Conventional versus cytokinetic polychemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized cooperative trial.

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
P F Conte ◽  
P Pronzato ◽  
A Rubagotti ◽  
A Alama ◽  
D Amadori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Prolongation ◽  
Significant Difference

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) can induce a recruitment into the proliferative pool of previously resting breast cancer cells in vivo. In order to verify if estrogenic recruitment could result in a larger tumor cell killing by chemotherapy, 117 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2; and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 on day 1); DES-CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 on day 1; DES, 1 mg orally on days 5, 6, and 7; and epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, on day 8) every 21 days. No significant difference in objective response rates, survival, or progression-free survival was seen between the two regimens. Patients in the DES-CEF arm experienced a higher complete response (CR) rate (24.1% v 16.1%), which reached statistical significance in the case of soft-tissue metastasis (48% v 27.3%; P less than .05) and estrogen receptor-negative tumors (35.7% v 11.1%; P less than .025). Survival and progression-free survival of patients refractory to treatment were not worsened by estrogenic recruitment. In the subset of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy, DES-CEF unexpectedly induced a significantly longer survival (greater than 802 days v 375 days; P = .029) and progression-free survival (239 days v 192 days; P = .041) than CEF. The DES-CEF regimen was more myelotoxic, and 43.3% of the DES-CEF cycles had to be delayed because of leukopenia in comparison with 11.8% of the CEF cycles (P less than .0001). In conclusion, chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment was able to induce more CRs in certain subsets of patients and a significant prolongation in survival and progression-free survival of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy. These results have been achieved despite a significantly lower dose intensity of chemotherapy.

Significantly Longer Progression-Free Survival Withnab-Paclitaxel Compared With Docetaxel As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3611-3619 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Gradishar ◽  
Dimitry Krasnojon ◽  
Sergey Cheporov ◽  
Anatoly N. Makhson ◽  
Georgiy M. Manikhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Prolongation

PurposeIn patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), nab-paclitaxel produced significantly higher antitumor activity compared with patients who received solvent-based paclitaxel. This phase II study examined the antitumor activity and safety of weekly and every 3 week (q3w) nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line treatment in patients with MBC.Patients and MethodsIn this randomized, multicenter study, patients (N = 302) with previously untreated MBC received nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m2q3w, 100 mg/m2weekly, or 150 mg/m2weekly or docetaxel 100 mg/m2q3w.Resultsnab-Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2weekly demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than docetaxel by both independent radiologist assessment (12.9 v 7.5 months, respectively; P = .0065) and investigator assessment (14.6 v 7.8 months, respectively; P = .012). On the basis of independent radiologist review, both 150 mg/m2(49%) and 100 mg/m2(45%) weekly of nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a higher overall response rate (ORR) than docetaxel (35%), but this did not reach statistical significance. This trend was supported by statistically significant investigator ORR for both weekly nab-paclitaxel doses versus docetaxel. nab-Paclitaxel q3w versus docetaxel was not different for PFS or ORR. On the basis of both the independent radiologist and investigator review, disease control rate was significantly higher for patients receiving either dose of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel. Grade 3 or 4 fatigue, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia were less frequent in all nab-paclitaxel arms. The frequency and grade of peripheral neuropathy were similar in all arms.ConclusionThis randomized study in first-line MBC demonstrated superior efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel, with a statistically and clinically significant prolongation of PFS (> 5 months) in patients receiving nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2weekly compared with docetaxel 100 mg/m2q3w.

scholarly journals Observational study of clinical outcomes of eribulin mesylate in metastatic breast cancer after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (34) ◽  
pp. 3935-3944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S Mougalian ◽  
Bruce A Feinberg ◽  
Edward Wang ◽  
Karenza Alexis ◽  
Debanjana Chatterjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Eribulin Mesylate ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: To examine the effectiveness of eribulin mesylate for metastatic breast cancer post cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKi) 4/6 therapy. Materials & methods: US community oncologists reviewed charts of patients who had received eriublin from 3 February 2015 to 31 December 2017 after prior CDKi 4/6 therapy and detailed their clinical/treatment history, clinical outcomes (lesion measurements, progression, death) and toxicity. Results: Four patient cohorts were created according to eribulin line of therapy: second line, third line, per US label and fourth line with objective response rates/clinical benefit rates of 42.2%/58.7%, 26.1%/42.3%, 26.7%/54.1% and 17.9%/46.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival/6-month progression-free survival (79.5% of all patients censored) by cohort was: 9.7 months/77.3%, 10.3 months/71.3%, not reached/70.4% and 4.0 months/0.0%, respectively. Overall occurrence of neutropenia = 23.5%, febrile neutropenia = 1.3%, peripheral neuropathy = 10.1% and diarrhea = 11.1%. Conclusion: Clinical outcome and adverse event rates were similar to those in clinical trials and other observational studies. Longer follow-up is required to confirm these findings.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus epirubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Results of PrE0102

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 1556-1563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah Kornblum ◽  
Fengmin Zhao ◽  
Judith Manola ◽  
Paula Klein ◽  
Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus targets aberrant signaling through the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, a mechanism of resistance to anti-estrogen therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. We hypothesized that everolimus plus the selective ER downregulator fulvestrant would be more efficacious than fulvestrant alone in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study included 131 postmenopausal women with ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative, AI-resistant metastatic breast cancer randomly assigned to fulvestrant (500 mg days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, then day 1 of cycles 2 and beyond) plus everolimus or placebo. The study was designed to have 90% power to detect a 70% improvement in median progression-free survival from 5.4 months to 9.2 months. Secondary end points included objective response and clinical benefit rate (response or stable disease for at least 24 weeks). Prophylactic corticosteroid mouth rinses were not used. Results The addition of everolimus to fulvestrant improved the median progression-free survival from 5.1 to 10.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.92]; stratified log-rank P = .02), indicating that the primary trial end point was met. Objective response rates were similar (18.2% v 12.3%; P = .47), but the clinical benefit rate was significantly higher in the everolimus arm (63.6% v 41.5%; P = .01). Adverse events of all grades occurred more often in the everolimus arm, including oral mucositis (53% v 12%), fatigue (42% v 22%), rash (38% v 5%), anemia (31% v. 6%), diarrhea (23% v 8%), hyperglycemia (19% v 5%), hypertriglyceridemia (17% v 3%), and pneumonitis (17% v 0%), although grade 3 to 4 events were uncommon. Conclusion Everolimus enhances the efficacy of fulvestrant in AI-resistant, ER-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Combination Chemotherapy in Taxane-Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study of the Kinki Multidisciplinary Breast Oncology Group (KMBOG) 1015

Chemotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Yamamura ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Daigo Yamamoto ◽  
Shigeru Tsuyuki ◽  
Masahide Yamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival

Background: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the chemotherapy combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in taxane-pretreated Japanese metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: In this multicenter, phase II, single-arm study, patients with recurrent or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer were administered gemcitabine (1,200 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, and other endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate and clinical benefit rate were 24 and 43%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months. The median overall survival was 11.1 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the most common hematologic toxicity, occurring in 22 patients (54%). Nonhematologic toxicity was moderate and transient, with fatigue (48%) being the most common condition and no severe adverse event reported. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is an effective and tolerable regimen for HER2-negative, taxane-pretreated, metastatic breast cancer patients in Japan.

Lack of Benefit of Maintenance Paclitaxel in First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 3912-3918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Gennari ◽  
Dino Amadori ◽  
Mario De Lena ◽  
Oriana Nanni ◽  
Paolo Bruzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose This randomized study compared maintenance paclitaxel with control in metastatic breast cancer patients not experiencing progression after first-line anthracycline/paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Methods Between April 1998 and October 2003, 459 metastatic breast cancer patients received first-line combination chemotherapy with epirubicin or doxorubicin plus paclitaxel. Of these, 255 who had a response or stable disease were then randomly assigned onto the Maintenance Paclitaxel 1 (MANTA1) study, comparing eight courses of maintenance paclitaxel versus control (ie, no additional chemotherapy administration). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Results The study was prematurely concluded after a futility analysis, which was performed on 215 of the 238 patients randomly assigned within December 2002. Of these, 109 patients were assigned to maintenance paclitaxel and 106 were assigned to stopping chemotherapy. No significant difference in median progression-free survival was observed (8.0 months for maintenance paclitaxel and 9.0 months for control). There was no significant difference in median survival time (28.0 v 29.0 months). When the Bayesian method for monitoring clinical trials was applied to these data, even under an enthusiastic prior distribution, in the posterior distribution there was only an 8.6% chance of observing a 3-month improvement in median progression-free survival in the group receiving maintenance paclitaxel. After these results study accrual was closed. Conclusion Compared with control, the administration of additional courses of paclitaxel in patients who achieve disease control after six to eight courses of first-line anthracycline plus paclitaxel combination chemotherapy does not improve progression-free survival.

scholarly journals Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors Plus Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 6400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Piezzo ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Maria Riemma ◽  
Stefania Cocco ◽  
Roberta Caputo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Sites

The introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) represents the most relevant advance in the management of hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer over the last few years. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is aimed to better characterize the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in some relevant subgroups and to test heterogeneity between different compounds with a particular focus on their ability to improve overall survival (OS). Pooled estimates of hazard ratios (HRs) were computed for progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and objective response rate (ORR) analysis in predefined subgroups to better understand treatment effect concerning specific patients’ characteristics. To estimate the absolute benefit in terms of PFS, pooled survival curves were generated by pooling the data of all trials. A total of eight RCTs were included. Adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to ET is beneficial in terms of PFS, irrespective of the presence or not of visceral metastases, the number of metastatic sites, and the length of the treatment-free interval (TFI). The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors produces a significant OS improvement, both in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-sensitive (HR 0.75, 95% CI) and AI-resistant patients (HR 0.77, 95% CI [0.67–0.89]). Pooled data from each single drug show that palbociclib remains the only class member not showing a statistically significant HR for OS (HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.68–1.02]).

scholarly journals Randomised Phase 2 study of lapatinib and vinorelbine vs vinorelbine in patients with HER2 + metastatic breast cancer after lapatinib and trastuzumab treatment (KCSG BR11-16)

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 985-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Hoon Sim ◽  
In Hae Park ◽  
Kyung Hae Jung ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Jin-Hee Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Abstract Background The continuum of anti-HER2 agents is a standard treatment of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study evaluated the efficacy of lapatinib plus vinorelbine in patients progressed on both trastuzumab and lapatinib treatments. Methods A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to lapatinib with vinorelbine (LV) (n = 75; lapatinib, 1000 mg daily; vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 D1, D8 q3w) or vinorelbine (V) (n = 74; 30 mg/m2 D1, D8 q3w). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 weeks. Results The median number of previous anti-HER2 therapies was 2 (range 2–5). There was no significant difference in PFS rate at 18 weeks between LV and V arms (45.9% vs 38.9%, p = 0.40). ORR was 19.7% in LV arm, and 16.9% in V arm (p = 0.88). PFS and OS did not differ between two arms (LV vs V; median PFS, 16 vs 12 weeks, HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.61–1.22; median OS, 15.0 vs 18.9 months, HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.72–1.58). Toxicity profiles were similar in both arms and all were manageable. Conclusions Lapatinib plus vinorelbine treatment was tolerable; however, it failed to demonstrate the clinical benefits over vinorelbine alone in patients with HER2 + MBC after progression on both trastuzumab and lapatinib. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01730677.

Pyrotinib or lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): A randomized phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Min Yan ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Xi-Chun Hu ◽  
Ji Feng Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label

1003 Background: Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) plus capecitabine showed clinically meaningful benefits and acceptable tolerability in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in phase 1 and 2 studies. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study enrolled HER2+ MBC pts after trastuzumab and taxanes, and/or anthracyclines. Up to two prior lines of chemotherapy (chemo) for metastatic disease were allowed. Pts were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pyrotinib 400 mg or lapatinib 1250 mg qd continuously plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid on days 1–14 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review. Results: From Jul 2017 to Oct 2018, 267 pts were randomized to the pyrotinib (n=134) or lapatinib (n=133) arm. One pt in the lapatinib arm did not receive study treatment and was excluded from analyses. 42.5% and 34.8% of pts in the pyrotinib and lapatinib arm had no prior chemo for metastatic disease, 41.8% and 49.2% had one prior line, and 15.7% and 15.9% had two lines. At the planned interim analysis, the median PFS was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.7–not reached) with pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs 6.8 months (95% CI 5.4–8.1) with lapatinib plus capecitabine (HR 0.39 [95% CI 0.27–0.56]; P<0.0001), which met the criterion for statistical significance (≤0.0066). Among trastuzumab-resistant pts, prolonged PFS with pyrotinib plus capecitabine was also observed (12.5 months [95% CI 6.9 to not reached] vs 6.9 months [95% CI 5.4 to not reached]; HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.29 to 1.21]). Benefits in objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and duration of response with pyrotinib plus capecitabine were also indicated (Table). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea (30.6% vs 8.3% in the pyrotinib vs lapatinib arm) and hand-foot syndrome (16.4% vs 15.2%). Conclusions: In pts with HER2+ MBC after trastuzumab and chemo, pyrotinib plus capecitabine achieved a significant better PFS than lapatinib plus capecitabine, with manageable toxicity, verifying the phase 2 findings. Clinical trial information: NCT03080805 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (33) ◽  
pp. 2763-2778
Author(s):  
Miguel Martin ◽  
Jose A Garcia-Saenz ◽  
Luis Manso ◽  
Antonio Llombart ◽  
Alejo Cassinello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

The addition of CDK4 and 6 inhibitors (abemaciclib, palbociclib or ribociclib) to endocrine therapy, as first-line treatment or following progression after initial endocrine therapy, significantly increased progression-free survival, objective response rates and in some trials overall survival, compared with endocrine therapy alone in HR+ and HER2- breast metastatic breast cancer. These CDK4 and 6 inhibitors are now approved in this context and have become a new standard of care. A hypothesis-generating exploratory analysis suggested that the addition of abemaciclib to endocrine therapy showed the largest effects in subgroups of women with indicators of poor prognosis, although these data require confirmation. This review provides updated clinical trial data for all three drugs in metastatic breast cancer, focusing on abemaciclib, the most recently approved agent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document