scholarly journals Predictors of poor adherence to antidiabetic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study insight from Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gebre Teklemariam Demoz ◽  
Shishay Wahdey ◽  
Degena Bahrey ◽  
Halefom Kahsay ◽  
Gebremariam Woldu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdallah Y Naser ◽  
Zahra Khalil Alsairafi ◽  
Hassan Alwafi ◽  
Fawaz Mohammad Turkistani ◽  
Nedaa Saud Bokhari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Comprehensive diabetes management includes an appropriate dietary plan, exercise, and antidiabetic medications. Nevertheless, the target glycaemic control is not always achieved using single antidiabetic, patients may need to start treatment intensification by increasing the dose of the single antidiabetic agent or by the administration of antidiabetic combination therapy. However, it has been shown that intensive antidiabetic therapy should be used carefully as it is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and death. The aim of this study is to understand physicians’ perspectives regarding treatment de-intensification and factors affecting their treatment choice for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in governmental specialised primary and secondary care units in Saudi Arabia using online questionnaire. Two previously validated questionnaires were used to understand physicians’ awareness of, agreement with, and their practices of individualising HbA1c goals and antidiabetic treatment de-intensification, and to assess factors affecting physicians’ treatment choice when prescribing antidiabetic treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Study population were physicians who are treating patients with diabetes mellitus during the period between October 2018 and May 2019.Results: A total of 205 physicians have participated in the study. Approximately 50% of physicians had family medicine speciality (n = 98, 47.8%). The majority of physicians (n = 183, 89.3%) were familiar with the concept of HbA1c goals individualisation. However, only 66.3% of them (n = 136) reported that they apply it either always or most of the time. 58.5% (n = 120) of physicians reported that they would not initiate conversations about de-intensifying antidiabetic therapy even if their patients had a stable HbA1c values for one year. Physicians showed higher consideration to objective patient clinical data and their assessment of patient’s health status, with minor consideration to patient-related factors.Conclusions: Healthcare professionals should focus more on implementing contemporary practices and applying any necessary treatment de-intensification. Subjective patient factors should be taken into account, as these factors are associated with better disease management.


Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2393-PUB
Author(s):  
KENICHIRO TAKAHASHI ◽  
MINORI SHINODA ◽  
RIKA SAKAMOTO ◽  
JUN SUZUKI ◽  
TADASHI YAMAKAWA ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e039625
Author(s):  
Jason I Chiang ◽  
John Furler ◽  
Frances Mair ◽  
Bhautesh D Jani ◽  
Barbara I Nicholl ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo explore the prevalence of multimorbidity as well as individual and combinations of long-term conditions (LTCs) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) attending Australian general practice, using electronic health record (EHR) data. We also examine the association between multimorbidity condition count (total/concordant(T2D related)/discordant(unrelated)) and glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c).DesignCross-sectional study.SettingAustralian general practice.Participants69 718 people with T2D with a general practice encounter between 2013 and 2015 captured in the MedicineInsight database (EHR Data from 557 general practices and >3.8 million Australian patients).Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrevalence of multimorbidity, individual and combinations of LTCs. Multivariable linear regression models used to examine associations between multimorbidity counts and HbA1c (%).ResultsMean (SD) age 66.42 (12.70) years, 46.1% female and mean (SD) HbA1c 7.1 (1.4)%. More than 90% of participants with T2D were living with multimorbidity. Discordant conditions were more prevalent (83.4%) than concordant conditions (69.9 %). The three most prevalent discordant conditions were: painful conditions (55.4%), dyspepsia (31.6%) and depression (22.8%). The three most prevalent concordant conditions were hypertension (61.4%), coronary heart disease (17.1%) and chronic kidney disease (8.5%). The three most common combinations of conditions were: painful conditions and hypertension (38.8%), painful conditions and dyspepsia (23.1%) and hypertension and dyspepsia (22.7%). We found no associations between any multimorbidity counts (total, concordant and discordant) or combinations and HbA1c.ConclusionsMultimorbidity was common in our cohort of people with T2D attending Australian general practice, but was not associated with glycaemia. Although we did not explore mortality in this study, our results suggest that the increased mortality in those with multimorbidity and T2D observed in other studies may not be linked to glycaemia. Interestingly, discordant conditions were more prevalent than concordant conditions with painful conditions being the second most common comorbidity. Better understanding of the implications of different patterns of multimorbidity in people with T2D will allow more effective tailored care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document