scholarly journals The initial learning curve for the ROSA® Knee System can be achieved in 6-11 cases for operative time and has similar 90-day complication rates with improved implant alignment compared to manual instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Vanlommel ◽  
Enrico Neven ◽  
Mike B. Anderson ◽  
Liesbeth Bruckers ◽  
Jan Truijen
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Operative Time ◽  
Initial Learning ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve for total operative time using a novel cutting guide positioning robotic assistant for total knee arthroplasty (raTKA). Additionally, we compared complications and final limb alignment between raTKA and manual TKA (mTKA), as well as accuracy to plan for raTKA cases. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study on a series of patients (n = 180) that underwent raTKA (n = 90) using the ROSA Total Knee System or mTKA (n = 90) by one of three high-volume (> 200 cases per year) orthopaedic surgeons between December 2019 and September 2020, with minimum three-month follow-up. To evaluate the learning curve surgical times and postoperative complications were reviewed. Results The cumulative summation analysis for total operative time revealed a change point of 10, 6, and 11 cases for each of three surgeons, suggesting a rapid learning curve. There was a significant difference in total operative times between the learning raTKA and both the mastered raTKA and mTKA groups (p = 0.001) for all three surgeons combined. Postoperative complications were minimal in all groups. The proportion of outliers for the final hip-knee-ankle angle compared to planned was 5.2% (3/58) for the mastered raTKA compared to 24.1% (19/79) for mTKA (p = 0.003). The absolute mean difference between the validated and planned resections for all angles evaluated was < 1 degree for the mastered raTKA cases. Conclusion As the digital age of medicine continues to develop, advanced technologies may disrupt the industry, but should not disrupt the care provided. This cutting guide positioning robotic system can be integrated relatively quickly with a rapid initial learning curve (6-11 cases) for operative times, similar 90-day complication rates, and improved component positioning compared to mTKA. Proficiency of the system requires additional analysis, but it can be expected to improve over time. Level of evidence Level III Retrospective Therapeutic Cohort Study.

scholarly journals When can total knee arthroplasty be safely performed following prior arthroscopy?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The optimal timing to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA, and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an endpoint. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA. Results The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). The survivorship of the KA group and control group was 92.0 and 99.4% at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR] = 3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR = 4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-linear relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months. Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. There is an increased risk of postoperative complications when TKA is performed within nine months of KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

scholarly journals When can be safely performed total knee arthroplasty following prior arthroscopy?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The optimal time to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA; and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA.Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum followup was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an end point. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA.Results The all-cause reoperation, revision and complication rates of KA group were significantly higher than those of control group (p<0.05). The survivorship of KA group and control group was 92.0% and 99.4% at the 2-year followup (p=0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR]=3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR=4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-liner relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months.Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. There is an increased risk of postoperative complications when TKA is performed within 9 months of KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

The Learning Curve of Reaching the Planned Limb Alignment in Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejbir S. Pannu ◽  
Jesus M. Villa ◽  
Isaac Schultz ◽  
Wael K. Barsoum ◽  
Carlos A. Higuera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Limb Alignment ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractEvidence on the learning curve associated with robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (ra-TKA) is scarce and mostly based on operative time. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess a surgeon's learning experience based on accuracy to reach planned limb alignment and its impact on surgical-characteristics, limb-alignment, and perioperative-outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted on a consecutive series of 204 primary ra-TKAs (patients), performed by a single surgeon in a single institution (3/7/2018-to-6/18/2019). Cumulative summation control sequential analysis was used for the assessment of the learning curve using accuracy of reaching the planned limb alignment establishing that surgeries had an initial-learning-phase, followed by a second-consolidation-phase. Baseline demographics, operative/tourniquet times, prosthesis type, and limb alignment were compared between these two phases. Length of stay, discharge disposition, complications, reoperation/readmission (90 days), and total morphine equivalents (TMEs) prescribed were compared between phases. Independent sample t-tests, and chi-squared analyses were performed. ra-TKA demonstrated a learning curve of 110 cases for reaching planned limb alignment (p = 0.012). Robotic experience resulted in significantly more proportion of knees in neutral-axis postoperatively (p = 0.035) and significant reduction in TMEs prescribed (p = 0.04). The mean operative and tourniquet time were found to be significantly lower in second-phase versus the first-phase (p for both < 0.0001). ra-TKA has a significant learning curve in clinical practice. A surgeon can reach the planned limb alignment with increased accuracy over time (110-cases). Progressive robotic learning and associated operative time efficiency can lead to significantly lower opioid consumption in patients undergoing TKA.

scholarly journals When Can Be Safely Performed Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Prior Arthroscopy?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The optimal time to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA; and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum followup was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an end point. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA. Results The all-cause reoperation, revision and complication rates of KA group were significantly higher than those of control group (p < 0.05). The survivorship of KA group and control group was 92.0% and 99.4% at the 2-year followup (p = 0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR] = 3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR = 4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-liner relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months. Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. The optimal timing of TKA may be 9 months after prior KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

scholarly journals When can be safely performed total knee arthroplasty following prior arthroscopy?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The optimal time to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA; and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum followup was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an end point. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA. Results The all-cause reoperation, revision and complication rates of KA group were significantly higher than those of control group (p<0.05). The survivorship of KA group and control group was 92.0% and 99.4% at the 2-year followup (p=0.002), respectively. Male (HR=3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (Hazards ratio [HR]=4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-liner relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months. Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. The optimal timing of TKA may be 9 months after prior KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

The Learning Curve by Operative Time for Soft Tissue Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Electronic Sensor Technology

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Lakra ◽  
Nana O. Sarpong ◽  
Emma L. Jennings ◽  
Matthew J. Grosso ◽  
H. John Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Sensor Technology ◽  
Soft Tissue Balancing ◽  
Electronic Sensor ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals When can total knee arthroplasty be safely performed following prior arthroscopy?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The optimal time to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA; and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA.Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum followup was 2 years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an end point. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA.Results The all-cause reoperation, revision and complication rates of KA group were significantly higher than those of control group (p<0.05). The survivorship of KA group and control group was 92.0% and 99.4% at the 2-year followup (p=0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR]=3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR=4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-liner relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months.Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. The optimal timing of TKA may be 9 months after prior KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

scholarly journals When can total knee arthroplasty be safely performed following prior arthroscopy?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ning Ma ◽  
Xiao-Lin Li ◽  
Pan Liang ◽  
Sheng-Li Yu
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background The optimal timing to perform a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after knee arthroscopy (KA) was controversial in the literature. We aimed to 1) explore the effect of prior KA on the subsequent TKA; 2) identify who were not suitable for TKA in patients with prior KA, and 3) determine the timing of TKA following prior KA.Methods We retrospectively reviewed 87 TKAs with prior KA and 174 controls using propensity score matching in our institution. The minimum follow-up was two years. Postoperative clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were created with reoperation as an endpoint. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify risk factors of severe complications in the KA group. The two-piecewise linear regression analysis was performed to examine the optimal timing of TKA following prior KA.Results The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p<0.05). The survivorship of the KA group and control group was 92.0% and 99.4% at the 2-year follow-up (p=0.002), respectively. Male (Hazards ratio [HR]=3.2) and prior KA for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (HR=4.4) were associated with postoperative complications in the KA group. There was a non-linear relationship between time from prior KA to TKA and postoperative complications with the turning point at 9.4 months.Conclusion Prior KA is associated with worse outcomes following subsequent TKA, especially male patients and those with prior KA for ACL injury. There is an increased risk of postoperative complications when TKA is performed within nine months of KA. Surgeons should keep these findings in mind when treating patients who are scheduled to undergo TKA with prior KA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document