Phase I trial of subcutaneous interleukin-6 in patients with advanced malignancies.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Weber ◽  
J C Yang ◽  
S L Topalian ◽  
D R Parkinson ◽  
D S Schwartzentruber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Organ Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Major Organ ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Grade Iii

PURPOSE Based on preclinical evidence in murine models that interleukin-6 (IL-6) mediates regression of metastatic tumors, we performed a phase I study of recombinant human IL-6 in patients with refractory advanced malignancies to determine its pharmacokinetics, toxicities, and possible immunologic and antitumor effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS Recombinant IL-6 was administered as a single subcutaneous dose daily for 7 days, with 7 days off therapy followed by another 7 days of IL-6. Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients starting at 3 micrograms/kg/d, provided that toxicity at the preceding dose level was not dose-limiting. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade III or IV major organ toxicity that did not resolve to grade II or less in 24 hours after stopping IL-6, using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Patients were treated with 3, 10, and 30 micrograms/kg/d IL-6 subcutaneously. RESULTS Three patients each were treated at the 3- and 10-micrograms dose levels. Two of five patients treated with 30 micrograms/kg/d IL-6 subcutaneously had grade III major organ toxicity that required IL-6 therapy to be discontinued. All patients experienced fever, chills, and minor fatigue. Significant increases in C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, platelet counts, and lymphocyte IL-2 receptor levels were seen in patients at the 10- and 30-micrograms/kg dose levels. Decreases in albumin and hemoglobin were observed, particularly at the 30-micrograms/kg dose level. The half-life (T1/2 beta) was 4.2 hours, with a peak IL-6 level at 5 hours. No antitumor responses were seen. CONCLUSION A safely tolerated dose of daily subcutaneous IL-6 is 10 micrograms/kg, with hepatotoxicity and cardiac arrhythmia being the dose-limiting toxicities at 30 micrograms/kg. Phase II trials of IL-6 administered subcutaneously daily for at least 7 days for two cycles with an intervening week of rest are recommended for phase II trials. However, patients with extensive replacement of liver by tumor and abnormal liver functions should receive IL-6 therapy with caution.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

scholarly journals Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of 17-Allylamino, 17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Patients With Advanced Malignancies

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 4152-4161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udai Banerji ◽  
Anne O'Donnell ◽  
Michelle Scurr ◽  
Simon Pacey ◽  
Sarah Stapleton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Profile ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To study the toxicity and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of 17-allylamino, 17- demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) and to recommend a dose for phase II trials. Patients and Methods This was a phase I study examining a once-weekly dosing schedule of 17-AAG. Thirty patients with advanced malignancies were treated. Results The highest dose level reached was 450 mg/m2/week. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) encountered were grade 3 diarrhea in three patients (one at 320 mg/m2/week and two at 450 mg/m2/week) and grade 3 to 4 hepatotoxicity (AST/ALT) in one patient at 450 mg/m2/week. Two of nine DLTs were at the highest dose level. Two patients with metastatic melanoma had stable disease and were treated for 15 and 41 months, respectively. The dose versus area under the curve-relationship for 17-AAG was linear (r2 = .71) over the dose range 10 to 450 mg/m2/week, with peak plasma concentrations of 8,998 μg/L (standard deviation, 2,881) at the highest dose level. After the demonstration of pharmacodynamic changes in peripheral blood leukocytes, pre- and 24 hours post-treatment, tumor biopsies were performed and demonstrated target inhibition (c-RAF-1 inhibition in four of six patients, CDK4 depletion in eight of nine patients and HSP70 induction in eight of nine patients) at the dose levels 320 and 450 mg/m2/week. It was not possible to reproducibly demonstrate these changes in biopsies taken 5 days after treatment. Conclusion It has been possible to demonstrate that 17-AAG exhibits a tolerable toxicity profile with therapeutic plasma concentrations and target inhibition for 24 hours after treatment and some indications of clinical activity at the dose level 450 mg/m2/week. We recommend this dose for phase II clinical trials.

Phase I Study of Flavopiridol in Combination with Imatinib Mesylate (STI571, Gleevec) in Bcr/Abl+ Hematological Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1102-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Grant ◽  
Judith E. Karp ◽  
Omer N. Koc ◽  
Brenda Cooper ◽  
Selina Luger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemia Cells ◽  
Human Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Pronounced Increase ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Imatinib (Im), a rationally designed inhibitor of the Bcr/Abl kinase as well as other kinases, represents the standard treatment for Bcr/Abl+ malignancies. Im as a single agent, however, is not curative. Flavopiridol (Fl), an investigational cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, is broadly active in vitro against human leukemia cells (Blood91:2482,1998). Previously we have shown that simultaneous disruption of a survival signaling pathway and a cell cycle regulatory pathway results in a pronounced increase in leukemic cell death (Cancer Res.61:5106,2001) and in more recent preclinical studies demonstrated synergistic interactions between Im and Fl in Bcr/Abl+ leukemia cells, including some that were resistant to Im (Clin Cancer Res8;2976,2002). Based on these considerations, we have initiated a phase I trial to identify appropriate doses of Im+Fl for further investigation. Eligible patients (pts) have CML with a suboptimal response to prior Im, CML in blast crisis, or Bcr/Abl+ acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). CML-BC and ALL patients may be Im-naïve. Pts receive Im by continuous daily oral dosing and Fl by 1 hour intravenous infusion weekly x 3 repeated every 4 weeks. Targeted dose levels are (Fl/Im; mg/m2): 30/400, 30/600, 45/600, 60/600, 60/800, 60/1000. Patients are divided into 2 strata based upon blast percentage in peripheral blood or bone marrow: stratum 1, <15%; and stratum 2, ≥15%. For stratum 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as NCI CTCAE grade 4 ANC/platelet for > 1 week or grade ≥ 3 non-heme toxicity; for stratum 2, DLT is profound marrow hypoplasia in the absence of persistent leukemia. In stratum 1, 16 pts have been treated at 4 dose levels; in stratum 2, 5 pts in the 1st and 3rd dose level. In stratum 1, 1 DLT has occurred at dose level 4 (cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy); in stratum 2, 1 DLT has occurred at dose level 3 (sepsis/multi-organ failure which was not clearly related to treatment). The only frequent toxicities have been hematological. 4 pts have experienced objective responses including complete hematological remissions in 2 pts in stratum 1 treated with Im/Fl 30/600 who had been previously treated with Im 800 and complete hematological remissions in 2 pts in stratum 2 (who had not received prior Im). Preliminary studies indicate no Fl impact upon Im pharmacokinetics, and variable post-treatment effects on signaling pathways in CML cells. These findings indicate that a regimen consisting of Fl and Im is tolerable and active in at least some patients with Bcr/Abl+ hematologic malignancies, including some with Im-resistant disease. Pending identification of the MTD and the recommended Phase II dose (RPTD), Phase II trials will be necessary to assess the activity of this strategy more definitively.

Fludarabine-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated Donors in Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): Serious and Unexpected Adverse Events in Pre-Defined Cyclophosphamide (CY) Dose Levels

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3009-3009
Author(s):  
Jakub Tolar ◽  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
Mitchell Horwitz ◽  
Joseph H. Antin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
The Other ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3009FN2 Objective: To determine toxicity and efficacy of adding fludarabine (FLU) to a regimen of total body irradiation (TBI), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclophosphamide (CY), with de-escalation of the CY dose. The goal is to minimize CY-related toxicities while preserving (or improving) engraftment and survival in patients with SAA receiving an unrelated donor marrow transplant. Patients and Methods: Since May 2006, the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN), sponsored by the NHLBI and NCI, has conducted a prospective Phase I/II clinical trial of unrelated donor marrow transplantation in SAA (BMT CTN 0301). Patients with SAA are eligible if they are < 65 years, have adequate organ function, and have an available unrelated marrow donor matched 7 of 8 HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 loci. Patients with Fanconi anemia and other marrow failure syndromes are excluded. All patients receive TBI 200 cGy, ATG (either thymoglobulin: 3 mg/kg IV or ATGAM 30 mg/kg IV daily × 3, days –4 to –2), FLU (30 mg/m2 IV daily × 4, days –5 to –2). The Phase I portion of the trial sequentially tested four CY dose levels: 150 mg/kg (administered days –4 to –2); 100 mg/kg (days –3 to –2); 50 mg/kg (day –2); and, 0 mg/kg, and allowed enrollment of up to six patients at each CY dose level unless toxicity or graft failure boundaries were crossed. In the Phase II portion of the trial, patients enroll onto the optimal CY dose level, which is chosen using adaptive Bayesian criteria to rank desirability of the CY doses. All patients are followed for two years after transplantation. Early stopping guidelines are used to monitor for graft failure and early transplant-related mortality through day 100. Results: Twenty-one patients accrued to the Phase I portion of the trial. CY dose level 0 mg/kg was closed after all three enrolled patients developed secondary graft failure. All received a second allograft. One patient remains alive at 23 months after the first transplantation. The other two died from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at 114 days after the first transplant and idiopathic pneumonia at 200 days after the first transplant. Review of Phase I results for the other three dose levels suggested CY dose 150 mg/kg as the optimal dose level for Phase II testing. However, after an additional eight patients were treated at this dose, the level was closed to further accrual because of excess toxicity. Seven of the 14 patients receiving 150 mg/kg of CY (and 7 of the last 8 enrolled) died. Causes of death were cardiac/pulmonary/multi-organ failure (n=4), ARDS (n=2), and parainfluenza virus type 3 pneumonia (n=1). Bayesian evaluation of the two remaining dose levels indicates very similar desirability scores and accrual continues at both the CY 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg levels. As of July 15, 2011, a total of 61 patients have been enrolled, 17 on the two closed levels, 33 on the 100 mg/kg level and 11 on the 50 mg/kg level. Conclusions: Early analysis of this trial, made necessary by these unexpected severe adverse events, revealed two important findings among patients receiving low-dose TBI, ATG, and FLU at the doses outlined: 1) CY dose 0 mg/kg is associated with higher than expected graft failure; and, 2) CY dose 150 mg/kg is associated with excess transplant-related toxicity. Neither CY dose level should be tested further in the context of the regimen used in this trial. To date, the two intermediate CY dose levels (100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg) have not crossed the graft failure or fatality stopping boundaries and accrual is in progress. Disclosures: Pulsipher: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A phase I study of sunitinib malate (SU11248) in combination with gefitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4537-4537 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Ronnen ◽  
G. V. Kondagunta ◽  
C. Lau ◽  
P. Fischer ◽  
M. S. Ginsberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Sunitinib Malate ◽  
Grade 3

4537 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU11248) is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors. Two phase II trials with sunitinib given as second line therapy in patients with mRCC showed a ≥40% response rate (JCO 2006;24:16–24; Proc ASCO 23,380s). Combining sunitinib and gefitinib (an EGFR inhibitor) may enhance antitumor activity by providing a broader spectrum of tyrosine kinase inhibition. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib in combination with gefitinib was assessed in this Phase I trial. Methods: Patients with mRCC previously treated with cytokine therapy were enrolled in the study. Cohorts of 4–6 patients received escalating doses of sunitinib and a fixed dose of gefitinib. Dose levels of sunitinib were 37.5 mg and 50 mg. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity of ≥7 days or a Grade 2 cardiac toxicity. Six-week treatment cycles comprised of sunitinib daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off and continuous gefitinib at 250 mg daily except in Cycle 1 where gefitinib was begun on Day 10. Results: In the first dose level (n=4, 37.5 mg of sunitinib and 250 mg of gefitinib), no DLTs were observed. In the second dose level (50 mg of sunitinib and 250 mg of gefitinib), there were 7 patients enrolled, but 1 patient had dose reduction for hypertension during the sunitinib monotherapy part of the study and was not included in the cohort defining MTD. 2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (Grade 2 decline in ejection fraction, persistent Grade 3 fatigue) and the MTD was determined as 37.5 mg of sunitinib with 250 mg of gefitinib. Grade 3 adverse events included: diarrhea (n = 2) and hand/foot syndrome (n = 2). Laboratory abnormalities included grade 4 neutropenia (n = 1), grade 3 neutropenia (n = 2), and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 2). Overall, 5 of 11 patients demonstrated a partial response and patient accrual to the phase 2 portion of the study is underway. Conclusions: The combination of sunitinib and gefitinib in mRCC patients was well tolerated and MTD was determined. The efficacy and toxicity of this combination is being assessed in a phase II component of this trial. [Table: see text]

A phase I trial of ABT-751 and carboplatin (C) in patients (pts) with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17098-17098 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Dragnev ◽  
J. R. Rigas ◽  
W. M. Disalvo ◽  
S. A. Simeone ◽  
A. E. Hagey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
The United States ◽  
Buccal Swabs ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Dose Levels

17098 Background: NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer mortality for men and women in the United States. More effective treatments are needed to prolong survival and improve quality of life. Platin-containing chemotherapy doublets are commonly used in NSCLC treatment. ABT-751 is a novel oral anti-microtubule agent targeting the colchicine binding site. As single agent, it was well-tolerated and showed a preliminary signal of activity in previously treated NSCLC. In vivo studies demonstrated additive activity between ABT-751 and cisplatin in a NSCLC xenograft model. Methods: A phase I trial of ABT-751 and C was conducted in pts with advanced previously treated NSCLC. Primary objective - maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives - toxicities, efficacy, and surrogate markers of response (cell cycle changes and cyclin D1 expression) in buccal swabs from pts at the phase II dose. Six dose levels - 1: ABT-751 100mg bid, C AUC 4.5; 2: ABT-751 125 mg bid, C AUC 4.5; 3: ABT-751 125 mg bid, C AUC 6; 4: ABT-751 150 mg bid, C AUC 6; 5: ABT-751 175 mg bid, C AUC 6; 6: ABT-751 200 mg bid, C AUC 6. ABT-751 was taken orally twice a day for 14 days in a 21 day cycle, C was administered intravenously on day 4 during cycle 1 and on day 1 on subsequent cycles. Rapid dose escalation was used for the first 3 dose levels followed by cohorts of at least 3 patients for the remaining dose levels. Results: Eight pts were enrolled, all stage IV NSCLC, 4 women, median age 62 (47–73), all KPS 80, 6 had one and 2 had 2 prior therapies. A median of 3.5 (1–4) cycles was administered. Dose-limiting toxiticies of grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were observed in 2/5 patients on dose level 4. Common grade 2 toxicites were constipation and peripheral sensory neuropathy (levels 2–4). MTD was dose level 3. Seven pts were evaluable for response, 2 had partial responses (levels 2 and 4, both had one prior therapy), 4 had stable disease, 1 had disease progression. Median time to progression was 18.7 weeks (6–24+). Pharmacokinetic analyses and buccal swabs are being performed. Conclusions: The recommended phase II doses are ABT-751 125 mg twice daily for 14 days and carboplatin AUC 6 on a 21-day cycle. This regimen is well tolerated and shows preliminary evidence of activity for previously treated NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of weekly intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Ishigami ◽  
Shoichi Kaisaki ◽  
Hironori Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroharu Yamashita ◽  
Shigenobu Emoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

146 Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. We previously verified the safety and efficacy of IP paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 and intravenous PTX in phase I and phase II studies. S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study, and is regarded as a candidate for the next-generation standard regimen for gastric cancer. We designed a new regimen combining weekly IP PTX with SOX in order to maximize systemic effects as well as local effects in the peritoneal cavity. A dose-escalation study of IP PTX in combination with fixed doses of SOX was carried out to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Methods: PTX was administered intraperitoneally on days 1 and 8 with an initial dose of 20 mg/m2 (level 1), stepped up to 30 mg/m2 (level 2) or 40 mg/m2 (level 3) depending on observed toxicity. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m2/day (b.i.d.) for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1. This treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 leukopenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which 2 or more of 3 or 6 patients developed DLTs during two courses of treatment. The RD was defined as one dose level under the MTD. Results: A total of 12 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. No DLTs were observed at all dose levels. Neutropenia in one patient at dose level 3 was the only grade 3 toxicity observed. Grade 2/3 leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed only in 2 patients at dose level 3. Regarding grade 2 non-hematological toxicities, anorexia, fatigue and nausea were observed in 6, 4 and 2 patients, respectively, independent of dose levels. Consequently, the MTD was not reached, and the RD of IP PTX was determined to be 40 mg/m2 (level 3). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy of IP PTX with SOX was shown to be a safe regimen that should be further explored in clinical trials.

Phase I Trial of the Novel Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Deforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) Administered Intravenously Daily for 5 Days Every 2 Weeks to Patients With Advanced Malignancies

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica M. Mita ◽  
Alain C. Mita ◽  
Quincy S. Chu ◽  
Eric K. Rowinsky ◽  
Gerald J. Fetterly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Solid Malignancies ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Purpose This phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of deforolimus (previously known as AP23573; MK-8669), a nonprodrug rapamycin analog, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Patients and Methods Patients were treated using an accelerated titration design with sequential escalating flat doses of deforolimus administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once daily for 5 consecutive days every 2 weeks (QD×5) in a 28-day cycle. Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tumor response assessments were performed. Results Thirty-two patients received at least one dose of deforolimus (3 to 28 mg/d). Three dose-limiting toxicity events of grade 3 mouth sores were reported. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 18.75 mg/d. Common treatment-related adverse events included reversible mouth sores and rash. Whole-blood clearance increased with dose. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition at all dose levels. Four patients (one each with non–small-cell lung cancer, mixed müllerian tumor [carcinosarcoma], renal cell carcinoma, and Ewing sarcoma) experienced confirmed partial responses, and three additional patients had minor tumor regressions. Conclusion The MTD of this phase I trial using an accelerated titration design was determined to be 18.75 mg/d. Deforolimus was well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity across a broad range of malignancies when administered intravenously on the QD×5 schedule. On the basis of these overall results, a dose of 12.5 mg/d is being evaluated in phase II trials.

Evaluation of statistical designs of phase I/II clinical trials for cancer patients published in 2005

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14077-14077
Author(s):  
N. Houede ◽  
A. Kramar ◽  
X. Paoletti
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Biological Marker ◽  
Statistical Design ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Dose Levels

14077 Background: Phase I trials determine the maximal safe dose that could be used in phase II trials. Designs are based on the assumption that efficacy and toxicity increase with dose. Phase I/II trials determine the safety, dosage levels, and response rate. This review addresses statistical issues of phase I/II studies designs. Methods: We reviewed phase I/II clinical trials for cancer patients published in 2005. The main criteria were: type of treatment, statistical design, endpoints, expected efficacy and toxicity, one- or two-steps designs, dose levels, definition of Dose Limiting Toxicity and recommended dose, objective response, survival, patient selection and follow-up. Results: 41 phase I/II trials were found. All but one, targeted a specific type of tumor. 14 studies included combined cytotoxic therapies. 21 studies included a cytotoxic agent combined with a targeted therapy (12) or with radiations (9). Others used monochemotherapy, immunotherapy, vaccine or gene therapy. 23 studies were a two steps design, i.e. a phase I followed by a phase II trial, and used a classical Fibonacci escalation dose model. All others used a one-step design evaluating efficacy and toxicity concomitantly. Among them, 3 had a Fibonacci-like design with a desescalation model and 4 had a randomization to different dose levels. In 1 trial, dose escalation was performed in the same patient. In the 10 remaining studies, 1 evaluated only one dose level and was improperly presented as a phase I/II study, and 9 did not describe any statistical design. DLT was described in only 27 trials. Also, recommended doses for further trials were only provided in 30 studies. Efficacy was evaluated with clinical or radiological response for 34 studies, biological marker was evaluated in 5 cases and time to progression in 2 cases. Conclusion: Most of the phase I/II trials published in 2005 used a classical two steps design with an adapted Fibonacci dose escalation. None of them used new designs such as continual reassessment method (CRM), which have the advantage to incorporate data during the course of the trial, leading to optimization of the study in terms of cost and speed. Methodological progresses are necessary to address issues related to multiple endpoints and to help clinicians to feel comfortable with the CRM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial of bevacizumab plus sunitinib in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5099-5099 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Feldman ◽  
G. V. Kondagunta ◽  
E. A. Ronnen ◽  
P. Fischer ◽  
R. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Dose Levels

5099 Background: Bevacizumab, an intravenous monoclonal antibody against VEGF, and sunitinib, an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors, both have activity in mRCC [NEJM 349:427–434; JAMA 295:2516–2524]. Combining bevacizumab and sunitinib may increase antitumor efficacy by maximizing inhibition of the VEGF pathway. The safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib in combination with bevacizumab was assessed in this Phase I trial. Methods: Cohorts of 3–6 pts with mRCC received escalating doses of sunitinib (dose levels: 25, 37.5, and 50 mg po) daily for 4 weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off with fixed- dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg iv) every 2 wks continuously. Pre-determined dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 6-wk cycle included Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia, ≥Gr 3 thrombocytopenia of ≥7 days, Gr 4 hypertension or proteinuria, and other Gr 3 non-hematologic toxicity of ≥7 days. Pts who came off study prior to completion of cycle 1 for any reason other than a DLT were replaced. Serum VEGF levels were measured before and during cycles 1 and 2. Results: 16 pts (11 male, 5 female, median age 57) were enrolled. Of 8 patients entered at the first dose level (sunitinib 25 mg, bevacizumab 10 mg/kg), 2 were replaced; 1 never received treatment and 1 did not complete cycle 1 due to rapid progression of disease (PD). No DLTs occurred in the remaining 6 evaluable pts in this cohort. At the 2nd dose level (n =6, sunitinib 37.5 mg, bevacizumab 10 mg/kg), 1 pt receiving low molecular weight heparin had a DLT of Gr 4 hemorrhage. 2 pts have enrolled in the 3rd dose level (sunitinib 50 mg, bevacizumab 10 mg/kg) but are not yet evaluable for toxicity or response. Gr 3/4 toxicities over all cycles included Gr 3 hypertension (n=4), Gr 3 proteinuria (n=2), Gr 3 abdominal pain (n=2), Gr 4 hemorrhage (n=1), and Gr 3 hand/foot syndrome (n=1). 13 pts were evaluated for best response–4 had partial responses, 7 had stable disease, and 2 had PD. Serum VEGF levels decreased during cycle 1 in all pts. Conclusions: The combination of sunitinib and bevacizumab in mRCC pts was tolerable at the first 2 dose levels. Once the MTD is identified, further testing of this combination in phase II trials may be indicated for mRCC as well as other malignancies. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document