Methods of working with primary care

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Gask ◽  
Justine Croft

By the 1980s, one-fifth of all general psychiatrists in England and Wales (Strathdee & Williams, 1984) and one-half in Scotland (Pullen & Yellowlees, 1988) were spending some proportion of their time working in primary care. Rather than limit this process, the growth of general practice fundholding fostered it and developments in general practice total purchasing and extended fundholding have encouraged it further (Lee et al, 1999). At the same time, nationally there has been a gradual increase in referrals directly from general practitioners (GPs) to community psychiatric nurses (CPNs). Referrals from GPs constituted 37% of all referrals to CPNs in 1990 and 46% in 1996 (Brooker & White, 1997: further details available from L.G. upon request), even though there has been a trend away from the primary care service base (21% in 1990 compared with 14% in 1996).

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lone Flarup ◽  
Grete Moth ◽  
Morten Bondo Christensen ◽  
Mogens Vestergaard ◽  
Frede Olesen ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 117 (8) ◽  
pp. 599-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Jayarajan ◽  
D. Rajenderkumar

There is little information in the current literature about the management of dizziness in Primary Care (General Practice). An attempt was made to evaluate this by carrying out a postal survey of General Practitioners’ (GPs) treatment methods in four Health Authorities in England and Wales. The survey revealed that eight out of every 1000 individuals are likely to consult their GP on account of dizziness in a 12-month period. The symptom is mostcommon in the 60–80 years’ age group, with ’labyrinthitis’ being the commonest diagnosis. In the majority of cases (74.9 per cent) there was an improvement in the symptoms and only 13 per cent were referred to a specialist clinic. The survey also highlighted the need for additional resources to improve the management of these patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1379-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Mazumdar ◽  
Ludovico Pinzari ◽  
Nasser Bagheri ◽  
Paul Konings ◽  
Federico Girosi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 277-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danica R. Pavlič ◽  
Maja Sever ◽  
Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš ◽  
Igor Švab ◽  
Milena Vainieri ◽  
...  

AimWe sought to examine strength of primary care service delivery as measured by selected process indicators by general practitioners from 31 European countries plus Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. We explored the relation between strength of service delivery and healthcare expenditures.BackgroundThe strength of a country’s primary care is determined by the degree of development of a combination of core primary care dimensions in the context of its healthcare system. This study analyses the strength of service delivery in primary care as measured through process indicators in 31 European countries plus Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.MethodsA comparative cross-sectional study design was applied using the QUALICOPC GP database. Data on the strength of primary healthcare were collected using a standardized GP questionnaire, which included 60 questions divided into 10 dimensions related to process, structure, and outcomes. A total of 6734 general practitioners participated. Data on healthcare expenditure were obtained from World Bank statistics. We conducted a correlation analysis to analyse the relationship between strength and healthcare expenditures.FindingsOur findings show that the strength of service delivery parameters is less than optimal in some countries, and there are substantial variations among countries. Continuity and comprehensiveness of care are significantly positively related to national healthcare expenditures; however, coordination of care is not.


Author(s):  
Julie Høgsgaard Andersen ◽  
Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen ◽  
Susanne Reventlow ◽  
Annette Sofie Davidsen

The international literature shows that primary care is well placed to address mental health problems in young people, but that primary care professionals experience a range of challenges in this regard. In Denmark, young adults who have complex psychosocial problems, and who are not in education or work, cause political and academic concern. They are also in regular contact with their general practitioners, the Danish municipalities and psychiatric services. However, little is known about general practitioners’ perspectives on caring for this vulnerable group of patients. In this article, we investigate how general practitioners’ care work is shaped by the bureaucratic management of care in a complex infrastructure network comprising the general practitioners, psychiatry, the municipalities and the young adults. The analysis is based on interviews and focus groups with general practitioners, psychiatric nurses and social workers. We employ Tronto’s concept of care and the concept of boundary work as a theoretical framework. We argue that general practitioners strive to provide care, but they are challenged by the following: contested diagnostic interpretations and the bureaucratic significance of diagnoses for the provision of care from psychiatry and the municipalities, systemic issues with handling intertwined social and mental health problems, and the young adults’ difficulties with accessing and receiving available care.


1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Wilkinson

A Conference on the above topic took place at the Institute of Psychiatry, London, on 17 and 18 July 1984. The Conference was sponsored by the Department of Health and Social Security and was organized by the General Practice Research Unit. Over 100 invited clinicians, research workers and policy-makers took part. The majority of the participants were either psychiatrists or general practitioners, but representatives of all relevant disciplines attended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document