Analysis of dose intensity for adjuvant chemotherapy trials in stage II breast cancer.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1162-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Hryniuk ◽  
M N Levine
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Prognostic Groups ◽  
Survival Studies ◽  
The Relationship

We have analyzed the relationship between dose intensity of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-containing adjuvant chemotherapy of stage II breast cancer and 3-year relapse-free survival. Studies using only one or two drugs of CMF or melphalan instead of cyclophosphamide were included in the analysis by using simple techniques developed for this purpose. There was a clear-cut relationship between relapse-free survival and dose intensity in trials containing all four prognostic groups: less than 50 years, one to three and more than three positive nodes; and greater than or equal to 50 years, one to three and more than three positive nodes (P less than 10(-5)). Relapse-free survival also correlated with dose intensity for each of the four prognostic groups analyzed separately (P less than .005). Dose intensity was an independently significant correlate of relapse-free survival in multivariate analysis (P less than 10(-5)). This is a retrospective study, and the hypothesis that dose intensity contributes to outcome independently of other variables should be tested prospectively. Methods of increasing dose intensity also require testing in randomized trials before they can be applied to routine clinical practice.

Intensification of Adjuvant Chemotherapy: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide With High-Dose Mitoxantrone and Cyclophosphamide With Filgrastim in Operable Breast Cancer With 10 or More Involved Axillary Nodes

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 612-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Fumoleau ◽  
Franck Chauvin ◽  
Moïse Namer ◽  
Roland Bugat ◽  
Michèle Tubiana-Hulin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: To determine whether intensifying the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and 10 or more involved axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 150) were randomized to receive either four cycles of standard doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (arm A) or four courses of intensified mitoxantrone 23 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, with filgrastim 5 g/kg/d from days 2 to 15, every 3 weeks (arm B). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in DFS (P = .44), DDFS (P = .67), or OS (P = .99) between the two groups at 5 years; DDFS was 45% (arm A) versus 50% (arm B), and DFS was 41% versus 49%, respectively. Five-year survival was similar in both arms (61% v 60%, respectively). Failure to note an intergroup difference in outcome was unrelated to relative dose-intensity. Analysis of patients with 15 or more positive nodes revealed a significant difference in 5-year DDFS (19% v 49% in arm B; P = .01). Toxicity was generally mild in both groups, with no toxic death. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low (0.3% v 3%). Alopecia was less frequent in arm B (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This randomized trial confirms the feasibility of administering mitoxantrone 23 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim. Although there was no significant difference between conventional and intensified arms at 5 years, according to subgroup analysis, intensified treatment may decrease the risk of relapse in patients with 15 or more positive nodes compared with doxorubicin an cyclophosphamide.

Impact of delaying initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1022-1022
Author(s):  
Debora De Melo Gagliato ◽  
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
Xiudong Lei ◽  
Sharon Hermes Giordano ◽  
Richard L. Theriault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse ◽  
Time To Initiation ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Definitive Surgery

1022 Background: The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is well established. However, the optimal timing to initiation of chemotherapy after definitive surgery is unknown. We evaluated the association between time to initiation of chemotherapy and survival outcomes according to breast cancer subtype and stage at diagnosis. Methods: Women diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer between 1997-2011 who received adjuvant chemotherapy at our institution were included. Patients were categorized according to time from definitive surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy into one of three groups: ≤ 30 days, 31–60 days and more than 60 days. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results: Among the 6,827 patients included, the 5-year Overall Survival (OS), Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) and Distant Relapse-Free Survival (DRFS) estimates were similar for the different time-to-chemotherapy categories. Among patients with stage I, there was no association between outcome and time to initiation of chemotherapy. Patients with stage II disease experienced an 18% and 22% increase in risk of RFS (HR 1.18; p=0.038) and DRFS (HR 1.22; p=0.02), when systemic treatment was started >60 days from surgery. Patients with stage III disease that started adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days after surgery had a 70% increase in the risk of death (HR 1.7; p=0.002), a 32% increase risk of relapse (HR 1.32; p=0.046) and a 34% increase risk of distant relapse (HR 1.34; p=0.044). Time to chemotherapy did not have a significant effect on outcome among Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive patients. Patients with triple negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive tumors treated with trastuzumab who started chemotherapy >60 days after surgery had lower 5 year-OS estimates (HR 1.52; p=0.016 and HR 2.62; p=0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Time to chemotherapy did not influence survival outcomes in the overall population. However, patients with stage III, TNBC and HER2-positive tumors treated with trastuzumab, experienced worse outcomes when chemotherapy was delayed. Among patients with tumors with aggressive biology and more advanced stages at diagnosis, early initiation of therapy should be favored.

Five-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Versus Surgery Alone in Stage II or III Gastric Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (33) ◽  
pp. 4387-4393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Sasako ◽  
Shinichi Sakuramoto ◽  
Hitoshi Katai ◽  
Taira Kinoshita ◽  
Hiroshi Furukawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point

Purpose The first planned interim analysis (median follow-up, 3 years) of the Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of S-1 for Gastric Cancer confirmed that the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1 significantly improved overall survival, the primary end point. The results were therefore opened at the recommendation of an independent data and safety monitoring committee. We report 5-year follow-up data on patients enrolled onto the ACTS-GC study. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically confirmed stage II or III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 after surgery or surgery only. S-1 (80 to 120 mg per day) was given for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. This 6-week cycle was repeated for 1 year. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were relapse-free survival and safety. Results The overall survival rate at 5 years was 71.7% in the S-1 group and 61.1% in the surgery-only group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.669; 95% CI, 0.540 to 0.828). The relapse-free survival rate at 5 years was 65.4% in the S-1 group and 53.1% in the surgery-only group (HR, 0.653; 95% CI, 0.537 to 0.793). Subgroup analyses according to principal demographic factors such as sex, age, disease stage, and histologic type showed no interaction between treatment and any characteristic. Conclusion On the basis of 5-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 was confirmed to improve overall survival and relapse-free survival in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer who had undergone D2 gastrectomy.

The PARSC trial: A prospective study for the assessment of recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer (CC) patients using ColoPrint.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 602-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Salazar ◽  
R. Rosenberg ◽  
M. Lutke Holzik ◽  
J. Marshall ◽  
J. J. Van Der Hoeven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients

602 Background: Clinical trials have not yet shown convincingly if adjuvant chemotherapy is justified for stage II CC patients of whom 25% are at risk of recurrence. An 18-gene expression profile, ColoPrint, has been developed for identifying CC cancer patients more likely to develop recurrent disease and who would be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. The gene signature has been validated in independent cohorts of 206 CC patients and in in-silico datasets (Salazar et al, JCO in press). The profile classified 63.2% of the stage II patients (n=134) as low risk. The HR for relapse free survival (RFS) was 3.34 (p=0.017) with a 5-year RFS rate of 90.9% (95%CI, 84.0 -97.8%) for low risk patients and 73.9% (95%CI, 59.2-88.6%) for high risk patients. Moreover, the profile stratified patients independent of ASCO clinical risk factors. Methods: A prospective trial, PARSC (Prospective Study for the Assessment of Recurrence Risk in Stage II CC Patients Using ColoPrint) has been initiated. The main objectives are: (1) determine risk assessment by ColoPrint profile versus clinical parameters based on local protocol and ASCO high-risk recommendations in stage II patients; (2) establish proportion of ′good prognosis′ and ′poor prognosis profile′ in various countries; and (3) validate the power of risk assessment and compare performance of ColoPrint and clinical risk assessment in estimating 3 year relapse rate. Inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years, adenocarcinoma of the colon, stage II,no neoadjuvant systemic therapy, no synchronous tumors, fresh tumor sample, and written informed consent. The treatment of the patient is at the discretion of the physician. Results: The trial started in Sept. 2008 with currently 26 participating sites in 11 countries. So far, 223 stage II patients have been enrolled of whom 183 are eligible. 11 patients were rejected because of prior malignancies; 24 patients were rejected based on low tumor content of the sample (< 30% tumor cells), 3 patients had rectal cancer and 2 synchronous tumor. Conclusions: The aim is to enroll 600 stage II patients to differentiate between 3 year relapse- free survival predicted by ColoPrint versus clinical factors. [Table: see text]

Randomized controlled phase II study of alternate-day S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 114-114
Author(s):  
Seiichi Nakamura ◽  
Shigeru Tatebe ◽  
Tetsu Shimizu ◽  
Nariyuki Yamane ◽  
Hideaki Nishidoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Treatment Completion ◽  
Completion Rate ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

114 Background: Based on the results of ACTS-GC, oral administration of S-1 for 1 year is considered standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan. However, the 1-year treatment completion rate was only 65.8%, and completion of the treatment is a problem to be solved. On the other hand, we experienced in clinical practice that the alternate-day administration of S-1 reduced adverse effects and was tolerable for advanced gastric cancer patients unwilling to continue the standard daily administration. We therefore conducted a multi-center cooperative prospective study to compare daily with alternate-day administration of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with Stage II or III gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery were randomly assigned to receive standard daily administration (group A: S-1 80-120 mg/day according to BSA, days 1 to 28, every 6weeks, for 1 year) or alternate-day administration of S-1 (group B: S-1 80-120 mg/day according to BSA, every other day, for 15 months). The primary endpoints were treatment completion rate and relative dose intensity. Secondary endpoints were safety, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled. As of August 30, 2011 analysis of the compliance data of 62 cases had been completed. The results showed a treatment completion rate of 74.2% in group A and 93.5% in group B and relative dose intensity of 72.1% in group A and 85.6% in group B, and compliance tended to be better in group B. Assessment of survival time showed a median follow-up time of 545 days, a 1-year survival rate of 93.8% in group A and 96.9% in group B and 1-year relapse-free survival rate of 79.5% in group A and 90.7% in group B. Digestive system adverse events were less frequent in group B than in group A. Conclusions: We will report the data from the final analysis at this meeting. The current data show improved compliance and mitigation of adverse effects with alternate-day administration of S-1, and it appears to be a more sustainable option for adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II and III gastric cancer.

Limited impact of tamoxifen following dose-intensive L-FAC multimodality therapy of breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10741-10741
Author(s):  
K. W. Jabboury ◽  
A. Wong ◽  
K. Sexton ◽  
L. Rogers ◽  
K. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Grade Iii

10741 Background: Front-line dose-intensive L-FAC has demonstrated a favorable 5-year relapse free survival pattern (ASCO 2004 #739). Tamoxifen was given for 5 years to ER+ patients after L-FAC completion. We evaluated the impact of adding tamoxifen to L-FAC. By design, this pilot study excluded low-risk patients not candidates for chemotherapy. Methods: 109 breast cancer patients were enrolled (4 excluded due to treatment violations) from 6/1989 to 1/2003: 20 Stage I (S), 52 S-II, 22 S-III, for a total of 94 patients. 11 S-IV patients were excluded from survival analysis. Adverse tumor presentations included: ER- 49, PgR- 60, P53+ 24, non-diploid 39, histological grade III 37, CerbB2+ 33. L-FAC included 72 hour (h) iv infusion 400mg/m2/day (d) 5-fluorouracil (F) modulated by iv bolus 200mg/m2/d X3 leucovorin (L), concomitantly with 24h iv d1 600–1000mg/m2 cyclophosphamide (C), 48h iv d2 + d3 60mg/m2 doxorubicin (A). S-I and S-II were given 6 courses and 8 for S-III. Increasing A + C dose level and/or shortening treatment intervals < 3 weeks with growth factors provided intensification. 40 patients received tamoxifen. Results: At a median follow-up of 74 months (range 9–214), 73 (78%) are alive (1 with relapse). Relapse free survival was: S-I 95%, S-II 81%, S-III 78%. At average course intervals of 18 days, dose intensity A/C mg/m2/wk was 24.2 / 335.4 with evidence of WHO grade III/IV stomatitis in 43%, neutropenia 59%, cumulative thrombocytopenia 50%, hand-foot syndrome 32% of patients. Aside from delayed relapse associated with tamoxifen, relapse-free survival >82 months was similar with and without tamoxifen. No relapse was observed after >53 months in ER- tumors despite showing higher frequency of adverse tumor risk factors. Conclusion: The impact of adding tamoxifen appears quite limited in a patient population with adverse tumor presentation treated with dose-intensive L-FAC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document