Efficient 3D wave-equation migration using virtual planar sources

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. S185-S197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Duquet ◽  
Patrick Lailly
Keyword(s):  
Plane Wave ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Wave Migration ◽  
Complex Velocity Model ◽  
Full Volume ◽  
Migration Technique

Full-volume seismic imaging is essential for a sound interpretation of structurally complex geologies. Prestack depth imaging is the most appropriate tool for such imaging, but it requires a precise and often complex velocity model. In such situations, 3D Kirchhoff prestack depth migration can be quite expensive. On the other hand, a wavefield approach, although generally tremendously expensive, is not affected by the complexity of the velocity model. We propose an affordable 3-D wavefield prestack depth-migration technique. It is designed for marine surveys for which the source-receiver azimuth is approximately constant. The technique applies a plane-wave migration algorithm to time-shifted data — quite a surprising approach when we realize that marine surveys do not allow the synthesis of genuine plane-wave data. Additionally, the imaging principle has to be modified to give results consistent with shot-record migration. Our technique also produces image gathers that allow an update of the velocity model by means of migration velocity analysis. Results from synthetics and conventional marine data demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.

Manual seismic reflection tomography

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 1546-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary E. Murphy ◽  
Samuel H. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Current Velocity ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Change ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Automatic Methods ◽  
Fact Finding ◽  
Reflection Tomography ◽  
User Intervention

Prestack depth migration needs a good velocity model to produce a good image; in fact, finding the velocity model is one of the goals of prestack depth migration. Migration velocity analysis uses information produced by the migration to update the current velocity model for use in the next migration iteration. Several techniques are currently used to estimate migration velocities, ranging from trial and error to automatic methods like reflection tomography. Here, we present a method that combines aspects of some of the more accurate methods into an interactive procedure for viewing the effects of residual normal moveout corrections on migrated common reflection point (CRP) gathers. The residual corrections are performed by computing traveltimes along raypaths through both the current velocity model and the velocity model plus suggested model perturbations. The differences between those sets of traveltimes are related to differences in depth, allowing the user to preview the approximate effects of a velocity change on the CRP gathers without remigrating the data. As with automatic tomography, the computed depth differences are essentially backprojected along raypaths through the model, yielding a velocity update that flattens the gathers. Unlike automatic tomography, in which an algebraic inverse problem is solved by the computer for all geologic layers simultaneously, our method estimates shallow velocities before proceeding deeper and requires substantial user intervention, both in flattening individual CRP gathers and in deciding the appropriateness of the suggested velocity updates in individual geologic units.

Hybrid migration: A cost‐effective 3-D depth‐imaging technique

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young C. Kim ◽  
Worth B. Hurt, ◽  
Louis J. Maher ◽  
Patrick J. Starich
Keyword(s):  
Model Building ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Depth Image ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Prestack Time Migration

The transformation of surface seismic data into a subsurface image can be separated into two components—focusing and positioning. Focusing is associated with ensuring the data from different offsets are contributing constructively to the same event. Positioning involves the transformation of the focused events into a depth image consistent with a given velocity model. In prestack depth migration, both of these operations are achieved simultaneously; however, for 3-D data, the cost is significant. Prestack time migration is much more economical and focuses events well even in the presence of moderate velocity variations, but suffers from mispositioning problems. Hybrid migration is a cost‐effective depth‐imaging approach that uses prestack time migration for focusing; inverse migration for the removal of positioning errors; and poststack depth migration for proper positioning. When lateral velocity changes are moderate, the hybrid technique can generate a depth image that is consistent with a velocity field. For very complex structures that require prestack depth migration, the results of the hybrid technique can be used to create a starting velocity model, thereby reducing the number of iterations for velocity model building.

Migration velocity analysis in factorized VTI media

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debashish Sarkar ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Wave Migration ◽  
Vti Media

One of the main challenges in anisotropic velocity analysis and imaging is simultaneous estimation of velocity gradients and anisotropic parameters from reflection data. Approximating the subsurface by a factorized VTI (transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis) medium provides a convenient way of building vertically and laterally heterogeneous anisotropic models for prestack depthmigration. The algorithm for P‐wave migration velocity analysis (MVA) introduced here is designed for models composed of factorized VTI layers or blocks with constant vertical and lateral gradients in the vertical velocity VP0. The anisotropic MVA method is implemented as an iterative two‐step procedure that includes prestack depth migration (imaging step) followed by an update of the medium parameters (velocity‐analysis step). The residual moveout of the migrated events, which is minimized during the parameter updates, is described by a nonhyperbolic equation whose coefficients are determined by 2D semblance scanning. For piecewise‐factorized VTI media without significant dips in the overburden, the residual moveout of P‐wave events in image gathers is governed by four effective quantities in each block: (1) the normal‐moveout velocity Vnmo at a certain point within the block, (2) the vertical velocity gradient kz, (3) the combination kx[Formula: see text] of the lateral velocity gradient kx and the anisotropic parameter δ, and (4) the anellipticity parameter η. We show that all four parameters can be estimated from the residual moveout for at least two reflectors within a block sufficiently separated in depth. Inversion for the parameter η also requires using either long‐spread data (with the maximum offset‐to‐depth ratio no less than two) from horizontal interfaces or reflections from dipping interfaces. To find the depth scale of the section and build a model for prestack depth migration using the MVA results, the vertical velocity VP0 needs to be specified for at least a single point in each block. When no borehole information about VP0 is available, a well‐focused image can often be obtained by assuming that the vertical‐velocity field is continuous across layer boundaries. A synthetic test for a three‐layer model with a syncline structure confirms the accuracy of our MVA algorithm in estimating the interval parameters Vnmo, kz, kx, and η and illustrates the influence of errors in the vertical velocity on the image quality.

Ultrashallow depth imaging of a channel stratigraphy with first-arrival traveltime inversion and prestack depth migration: A case history from Bull Creek, Oklahoma

Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. B87-B96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ammanuel Fesseha Woldearegay ◽  
Priyank Jaiswal ◽  
Alexander R. Simms ◽  
Hanna Alexander ◽  
Leland C. Bement ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Model ◽  
Depth Image ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Traveltime Inversion ◽  
Time Processing ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
First Arrival ◽  
Bull Creek

Depth imaging in ultrashallow ([Formula: see text]) environments presents twofold challenge: (1) coda available for depth migration is very limited; and (2) conventional time processing with limited coda generally fails to estimate reliable velocity models for depth migration. We studied the combining of first-arrival traveltime inversion and prestack depth migration (PSDM) for depth imaging of ultrashallow paleochannel stratigraphy associated with the Bull Creek drainage system, Oklahoma. Restricted by a limited number of geophones (24) we acquired data for inversion and migration through two coincident profiles. The first profile for inversion has a wider survey-aperture (115-m maximum shot-receiver spacing) and consequently sparse CMP spacing (2.5 m), whereas the second profile for PSDM has denser CMP spacing (1 m) and consequently a narrower survey aperture (46-m maximum shot-receiver spacing). We also found that the velocity model from traveltime inversion of the wider-aperture data set is more preferable for depth-migration than the velocity model from time processing of the denser data set. The preferred depth image showed three episodes of incision whose chronological order is resolved through radio-carbon dating of terrace sediments. Results suggested that even with limited geophones, depth imaging of ultrashallow targets can be achieved by combining first-arrival traveltime inversion and PSDM through coincident wide- and narrow-aperture acquisitions.

3D common-reflection-point-based seismic migration velocity analysis

Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. S161-S167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihong Fei ◽  
George A. McMechan
Keyword(s):  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Migration Velocity ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Reflection Point ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Migration Velocity Analysis ◽  
Spatial Coordinates

Three-dimensional prestack depth migration and depth residual picking in common-image gathers (CIGs) are the most time-consuming parts of 3D migration velocity analysis. Most migration-based velocity analysis algorithms need spatial coordinates of reflection points and CIG depth residuals at different offsets (or angles) to provide updated velocity information. We propose a new algorithm that can analyze 3D velocity quickly and accurately. Spatial coordinates and orientations of reflection points are provided by a 3D prestack parsimonious depth migration; the migration involves only the time samples picked from the salient reflection events on one 3D common-offset volume. Ray tracing from the reflection points to the surface provides a common-reflection-point (CRP) gather for each reflection point. Predicted (nonhyperbolic) moveouts for local velocity perturbations, based on maximizing the stacked amplitude, give the estimated velocity updates for each CRP gather. Then the velocity update for each voxel in the velocity model is obtained by averaging over all predicted velocity updates for that voxel. Prior model constraints may be used to stabilize velocity updating. Compared with other migration velocity analyses, the traveltime picking is limited to only one common-offset volume (and needs to be done only once); there is no need for intensive 3D prestack depth migration. Hence, the computation time is orders of magnitude less than other migration-based velocity analyses. A 3D synthetic data test shows the algorithm works effectively and efficiently.

3-D prestack Kirchhoff beam migration for depth imaging

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1592-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghe Sun ◽  
Fuhao Qin ◽  
Steve Checkles ◽  
Jacques P. Leveille
Keyword(s):  
Distributed Environment ◽  
Small Surface ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Kirchhoff Migration ◽  
Surface Patches ◽  
Image Volume ◽  
Kirchhoff Depth Migration ◽  
Full Volume ◽  
Single Set

A beam implementation is presented for efficient full‐volume 3-D prestack Kirchhoff depth migration of seismic data. Unlike conventional Kirchhoff migration in which the input seismic traces in time are migrated one trace at a time into the 3-D image volume for the earth’s subsurface, the beam migration processes a group of input traces (a supergather) together. The requirement for a supergather is that the source and receiver coordinates of the traces fall into two small surface patches. The patches are small enough that a single set of time maps pertaining to the centers of the patches can be used to migrate all the traces within the supergather by Taylor expansion or interpolation. The migration of a supergather consists of two major steps: stacking the traces into a τ-P beam volume, and mapping the beams into the image volume. Since the beam volume is much smaller than the image volume, the beam migration cost is roughly proportional to the number of input supergathers. The computational speedup of beam migration over conventional Kirchhoff migration is roughly proportional to [Formula: see text], the average number of traces per supergather, resulting a theoretical speedup up to two orders of magnitudes. The beam migration was successfully implemented and has been in production use for several years. A factor of 5–25 speedup has been achieved in our in‐house depth migrations. The implementation made 3-D prestack full‐volume depth imaging feasible in a parallel distributed environment.

Kinematic interpretation in the prestack depth‐migrated domain

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1226-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Apostoiu‐Marin ◽  
Andreas Ehinger
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Domain Data ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Point To Point ◽  
Homogeneous Media

Prestack depth migration can be used in the velocity model estimation process if one succeeds in interpreting depth events obtained with erroneous velocity models. The interpretational difficulty arises from the fact that migration with erroneous velocity does not yield the geologically correct reflector geometries and that individual migrated images suffer from poor signal‐to‐noise ratio. Moreover, migrated events may be of considerable complexity and thus hard to identify. In this paper, we examine the influence of wrong velocity models on the output of prestack depth migration in the case of straight reflector and point diffractor data in homogeneous media. To avoid obscuring migration results by artifacts (“smiles”), we use a geometrical technique for modeling and migration yielding a point‐to‐point map from time‐domain data to depth‐domain data. We discover that strong deformation of migrated events may occur even in situations of simple structures and small velocity errors. From a kinematical point of view, we compare the results of common‐shot and common‐offset migration. and we find that common‐offset migration with erroneous velocity models yields less severe image distortion than common‐shot migration. However, for any kind of migration, it is important to use the entire cube of migrated data to consistently interpret in the prestack depth‐migrated domain.

Efficient velocity model building for prestack depth migration

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Kim ◽  
C. M. Samuelsen ◽  
T. A. Hauge
Keyword(s):  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Model Building

Integrated prestack depth migration of vertical seismic profile and surface seismic data from the Rocky Mountain Foothills of southern Alberta, Canada

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1782-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Graziella Kirtland Grech ◽  
Don C. Lawton ◽  
Scott Cheadle
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Rocky Mountain ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Seismic Profile ◽  
Vertical Seismic Profile ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Southern Alberta ◽  
Vsp Data

We have developed an anisotropic prestack depth migration code that can migrate either vertical seismic profile (VSP) or surface seismic data. We use this migration code in a new method for integrated VSP and surface seismic depth imaging. Instead of splicing the VSP image into the section derived from surface seismic data, we use the same migration algorithm and a single velocity model to migrate both data sets to a common output grid. We then scale and sum the two images to yield one integrated depth‐migrated section. After testing this method on synthetic surface seismic and VSP data, we applied it to field data from a 2D surface seismic line and a multioffset VSP from the Rocky Mountain Foothills of southern Alberta, Canada. Our results show that the resulting integrated image exhibits significant improvement over that obtained from (a) the migration of either data set alone or (b) the conventional splicing approach. The integrated image uses the broader frequency bandwidth of the VSP data to provide higher vertical resolution than the migration of the surface seismic data. The integrated image also shows enhanced structural detail, since no part of the surface seismic section is eliminated, and good event continuity through the use of a single migration–velocity model, obtained by an integrated interpretation of borehole and surface seismic data. This enhanced migrated image enabled us to perform a more robust interpretation with good well ties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document