scholarly journals Multiple transmit antennas for low PAPR spatial modulation in SC-FDMA: single vs. multiple streams

Author(s):  
Darko Sinanović ◽  
Gordan Šišul ◽  
Adrian Satja Kurdija ◽  
Željko Ilić
Author(s):  
Arwanto Arwanto ◽  
Wike Anggraini

ABSTRACT Understanding policy process involves many distinctive approaches. The most common are institutional, groups or networks, exogenous factors, rational actors, and idea-based approach. This paper discussed the idea-based approach to explain policy process, in this case policy change. It aims to analyse how ideas could assist people to understand policy change. What role do they play and why are they considered as fundamental element? It considers that ideas are belong to every policy actor, whether it is individual or institution. In order to answer these questions, this paper adopts Kingdon’s multi streams approach to analyse academic literatures. Through this approach, the relationship between ideas and policy change can be seen clearer. Ideas only can affect in policy change if it is agreed and accepted by policy makers. Therefore the receptivity of ideas plays significant role and it emerges policy entrepreneurs. They promote ideas (through problem framing, timing, and narrative construction) and manipulate in order to ensure the receptivity of ideas. Although policy entrepreneurs play significant role, political aspects remains the most important element in the policy process. Keywords: policy change, ideas, idea-based approach, Kingdon’s multiple streams, policy entrepreneurs.


2018 ◽  
Vol E101.B (11) ◽  
pp. 2304-2312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian CHENG ◽  
Jiang ZHU ◽  
Junshan LUO
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 120-130
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Jia Hou ◽  
Lisheng Fan ◽  
Yier Yan ◽  
Xue-Qin Jiang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bastian Widyatama

Kingdon’s Multiple Streams, a framework to analyze agenda-setting process is widely considered as a ‘universal’ theoretical framework because of its flexibility to be applied. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the validity of this ‘universal’ term. By using the case of the establishment of Law No.13 of 2012 concerning the Privilege of Yogyakarta Special Region, this research aims to apply and examine the Kingdon’s framework. The research has been done by using the qualitative method. Interviewing key persons and interpreting written documents are main techniques in data collection process. As the result, this framework remains applicable in the Yogyakarta case. There are 3 factors that brought Yogyakarta issues into the central government’s agenda encompass problem, policy, and politics. Politics is the most dominant factor indicated by Yogyakartans strong political movement and Sultanate of Yogyakarta’s political approach. In addition, Sultanate of Yogyakarta can also be discussed as a policy entrepreneur. As the conclusion, this research has a significant contribution to Kingdon’s multiple streams framework which is still able to explain social phenomena in policy making studies although there are some concerns that need to be explored further, particularly regarding the role of media and policy entrepreneur. Keywords: Agenda setting, policy, Law No.13 of 2012, Sultanate of Yogyakarta


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 3529-3536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anirban Bhowal ◽  
Aditi Satsheel Sapre ◽  
Ronak Lalani ◽  
RakheshSingh Kshetrimayum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document