Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling for Drug Development in Oncology

Author(s):  
Elena Garralda ◽  
Rodrigo Dienstmann ◽  
Josep Tabernero

High drug attrition rates remain a critical issue in oncology drug development. A series of steps during drug development must be addressed to better understand the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of novel agents and, thus, increase their probability of success. As available data continues to expand in both volume and complexity, comprehensive integration of PK and PD information into a robust mathematical model represents a very useful tool throughout all stages of drug development. During the discovery phase, PK/PD models can be used to identify and select the best drug candidates, which helps characterize the mechanism of action and disease behavior of a given drug, to predict clinical response in humans, and to facilitate a better understanding about the potential clinical relevance of preclinical efficacy data. During early drug development, PK/PD modeling can optimize the design of clinical trials, guide the dose and regimen that should be tested further, help evaluate proof of mechanism in humans, anticipate the effect in certain subpopulations, and better predict drug-drug interactions; all of these effects could lead to a more efficient drug development process. Because of certain peculiarities of immunotherapies, such as PK and PD characteristics, PK/PD modeling could be particularly relevant and thus have an important impact on decision making during the development of these agents.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azeem Saleem ◽  
Philip Murphy ◽  
Christophe Plisson ◽  
Michael Lahn

In early drug development advanced imaging techniques can help with progressing new molecular entities (NME) to subsequent phases of drug development and thus reduce attrition. However, several organizational, operational, and regulatory hurdles pose a significant barrier, potentially limiting the impact these techniques can have on modern drug development. Positron emission tomography (PET) of radiolabelled NME is arguably the best example of a complex technique with a potential to deliver unique decision-making data in small cohorts of subjects. However, to realise this potential the impediments to timely inclusion of PET into the drug development process must be overcome. In the present paper, we discuss the value of PET imaging with radiolabelled NME during early anticancer drug development, as exemplified with one such NME. We outline the multiple hurdles and propose options on how to streamline the organizational steps for future studies.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 691
Author(s):  
Milana Bergamino Sirvén ◽  
Sonia Pernas ◽  
Maggie C. U. Cheang

The rapidly evolving landscape of immuno-oncology (IO) is redefining the treatment of a number of cancer types. IO treatments are becoming increasingly complex, with different types of drugs emerging beyond checkpoint inhibitors. However, many of the new drugs either do not progress from phase I-II clinical trials or even fail in late-phase trials. We have identified at least five areas in the development of promising IO treatments that should be redefined for more efficient designs and accelerated approvals. Here we review those critical aspects of IO drug development that could be optimized for more successful outcome rates in all cancer types. It is important to focus our efforts on the mechanisms of action, types of response and adverse events of these novel agents. The use of appropriate clinical trial designs with robust biomarkers of response and surrogate endpoints will undoubtedly facilitate the development and subsequent approval of these drugs. Further research is also needed to establish biomarker-driven strategies to select which patients may benefit from immunotherapy and identify potential mechanisms of resistance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (12) ◽  
pp. F996-F999 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Shayman

Historically, most Federal Drug Administration-approved drugs were the result of “in-house” efforts within large pharmaceutical companies. Over the last two decades, this paradigm has steadily shifted as the drug industry turned to startups, small biotechnology companies, and academia for the identification of novel drug targets and early drug candidates. This strategic pivot has created new opportunities for groups less traditionally associated with the creation of novel therapeutics, including small academic laboratories, for engagement in the drug discovery process. A recent example of the successful development of a drug that had its origins in academia is eliglustat tartrate, an oral agent for Gaucher disease type 1.


2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Gutierrez ◽  
Shivaani Kummar ◽  
Giuseppe Giaccone

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 338-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Tentler ◽  
Aik Choon Tan ◽  
Colin D. Weekes ◽  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
Stephen Leong ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 289 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhu Huang ◽  
Walter Collette ◽  
Michelle Twamley ◽  
Shirley A. Aguirre ◽  
Aida Sacaan

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 512-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rick Turner ◽  
Gopi Krishna Panicker ◽  
Dilip R. Karnad ◽  
Christopher H. Cabell ◽  
Ronald Lieberman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjuan Zhang ◽  
Ruilin Sun ◽  
Annie X. An ◽  
Henry Q.x Li ◽  
Davy Xuesong Ouyang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document