scholarly journals Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Behrens ◽  
Michaela Koehm ◽  
Eva C. Schwaneck ◽  
Marc Schmalzing ◽  
Holger Gnann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Critical Difference ◽  
Routine Clinical Care ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Questionnaire Disability

Abstract Background The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically defined critical difference for HAQ-DI (HAQ-DI-dcrit) and evaluate its association with therapeutic outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from adult German patients with RA enrolled in a multicenter observational trial in which they received adalimumab therapy at the decision of the treating clinician during routine clinical care. The HAQ-DI-dcrit, defined as the minimum change that can be reliably discriminated from random long-term variations in patients on stable therapy, was determined by evaluating intra-individual variation in patient scores. Other outcomes of interest included Disease Activity Score-28 joints and patient-reported pain and fatigue. Results The HAQ-DI-dcrit was calculated as an improvement (decrease) from baseline of 0.68 in a discovery cohort (N = 1645) of RA patients on stable therapy and with moderate disease activity (mean DAS28 [standard deviation] of 4.4 [1.6]). In the full patient cohort (N = 2740), 22.1% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI-dcrit improvement at month 6. Compared with patients with a small improvement in HAQ-DI (decrease of ≥0.22 to < 0.68) or no improvement (< 0.22), patients achieving a HAQ-DI-dcrit at month 6 had better therapeutic outcomes at months 12 and 24, including stable functional improvements. Change in pain was the most important predictor of HAQ-DI improvement during the first 6 months of therapy. Conclusions A HAQ-DI-dcrit of 0.68 is a reliable measure of functional improvement. This measure may be useful in routine clinical care and clinical trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01076205. Registered on February 26, 2010 (retrospectively registered).

scholarly journals SAT0125 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CHANGE IN HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE DISABILITY INDEX AND TREATMENT RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN TOCILIZUMAB CLINICAL TRIALS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 998.2-998
Author(s):  
S. Unizony ◽  
J. Dang ◽  
J. Han ◽  
M. Michalska ◽  
J. H. Best
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Questionnaire Disability

Background:The efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab (TCZ) in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been demonstrated in large clinical trials and real-world data studies. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is commonly used to assess physical function in patients with RA. While HAQ-DI outcomes at Week 24 in TCZ clinical trials have been reported, outcomes at Week 12 and results stratified by treatment response categories at Weeks 12 and 24 have not been previously described.Objectives:To report the association between change in HAQ-DI from baseline to Weeks 12 and 24 and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) response categories in patients who received TCZ or comparators in TCZ clinical trials.Methods:Data from patients with active RA who received TCZ or a comparator from 6 Phase III or IV TCZ-IV studies (OPTION [NCT00106548], RADIATE [NCT00106522], TOWARD [NCT00106574] LITHE [NCT00109408], ACT-RAY [NCT00810199] and ADACTA [NCT01119859]) and 1 Phase III TCZ-SC study (BREVACTA [NCT01232569]) were analyzed. Mean change in HAQ-DI score at Weeks 12 and 24 was assessed in patients stratified by DAS28 disease activity level (DAS28 < 2.6 [remission], DAS28 ≥ 2.6 to ≤ 3.2 [low disease activity; LDA], DAS28 > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 [moderate disease activity; MDA], DAS28 > 5.1 [high disease activity; HDA] at Weeks 12 and 24. The adjusted least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was estimated using a mixed model with repeated measures, including region (North America vs non-North America), RA duration (> 2 years vs ≤ 2 years), baseline HAQ-DI and DAS28, treatment, visit, visit by treatment and visit by baseline HAQ-DI.Results:Data from 5051 patients were included. Across all studies, the mean duration of RA ranged from 6.3 to 12.6 years. At baseline, patients had severe RA with a mean DAS28 ≥ 6.3; baseline HAQ-DI was ≥ 1.5. At Week 12, patients who achieved remission or LDA had greater improvements in HAQ-DI than those in MDA or HDA (Figure 1). Results were similar at Week 24 (Figure 2). Among patients who received TCZ and achieved remission or LDA, mean improvement in HAQ-DI was ≥ 0.65 and ≥ 0.44, respectively, at Week 12 (Figure 1) and ≥ 0.48 and ≥ 0.43 at Week 24 (Figure 2). Mean changes in HAQ-DI were similar between patients who received TCZ-IV in combination with MTX or as monotherapy (ACT-RAY) and in those who received TCZ-IV or ADA as monotherapy (ADACTA).Conclusion:Patients with long-standing, severe RA who received IV or SC TCZ as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs had improvement in physical function and disease activity at Week 12 that was maintained at Week 24. Overall, across all the trials, response to treatment was associated with improvement in physical function.Acknowledgments :This study was sponsored by Genentech, Inc. Support for third-party writing assistance, furnished by Health Interactions, Inc, was provided by Genentech, Inc.Disclosure of Interests: :Sebastian Unizony Grant/research support from: Genentech, Inc., Joseph Dang Shareholder of: Genentech, Inc., Employee of: Genentech, Inc., Jian Han Shareholder of: Genentech, Inc., Employee of: Genentech, Inc., Margaret Michalska Shareholder of: Genentech, Inc., Employee of: Genentech, Inc., Jennie H. Best Shareholder of: Genentech, Inc., Employee of: Genentech, Inc.

scholarly journals AB0140 A HIGH-CONFIDENCE DEFINITION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS USING A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION APPROACH

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1097.2-1098
Author(s):  
V. Strand ◽  
S. Cohen ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
T. Mellors ◽  
A. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
High Confidence ◽  
Response Status ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Fidelity Score ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Therapy choice and therapy change depend on the ability to accurately assess patients’ disease activity. The clinical assessments used to evaluate treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis have inherent variability, normally considered as measurement error, intra-observer variability or within subject variability. Each contribute to variability in deriving response status as defined by composite measures such as the ACR or EULAR criteria, particularly when a one-time observed measurement lies near the boundary defining response or non-response. To select an optimal therapeutic strategy in the burgeoning age of precision medicine in rheumatology, achieve the lowest disease activity and maximize long-term health outcomes for each patient, improved treatment response definitions are needed.Objectives:Develop a high-confidence definition of treatment response and non-response in rheumatoid arthritis that exceeds the expected variability of subcomponents in the composite response criteria.Methods:A Monte Carlo simulation approach was used to assess ACR50 and EULAR response outcomes in 100 rheumatoid arthritis patients who had been treated for 6 months with a TNF inhibitor therapy. Monte Carlo simulations were run with 2000 iterations implemented with measurement variability derived for each clinical assessment: tender joint count, swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), patient pain assessment, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, serum C-reactive protein level (CRP) and disease activity score 28-joint count with CRP.1-3 Each iteration of the Monte Carlo simulation generated one outcome with a value of 0 or 1 indicating non-responder or responder, respectively.Results:A fidelity score, calculated separately for ACR50 and EULAR response, was defined as an aggregated score from 2000 iterations reported as a fraction that ranges from 0 to 1. The fidelity score depicted a spectrum of response covering strong non-responders, inconclusive statuses and strong responders. A fidelity score around 0.5 typified a response status with extreme variability and inconclusive clinical response to treatment. High-fidelity scores were defined as >0.7 or <0.3 for responders and non-responders, respectively, meaning that the simulated clinical response status label among all simulations agreed at least 70% of the time. High-confidence true responders were considered as those patients with high-fidelity outcomes in both ACR50 and EULAR outcomes.Conclusion:A definition of response to treatment should exceed the expected variability of the clinical assessments used in the composite measure of therapeutic response. By defining high-confidence responders and non-responders, the true impact of therapeutic efficacy can be determined, thus forging a path to development of better treatment options and advanced precision medicine tools in rheumatoid arthritis.References:[1]Cheung, P. P., Gossec, L., Mak, A. & March, L. Reliability of joint count assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum43, 721-729, doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.003 (2014).[2]Uhlig, T., Kvien, T. K. & Pincus, T. Test-retest reliability of disease activity core set measures and indices in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis68, 972-975, doi:10.1136/ard.2008.097345 (2009).[3]Maska, L., Anderson, J. & Michaud, K. Measures of functional status and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire II (HAQ-II), Improved Health Assessment Questionnaire (Improved HAQ), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63 Suppl 11, S4-13, doi:10.1002/acr.20620 (2011).Disclosure of Interests:Vibeke Strand Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Arena, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GSK, Ichnos, Inmedix, Janssen, Kiniksa, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Setpoint, UCB, Stanley Cohen: None declared, Lixia Zhang Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Ted Mellors Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Alex Jones Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Johanna Withers Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Viatcheslav Akmaev Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation

scholarly journals THU0106 PREDICTORS OF FLARE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WITH LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 267.1-267
Author(s):  
K. W. Moon
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Euroqol 5D ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are usually recognized as stable state. In according to most guidelines for RA, monotherapy of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DAMRD) was recommended for RA patents with LDA. But some of patients with LDA suffer from flare in their disease course. Until now, we don’t have enough data on factors that can predict flare in RA patients with LDA.Objectives:The aim of this study is to evaluate predictor of flare in RA patient with LDA from long-term (3 year) cohort data.Methods:Korean observational study network for arthritis (KORONA) registry is a nationwide Korean RA specific cohort registry that collecting data annually from 5,376 RA patients in 23 centers across South Korea. We include the data from 1, 801 RA patients with LDA (28 –joint disease activity score (DAS 28) < 3.2 at enrollment) who had consecutive data of DAS28 for 3 years. Flare was defined as an increase in DAS28 compared with baseline of >1.2 or >0.6 if concurrent DAS28 ≥3.2. Cox regression analysis was used to identify baseline predictors of flare.Results:Among 1,801 RA patients, 673 patients (37.4%) experienced flare in 3 years. When we compare the baseline characteristics of both flare and non-flare group, more women and more non-adherent patients for medication were observed in flare group. Flare group had longer disease duration, lower EuroQol 5D score, higher health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score, and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) than non-flare group at baseline. In multivariate analysis, physician’s VAS, HAQ score, ESR, and poor adherence for medication were significant predictors of flare (Table 1).Table 1.Multivariate analysis of prediction of flare with baseline variablesMeasureHazard ratio95% Confidence IntervalP-valueFemale1.1300.906-1.4090.280Age0.9960.988-1.0050.414Physician’s VAS1.0081.002-1.013<0.01Pain VAS1.0020.998-1.0060.34EQ5D0.9520.534-1.6960.87HAQ1.4071.109-1.786<0.01ESR1.0081.002-1.014<0.01Poor adherence1.2721.047-1.545<0.05VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; EQ5D: EuroQol 5D; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; ESR: Erythrocyte Sedimentation RateConclusion:RA patient who have risk factors for flare, even though their disease activity was low, require more proactive treatment.References:[1]Bechman K, Tweehuysen L, Garrood T, Scott DL, Cope AP, Galloway JB, et al. Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Low Disease Activity: Predictability and Association with Worse Clinical Outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(11):1515-21.[2]Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, Jr., Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1-26.[3]Sung YK, Cho SK, Choi CB, Park SY, Shim J, Ahn JK, et al. Korean Observational Study Network for Arthritis (KORONA): establishment of a prospective multicenter cohort for rheumatoid arthritis in South Korea. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(6):745-51.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Validating and Assessing the Sensitivity of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index-derived Short Form-6D in Patients with Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1150-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
SOGOL S. AMJADI ◽  
PAUL M. MARANIAN ◽  
HAROLD E. PAULUS ◽  
ROBERT M. KAPLAN ◽  
VEENA K. RANGANATH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinical Measures ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Questionnaire Disability

Objective.New methodologies allow the scores for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) to be translated into preferences/utility scores. We evaluated the construct validity of the HAQ-DI-derived Short Form-6D (SF-6D) score and assessed its responsiveness to change over 6- and 12-month followup periods in patients with early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Patients (n = 277) participating in an RA observational study completed self-reported measures of symptoms and the HAQ-DI at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Total Sharp scores, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were assessed along with clinical data. Construct validity was assessed by examining the association between SF-6D score and patient-reported and clinical measures using Spearman correlation coefficients. The responsiveness of SF-6D to change was assessed using patient and physician assessments of the disease as clinical anchors. The magnitude of responsiveness was calculated using SF-6D effect size (ES).Result.Mean SF-6D scores were 0.690, 0.720, and 0.723 at baseline and 6 and 12-month followup, respectively. Baseline patient-reported measures had moderate to high correlations with baseline SF-6D (r = 0.43 to 0.52); whereas clinical measures had negligible to low correlations with SF-6D (r = 0.001 to 0.32). ES was moderate for the groups that were deemed to have improved (ES 0.63–0.75) but negligible to small for those that did not (ES 0.13–0.46).Conclusion.Our data support the validity and responsiveness of the HAQ-DI derived SF-6D score in an early RA cohort. These results support the use of the HAQ-DI derived SF-6D in RA cohorts and clinical trials lacking preference-based measures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document