scholarly journals Using daily monitoring of psychiatric symptoms to evaluate hospital length of stay

BJPsych Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Page ◽  
Nadia K. Cunningham ◽  
Geoffrey R. Hooke
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Significant Treatment ◽  
Daily Monitoring ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Clinically Significant

BackgroundRoutine symptom monitoring and feedback improves out-patient outcomes, but the feasibility of its use to inform decisions about discharge from in-patient care has not been explored.AimsTo examine the potential value to clinical decision-making of monitoring symptoms during psychiatric in-patient hospitalisation.MethodA total of 1102 in-patients in a private psychiatric hospital, primarily with affective and neurotic disorders, rated daily distress levels throughout their hospital stay. The trajectories of patients who had, and had not, met a criterion of clinically significant improvement were examined.ResultsTwo-thirds of patients (n=604) met the clinically significant improvement criterion at discharge, and three-quarters (n=867) met the criterion earlier during their hospital stay. After meeting the criterion, the majority (73.2%) showed stable symptoms across the remainder of their hospital stay, and both classes showed substantially lower symptoms than at admission.ConclusionsMonitoring of progress towards this criterion provides additional information regarding significant treatment response that could inform clinical decisions around discharge readiness.

scholarly journals Can soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor predict outcomes after cardiac surgery?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chase T Schultz-Swarthfigure ◽  
Philip McCall ◽  
Robert Docking ◽  
Helen F Galley ◽  
Benjamin Shelley
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor ◽  
Prolonged Ventilation ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Abstract OBJECTIVES Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker that has been implicated in several cardiac pathologies and has been shown to be elevated in critically ill populations. We measured plasma suPAR in a cohort of cardiac surgical patients to evaluate its ability to predict prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and development of complications following surgery. We compared suPAR against EuroSCORE II and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS Ninety patients undergoing cardiac surgery were recruited with samples taken preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. suPAR was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) was used to test predictive capability of suPAR. Comparison was made with EuroSCORE II and CRP. RESULTS suPAR increased over time (P < 0.001) with higher levels in patients requiring prolonged ICU and hospital stay, and prolonged ventilation (P < 0.05). suPAR was predictive for prolonged ICU and hospital stay, and prolonged ventilation at all time points (AUROC 0.66–0.74). Interestingly, this association was also observed preoperatively, with preoperative suPAR predicting prolonged ICU (AUROC 0.66), and hospital stay (AUROC 0.67) and prolonged ventilation (AUROC 0.74). The predictive value of preoperative suPAR compared favourably to EuroSCORE II and CRP. CONCLUSIONS suPAR increases following cardiac surgery and levels are higher in those who require prolonged ICU stay, prolonged hospital stay and prolonged ventilation. Preoperative suPAR compares favourably to EuroSCORE II and CRP in the prediction of these outcomes. suPAR could be a useful biomarker in predicting outcome following cardiac surgery, helping inform clinical decision-making. Clinical registration West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee Reference: 12/WS/0179 (AM01).

scholarly journals Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar Mandalia ◽  
Erik-Jan Wamsteker ◽  
Matthew J. DiMagno
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Treatment Interventions ◽  
Local Complication ◽  
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.

scholarly journals Surgical and Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement: A Single Institution Comparison

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Barron ◽  
John W. Brown ◽  
Mark W. Turrentine ◽  
Mark Hoyer ◽  
Mark H. Rodefeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Pulmonary Valve ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Stent Migration ◽  
Pulmonary Valve Replacement ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Valve Dysfunction

Background and Hypothesis: Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures for patients with congenital heart disease. Transcatheter-based PVR (TPVR) approaches have emerged as alternatives to surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR), but few studies have directly compared clinical outcomes between the two interventions. Further characterization of performance between the two valve procedures may inform clinical decision-making.  Project Methods: Using institutional databases, we identified patients aged ≥ 9 years who underwent either a TPVR or SPVR at Riley Hospital for Children between January 2009 and June 2020. Exclusions were made for previous endocarditis diagnosis, <1 year follow-up, and concomitant left heart procedures. Valve dysfunction was defined as ≥ moderate regurgitation or gradient ≥ 40 mmHg.  Results: 94 (TPVR, n=52; SPVR, n=42) patients met inclusion criteria. Average follow-up for SPVR and TPVR patients was 5.1(2.0,6.7) and 2.9(1.6,4.8) years, respectively (p=0.007). The SPVR cohort was younger, had lower BMI, and underwent more prior sternotomies. Hospital length of stay was shorter after TPVR (1.0 day vs. 5.0 days, p<0.001). Despite being younger, BSA-indexed valve size was larger in the SPVR cohort (14.7 mm/m2 vs 12.9 mm/m2, p<0.001). Short-term mortality (0% vs 2%, p=0.36), endocarditis (0% vs 6%, p=0.11), and reintervention (12% vs 8%, p=0.49) did not differ between groups. Intermediate-term valve dysfunction/failure was greater in SPVR patients (29% vs 12%, p=0.04) with time to dysfunction 809(421,1565) and 1184(181,1627) days for SPVR and TPVR, respectively. Valve implantation failure due to pre-stent migration occurred in 4% of TPVR cases; one required surgical intervention.   Conclusion and Potential Impact: In patients undergoing PVR at our institution, rates of mortality and infective endocarditis are similar between interventions. Intermediate-term valve dysfunction/failure was greater in SPVR cohort, but length of follow-up was significantly longer in these patients. Reintervention rates were similar between procedures. 

scholarly journals Recent advances in understanding and managing acute pancreatitis

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amar Mandalia ◽  
Erik-Jan Wamsteker ◽  
Matthew J. DiMagno
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Biliary Pancreatitis ◽  
Treatment Interventions ◽  
Local Complication ◽  
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis

This review highlights advances made in recent years in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis (AP). We focus on epidemiological, clinical, and management aspects of AP. Additionally, we discuss the role of using risk stratification tools to guide clinical decision making. The majority of patients suffer from mild AP, and only a subset develop moderately severe AP, defined as a pancreatic local complication, or severe AP, defined as persistent organ failure. In mild AP, management typically involves diagnostic evaluation and supportive care resulting usually in a short hospital length of stay (LOS). In severe AP, a multidisciplinary approach is warranted to minimize morbidity and mortality over the course of a protracted hospital LOS. Based on evidence from guideline recommendations, we discuss five treatment interventions, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, feeding, prophylactic antibiotics, probiotics, and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute biliary pancreatitis. This review also highlights the importance of preventive interventions to reduce hospital readmission or prevent pancreatitis, including alcohol and smoking cessation, same-admission cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis, and chemoprevention and fluid administration for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Our review aims to consolidate guideline recommendations and high-quality studies published in recent years to guide the management of AP and highlight areas in need of research.

scholarly journals Predictors of prolonged hospital stay in HIV-positive patients presenting to the emergency department

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0249706
Author(s):  
Abdullah E. Laher ◽  
Fathima Paruk ◽  
Guy A. Richards ◽  
Willem D. F. Venter
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prolonged Hospitalization ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Background Prolonged hospitalization places a significant burden on healthcare resources. Compared to the general population, hospital length of stay (LOS) is generally longer in HIV-positive patients. We identified predictors of prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) in HIV-positive patients presenting to an emergency department (ED). Methods In this cross-sectional study, HIV-positive patients presenting to the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital adult ED were prospectively enrolled between 07 July 2017 and 18 October 2018. Data was subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine parameters associated with a higher likelihood of prolonged hospital LOS, defined as ≥7 days. Results Among the 1224 participants that were enrolled, the median (IQR) LOS was 4.6 (2.6–8.2) days, while the mean (SD) LOS was 6.9 (8.2) days. On multivariate analysis of the data, hemoglobin <11 g/dL (OR 1.37, p = 0.032), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) <15 (OR 1.80, p = 0.001), creatinine >120 μmol/L (OR 1.85, p = 0.000), cryptococcal meningitis (OR 2.45, p = 0.015) and bacterial meningitis (OR 4.83, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of LOS ≥7 days, while bacterial pneumonia (OR 0.35, p = 0.000) and acute gastroenteritis (OR 0.40, p = 0.025) were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of LOS ≥7 days. Conclusion Various clinical and laboratory parameters are useful in predicting prolonged hospitalization among HIV-positive patients presenting to the ED. These parameters may be useful in guiding clinical decision making and directing the allocation of resources.

scholarly journals Laboratory predictors of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the area of Valcamonica, Italy

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 1100-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graziella Bonetti ◽  
Filippo Manelli ◽  
Andrea Patroni ◽  
Alessandra Bettinardi ◽  
Gianluca Borrelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Serum Glucose ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Laboratory Findings

AbstractBackgroundComprehensive information has been published on laboratory tests which may predict worse outcome in Asian populations with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study is to describe laboratory findings in a group of Italian COVID-19 patients in the area of Valcamonica, and correlate abnormalities with disease severity.MethodsThe final study population consisted of 144 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (70 who died during hospital stay and 74 who survived and could be discharged) between March 1 and 30, 2020, in Valcamonica Hospital. Demographical, clinical and laboratory data were collected upon hospital admission and were then correlated with outcome (i.e. in-hospital death vs. discharge).ResultsCompared to patients who could be finally discharged, those who died during hospital stay displayed significantly higher values of serum glucose, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), urea, creatinine, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTnI), prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, C reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and leukocytes (especially neutrophils), whilst values of albumin, hemoglobin and lymphocytes were significantly decreased. In multiple regression analysis, LDH, CRP, neutrophils, lymphocytes, albumin, APTT and age remained significant predictors of in-hospital death. A regression model incorporating these variables explained 80% of overall variance of in-hospital death.ConclusionsThe most important laboratory abnormalities described here in a subset of European COVID-19 patients residing in Valcamonica are highly predictive of in-hospital death and may be useful for guiding risk assessment and clinical decision-making.

4971Blood viscosity and its relevance to the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension: a new elephant in the cathlab

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kempny ◽  
K Dimopoulos ◽  
A E Fraisse ◽  
G P Diller ◽  
L C Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Pulmonary Vasculature ◽  
Pulmonary Vascular Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is an essential parameter assessed during cardiac catheterization. It is used to confirm pulmonary vascular disease, to assess response to targeted pulmonary hypertension (PH) therapy and to determine the possibility of surgery, such as closure of intra-cardiac shunt or transplantation. While PVR is believed to mainly reflect the properties of the pulmonary vasculature, it is also related to blood viscosity (BV). Objectives We aimed to assess the relationship between measured (mPVR) and viscosity-corrected PVR (cPVR) and its impact on clinical decision-making. Methods We assessed consecutive PH patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. BV was assessed using the Hutton method. Results We included 465 patients (56.6% female, median age 63y). The difference between mPVR and cPVR was highest in patients with abnormal Hb levels (anemic patients: 5.6 [3.4–8.0] vs 7.8Wood Units (WU) [5.1–11.9], P<0.001; patients with raised Hb: 10.8 [6.9–15.4] vs. 7.6WU [4.6–10.8], P<0.001, respectively). Overall, 33.3% patients had a clinically significant (>2.0WU) difference between mPVR and cPVR, and this was more pronounced in those with anemia (52.9%) or raised Hb (77.6%). In patients in the upper quartile for this difference, mPVR and cPVR differed by 4.0WU [3.4–5.2]. Adjustment of PVR required Conclusions We report, herewith, a clinically significant difference between mPVR and cPVR in a third of contemporary patients assessed for PH. This difference is most pronounced in patients with anemia, in whom mPVR significantly underestimates PVR, whereas in most patients with raised Hb, mPVR overestimates it. Our data suggest that routine adjustment for BV is necessary.

scholarly journals The independent patient factors that affect length of stay following hip fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 556-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Richards ◽  
A Glendenning ◽  
D Benson ◽  
S Alexander ◽  
S Thati
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Mobility Status

Introduction Management of hip fractures has evolved over recent years to drive better outcomes including length of hospital stay. We aimed to identify and quantify the effect that patient factors influence acute hospital and total health service length of stay. Methods A retrospective observational study based on National Hip Fracture Database data was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015. A multiple regression analysis of 330 patients was carried out to determine independent factors that affect acute hospital and total hospital length of stay. Results American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or above, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) less than 8 and poor mobility status were independent factors, significantly increasing length of hospital stay in our population. Acute hospital length of stay can be predicted as 8.9 days longer when AMTS less than 8, 4.2 days longer when ASA grade was 3 or above and 20.4 days longer when unable to mobilise unaided (compared with independently mobile individuals). Other factors including total hip replacement compared with hemiarthroplasty did not independently affect length of stay. Conclusions Our analysis in a representative and generalisable population illustrates the importance of identifying these three patient characteristics in hip fracture patients. When recognised and targeted with orthogeriatric support, the length of hospital stay for these patients can be reduced and overall hip fracture care improved. Screening on admission for ASA grade, AMTS and mobility status allows prediction of length of stay and tailoring of care to match needs.

223 Procedural Safety of Stereotactic Laser Ablation (SLA) and Associated Hospital Stay: Outcome from the First Hundred Patient from LAANTERN Prospective Registry

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
Clark C Chen ◽  
Robert Rennert ◽  
Usman Khan ◽  
Stephen B Tatter ◽  
Melvin Field ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay

Abstract INTRODUCTION We examined the procedural safety and length of hospital stay for patients who underwent stereotactic laser ablation (SLA). METHODS Patients undergoing stereotactic laser ablation were prospectively enrolled in the Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue using Robotic Neuroblate System (LAANTERN) registry. Data from the first 100 enrolled patients are presented. RESULTS >The demographic of the patient cohort consisted of 58% females and 42% males. The mean age and KPS of the cohort were 51 (±17) years and 83 (±15), respectively. 87% of the SLA-treated patients had undergone prior surgical or radiation treatment. In terms of indications, 84% of the SLAs were performed as treatment for brain tumor and 16% were performed as treatment for epilepsy. In terms of the procedure, 79% of the SLA patients underwent treatment of a single lesion. In 72% of the SLA treated patients, >90% of the target lesion was ablated. The average procedural time was 188.2 minutes (range: 48–368 minutes). The average blood loss per procedure was 17.7 cc (range: 0–300cc). In terms of hospitalization, the average length of Intensive Care stay was 38.1 hours (range 0335). The number of hours post-procedure before patient discharge was 61.1 hours (range 6–612). 85% of the patients were discharged home. There were 15 adverse events at the one-month follow-up (12%), with two events definitively related to the procedure (2%), including one patient with post-operative intraventricular hemorrhage and another with post-procedural gait compromise. CONCLUSION SLA is a minimally invasive procedure with favorable profile in terms of safety and hospital length of stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document