scholarly journals Velocity analysis for transversely isotropic media

Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1550-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Alkhalifah ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Anisotropic Media ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Analytic Equation ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Time Processing ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Ti Media ◽  
Ray Parameter

The main difficulty in extending seismic processing to anisotropic media is the recovery of anisotropic velocity fields from surface reflection data. We suggest carrying out velocity analysis for transversely isotropic (TI) media by inverting the dependence of P‐wave moveout velocities on the ray parameter. The inversion technique is based on the exact analytic equation for the normal‐moveout (NMO) velocity for dipping reflectors in anisotropic media. We show that P‐wave NMO velocity for dipping reflectors in homogeneous TI media with a vertical symmetry axis depends just on the zero‐dip value [Formula: see text] and a new effective parameter η that reduces to the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ in the limit of weak anisotropy. Our inversion procedure makes it possible to obtain η and reconstruct the NMO velocity as a function of ray parameter using moveout velocities for two different dips. Moreover, [Formula: see text] and η determine not only the NMO velocity, but also long‐spread (nonhyperbolic) P‐wave moveout for horizontal reflectors and the time‐migration impulse response. This means that inversion of dip‐moveout information allows one to perform all time‐processing steps in TI media using only surface P‐wave data. For elliptical anisotropy (ε = δ), isotropic time‐processing methods remain entirely valid. We show the performance of our velocity‐analysis method not only on synthetic, but also on field data from offshore Africa. Accurate time‐to‐depth conversion, however, requires that the vertical velocity [Formula: see text] be resolved independently. Unfortunately, it cannot be done using P‐wave surface moveout data alone, no matter how many dips are available. In some cases [Formula: see text] is known (e.g., from check shots or well logs); then the anisotropy parameters ε and δ can be found by inverting two P‐wave NMO velocities corresponding to a horizontal and a dipping reflector. If no well information is available, all three parameters ([Formula: see text], ε, and δ) can be obtained by combining our inversion results with shear‐wave information, such as the P‐SV or SV‐SV wave NMO velocities for a horizontal reflector. Generalization of the single‐layer NMO equation to layered anisotropic media with a dipping reflector provides a basis for extending anisotropic velocity analysis to vertically inhomogeneous media. We demonstrate how the influence of a stratified anisotropic overburden on moveout velocity can be stripped through a Dix‐type differentiation procedure.

Seismic data processing in vertically inhomogeneous TI media

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 662-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Alkhalifah
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Inhomogeneous Media ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Data Processing ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Processing Data ◽  
Two Parameters ◽  
Ti Media ◽  
Ray Parameter

The first and most important step in processing data in transversely isotropic (TI) media for which velocities vary with depth is parameter estimation. The multilayer normal‐moveout (NMO) equation for a dipping reflector provides the basis for extending the TI velocity analysis of Alkhalifah and Tsvankin to vertically inhomogeneous media. This NMO equation is based on a root‐mean‐square (rms) average of interval NMO velocities that correspond to a single ray parameter, that of the dipping event. Therefore, interval NMO velocities [including the normal‐moveout velocity for horizontal events, [Formula: see text]] can be extracted from the stacking velocities using a Dix‐type differentiation procedure. On the other hand, η, which is a key combination of Thomsen's parameters that time‐related processing relies on, is extracted from the interval NMO velocities using a homogeneous inversion within each layer. Time migration, like dip moveout, depends on the same two parameters in vertically inhomogeneous media, namely [Formula: see text] and η, both of which can vary with depth. Therefore, [Formula: see text] and ε estimated using the dip dependency of P‐wave moveout velocity can be used for TI time migration. An application of anisotropic processing to seismic data from offshore Africa demonstrates the importance of considering anisotropy, especially as it pertains to focusing and imaging of dipping events.

Reflection moveout approximations for P-waves in a moderately anisotropic homogeneous tilted transverse isotropy layer

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. C175-C185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Pšenčík ◽  
Véronique Farra
Keyword(s):  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
P Waves ◽  
3D Space ◽  
Axis Of Symmetry ◽  
Relative Errors ◽  
Symmetry Tests ◽  
Ti Media

We have developed approximate nonhyperbolic P-wave moveout formulas applicable to weakly or moderately anisotropic media of arbitrary anisotropy symmetry and orientation. Instead of the commonly used Taylor expansion of the square of the reflection traveltime in terms of the square of the offset, we expand the square of the reflection traveltime in terms of weak-anisotropy (WA) parameters. No acoustic approximation is used. We specify the formulas designed for anisotropy of arbitrary symmetry for the transversely isotropic (TI) media with the axis of symmetry oriented arbitrarily in the 3D space. Resulting formulas depend on three P-wave WA parameters specifying the TI symmetry and two angles specifying the orientation of the axis of symmetry. Tests of the accuracy of the more accurate of the approximate formulas indicate that maximum relative errors do not exceed 0.3% or 2.5% for weak or moderate P-wave anisotropy, respectively.

Quartic moveout coefficient: 3D description and application to tilted TI media

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1600-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Pech ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin ◽  
Vladimir Grechka
Keyword(s):  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Individual Values ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
Ti Media

Nonhyperbolic (long‐spread) moveout provides essential information for a number of seismic inversion/processing applications, particularly for parameter estimation in anisotropic media. Here, we present an analytic expression for the quartic moveout coefficient A4 that controls the magnitude of nonhyperbolic moveout of pure (nonconverted) modes. Our result takes into account reflection‐point dispersal on irregular interfaces and is valid for arbitrarily anisotropic, heterogeneous media. All quantities needed to compute A4 can be evaluated during the tracing of the zero‐offset ray, so long‐spread moveout can be modeled without time‐consuming multioffset, multiazimuth ray tracing. The general equation for the quartic coefficient is then used to study azimuthally varying nonhyperbolic moveout of P‐waves in a dipping transversely isotropic (TI) layer with an arbitrary tilt ν of the symmetry axis. Assuming that the symmetry axis is confined to the dip plane, we employed the weak‐anisotropy approximation to analyze the dependence of A4 on the anisotropic parameters. The linearized expression for A4 is proportional to the anellipticity coefficient η ≈ ε − δ and does not depend on the individual values of the Thomsen parameters. Typically, the magnitude of nonhyperbolic moveout in tilted TI media above a dipping reflector is highest near the reflector strike, whereas deviations from hyperbolic moveout on the dip line are substantial only for mild dips. The azimuthal variation of the quartic coefficient is governed by the tilt ν and reflector dip φ and has a much more complicated character than the NMO–velocity ellipse. For example, if the symmetry axis is vertical (VTI media, ν = 0) and the dip φ < 30°, A4 goes to zero on two lines with different azimuths where it changes sign. If the symmetry axis is orthogonal to the reflector (this model is typical for thrust‐and‐fold belts), the strike‐line quartic coefficient is defined by the well‐known expression for a horizontal VTI layer (i.e., it is independent of dip), while the dip‐line A4 is proportional to cos4 φ and rapidly decreases with dip. The high sensitivity of the quartic moveout coefficient to the parameter η and the tilt of the symmetry axis can be exploited in the inversion of wide‐azimuth, long‐spread P‐wave data for the parameters of TI media.

Geometrical spreading of P-waves in horizontally layered, azimuthally anisotropic media

Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. D43-D53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Xu ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin ◽  
Andrés Pech
Keyword(s):  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Anisotropic Media ◽  
Azimuthal Velocity ◽  
Azimuthal Anisotropy ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Geometrical Spreading ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Anisotropic Models ◽  
Wide Range

For processing and inverting reflection data, it is convenient to represent geometrical spreading through the reflection traveltime measured at the earth's surface. Such expressions are particularly important for azimuthally anisotropic models in which variations of geometrical spreading with both offset and azimuth can significantly distort the results of wide-azimuth amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) analysis. Here, we present an equation for relative geometrical spreading in laterally homogeneous, arbitrarily anisotropic media as a simple function of the spatial derivatives of reflection traveltimes. By employing the Tsvankin-Thomsen nonhyperbolic moveout equation, the spreading is represented through the moveout coefficients, which can be estimated from surface seismic data. This formulation is then applied to P-wave reflections in an orthorhombic layer to evaluate the distortions of the geometrical spreading caused by both polar and azimuthal anisotropy. The relative geometrical spreading of P-waves in homogeneous orthorhombic media is controlled by five parameters that are also responsible for time processing. The weak-anisotropy approximation, verified by numerical tests, shows that azimuthal velocity variations contribute significantly to geometrical spreading, and the existing equations for transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI) cannot be applied even in the vertical symmetry planes. The shape of the azimuthally varying spreading factor is close to an ellipse for offsets smaller than the reflector depth but becomes more complicated for larger offset-to-depth ratios. The overall magnitude of the azimuthal variation of the geometrical spreading for the moderately anisotropic model used in the tests exceeds 25% for a wide range of offsets. While the methodology developed here is helpful in modeling and analyzing anisotropic geometrical spreading, its main practical application is in correcting the wide-azimuth AVO signature for the influence of the anisotropic overburden.

P‐wave signatures and notation for transversely isotropic media: An overview

Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Anisotropic Media ◽  
Seismic Inversion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Symmetry Direction ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Isotropic Media

Progress in seismic inversion and processing in anisotropic media depends on our ability to relate different seismic signatures to the anisotropic parameters. While the conventional notation (stiffness coefficients) is suitable for forward modeling, it is inconvenient in developing analytic insight into the influence of anisotropy on wave propagation. Here, a consistent description of P‐wave signatures in transversely isotropic (TI) media with arbitrary strength of the anisotropy is given in terms of Thomsen notation. The influence of transverse isotropy on P‐wave propagation is shown to be practically independent of the vertical S‐wave velocity [Formula: see text], even in models with strong velocity variations. Therefore, the contribution of transverse isotropy to P‐wave kinematic and dynamic signatures is controlled by just two anisotropic parameters, ε and δ, with the vertical velocity [Formula: see text] being a scaling coefficient in homogeneous models. The distortions of reflection moveouts and amplitudes are not necessarily correlated with the magnitude of velocity anisotropy. The influence of transverse isotropy on P‐wave normal‐moveout (NMO) velocity in a horizontally layered medium, on small‐angle reflection coefficient, and on point‐force radiation in the symmetry direction is entirely determined by the parameter δ. Another group of signatures of interest in reflection seisimology—the dip‐dependence of NMO velocity, magnitude of nonhyperbolic moveout, time‐migration impulse response, and the radiation pattern near vertical—is dependent on both anisotropic parameters (ε and δ) and is primarily governed by the difference between ε and δ. Since P‐wave signatures are so sensitive to the value of ε − δ, application of the elliptical‐anisotropy approximation (ε = δ) in P‐wave processing may lead to significant errors. Many analytic expressions given in the paper remain valid in transversely isotropic media with a tilted symmetry axis. Moreover, the equation for NMO velocity from dipping reflectors, as well as the nonhyperbolic moveout equation, can be used in symmetry planes of any anisotropic media (e.g., orthorhombic).

Fowler DMO and time migration for transversely isotropic media

Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 835-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Anderson ◽  
Tariq Alkhalifah ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Computing Time ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Effective Parameters ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
Zero Offset

The main advantage of Fowler’s dip‐moveout (DMO) method is the ability to perform velocity analysis along with the DMO removal. This feature of Fowler DMO becomes even more attractive in anisotropic media, where imaging methods are hampered by the difficulty in reconstructing the velocity field from surface data. We have devised a Fowler‐type DMO algorithm for transversely isotropic media using the analytic expression for normal‐moveout velocity. The parameter‐estimation procedure is based on the results of Alkhalifah and Tsvankin showing that in transversely isotropic media with a vertical axis of symmetry (VTI) the P‐wave normal‐moveout (NMO) velocity as a function of ray parameter can be described fully by just two coefficients: the zero‐dip NMO velocity [Formula: see text] and the anisotropic parameter η (η reduces to the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ in the limit of weak anisotropy). In this extension of Fowler DMO, resampling in the frequency‐wavenumber domain makes it possible to obtain the values of [Formula: see text] and η by inspecting zero‐offset (stacked) panels for different pairs of the two parameters. Since most of the computing time is spent on generating constant‐velocity stacks, the added computational effort caused by the presence of anisotropy is relatively minor. Synthetic and field‐data examples demonstrate that the isotropic Fowler DMO technique fails to generate an accurate zero‐offset section and to obtain the zero‐dip NMO velocity for nonelliptical VTI models. In contrast, this anisotropic algorithm allows one to find the values of the parameters [Formula: see text] and η (sufficient to perform time migration as well) and to correct for the influence of transverse isotropy in the DMO processing. When combined with poststack F-K Stolt migration, this method represents a complete inversion‐processing sequence capable of recovering the effective parameters of transversely isotropic media and producing migrated images for the best‐fit homogeneous anisotropic model.

Normal moveout from dipping reflectors in anisotropic media

Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Symmetry Axis ◽  
Transverse Isotropy ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Anisotropic Media ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Anisotropic Models ◽  
Transversely Isotropic Media ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Isotropic Media ◽  
The Difference

Description of reflection moveout from dipping interfaces is important in developing seismic processing methods for anisotropic media, as well as in the inversion of reflection data. Here, I present a concise analytic expression for normal‐moveout (NMO) velocities valid for a wide range of homogeneous anisotropic models including transverse isotropy with a tilted in‐plane symmetry axis and symmetry planes in orthorhombic media. In transversely isotropic media, NMO velocity for quasi‐P‐waves may deviate substantially from the isotropic cosine‐of‐dip dependence used in conventional constant‐velocity dip‐moveout (DMO) algorithms. However, numerical studies of NMO velocities have revealed no apparent correlation between the conventional measures of anisotropy and errors in the cosine‐of‐dip DMO correction (“DMO errors”). The analytic treatment developed here shows that for transverse isotropy with a vertical symmetry axis, the magnitude of DMO errors is dependent primarily on the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ. For the most common case, ε − δ > 0, the cosine‐of‐dip–corrected moveout velocity remains significantly larger than the moveout velocity for a horizontal reflector. DMO errors at a dip of 45 degrees may exceed 20–25 percent, even for weak anisotropy. By comparing analytically derived NMO velocities with moveout velocities calculated on finite spreads, I analyze anisotropy‐induced deviations from hyperbolic moveout for dipping reflectors. For transversely isotropic media with a vertical velocity gradient and typical (positive) values of the difference ε − δ, inhomogeneity tends to reduce (sometimes significantly) the influence of anisotropy on the dip dependence of moveout velocity.

scholarly journals Seismic AVOA Inversion for Weak Anisotropy Parameters and Fracture Density in a Monoclinic Medium

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 5136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijian Ge ◽  
Shulin Pan ◽  
Jingye Li
Keyword(s):  
Fractured Rock ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Fracture Density ◽  
Weak Anisotropy ◽  
Amplitude Versus Offset ◽  
Porosity And Permeability ◽  
Transverse Isotropic

In shale gas development, fracture density is an important lithologic parameter to properly characterize reservoir reconstruction, establish a fracturing scheme, and calculate porosity and permeability. The traditional methods usually assume that the fracture reservoir is one set of aligned vertical fractures, embedded in an isotropic background, and estimate some alternative parameters associated with fracture density. Thus, the low accuracy caused by this simplified model, and the intrinsic errors caused by the indirect substitution, affect the estimation of fracture density. In this paper, the fractured rock of monoclinic symmetry assumes two non-orthogonal vertical fracture sets, embedded in a transversely isotropic background. Firstly, assuming that the fracture radius, width, and orientation are known, a new form of P-wave reflection coefficient, in terms of weak anisotropy (WA) parameters and fracture density, was obtained by substituting the stiffness coefficients of vertical transverse isotropic (VTI) background, normal, and tangential fracture compliances. Then, a linear amplitude versus offset and azimuth (AVOA) inversion method, of WA parameters and fracture density, was constructed by using Bayesian theory. Tests on synthetic data showed that WA parameters, and fracture density, are stably estimated in the case of seismic data containing a moderate noise, which can provide a reliable tool in fracture prediction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document