scholarly journals Simultaneous lipid biosynthesis and recovery for oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratik Prashant Pawar ◽  
Annamma Anil Odaneth ◽  
Rajeshkumar Natwarlal Vadgama ◽  
Arvind Mallinath Lali

Abstract Background Recent trends in bioprocessing have underlined the significance of lignocellulosic biomass conversions for biofuel production. These conversions demand at least 90% energy upgradation of cellulosic sugars to generate renewable drop-in biofuel precursors (Heff/C ~ 2). Chemical methods fail to achieve this without substantial loss of carbon; whereas, oleaginous biological systems propose a greener upgradation route by producing oil from sugars with 30% theoretical yields. However, these oleaginous systems cannot compete with the commercial volumes of vegetable oils in terms of overall oil yields and productivities. One of the significant challenges in the commercial exploitation of these microbial oils lies in the inefficient recovery of the produced oil. This issue has been addressed using highly selective oil capturing agents (OCA), which allow a concomitant microbial oil production and in situ oil recovery process. Results Adsorbent-based oil capturing agents were employed for simultaneous in situ oil recovery in the fermentative production broths. Yarrowia lipolytica, a model oleaginous yeast, was milked incessantly for oil production over 380 h in a media comprising of glucose as a sole carbon and nutrient source. This was achieved by continuous online capture of extracellular oil from the aqueous media and also the cell surface, by fluidizing the fermentation broth over an adsorbent bed of oil capturing agents (OCA). A consistent oil yield of 0.33 g per g of glucose consumed, corresponding to theoretical oil yield over glucose, was achieved using this approach. While the incorporation of the OCA increased the oil content up to 89% with complete substrate consumptions, it also caused an overall process integration. Conclusion The nondisruptive oil capture mediated by an OCA helped in accomplishing a trade-off between microbial oil production and its recovery. This strategy helped in realizing theoretically efficient sugar-to-oil bioconversions in a continuous production process. The process, therefore, endorses a sustainable production of molecular drop-in equivalents through oleaginous yeasts, representing as an absolute microbial oil factory.

RSC Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 2539-2550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guiqin Cai ◽  
Lalehvash Moghaddam ◽  
Ian M. O'Hara ◽  
Zhanying Zhang

A microbial oil production process consisting of acidified glycerol pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse, enzymatic hydrolysis, microbial oil production by M. isabellina NRRL 1757 and oil recovery by hydrothermal liquefaction of fungal biomass in fermentation broth was assessed.


Author(s):  
Agata Fabiszewska ◽  
Patrycja Mazurczak-Zieniuk ◽  
Dorota Nowak ◽  
Małgorzata Wołoszynowska ◽  
Bartłomiej Zieniuk


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1929-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Mattanna ◽  
Priscila Dallé da Rosa ◽  
Ana Paula Gusso ◽  
Neila S. P. S. Richards ◽  
Patrícia Valente

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Dalia Mohammed ◽  
Fatma Zaher ◽  
Enass Hassan ◽  
H Maksoud ◽  
E Ramadan

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3961
Author(s):  
Haiyang Yu ◽  
Songchao Qi ◽  
Zhewei Chen ◽  
Shiqing Cheng ◽  
Qichao Xie ◽  
...  

The global greenhouse effect makes carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reduction an important task for the world, however, CO2 can be used as injected fluid to develop shale oil reservoirs. Conventional water injection and gas injection methods cannot achieve desired development results for shale oil reservoirs. Poor injection capacity exists in water injection development, while the time of gas breakthrough is early and gas channeling is serious for gas injection development. These problems will lead to insufficient formation energy supplement, rapid energy depletion, and low ultimate recovery. Gas injection huff and puff (huff-n-puff), as another improved method, is applied to develop shale oil reservoirs. However, the shortcomings of huff-n-puff are the low sweep efficiency and poor performance for the late development of oilfields. Therefore, this paper adopts firstly the method of Allied In-Situ Injection and Production (AIIP) combined with CO2 huff-n-puff to develop shale oil reservoirs. Based on the data of Shengli Oilfield, a dual-porosity and dual-permeability model in reservoir-scale is established. Compared with traditional CO2 huff-n-puff and depletion method, the cumulative oil production of AIIP combined with CO2 huff-n-puff increases by 13,077 and 17,450 m3 respectively, indicating that this method has a good application prospect. Sensitivity analyses are further conducted, including injection volume, injection rate, soaking time, fracture half-length, and fracture spacing. The results indicate that injection volume, not injection rate, is the important factor affecting the performance. With the increment of fracture half-length and the decrement of fracture spacing, the cumulative oil production of the single well increases, but the incremental rate slows down gradually. With the increment of soaking time, cumulative oil production increases first and then decreases. These parameters have a relatively suitable value, which makes the performance better. This new method can not only enhance shale oil recovery, but also can be used for CO2 emission control.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Keshavarz ◽  
Ryosuke Okuno ◽  
Tayfun Babadagli

Summary Laboratory and field data, although limited in number, have shown that steam/solvent coinjection can lead to a higher oil-production rate, higher ultimate oil recovery, and lower steam/oil ratio, compared with steam-only injection in steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). However, a critical question still remains unanswered: Under what circumstances can the previously mentioned benefits be obtained when steam and solvent are coinjected? To answer this question requires a detailed knowledge of the mechanisms involved in coinjection and an application of this knowledge to numerical simulation. Our earlier studies demonstrated that the determining factors for improved oil-production rates are relative positions with respect to the temperature and solvent fronts, the steam and solvent contents of the chamber at its interface with reservoir bitumen, and solvent-diluting effects on the mobilized bitumen just ahead of the chamber edge. Then, the key mechanisms for improved oil displacement are solvent propagation, solvent accumulation at the chamber edge, and phase transition. This paper deals with this unanswered question by providing some key guidelines for selecting an optimum solvent and its concentration in coinjection of a single-component solvent with steam. The optimization considers the oil-production rate, ultimate oil recovery, and solvent retention in situ. Multiphase behavior of water/hydrocarbon mixtures in the chamber is explained in detail analytically and numerically. The proposed guidelines are applied to simulation of the Senlac solvent-aided-process pilot and the Long Lake expanding-solvent SAGD pilot. Results show that an optimum volatility of solvent can be typically observed in terms of the oil-production rate for given operation conditions. This optimum volatility occurs as a result of the balance between two factors affecting the oil mobility along the chamber edge: reduction of the chamber-edge temperature and superior dilution of oil in coinjection of more-volatile solvent with steam. It is possible to maximize oil recovery and minimize solvent retention in situ by controlling the concentration of a given coinjection solvent. Beginning coinjection immediately after achieving interwell communication enables the enhancement of oil recovery early in the process. Subsequently, the solvent concentration should be gradually decreased until it becomes zero for the final period of the coinjection. Simulation case studies show the validity of the oil-recovery mechanisms described. In the final section of the paper, a limited economic analysis of SAGD and different coinjection cases is provided.


Author(s):  
Awni Khatib ◽  
Fathi Aqra ◽  
Nader Yaghi ◽  
Sobhi Basheer ◽  
Isam Sabbah ◽  
...  

The level of the environmental impact of olive oil production in Palestine was evaluated by measuring the parameters: pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), the concentration of fat; oil, and grease (FOG), phenols, electric conductivity (EC) total phosphorus (T-P), and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN, and compared with the Jordanian standard values. The results show that the value of these parameters are too high. A local survey has also been conducted by designing a questionnaire that covers oil production yield, water consumptions in olive washing and in oil recovery, wastewater generation relative to olive processed and oil generated, and solid waste product: The data were collected from 92 local olive oil mills, which were analyzed and organized according to the investigated parameters, and categorized according to local selected areas in the West Bank such as Hebron (South), Nablus (Center) and Jenine (North). The results revealed local variations in oil yield and solid waste product due to variations in the type of olive produced. The olives from the South were found to contain larger solid content than those from the North, .resulting in lower oil yield. The overall results indicated that the average oil yield was 23.7%, the solid waste product was 40.0% while the remaining balance was. the water. content (36.7%) in the olive fruit. A representative value at 1.7 m3/ton for wastewater generation was found to be high compared to similar values in other places of the world. This requires a criterious review of the technology and operation of olive mills in Palestine. The characteristics of OMW were found to violate the standards for OMW and this requires the attention of authorities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document