The importance of age in survival of patients treated with chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1838-1844 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Vose ◽  
J O Armitage ◽  
D D Weisenburger ◽  
P J Bierman ◽  
S Sorensen ◽  
...  

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is a malignancy that occurs frequently in the elderly with a median age greater than 60 years. However, most chemotherapy trials have included predominantly patients less than 60 years of age. We treated 157 patients with diffuse aggressive NHL between September 1982 and May 1986 with cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), procarbazine, bleomycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CAP/BOP). There were no treatment exclusions for age. Patients in this study ranged in age from 15 to 91 years (median, 63) with 112 patients greater than or equal to 60 years of age. The overall complete remission (CR) rate was 65% with no significant difference for age less than 60 (76%) v age greater than or equal to 60 (61%) (P = .18). With a median 36-month follow-up (range, 22 to 65 months), the overall 5-year survival was 42%. The patients less than 60 years old had a 62% 5-year survival in contrast to a 34% 5-year survival in those patients greater than or equal to age 60 (P = .01). The deaths attributed to tumor or treatment-related toxicity were similar above and below age 60. The difference in survival was due to other causes of death not obviously related to the lymphoma or its therapy-occurring in 22% of patients greater than or equal to 60 years of age but only 2% of patients less than 60 years (P = .005). Our data supports the position that aggressive NHL in elderly patients is not significantly less responsive than in younger patients; however, the inclusion of older patients in clinical trials will decrease the overall survival secondary to deaths due to apparently unrelated causes.

1988 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Tirelli ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Rachele Volpe ◽  
Mauro G. Trovo ◽  
Antonino Carbone

The outcome of 70 elderly patients aged 65 years or more (median, 71 years) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated between 1973 and 1981 with aggressive (AM) or conservative modalities (CM) was retrospectively evaluated. A significantly higher incidence of lethal and severe toxicity was observed in patients treated with AM than in those treated with CM (32 % vs 3 %, p < 0.01), with 10 % treatment related deaths in the AM group. Only 56 % of the deaths were attributed to NHL; other major causes were treatment-related deaths, infection and cardiac diseases. No significant difference in response and survival was found between AM and CM groups (complete remission rates were 35 % vs 42 %, and 10 year survival rates were 31 % vs 19 %, respectively), but the prevalence of stages III-IV in patients treated with AM makes these results meaningless. Prospective randomized trials with AM vs CM are clearly needed in elderly patients with advanced unfavorable NHL.


1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. MONSUEZ ◽  
J. FRIJA ◽  
L. HERTZ-PANNIER ◽  
J. M. MICLEA ◽  
J. M. EXTRA ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Lazzarino ◽  
Ester Orlandi ◽  
Catherine Klersy ◽  
Cesare Astori ◽  
Ercole Brusamolino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19540-e19540
Author(s):  
Rouslan Kotchetkov ◽  
David Susman ◽  
Lauren Gerard ◽  
Erica DiMaria ◽  
Derek Wayne Nay

e19540 Background: Bendamustine plus rituximab (B+R) was established as a preferred first line therapy for patients with previously untreated indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma based on the BRIGHT and STIL trials. However, only few reports on efficacy and safety data of this combination in the real-world setting are available to-date. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received therapy with standard doses of B+R in our cancer center from June 2013 to January 2021. Patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who received more than one cycle of B+R were evaluated. Results: Amongst a total of 201 patients 56% were males and 44% females. Median age at B+R initiation was 72 years (range 34-94). Follicular lymphoma (FL) (50.3%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (19.4%), and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) (14.5%) were the most common iNHL. Stage 3 and 4 diseases represented 19.9% and 68.6% of patients. Extranodal disease was found in 35.8%. The proportion of patients with high risk disease was 48.5% for FL (FLIPI ≥3), 86.6% for LPL (WMISS score ≥2), and 80.5% for MCL (MIPI score ≥6.2). Prior history of secondary malignancy had 23.4% of patients; 11.4% patients had ECOG 3. Most common indications for B+R initiation were bulky symptomatic lymphadenopathy (69.1%), cytopenia (36.8%) and constitutional symptoms (36.8%). Fifty-eight percent of patients had more than one indication for therapy. Median number of B+R cycles delivered was 6 (range: 1-6), median dose of bendamustine was 90 mg/m2 (range 45-90). Full doses of treatment were given in 66.7% of patients, reduced in 33.3% with mean dose 78.3 mg/m2. A total of 50.8% completed 6 cycles with no delays, in 49.2% treatment was delayed (mean delay time 1.8 weeks). Overall response was 94.5%, with 77.6% complete and 16.9% partial remission. Median duration of follow-up was 35 months (range: 4-91). At the end of follow-up, event free survival (EFS) was 77.1% and overall survival (OS) was 79.6%. Six percent of patients relapsed, 8% developed secondary hematological malignancies, including 14 cases of aggressive B-cell lymphoma and 2 cases of MDS. 16.9% of patients required support with G-CSF. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was recorded in 22.4%, febrile neutropenia in 7.5%, grade 3-4 anemia in 7.9%, and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 3.9% of patients. Rituximab-associated infusion reactions, skin rash, thrombophlebitis, and infection were the most common non-hematological adverse events. A total of 80.6% of patients proceeded to rituximab maintenance. Conclusions: B+R chemoimmunotherapy is feasible to administer in non-clinical trial setting. Despite more dose reduction as compared to STIL trial, B+R retained its efficacy with comparable EFS and OS. No new adverse events or increase in secondary malignancies were found.


2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (1_suppl1) ◽  
pp. S17-S19
Author(s):  
Umberto Tirelli ◽  
Daniele Bernardi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document