Treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathisia with the 5-HT2 antagonist mianserin

1999 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Poyurovsky ◽  
Marina Shardorodsky ◽  
Camil Fuchs ◽  
Michael Schneidman ◽  
Abraham Weizman
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Log Odds ◽  
Double Blind Design ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Barnes Akathisia Scale

BackgroundSerotonin (5-HT): dopamine imbalance may underlie neuroleptic-induced akathisia.AimTo evaluate the efficacy of the 5-HT2 antagonist, mianserin in neuroleptic-induced akathisia.MethodsThirty neuroleptic-treated patients with schizophrenia were randomly allocated in a double-blind design to receive either mianserin (15 mg/day) or placebo for five days. Patients were assessed at baseline and on Days 3 and 5 by the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS), as well as by other relevant clinical rating scales.ResultsCompared with the placebo group, the mianserin-treated patients showed a significant reduction in all four BARS subscales by Day 5, with mean reductions in the BARS global score of 9.9% and 52.2%, respectively (P=0.006). Response to treatment (a reduction of at least two points on the BARS global subscale), was noted in six patients (40%) in the mianserin group and only one patient (9.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.04, log odds ratio 2.23).ConclusionsMianserin at a low dose may be a promising therapeutic option for patients with acute neuroleptic-induced akathisia.

Comparison of clomipramine and fluoxetine treatment of dogs with tail chasing

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (05) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Yalcin
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
German Shepherd ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Behavioral History ◽  
Fluoxetine Treatment ◽  
Double Blind Design ◽  
Hydro Chloride ◽  
Better Than

Summary Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the response to treatment with clomipramine and fluoxetine in dogs with tail chasing. Material and methods: Twenty-five client owned dogs with tail chasing were included in this study. Diagnosis of tail chasing was made on the basis of the dog’s behavioral history, clinical signs, and results of laboratory parameters. The study had a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design. Dogs were allocated to three groups. During 12 weeks, dogs of one group were given 2 mg/kg clomipramine hydro-chloride orally, dogs of the second group received 1 mg/kg fluoxetine orally and placebo was administered to control dogs. Changes in signs of tail chasing were weekly reported by the owners. Treatment was assessed in four intervals: weeks 1–3, 4–6, 7–9, and weeks 10–12, respectively. Results: German shepherd dogs and Anatolian sheepdogs were overrepresented. In all four intervals improvement of tail chasing did not differ significantly between clomipramine and fluoxetine (p > 0.05). Improvement of behavior in the clomipramine group was significantly better than in the placebo group between weeks 1–3 and 4–6 and between weeks 7–9 and 10–12 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significantly better improvement in the fluoxetine group between weeks 7–9 and weeks 10–12 when compared to the placebo group (p < 0.05). Conclusion and clinical relevance: Clomipramine and fluoxetine seem to be equally effective in the treatment of tail chasing. Treated dogs responded well to the drugs and both drugs did not show superiority over each other.

A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Intranasal Capsaicin for Cluster Headache

Cephalalgia ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R Marks ◽  
Alan Rapoport ◽  
Dennis Padla ◽  
Randall Weeks ◽  
Robert Rosum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Cluster Headache ◽  
Sensory Neurons ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nerve Terminals ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Headache Severity ◽  
Topical Capsaicin ◽  
To Receive

It has been suggested that treatment of cluster headache (CH) patients with topical capsaicin may desensitize sensory neurons by depleting the nerve terminals of substance P. We attempted to determine whether capsaicin is effective in aborting CH attacks. Patients in acute cluster were randomized to receive either capsaicin or placebo in the ipsilateral nostril for 7 days. Patients recorded the severity of each headache for 15 days. Headaches on days 8–15 of the study were significantly less severe in the capsaicin group vs the placebo group. There was also a significant decrease in headache severity in the capsaicin group on days 8–15 compared to days 1–7, but not in the placebo group. Episodic CH patients appeared to benefit more than chronic CH patients. These results indicate that intranasal capsaicin may provide a new therapeutic option for the treatment of this disease.

The Antiaggressive Action of Combined Haloperidol-Propranolol Treatment in Schizophrenia

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gadi Maoz ◽  
Daniel Stein ◽  
Sorin Meged ◽  
Larisa Kurzman ◽  
Joseph Levine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scales ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Propranolol Group ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Propranolol Treatment ◽  
Simultaneous Decrease ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Haloperidol Treatment ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Drug Free

Psychopharmacological interventions for managing aggression in schizophrenia have thus far yielded inconsistent results. This study evaluates the antiaggressive efficacy of combined haloperidol-propranolol treatment. Thirty-four newly admitted schizophrenic patients were studied in a controlled double-blind trial. Following a 3-day drug-free period and 7 days of haloperidol treatment, patients were randomly assigned to receive either haloperidol-propranolol or haloperidol-placebo for eight consecutive weeks. Doses of medications were adjusted as necessary; biperiden was administered if required. Rating scales were applied to assess aggression, anger, psychosis, depression, anxiety and extrapyramidal symptoms. The mean daily dose of haloperidol was 21 mg (SD = 6.4) in the research group and 29 mg (SD = 6.9) in the controls. Mean and maximal daily doses of propranolol were 159 mg (SD = 61) and 192 mg (SD = 83), and of placebo, 145 mg (SD = 50) and 180 mg (SD = 70), respectively. Compared with the controls, the scores for the research patients decreased significantly from baseline, particularly after 4 weeks of treatment, for some dimensions of anger, psychosis, anxiety, and neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism. A tendency for reduced aggression was shown in the combined haloperidol-propranolol group for some dimensions but not others. These patients also required significantly less biperiden. The tendency toward elevated antiaggressive effect of combined haloperidol-propranolol treatment compared to haloperidol alone may be explained by a simultaneous decrease in aggression, psychotic symptomatology, and anxiety.

scholarly journals The Composition and Diversity of the Gut Microbiota in Children Is Modifiable by the Household Dogs: Impact of a Canine-Specific Probiotic

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 557
Author(s):  
Carlos Gómez-Gallego ◽  
Mira Forsgren ◽  
Marta Selma-Royo ◽  
Merja Nermes ◽  
Maria Carmen Collado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Home Environment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Probiotic Intervention ◽  
Probiotic Product ◽  
Acid Producing Bacteria ◽  
Double Blind Design ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Gut Microbiota Composition

The development of the infant gut microbiota is initiated during pregnancy and continued through early life and childhood, guided by the immediate environment of the child. Our aim was to characterize the shared microbiota between dogs and children as well as to determine whether introduction to dogs of a dog-specific probiotic combination modifies the transfer process. We studied 31 children from allergic families with pet dog(s) and 18 control families without a dog. Altogether 37 dogs were randomized for a 4-week period in a double-blind design to receive canine-derived probiotic product containing a mixture of L. fermentum, L. plantarum, and L. rhamnosus, or placebo. Fecal samples from children and dogs were taken before and after the treatment. Distinctive gut microbiota composition was observed in children with dogs compared to those without a dog, characterized by higher abundance of Bacteroides and short-chain fatty acid producing bacteria such as Ruminococcus and Lachnospiraceae. Probiotic intervention in dogs had an impact on the composition of the gut microbiota in both dogs and children, characterized by a reduction in Bacteroides. We provide evidence for a direct effect of home environment and household pets on children microbiota and document that modification of dog microbiota by specific probiotics is reflected in children’s microbiota.

scholarly journals Efficacy of a nasal spray containing Iota-Carrageenan in the prophylaxis of COVID-19 in hospital personnel dedicated to patients care with COVID-19 disease. A pragmatic multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (CARR-COV-02)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Manuel Figueroa ◽  
Monica Lombardo ◽  
Ariel Dogliotti ◽  
Luis Flynn ◽  
Robert P. Giugliano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Nasal Spray ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hospital Personnel ◽  
Culture Methods ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Significant Efficacy ◽  
To Receive

Background Iota-Carrageenan (I-C) is a sulfate polysaccharide synthesized by red algae, with demonstrated antiviral activity and clinical efficacy as nasal spray in the treatment of common cold. In vitro, I-C inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection in cell culture. Methods This is a pragmatic multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the use of a nasal spray containing I-C in the prophylaxis of COVID-19 in hospital personnel dedicated to care of COVID-19 patients. Clinically healthy physicians, nurses, kinesiologists and others medical providers were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive four daily doses of I-C spray or placebo for 21 days. The primary end point was clinical COVID-19, as confirmed by reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction testing, over a period of 21 days. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04521322). Findings A total of 394 individuals were randomly assigned to receive I-C or placebo. Both treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics. The incidence of COVID-19 was significantly lower in the I-C group compared to placebo (1.0% vs 5.0%) (Odds Ratio 0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.77; p= 0.03). Workday loss in placebo group compared to I-C were 1.6% days / person (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.2); p <0.0001 There were no differences in the incidence of adverse events across the two groups (17.3% in the I-C group and 15.2% in the placebo group, p= 0.5). Interpretation I-C showed significant efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital personnel dedicated to care patients with COVID-19 disease.

Pirenzepine in Non-Ulcer Dyspepsia: A Double-Blind Multicentre Trial

1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Smith ◽  
A.H. Troughton ◽  
F. Gleeson ◽  
J. Walters ◽  
C.F. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
Multicentre Trial ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Non Ulcer Dyspepsia ◽  
Upper Abdominal ◽  
To Receive

In a double-blind multicentre study to compare pirenzepine with placebo in non-ulcer dyspepsia, 71 patients were randomized to receive 50 mg pirenzepine or placebo given orally twice daily for 4 weeks. The trial was not completed by five patients in the pirenzepine group and six in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect to changes in total symptoms (upper abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, early satiety and postprandial bloating, eructation and pyrosis) scores and outcome, although 27/35 (77%) patients receiving pirenzepine were cured or improved compared with 22/36 (61%) receiving the placebo. Adverse effects were reported by 13 (37%) patients treated with pirenzepine and by six (17%) treated with placebo, seven withdrawing due to adverse effects.

The Comparative Amnestic Effects of Midazolam, Propofol, Thiopental, and Fentanyl at Equisedative Concentrations 

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 749-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Veselis ◽  
Ruth A. Reinsel ◽  
Vladimir A. Feshchenko ◽  
Marek Wronski
Keyword(s):  
Memory Impairment ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Modeling ◽  
Target Concentration ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Regression Methods ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Computer Controlled ◽  
Double Blind Design ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Relative Potencies

Background The authors evaluated the effects of midazolam, propofol, thiopental, and fentanyl on volunteer participants' memory for words and pictures at equisedative concentrations. Methods Sixty-seven healthy volunteers were randomized to receive intravenous infusions of midazolam (n = 11), propofol (n = 11), thiopental (n = 10), fentanyl with ondansetron pretreatment (n = 11), ondansetron alone (n = 8), or placebo (n = 16) in a double-blind design. Three increasing and then two decreasing sedative concentrations were achieved by computer-controlled infusion in each volunteer. Measures of sedation, memory, and drug concentration were obtained at each target concentration. Drug concentrations were normalized to equisedative effects using both Emax and logistic regression methods of pharmacodynamic modeling. The serum concentrations at 50% memory effect (Cp50s) were determined using four different memory end points. The relative potencies compared with midazolam for memory impairment were determined. Results Equisedative concentrations were midazolam, 64.5 +/- 9.4 ng/ml; propofol, 0.7 +/- 0.2 microg/ml; thiopental, 2.9 /- 1.0 microg/ml; and fentanyl, 0.9 +/- 0.2 ng/ml. The Cp50s for 50% loss of memory for words were midazolam, 56 +/- 4 ng/ml; propofol, 0.62 +/- 0.04 microg/ml; thiopental, 4.5 +/- 0.3 microg/ml; and fentanyl, 3.2 +/- 0.4 ng/ml. Compared with midazolam, relative potencies (with 95% confidence intervals) were propofol, 0.96 (0.44-1.78); thiopental, 0.76 (0.52-0.94); and fentanyl, 0.34 (0.05-0.76). Large effects on memory were only produced by propofol and midazolam. Conclusions At equal sedation, propofol produces the same degree of memory impairment as midazolam. Thiopental has mild memory effects whereas fentanyl has none. Ondansetron alone has no sedative or amnesic effects.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Low-Dose Prophylactic Quetiapine on Delirium Prevention in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Youlim Kim ◽  
Hyung-Sook Kim ◽  
Jong Sun Park ◽  
Young-Jae Cho ◽  
Ho Il Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Icu Discharge ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
Delirium Prevention

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of short-term low-dose quetiapine for delirium prevention in critically ill patients. Methods: In this prospective, a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult patients who were admitted from July 2015 to July 2017 to a medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital affiliated to Seoul National University were included. Quetiapine (12.5 mg or 25 mg oral at night; N = 16) or placebo (N = 21) was administered according to randomization until ICU discharge or the 10th ICU day. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium within the first 10 ICU days. Secondary endpoints included the rate of positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) (the number of positive CAM-ICU counts/the number of total CAM-ICU counts), delirium duration, successful extubation, and overall mortality. Result: The incidence of delirium during the 10 days after ICU admission was 46.7% (7/15) in the quetiapine group and 55.0% (11/20) in the placebo group (p = 0.442). In the quetiapine group, the rate of positive CAM-ICU was significantly lower than in the placebo group (14.4% vs. 37.4%, p = 0.048), delirium duration during the study period was significantly shorter (0.28 day vs. 1.83 days, p = 0.018), and more patients in the quetiapine than in the placebo group were weaned from mechanical ventilation successfully (84.6% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.040). Conclusions: Our study suggests that prophylactic use of low-dose quetiapine could be helpful for preventing delirium in critically ill patients. A further large-scale prospective study is needed.

scholarly journals Effects of Rivastigmine on Memory and Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Shaygannejad ◽  
Mohsen Janghorbani ◽  
Fereshteh Ashtari ◽  
Hamid Afshar Zanjani ◽  
Naser Zakizade
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Placebo Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Wechsler Memory Scale ◽  
Memory Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
To Receive

Background:Cognitive dysfunction is one of the common clinical symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is no effective treatment for it.Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of rivastigmine in treating memory and cognitive dysfunction in MS.Methods:A single-center double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted from October 2005 to February 2007. Sixty definite MS patients with cognitive impairment age 16 to 54 years were randomly allocated to receive a 12-week treatment course of either rivastigmine (1.5 mg once a day increment over 4 weeks to 3 mg twice daily) or placebo. Response to treatment was assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) at baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy.Results:A slight, but significant memory improvement occurred in both groups. Of the 30 patients treated with rivastigmine, the mean (SD) WMS general memory score increased from 60.3 (4.2) at baseline to 64.9 (5.3) at the end of study period (P<0.001). Correspondingly, in the 30 patients treated with placebo, the mean (SD) WMS general memory score increased from 60.5 (4.9) to 64.5 (3.7) (P < 0.001). The average WMS general memory score at the end of trial did not changed between rivastigmine and placebo group (mean difference, 0.4; 95% CI, -2.0, 2.8).Conclusion:No significant differences were seen between rivastigmine and placebo on the mean (SD) WMS general memory score. A larger multicenter study of rivastigmine in MS is warranted in order to more definitely assess the efficacy of this intervention.

scholarly journals Effect of a Fermented Milk CombiningLactobacillus AcidophilusCL1285 andLactobacillus Caseiin the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 732-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélanie Beausoleil ◽  
Nadia Fortier ◽  
Stéphanie Guénette ◽  
Amélie L’Ecuyer ◽  
Michel Savoie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Fermented Milk ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea ◽  
Potential Measure ◽  
To Receive

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea is an important problem in hospitalized patients. The use of probiotics is gaining interest in the scientific community as a potential measure to prevent this complication. The main objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a fermented milk combiningLactobacillus acidophilusandLactobacillus caseithat is widely available in Canada, in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea.METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized study, hospitalized patients were randomly assigned to receive either a lactobacilli-fermented milk or a placebo on a daily basis.RESULTS: Among 89 randomized patients, antibiotic-associated diarrhea occurred in seven of 44 patients (15.9%) in the lactobacilli group and in 16 of 45 patients (35.6%) in the placebo group (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.125 to 0.944; P=0.05). The median hospitalization duration was eight days in the lactobacilli group, compared with 10 days in the placebo group (P=0.09). Overall, the lactobacilli-fermented milk was well tolerated.CONCLUSION: The daily administration of a lactobacilli-fermented milk was safe and effective in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document