Conclusions PPIs are often not prescribed when discharging vascular patients, most of whom are high risk for having UGI bleeds. We will re-audit this after education and protocols have been implemented.