scholarly journals Choosing the right timing for interval debulking surgery and perioperative chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dengfeng Wang ◽  
Guonan Zhang ◽  
Chunrong Peng ◽  
Yu Shi ◽  
Xunwei Shi
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

Abstract Background Primary debulking surgery (PDS) is the main treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is for bulky stage III-IV patients who are poor surgical candidates and/or for whom there is a low likelihood of optimal cytoreduction. NACT can increase the rate of complete cytoreduction, but this advantage has not translated to an improvement in survival. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors associated with the survival of patients who received NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Methods A retrospective study was conducted in FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients who underwent PDS or IDS in our center between January 1st, 2013, and December 31st, 2018. Results A total of 273 cases were included, of whom 20 were lost to follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the IDS and PDS groups were found to be similar, although the proportion of patients in stage IV and serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) levels before treatment in the IDS group were significantly higher than that in the PDS group. Body mass index (BMI), CA125 level before IDS, residual disease after surgery, and the interval between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy were all found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS; FIGO stage, residual disease after surgery, and CA125 level before IDS were independent prognostic factors for OS. We found that PFS and OS were both significantly longer in patients with normal CA125 levels before IDS and when the interval between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy was < 35.5 days (IDS-3 group) than for patients in the PDS group. Conclusions The results suggested the importance of timely IDS and postoperative chemotherapy and potentially allowed the identification of patients who would benefit the most from NACT. Normal CA125 levels before IDS and an interval between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy no longer than 5 weeks were associated with improved prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

scholarly journals Survey on the current gynaecological approach of ovarian cancer patients: The utility of HIPEC

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Iavazzo ◽  
Alexandros Fotiou ◽  
M. Tsiatas ◽  
Athina Christopoulou ◽  
John Spiliotis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Current Management ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of this survey was to acquire an overview of the current management of ovarian cancer with an emphasis on the utility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).Methods: An email was sent to Oncologists prior to PSOGI International Symposium on Advanced Ovarian Cancer, Athens 11–13 April 2019. Doctors submitted responses on the relevant website. The self-report survey contained 17 questions.ResultsIn total, 467 Medical Oncologists, Surgical Oncologists or Gynaecologic Oncologists were participated and answered to this survey. The resectability of disease was evaluated by laparoscopy from 48.5% of the participants, while 51.5% answered that they stage their patients pre-surgically with the use of CT or MRI. The preferred first intervention in advanced ovarian cancer patients is the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (72%). Regarding the use of HIPEC, almost half of the participants answered that there is role of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, while almost 70% answered positively about the utility of HIPEC use in ovarian cancer recurrence. As for the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients, half of the responders answered negatively. Finally, only 25% of the participants responded that they always check the BRCA status of their ovarian cancer patients, despite the possible differentiation of treatment based on the molecular profiling (80%).ConclusionsThe results of this survey indicate the utility of HIPEC in treatment of ovarian cancer patients and the differences in the overall management of ovarian cancer patients in the current clinical practice.

The evaluation of intra- and postoperative complications related to debulking surgery with bowel resection in patients with FIGO stage III–IV ovarian cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 993-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bidzinski ◽  
P. Derlatka ◽  
P. Kubik ◽  
I. Ziolkowska-Seta ◽  
A. Dańska-Bidzinska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Bowel Resection ◽  
Intestinal Resection ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Hartmann’S Procedure ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Hartmann's Procedure

The surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer is based on the maximal debulking with widening the operation range to the infiltrated organs. The aims are as follows: (1) the assessment of the quantity and quality of intra- and postoperative complications in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in which partial bowel resection was performed and (2) the evaluation of intra- and postoperative complications related to surgery with bowel resection and anastomosis, compared to Hartmann's procedure. The analysis of debulking procedures with intestinal resection and postoperative period in 39 ovarian cancer patients, FIGO stage III–IV, was performed. During 39 operations, the most frequent type of resection was the sigmoidectomy or proctosigmoidectomy (29 patients). In the remaining patients, left- and right-side hemicolectomy or partial enterectomy was done. Twenty-four anastomosis and 15 Hartmann's procedures were performed. There were no differences between surgery with anastomosis and Hartmann's procedure in aspect of quantity of complications, blood loss, and the time of surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in both groups. We conclude that the percentage of complications related to debulking surgery with intestinal resection in advanced ovarian cancer patients might be accepted. The quantity of complications related to surgery with anastomosis and to Hartmann's procedure is similar. If possible, the surgery with anastomosis should be performed.

scholarly journals Role of Lymphadenectomy During Interval Debulking Surgery Performed After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minjun He ◽  
Yuerong Lai ◽  
Hongyu Peng ◽  
Chongjie Tong
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery

ObjectiveThe role of lymphadenectomy in interval debulking surgery (IDS) performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced ovarian cancer remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in IDS.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the data of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent NACT followed by IDS.ResultsIn 303 patients receiving NACT-IDS, lymphadenectomy was performed in 127 (41.9%) patients. One hundred and sixty-three (53.8%) patients achieved no gross residual disease (NGRD), and 69 (22.8%) had residual disease &lt; 1 cm, whereas 71 (23.4%) had residual disease ≥ 1cm. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed between the lymphadenectomy group and the no lymphadenectomy group in patients with NGRD, residual disease &lt; 1 cm, and residual disease ≥ 1 cm, respectively. The proportions of pelvic, para-aortic and distant lymph node recurrence were 7.9% (10/127), 4.7% (6/127) and 5.5% (7/127) in the lymphadenectomy group, compared with 5.7% (10/176, P = 0.448), 4.5% (8/176, P = 0.942) and 5.1% (9/176, P = 0.878), respectively, in no lymphadenectomy group. Multivariate analysis identified residual disease ≥ 1 cm [hazard ratios (HR), 4.094; P = 0.008] and elevated CA125 levels after 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.883; P = 0.004) were negative predictors for OS.ConclusionLymphadenectomy may have no therapeutic value in patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent NACT-IDS. Our findings may help to better the therapeutic strategy for advanced ovarian cancer. More clinical trials are warranted to further clarify the real role of lymphadenectomy in IDS.

scholarly journals Rethinking Radical Surgery in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Jae Lee ◽  
Jung-Yun Lee ◽  
Eun Ji Nam ◽  
Sang Wun Kim ◽  
Sunghoon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Surgical Complexity

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects on survival outcomes of the disease burden before interval debulking surgery (IDS), surgical complexity, and residual disease after IDS in advanced-stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We reviewed the data of 268 epithelial ovarian cancer patients who had received three or four cycles of NAC and undergone optimal resections through IDS. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the effects of disease burden (peritoneal cancer index (PCI)), degree of complexity of surgery (surgical complexity score/s (SCS)), and extent of residual disease. In no residual disease (R0) patients, those with intermediate/high SCS had shorter progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.001) than patients with low SCS. An analysis of a subset of patients with R0 and low PCIs showed those with intermediate/high SCS had worse PFS and OS than patients with low SCS (p = 0.049) and OS (p = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, patients with R0 as a result of intermediate/high SCS fared worse than patients whose R0 was achieved by low SCS (PFS hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.10; OS HR 5.59, 95% CI 1.70–18.39). High PCIs at the time of IDS, high SCS, and residual disease signal poor prognoses for patients treated with NAC.

Pazopanib (Paz) monotherapy in Asian women who have not progressed after first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5512-5512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongyu Zang ◽  
Lingying Wu ◽  
Jianqing Zhu ◽  
Beihua Kong ◽  
Byoung-Gie Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Asian Women ◽  
Debulking Surgery

5512 Background: Paz, an oral multikinase inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF and c-Kit has showed activity in advanced ovarian cancer. This study evaluated paz as maintenance therapy in Asian women with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: Subjects with FIGO stage II, III, or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer whose disease had not progressed after debulking surgery and followed by chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to paz 800 mg once daily or placebo for up to 24 months. Primary endpoint was PFS by RECIST v1.0 based on visit date. If a progression occurred between the 2 scheduled visits (6 mos apart), progression was considered to have occurred at the next scheduled scan date. This minimized potential bias due to any imbalance of visit frequency between the arms. Results: 145 Asian subjects were randomized; 144 were treated. Mean age was 52.9 years. At diagnosis 17% were FIGO stage II, 73% stage III and 10% stage IV. After debulking surgery, 30% (n = 44) had no residual disease and 41% (n = 59) had. 47% (28/59) had residual disease ≤1cm. Prior to randomization, all subjects received median 8 cycles of chemotherapy; all subjects received platinum and taxane. At randomization 81% had ECOG status 0, 97% were disease free and all had normal CA-125. At clinical data cut-off median PFS was 18.1 months in both arms. Because of the small sample size a HR was not calculated but the KM curves indicated a trend in favor of paz from 6 to 18 mos; the curves crossed after 18 mos. The adverse event (AE) profile for paz was similar to previous reports except rates of hypertension and neutropenia were higher. The most frequent AEs (≥ 20%) on the paz arm were hypertension (76%), neutropenia (64%), leucopenia (53%), diarrhea (47%), hair color changes (40%), palm-plantar erythrodysaethesia syndrome (29%), ALT increase (28%), thrombocytopenia (24%), AST increase (22%) and TSH increase (21%). Most of these AEs were Grade 1-2. Conclusions: The results of this study alone cannot confirm the efficacy of paz maintenance treatment in Asian women with ovarian cancer, but should be interpreted in conjunction of AGO-OVAR16 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01227928.

Timing of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Vergote ◽  
T. Van Gorp ◽  
F. Amant ◽  
K. Leunen ◽  
P. Neven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Tumor Load

It is clear that primary debulking remains the standard of care within the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (FIGO stage III and IV). This debulking surgery should be performed by a gynecological oncologist without any residual tumor load, or so-called “optimal debulking.” Over the last decades, interest in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy together with an interval debulking has increased. Neoadjuvant therapy can be used for patients who are primarily suboptimally debulked due to an extensive tumor load. In this situation, based on the randomized European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Gynaecological Cancer Group trial, interval debulking by an experienced surgeon improves survival in some patients who did not undergo optimal primary debulking surgery. Based on the GOG 152 data, interval debulking surgery does not seem to be indicated in patients who underwent primarily a maximal surgical effort by a gynecological oncologist. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can also be used as an alternative to primary debulking. In retrospective analyses, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery does not seem to worsen prognosis compared to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. However, we will have to wait for the results of future randomized trials to know whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is a good alternative to primary debulking surgery in stage IIIc and IV patients. Open laparoscopy is probably the most valuable tool for evaluating the operability primarily or at the time of interval debulking surgery

Should laparoscopy be included in the work-up of advanced ovarian cancer patients attempting interval debulking surgery?

2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fagotti ◽  
F. Fanfani ◽  
G. Vizzielli ◽  
V. Gallotta ◽  
A. Ercoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Work Up
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document