Acoustic-elastic coupled equations in vertical transverse isotropic media for pseudoacoustic-wave reverse time migration of ocean-bottom 4C seismic data

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. S317-S327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
Jianhua Geng

Quasi-P (qP)-wave separation and receiver-side records back extrapolation are two key technologies commonly applied in vertical transverse isotropic (VTI) media for ocean-bottom 4C seismic data pseudoacoustic-wave reverse time migration (RTM). However, it remains problematic to quickly and accurately separate the qP-wave in VTI media. The qP-wave can be fast separated by synthesizing pressure in weakly anisotropic media. Like the derivation of acoustic-elastic coupled equations (AECEs) in an isotropic medium, novel AECEs can also be obtained in VTI media. Based on these novel coupled equations, we have developed a method for pseudoacoustic-wave RTM of ocean-bottom 4C seismic data. Three synthetic examples are provided to illustrate the validity and effectiveness of our method. The results indicate that our method possesses three advantages for ocean-bottom 4C data compared with the conventional method when conducting pseudoacoustic-wave RTM in VTI media. First, these new coupled equations are able to obtain a qP-wave during wavefield propagation. Second, ocean-bottom 4C records can be implemented strictly for receiver-side tensorial extrapolation with undulating topography of the seafloor, which brings benefits for suppressing artifacts in pseudoacoustic-wave RTM and improving imaging quality. Finally, our method is fairly robust to coarse sampling.

2019 ◽  
Vol 177 (2) ◽  
pp. 961-975
Author(s):  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
Jianhua Geng

Abstract In conventional vector-wave-based elastic reverse-time migration, there are two types of artifacts: low-frequency artifacts and nonphysical artifacts. Vector-decomposition-based acoustic–elastic coupled equations are effective in suppressing nonphysical artifacts by using ocean bottom four component (4C) seismic data for receiver-side tensorial extrapolation. We introduce up/down-going wave separation into the vector-decomposition-based acoustic–elastic coupled equations, and deduce novel analytic acoustic–elastic coupled equations. With these novel equations, we can obtain the source-side and receiver-side up-going and down-going P/S-wave vectors in wavefield propagation, and effectively suppress both of the artifacts in vector-wave-based elastic reverse-time migration by combining receiver-side tensorial extrapolation and the decomposed vector-wave-based imaging conditions. Examples using synthetic data and field data are presented to illustrate the validity and effectiveness of our method.


Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. S333-S345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
Jianhua Geng ◽  
Xiaobo Li ◽  
Chenlong Wang

Conventionally, multicomponent geophones used to record the elastic wavefields in the solid seabed are necessary for ocean bottom seismic (OBS) data elastic reverse time migration (RTM). Particle velocity components are usually injected directly as boundary conditions in the elastic-wave equation in the receiver-side wavefield extrapolation step, which causes artifacts in the resulting elastic images. We have deduced a first-order acoustic-elastic coupled equation (AECE) by substituting pressure fields into the elastic velocity-stress equation (EVSE). AECE has three advantages for OBS data over EVSE when performing elastic RTM. First, the new equation unifies wave propagation in acoustic and elastic media. Second, the new equation separates P-waves directly during wavefield propagation. Third, three approaches are identified when using the receiver-side multicomponent particle velocity records and pressure records in elastic RTM processing: (1) particle velocity components are set as boundary conditions in receiver-side vectorial extrapolation with the AECE, which is equal to the elastic RTM using the conventional EVSE; (2) the pressure component may also be used for receiver-side scalar extrapolation with the AECE, and with which we can accomplish PP and PS images using only the pressure records and suppress most of the artifacts in the PP image with vectorial extrapolation; and (3) ocean-bottom 4C data can be simultaneously used for elastic images with receiver-side tensorial extrapolation using the AECE. Thus, the AECE may be used for conventional elastic RTM, but it also offers the flexibility to obtain PP and PS images using only pressure records.


Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. C295-C307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
Jianhua Geng ◽  
Chenlong Wang

Quasi-P (qP)-wavefield separation is a crucial step for elastic P-wave imaging in anisotropic media. It is, however, notoriously challenging to quickly and accurately obtain separated qP-wavefields. Based on the concepts of the trace of the stress tensor and the pressure fields defined in isotropic media, we have developed a new method to rapidly separate the qP-wave in a transversely isotropic medium with a vertical symmetry axis (VTI) by synthesized pressure from ocean-bottom seismic (OBS) data as a preprocessing step for elastic reverse time migration (ERTM). Another key aspect of OBS data elastic wave imaging is receiver-side 4C records back extrapolation. Recent studies have revealed that receiver-side tensorial extrapolation in isotropic media with ocean-bottom 4C records can sufficiently suppress nonphysical waves produced during receiver-side reverse time wavefield extrapolation. Similarly, the receiver-side 4C records tensorial extrapolation was extended to ERTM in VTI media in our studies. Combining a separated qP-wave by synthesizing pressure and receiver-side wavefield reverse time tensorial extrapolation with the crosscorrelation imaging condition, we have developed a robust, fast, flexible, and elastic imaging quality improved method in VTI media for OBS data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-93
Author(s):  
Peng Guo ◽  
Huimin Guan ◽  
George A McMechan

SUMMARY Seismic data recorded using a marine acquisition geometry contain both upgoing reflections from subsurface structures and downgoing ghost waves reflected back from the free surface. In addition to the ambiguity of propagation directions in the data, using the two-way wave equation for wavefield extrapolation of seismic imaging generates backscattered/turned waves when there are strong velocity contrasts/gradients in the model, which further increases the wavefield complexity. For reverse-time migration (RTM) of free-surface multiples, apart from unwanted crosstalk between inconsistent orders of reflections, image artefacts can also be formed along with the true reflector images from the overlapping of up/downgoing waves in the data and in the extrapolated wavefield. We present a wave-equation-based, hybrid (data- and model-domain) wave separation workflow, with vector seismic data containing pressure- and vertical-component particle velocity from dual-sensor seismic acquisition, for removing image artefacts produced by the mixture of up/downgoing waves. For imaging with free-surface multiples, the wavefield extrapolated from downgoing ghost events (reflected from the free surface) in the recorded data act as an effective source wavefield for one-order-higher free-surface multiples. Therefore, only the downgoing waves in the data should be used as the source wavefield for RTM with multiples; the recorded upgoing waves in the seismograms will be used for extrapolation of the time-reversed receiver wavefield. We use finite-difference (FD) injection for up/down separation in the data domain, to extrapolate the down- and upgoing waves of the common-source gathers for source and receiver wavefield propagation, respectively. The model-domain separation decomposes the extrapolated wavefield into upgoing (backscattered) and downgoing (transmitted) components at each subsurface grid location, to remove false images produced by cross-correlating backscattered waves along unphysical paths. We combine FD injection with the model-domain wavefield separation, for separating the wavefield into up- and downgoing components for the recorded data and for the extrapolated wavefields. Numerical examples using a simple model, and the Sigsbee 2B model, demonstrate that the hybrid up/down separation approach can effectively produce seismic images of free-surface multiples with better resolution and fewer artefacts.


Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. S333-S343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
Jianhua Geng ◽  
Jiqiang Ma

The acoustic-elastic coupled equation (AECE) has several advantages when compared with conventional scalar-wave-based elastic reverse time migration (ERTM) methods used to image ocean-bottom multicomponent seismic data. In particular, vector-wave-based ERTM requires vectorial P- and S-waves on the source and receiver sides, but these cannot be directly obtained from wavefield extrapolation using AECE. Therefore, we have developed a P- and S-wave vector decomposition (VD) approach within AECE; this approach enables the deduction of a novel VD-based AECE, from which vectorial P- and S-waves can be obtained directly via wavefield extrapolation. We are also able to derive a new formulation suitable for vector-wave-based ERTM of ocean-bottom multicomponent seismic data that can generate a phase-preserved PS-image. Three synthetic examples illustrate the validity and effectiveness of our new method.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hala Alqatari ◽  
Thierry-Laurent Tonellot ◽  
Mohammed Mubarak

Abstract This work presents a full waveform sonic (FWS) dataset processing to generate high-resolution images of the near-borehole area. The dataset was acquired in a nearly horizontal well over a distance of 5400 feet. Multiple formation boundaries can be identified on the final image and tracked at up to 200 feet deep, along the wellbore's trajectory. We first present a new preprocessing sequence to prepare the sonic data for imaging. This sequence leverages denoising algorithms used in conventional surface seismic data processing to remove unwanted components of the recorded data that could harm the imaging results. We then apply a reverse time migration algorithm to the data at different processing stages to assess the impact of the main processing steps on the final image.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavlo Kuzmenko ◽  
Viktor Buhrii ◽  
Carlo D'Aguanno ◽  
Viktor Maliar ◽  
Hrigorii Kashuba ◽  
...  

Abstract Processing of the seismic data acquired in areas of complex geology of the Dnieper-Donets basin, characterized by the salt tectonics, requires special attention to the salt dome interpretation. For this purpose, Kirchhoff Depth Imaging and Reverse Time Migration (RTM) were applied and compared. This is the first such experience in the Dnieper-Donets basin. According to international experience, RTM is the most accurate seismic imaging method for steep and vertical geological (acoustic contrast) boundaries. Application of the RTM on 3D WAZ land data is a great challenge in Dnieper-Donets Basin because of the poor quality of the data with a low signal-to-noise ratio and irregular spatial sampling due to seismic acquisition gaps and missing traces. The RTM algorithm requires data, organized to native positions of seismic shots. For KPSDM we used regularized data after 5D interpolation. This affects the result for near salt reflection. The analysis of KPSDM and RTM results for the two areas revealed the same features. RTM seismic data looked more smoothed, but for steeply dipping reflections, lateral continuity of reflections was much improved. The upper part (1000 m) of the RTM has shadow zones caused by low fold. Other differences between Kirchhoff data and RTM are in the spectral content, as the former is characterized by the full range of seismic frequency spectrum. Conversely, beneath the salt, the RTM has reflections with steep dips which are not observed on the KPSDM. It is possible to identify new prospects using the RTM seismic image. Reverse Time Migration of 3D seismic data has shown geologically consistent results and has the potential to identify undiscovered hydrocarbon traps and to improve salt flank delineation in the complex geology of the Dnieper-Donets Basin's salt domes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document